Development of a robust and validated 2D-QSPR model for sweetness potency of diverse functional organic molecules

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 112, Issue , 2018, Pages 551-562

  Ojha, Probir Kumar ^a   Roy, Kunal ^a  

^a JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

K fold double cross validation; PLS; QSPR; Sweetener

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE; SWEETENING AGENT; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

MODELS, CHEMICAL; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SWEETENING AGENTS;

EID: 85016450539     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: 18736351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.03.043     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ambure, P., Aher, R.B., Gajewicz, A., Puzyn, T., Roy, K., “NanoBRIDGES” software: Open access tools to perform QSAR and nano-QSAR modeling. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 147 (2015), 1–13, 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.07.007.
2. Ariyoshi, Y., The structure-taste relationships of aspartyl dipeptide esters. Agric. Biol. Chem. 40:5 (1976), 983–992.
3. Ariyoshi, Y., Yasuda, N., Yamatani, T., The structure-taste relationships of the dipeptide esters composed of L-aspartic acid and β-hydroxy amino acids. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 47:2 (1974), 326–330.
4. Open Babel, Open Babel: the Open Source Chemistry Toolbox. http://openbabel.org/.
5. Baumann, D., Baumann, K., Reliable estimation of prediction errors for QSAR models under model uncertainty using double cross-validation. J. Chem., 6(1), 2014, 1, 10.1186/s13321-014-0047-1 PMID:25506400.
6. Brussel, L.B., Peer, H.G., van der Heijden, A., Structure-taste relationship of some sweet-tasting dipeptide esters. Z. für Lebensm. Forsch. 159:6 (1975), 337–343.
7. ChemDraw Ultra ver 5.0 is a program of Cambridge Soft Corporation, 2005, MA, U.S.A.
8. Chirico, N., Gramatica, P., Real external predictivity of QSAR models: how to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51:9 (2011), 2320–2335.
9. Das, S., Ojha, P.K., Roy, K., Multilayered variable selection in QSPR: a case study of modeling melting point of bromide ionic liquids. Int. J. Quant. Structure-Prop. Relat. (IJQSPR) 2:1 (2017), 106–124.
10. Dearden, J.C., The history and development of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs). Int. J. Quant. Structure-Prop. Relat. 1:1 (2016), 1–44, 10.4018/IJQSPR.2016010101.
11. Drew, M.G., Wilden, G.R., Spillane, W.J., Walsh, R.M., Ryder, C.A., Simmie, J.M., Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of sulfamates RNHSO3Na: distinction between sweet, sweet-bitter, and bitter molecules. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:8 (1998), 3016–3026.
12. Duffy, V.B., Sigman-Grant, M., Powers, M.A., Elmore, D., Myers, E.F., Quagliani, D., Spano, M., Stitzel, K.F., Taylor, S., Earl, R., Connor, S., ‘Position of the American Dietetic Association: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners’. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 104 (2004), 255–275.
13. Eriksson, L., Jaworska, J., Worth, A.P., Cronin, M.T., McDowell, R.M., Gramatica, P., Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification-and regression-based QSARs. Environ. Health Persp. 111:10 (2003), 1361–1375.
14. Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M., Cluster Analysis. 2001, Edward Arnold, London.
15. Forina, M., Casolino, C., Millan, C.P., Iterative predictor weighting (IPW) PLS: a technique for the elimination of useless predictors in regression problems. J. Chemom. 13:2 (1999), 165–184, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199903/04)13 2<165::AID-CEM535>3.0.CO;2-Y.
16. Fourches, D., Muratov, E.N., Tropsha, A., Trust, but verify ii: a practical guide to chemogenomics data curation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56 (2016), 1243–1252, 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00129.
