Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 148, Issue , 2014, Pages 12-18

  Gade, Miriam ^a   Koch, Iring ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

2300 Experimental Psychology; 2340 Cognitive Processes; 2346 Attention; Cue type; Inhibition; Preparation; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CUE TYPE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PREPARATION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASK SWITCHING;

CUE TYPE; INHIBITION; PREPARATION; TASK SWITCHING;

ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); JUDGMENT; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84893201858     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Altmann E.M. Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done?. Psychological Science 2004, 15(9):616-622. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00729.x.
2. Arbuthnott K.D. The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31(5):1030-1042. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1030.
3. Arbuthnott K., Frank J. Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale 2000, 54(1):33-41.
4. Arbuthnott K.D., Woodward T.S. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale 2002, 56(1):18-29. 10.1037/h0087382.
5. Cohen-Kdoshay O., Meiran N. The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006) 2007, 60(8):1140-1154. 10.1080/17470210600896674.
6. Cohen-Kdoshay O., Meiran N. The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: Flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions. Experimental Psychology 2009, 56(2):128-133. 10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.128.
7. Dreisbach G., Goschke T., Haider H. Implicit task sets in task switching?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32(6):1221-1233. 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1221.
8. Dreisbach G., Goschke T., Haider H. The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm. Psychological Research 2007, 71(4):383-392.
9. Gade M., Koch I. Cue-task associations in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60(6):762-769. 10.1080/17470210701268005.
10. Gade M., Koch I. Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: Evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale 2008, 62(1):51-55. 10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.51.
11. Gade M., Koch I. Inhibitory processes for critical situations - The role of n-2 task repetition costs in human multitasking situations. Frontiers in Physiology 2012, 3:159. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00159.
12. Gade M., Schuch S., Druey M.D., Koch I. Inhibitory control in task switching. Executive control and task switching 2013, Oxford University Press, (in press). J.A. Grange, G. Houghton (Eds.).
13. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching. Control of cognitive processes 2000, 331-355. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
14. Grange J.A., Houghton G. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36(4):1003-1009. 10.1037/a0019129.
15. Grange J.A., Houghton G. Task preparation and task inhibition: A comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18(1):211-216. 10.3758/s13423-010-0023-3.
16. Hommel B. The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. Control of cognitive processes 2000, 247-273. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
17. Houghton G., Pritchard R., Grange J.A. The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35(2):466-476. 10.1037/a0014648.
18. Jennings J.R., van der Molen M.W. Preparation for speeded action as a psychophysiological concept. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131(3):434. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.434.
19. Jost K., De Baene W., Koch I., Brass M. A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2013, 221(1):5-14. 10.1027/2151-2604/a000125.
20. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A.M., et al. Control and interference in task switching - A review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136(5):849-874. 10.1037/a0019842.
21. Koch I. The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10(2):488-492. 10.3758/BF03196511.
22. Koch I., Gade M., Philipp A.M. Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology 2004, 51(1):52-58. 10.1027/1618-3169.51.1.52.
23. Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., Philipp A.M. The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17(1):1-14. 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1.
24. Lawo V., Philipp A.M., Schuch S., Koch I. The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging 2012, 27(4):1130-1137. 10.1037/a0027455.
25. Logan G.D., Bundesen C. Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29(3):575-599.
26. Luria A.R. The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior 1961, Pergamon Press, Oxford, England.
27. Mayr U., Bryck R.L. Outsourcing control to the environment: Effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection. Psychological Research 2007, 71(1):107-116. 10.1007/s00426-005-0039-x.
28. Mayr U., Keele S.W. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129(1):4-26.
29. Mayr U., Kliegl R. Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26(5):1124-1140. 10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1124.
30. Mayr U., Kliegl R. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29(3):362-372. 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.362.
31. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22(6):1423-1442. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423.
32. Meiran N. Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research 2000, 63(3-4):234-249. 10.1007/s004269900004.
33. Meiran N., Chorev Z., Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41(3):211-253. 10.1006/cogp.2000.0736.
34. Meiran N., Cohen-Kdoshay O. Working memory load but not multitasking eliminates the prepared reflex: Further evidence from the adapted flanker paradigm. Acta Psychologica 2012, 139(2):309-313. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.008.
35. Meiran N., Kessler Y., Adi-Japha E. Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research 2008, 72(5):473-500. 10.1007/s00426-008-0136-8.
36. Miyake A., Emerson M.J., Padilla F., Ahn J. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica 2004, 115(2-3):123-142. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.004.
37. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(3):134-140.
38. Monsell S., Mizon G.A. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(3):493-516. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493.
39. Niemi P., Näätänen R. Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin 1981, 89(1):133-162. 10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.133.
40. Philipp A.M., Gade M., Koch I. Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2007, 19(3):395-416. 10.1080/09541440600758812.
41. Philipp A.M., Koch I. Switching of response modalities. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 2005, 58(7):1325-1338. 10.1080/02724980443000656.
42. Philipp A.M., Koch I. Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2006, 18(4):624-639. 10.1080/09541440500423269.
43. Philipp A.M., Koch I. Inhibition in language switching: What is inhibited when switching between languages in naming tasks?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35(5):1187-1195. 10.1037/a0016376.
44. Prior A. Too much of a good thing: Stronger bilingual inhibition leads to larger lag-2 task repetition costs. Cognition 2012, 125(1):1-12. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.019.
45. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124(2):207-231. 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207.
46. Schuch S., Koch I. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29(1):92-105. 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.92.
47. Stevens M.Ë., Lammertyn J., Verbruggen F., Vandierendonck A. Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods 2006, 38(2):280-286. 10.3758/BF03192779.
48. Vandierendonck A., Liefooghe B., Verbruggen F. Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136(4):601-626. 10.1037/a0019791.