Comparison between respiratory changes in the inferior vena cava diameter and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative patients

Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 34, Issue , 2016, Pages 46-49

  de Oliveira, Olivia Haun ^a   Freitas, Flávio Geraldo Rezende de ^a   Ladeira, Renata Teixeira ^a   Fischer, Claudio Henrique ^a   Bafi, Antônio Tonete ^a   Azevedo, Luciano Cesar Pontes ^a   Machado, Flávia Ribeiro ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Echocardiography; Fluid therapy; Hemodynamics; Inferior vena cava; Postoperative care

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CRYSTALLOID; FLUID THERAPY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HUMAN; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; INFUSION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RELIABILITY; SURGERY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VELOCITY; VENTILATED PATIENT; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 84973299501     PISSN: 08839441     EISSN: 15578615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Shoemaker W.C., Appel P.L., Bland R., Hopkins J.A., Chang P. Clinical trial of an algorithm for outcome prediction in acute circulatory failure. Crit Care Med 1982, 10:390-397.
2. Shoemaker W.C., Appel P.L., Waxman K., Schwartz S., Chang P. Clinical trial of survivors' cardiorespiratory patterns as therapeutic goals in critically ill postoperative patients. Crit Care Med 1982, 10:398-403.
3. Grocott M.P., Dushianthan A., Hamilton M.A., Mythen M.G., Harrison D., Rowan K. Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Anaesth 2013, 111:535-548.
4. Meregalli A., Oliveira R.P., Friedman G. Occult hypoperfusion is associated with increased mortality in hemodynamically stable, high-risk, surgical patients. Crit Care 2004, 8:R60-R65.
5. Marik P.E., Monnet X., Teboul J.L. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011, 1.
6. Mohsenin V. Assessment of preload and fluid responsiveness in intensive care unit. How good are we?. J Crit Care 2015, 30:567-573.
7. Stewart R.M., Park P.K., Hunt J.P., McIntyre R.C., McCarthy J., Zarzabal L.A., et al. Less is more: improved outcomes in surgical patients with conservative fluid administration and central venous catheter monitoring. J Am Coll Surg 2009, 208:725-735. [discussion 35-7].
8. Brandstrup B., Tonnesen H., Beier-Holgersen R., Hjortso E., Ording H., Lindorff-Larsen K., et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003, 238:641-648.
9. Rahbari N.N., Zimmermann J.B., Schmidt T., Koch M., Weigand M.A., Weitz J. Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2009, 96:331-341.
10. Lobo S.M., Ronchi L.S., Oliveira N.E., Brandao P.G., Froes A., Cunrath G.S., et al. Restrictive strategy of intraoperative fluid maintenance during optimization of oxygen delivery decreases major complications after high-risk surgery. Crit Care 2011, 15.
11. Yang X., Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2014, 18.
12. Marik P.E., Cavallazzi R., Vasu T., Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2642-2647.
13. Schmidt G.A., Koenig S., Mayo P.H. Shock: ultrasound to guide diagnosis and therapy. Chest 2012, 142:1042-1048.
14. Au S.M., Vieillard-Baron A. Bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients: a true hemodynamic monitoring tool. J Clin Monit Comput 2012, 26:355-360.
15. Barbier C., Loubieres Y., Schmit C., Hayon J., Ricome J.L., Jardin F., et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:1740-1746.
16. Feissel M., Michard F., Faller J.P., Teboul J.L. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:1834-1837.
17. Sobczyk D., Nycz K., Andruszkiewicz P. Bedside ultrasonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava fails to predict fluid responsiveness in the first 6 hours after cardiac surgery: a prospective case series observational study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015, 29:663-669.
18. Charbonneau H., Riu B., Faron M., Mari A., Kurrek M.M., Ruiz J., et al. Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cava diameters. Crit Care 2014, 18.
19. Jardin F., Dubourg O., Bourdarias J.P. Echocardiographic pattern of acute cor pulmonale. Chest 1997, 111:209-217.
20. Mayo P.H., Beaulieu Y., Doelken P., Feller-Kopman D., Harrod C., Kaplan A., et al. American College of Chest Physicians/La Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest 2009, 135:1050-1060.
21. Freitas F.G., Bafi A.T., Nascente A.P., Assuncao M., Mazza B., Azevedo L.C., et al. Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110:402-408.
22. Obuchowski N.A., Lieber M.L., Wians F.H. ROC curves in clinical chemistry: uses, misuses, and possible solutions. Clin Chem 2004, 50:1118-1125.
23. Funk D.J., Jacobsohn E., Kumar A. Role of the venous return in critical illness and shock: part II-shock and mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2013, 41:573-579.
24. Michard F., Teboul J.L. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002, 121:2000-2008.
25. Guerin L., Monnet X., Teboul J.L. Monitoring volume and fluid responsiveness: from static to dynamic indicators. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2013, 27:177-185.
26. Moretti R., Pizzi B. Inferior vena cava distensibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2010, 13:3-9.
27. Machare-Delgado E., Decaro M., Marik P.E. Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care Med 2011, 26:116-124.
28. Ray P., Le Manach Y., Riou B., Houle T.T. Statistical evaluation of a biomarker. Anesthesiology 2010, 112:1023-1040.
29. Romand J.A., Shi W., Pinsky M.R. Cardiopulmonary effects of positive pressure ventilation during acute lung injury. Chest 1995, 108:1041-1048.
30. Lakhal K., Ehrmann S., Benzekri-Lefevre D., Runge I., Legras A., Dequin P.F., et al. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011, 15.
31. Bendjelid K., Viale J.P., Duperret S., Colling J., Piriou V., Merlani P., et al. Impact of intra-abdominal pressure on retrohepatic vena cava shape and flow in mechanically ventilated pigs. Physiol Meas 2012, 33:615-627.
32. Nakao S., Come P.C., McKay R.G., Ransil B.J. Effects of positional changes on inferior vena caval size and dynamics and correlations with right-sided cardiac pressure. Am J Cardiol 1987, 59:125-132.
33. Bodson L., Vieillard-Baron A. Respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter: surrogate of central venous pressure or parameter of fluid responsiveness? Let the physiology reply. Crit Care 2012, 16.
34. Muller L., Bobbia X., Toumi M., Louart G., Molinari N., Ragonnet B., et al. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care 2012, 16.
35. Futier E., Constantin J.M., Jaber S. Protective lung ventilation in operating room: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol 2014, 80:726-735.
36. Monnet X., Teboul J.L. Assessment of volume responsiveness during mechanical ventilation: recent advances. Crit Care 2013, 17.
37. Azevedo L.C., Park M., Salluh J.I., Rea-Neto A., Souza-Dantas V.C., Varaschin P., et al. Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Crit Care 2013, 17.
38. Esteban A., Frutos-Vivar F., Muriel A., Ferguson N.D., Penuelas O., Abraira V., et al. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013, 188:220-230.
39. Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L. Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology;40:845-53.