17. Frank, I.E., Intermediate least squares regression method. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1:3 (1987), 233–242.
18. Gao, P., Fang, Z., The relationship between the sweetness and structure of sucrose derivatives. Jiangsu Chem. Ind. 33 (2005), 73–75.
19. Golbraikh, A., Tropsha, A., Beware of q2!. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20:4 (2002), 269–276, 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1.
20. Golbraikh, A., Muratov, E., Fourches, D., Tropsha, A., Data set modelability by QSAR. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54:1 (2014), 1–4, 10.1021/ci400572x do.
21. Grande, F., Sugars in cardiovascular disease. Sipple, H.L., Mcnutt, K.W., (eds.) Sugars in Nutrition, 1974, Academic Press, New York, 401–437.
22. Guha, R., Jurs, P.C., Determining the validity of a QSAR model-a classification approach. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45:1 (2005), 65–73.
23. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf.
24. http://www.oecd.org/document/23/0,3746,en_2649_34379_33957015_1_1_1_1,00.html.
25. Iwamura, H., Structure-taste relationship of perillartine and nitro-and cyanoaniline derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 23:3 (1980), 308–312.
26. Iwamura, H., Structure-sweetness relationship of L-aspartyl dipeptide analogs. A receptor site topology. J. Med. Chem. 24:5 (1981), 572–583.
27. Katritzky, A.R., Petrukhin, R., Perumal, S., Karelson, M., Prakash, I., Desai, N., A QSPR study of sweetness potency using the CODESSA program. Croat. Chem. Acta 75:2 (2002), 475–502.
28. Kelly, D.P., Spillane, W.J., Newell, J., Development of structure-taste relationships for monosubstituted phenylsulfamate sweeteners using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. J. Agric. food Chem. 53:17 (2005), 6750–6758.
29. Kier, L.B., Molecular structure influencing either a sweet or bitter taste among aldoximes. J. Pharm. Sci. 69:4 (1980), 416–419.
30. Kim, N.C., Kinghorn, A.D., Sweet-tasting and sweetness-modifying constituents of plants. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 27 (2002), 3–57.
31. Kinghorn, A.D., Soejarto, D.D., Discovery of terpenoid and phenolic sweeteners from plants. Pure Appl. Chem. 74:7 (2002), 1169–1179.
32. Lawrence, I., Lin, K., Assay validation using the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 1992, 599–604.
33. Leonard, J.T., Roy, K., On selection of training and test sets for the development of predictive QSAR models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 25:3 (2006), 235–251.
34. Mazur, R.H., Goldkamp, A.H., James, P.A., Schlatter, J.M., Structure-taste relation of aspartic acid amides. J. Med. Chem. 13:6 (1970), 1217–1221.
35. Mazur, R.H., Reuter, J.A., Swiatek, K.A., Schlatter, J.M., Synthetic sweeteners. 3. Aspartyl dipeptide esters from L-and D-alkylglycines. J. Med. Chem. 16:11 (1973), 1284–1287.
36. Mehmood, T., Martens, H., Sæbø S., Warringer, J., Snipen, L., A Partial Least Squares based algorithm for parsimonious variable selection. Algorithms Mol. Biol., 6(1), 2011, 1, 10.1186/1748-7188-6-27 PMID:22142365.
37. Mehmood, T., Liland, K.H., Snipen, L., Sæbø S., A review of variable selection methods in partial least squares regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 118 (2012), 62–69, 10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.07.010.
38. Melagraki, G., Afantitis, A., Exploring corrosion inhibition of steel in acidic medium. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 123 (2013), 9–14, 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.02.003 Enalos KNIME nodes.
39. Miyashita, Y., Takahashi, Y., Takayama, C., Ohkubo, T., Funatsu, K., Sasaki, S.I., Computer-assisted structure/taste studies on sulfamates by pattern recognition methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 184 (1986), 143–149.
