Effects of absolute and relative practice on n-2 repetition costs

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 164, Issue , 2016, Pages 65-69

  Scheil, Juliane ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Inhibition; N 2 repetition costs; Practice; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84951820492     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Altmann E.M. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: Evidence from backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:892-899.
2. Declerck M., Thoma A.M., Koch I., Philipp A.M. Highly proficient bilinguals implement inhibition: Evidence from n-2 language repetition costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2015, 41:1911-1916.
3. Gade M., Koch I. Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: Evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 62:51-55.
4. Grange J.A., Houghton G. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:1003-1009.
5. Grange J.A., Juvina I. The effect of practice on n-2 repetition costs in set switching. Acta Psychologica 2015, 154:14-25.
6. Grange J.A., Juvina I., Houghton G. On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: Towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition. Psychological Research 2013, 77:211-222.
7. Houghton G., Pritchard R., Grange J.A. The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:466-476.
8. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A.M., Koch I. Control and interference in task switching - A review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:849-874.
9. Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., Philipp A.M. The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:1-14.
10. Logan G.D. Toward an instance theory of automization. Psychological Review 1988, 95:492-527.
11. Mayr U., Keele S.W. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:4-26.
12. Regev S., Meiran N. Cue-type manipulation dissociated two types of task set inhibition: Backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression. Psychological Research 2015, 10.1007/s00426-015-0663-z.
13. Scheil J., Kleinsorge T. N-2 repetition costs depend on preparation in trials n-1 and n-2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2014, 40:865-872.
14. Schuch S., Koch I. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:92-105.
15. Vandierendonck A., Liefooghe B., Verbruggen F. Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:601-626.