40. Miyashita, Y., Takahashi, Y., Takayama, C., Sumi, K., Nakatsuka, K., Ohkubo, T., Abe, H., Sasaki, S., Structure-taste correlation of L-aspartyl dipeptides using the SIMCA method. J. Med. Chem. 29:6 (1986), 906–912.
41. Miyoshi, M., Nunami, K.I., Sugano, H., Fujii, T., Structure-taste relationship of novel α-l-aspartyl dipeptide sweetners. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 51:5 (1978), 1433–1440.
42. Moriguchi, I., Hirono, S., Liu, Q., Nakagome, I., Matsushita, Y., Simple method of calculating octanol/water partition coefficient. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 40:1 (1992), 127–130.
43. Moriguchi, I., Hirono, S., Nakagome, I., Hirano, H., Comparison of reliability of log P values for drugs calculated by several methods. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 42:4 (1994), 976–978.
44. Nicolotti, O., Gadaleta, D., Mangiatordi, G.F., Catto, M., Carotti, A., Applicability domain for QSAR models: where theory meets reality. Int. J. Quant. Structure-Prop. Relat. (IJQSPR) 1:1 (2016), 45–63, 10.4018/IJQSPR 2016010102.
45. Okuyama, T., Miyashita, Y., Kanaya, S., Katsumi, H., Sasaki, S.I., Randić M., Computer assisted structure–taste studies on sulfamates by pattern recognition method using graph theoretical invariants. J. Comput. Chem. 9:6 (1988), 636–646.
46. Park, H.S., Jun, C.H., A simple and fast algorithm for K-medoids clustering. Expert Syst. Appl. 36:2 (2009), 3336–3341.
47. Paulus, K., Reisch, A.M., The influence of temperature on the threshold values of primary tastes. Chem. Senses 5:1 (1980), 11–21.
48. Rojas, C., Ballabio, D., Consonni, V., Tripaldi, P., Mauri, A., Todeschini, R., Quantitative structure–activity relationships to predict sweet and non-sweet tastes. Theor. Chem. Acc. 135:3 (2016), 1–13, 10.1007/s00214-016-1812-1.
49. Rojas, C., Tripaldi, P., Duchowicz, P.R., A new QSPR study on relative sweetness. (IJQSPR) Int. J. Quant. Structure-Prop. Relat. 1:1 (2016), 78–93.
50. Roy, K., Ambure, P., The “double cross-validation” software tool for MLR QSAR model development. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 159 (2016), 108–126.
51. Roy, K., Mitra, I., Kar, S., Ojha, P.K., Das, R.N., Kabir, H., Comparative studies on some metrics for external validation of QSPR models. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52:2 (2012), 396–408.
52. (rank) metric incorporating rank-order predictions as an additional tool for validation of QSAR/QSPR models. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 118 (2012), 200–210.
53. Roy, K., Kar, S., Das, R.N., Understanding the Basics of QSAR for Applications in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Risk Assessment. 2015, Academic press.
54. Roy, K., Das, R.N., Ambure, P., Aher, R.B., Be aware of error measures. Further studies on validation of predictive QSAR models. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 152 (2016), 18–33, 10.1016/j. chemolab.2016.01.008.
55. Schrödinger, Maestro, Version 11.1. 2017, LLC, New York, NY.
56. Shafrir, E., Diabetes Metab. 22 (1997), 131–148.
57. Shallenberger, R.S., Taste Chemistry. 1993, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.
58. Spillane, W.J., Optimising Sweet Taste in Foods. (CRC, USA), 1th ed., 2006, 159–334.
59. Spillane, W.J., McGlinchey, G., Structure-activity studies on sulfamate sweeteners II: semiquantitative structure-taste relationship for sulfamate (RNHSO3−) sweeteners-the role of R. J. Pharm. Sci. 70:8 (1981), 933–935.
60. Spillane, W.J., McGlinchey, G., Muircheartaigh, I.Ó., Benson, G.A., Structure–activity studies on sulfamate sweetners III: structure–taste relationships for heterosulfamates. J. Pharm. Sci. 72:8 (1983), 852–856.
61. Spillane, W.J., Sheahan, M.B., Semi-quantitative and quantitative structure–taste relationships for carboand hetero-sulphamate (RNHSO 3–) sweeteners. Perkin Transactions J. Chem. Soc. 2:7 (1989), 741–746.
62. Spillane, W.J., Sheahan, M., Structure-taste relationships for sulfamate sweeteners (RNHSO3−). Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem. 59:1–4 (1991), 255–258.
63. Spillane, W.J., Sheahan, M.B., Ryder, C.A., Synthesis and taste properties of sodium disubstituted phenylsulfamates. Structure-taste relationships for sweet and bitter/sweet sulfamates. Food Chem. 47:4 (1993), 363–369.
64. Spillane, W.J., Ryder, C.A., Curran, P.J., Wall, S.N., Kelly, L.M., Feeney, B.G., Newell, J., Development of structure–taste relationships for sweet and non-sweet heterosulfamates. J. Chem.Soc. Perkin Trans. 2:7 (2000), 1369–1374.
65. Spillane, W.J., Feeney, B.G., Coyle, C.M., Further studies on the synthesis and tastes of monosubstituted benzenesulfamates. A semi-quantitative structure–taste relationship for the meta-compounds. Food Chem. 79:1 (2002), 15–22.
66. Spillane, W.J., Kelly, L.M., Feeney, B.G., Drew, M.G., Hattotuwagama, C.K., Synthesis of heterosulfamates. Search for structure-taste relationships. Arkivoc 7 (2003), 297–309.
67. Spillane, W.J., Kelly, D.P., Curran, P.J., Feeney, B.G., Structure-taste relationships for disubstituted phenylsulfamate tastants using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. J. Agric. food Chem. 54:16 (2006), 5996–6004.
68. Spillane, W.J., Coyle, C.M., Feeney, B.G., Thompson, E.F., Development of Structure− taste relationships for thiazolyl-, benzothiazolyl-, and thiadiazolylsulfamates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57:12 (2009), 5486–5493.
69. Takahashi, Y., Miyashita, Y., Tanaka, Y., Abe, H., Sasaki, S., A consideration for structure-taste correlations of perillartines using pattern-recognition techniques. J. Med. Chem. 25:10 (1982), 1245–1248.
70. Takahashi, Y., Abe, H., Miyashita, Y., Tanaka, Y., Hayasaka, H., Sasaki, S.I., Discriminative structural analysis using pattern recognition techniques in the structure-taste problem of perillartines. J. Pharm. Sci. 73:6 (1984), 737–741.
71. Talete, Dragon (Version 6) Srl. 2010 Retrieved from http://www.talete.mi.it/products/dragondescription.htm.
72. Tarko, L., Lupescu, I., Groposila-Constantinescu, D., Sweetness power QSARs by PRECLAV software. ARKIVOC 10 (2005), 254–271.
73. Tarko, L., Lupescu, I., Constantinescu-Groposila, D., QSAR Studies on amino-succinamic acid derivatives sweeteners. ARKIVOC 13 (2006), 22–40.
74. UMETRICS, UMETRICS SIMCA-p 10.0. 2002 info@umetrics.com www.umetrics.com (Umea, Sweden).
75. Vepuri, S.B., Tawari, N.R., Degani, M.S., Quantitative structure–activity relationship study of some aspartic acid analogues to correlate and predict their sweetness potency. QSAR Comb. Sci. 26:2 (2007), 204–214.
76. Wilson, R., Sweeteners. 2007, Blackwell Publishing, London, UK, 23–252.
77. Wold, S., Sjöström, M., Eriksson, L., PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 58:2 (2001), 109–130, 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1.
78. Yan, A., Chong, Y., Wang, L., Hu, X., Wang, K., Prediction of biological activity of Aurora-A kinase inhibitors by multilinear regression analysis and support vector machine. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21:8 (2011), 2238–2243.
79. Yang, X., Chong, Y., Yan, A., Chen, J., In-silico prediction of sweetness of sugars and sweeteners. Food Chem. 128:3 (2011), 653–658.
80. Zheng, J., Rao, Z., Jia, C., Study on the relationship between structure and sweetness of sucrose derivatives. Food Sci. 24:5 (2003), 29–33.
81. Zhong, M., Chong, Y., Nie, X., Yan, A., Yuan, Q., Prediction of sweetness by multilinear regression analysis and support vector machine. J. food Sci. 78:9 (2013), S1445–S1450.
82. Zimmet, P., Alberti, K.G.M.M., Shaw, J., Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature 414:6865 (2001), 782–787.