A Partial Least Squares based algorithm for parsimonious variable selection

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Mehmood, Tahir ^a   Martens, Harald ^a   Sæbø, Solve ^a   Warringer, Jonas ^a,b   Snipen, Lars ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 82655180619     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17487188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-7188-6-27     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bachvarov B, Kirilov K, Ivanov I. Codon usage in prokaryotes. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment 2008, 22(2):669.
2. Binnewies T, Motro Y, Hallin P, Lund O, Dunn D, La T, Hampson D, Bellgard M, Wassenaar T, Ussery D. Ten years of bacterial genome sequencing: comparative-genomics-based discoveries. Functional & integrative genomics 2006, 6(3):165-185. 10.1007/s10142-006-0027-2, 3228986, 22148115.
3. Shendure J, Porreca G, Reppas N, Lin X, McCutcheon J, Rosenbaum A, Wang M, Zhang K, Mitra R, Church G. Accurate multiplex polony sequencing of an evolved bacterial genome. Science 2005, 309(5741):1728. 10.1126/science.1117389, 16081699.
4. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. 2008,
5. Fernández Pierna J, Abbas O, Baeten V, Dardenne P. A Backward Variable Selection method for PLS regression (BVSPLS). Analytica chimica acta 2009, 642(1-2):89-93. 10.1016/j.aca.2008.12.002, 19427462.
6. Riaz K, Elmerich C, Moreira D, Raffoux A, Dessaux Y, Faure D. A metagenomic analysis of soil bacteria extends the diversity of quorum-quenching lactonases. Environmental Microbiology 2008, 10(3):560-570. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01475.x, 18201196.
7. Suzuki H, Brown C, Forney L, Top E. Comparison of correspondence analysis methods for synonymous codon usage in bacteria. DNA Research 2008, 15(6):357. 10.1093/dnares/dsn028, 2608848, 18940873.
8. Martens H, Næs T. Multivariate Calibration 1989, Wiley.
9. Keleş S, Chun H. Comments on: Augmenting the bootstrap to analyze high dimensional genomic data. TEST 2008, 17:36-39.
10. Höskuldsson A. Variable and subset selection in PLS regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001, 55(1-2):23-38.
11. Boulesteix A, Strimmer K. Partial least squares: a versatile tool for the analysis of high-dimensional genomic data. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2007, 8:32.
12. John G, Kohavi R, Pfleger K. Irrelevant features and the subset selection problem. Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on machine learning 1994, 129:121-129. Citeseer.
13. Jouan-Rimbaud D, Walczak B, Massart D, Last I, Prebble K. Comparison of multivariate methods based on latent vectors and methods based on wavelength selection for the analysis of near-infrared spectroscopic data. Analytica Chimica Acta 1995, 304(3):285-295.
14. Alsberg B, Kell D, Goodacre R. Variable selection in discriminant partial least-squares analysis. Anal Chem 1998, 70(19):4126-4133. 10.1021/ac980506o, 21651249.
15. Trygg J, Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). Journal of Chemometrics 2002, 16(3):119-128.
16. Boulesteix A. PLS dimension reduction for classification with microarray data. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2004, 3:1075.
17. Sæbø S, Almøy T, Aarøe J, Aastveit AH. ST-PLS: a multi-dimensional nearest shrunken centroid type classifier via PLS. Jornal of Chemometrics 2007, 20:54-62.
18. Centner V, Massart D, de Noord O, de Jong S, Vandeginste B, Sterna C. Elimination of uninformative variables for multivariate calibration. Anal Chem 1996, 68(21):3851-3858. 10.1021/ac960321m, 21619260.
19. Osborne S, Künnemeyer R, Jordan R. Method of wavelength selection for partial least squares. The Analyst 1997, 122(12):1531-1537.
20. Cai W, Li Y, Shao X. A variable selection method based on uninformative variable elimination for multivariate calibration of near-infrared spectra. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2008, 90(2):188-194.
21. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S. Multi-and megavariate data analysis 2001, Umetrics Umeå.
22. Gosselin R, Rodrigue D, Duchesne C. A Bootstrap-VIP approach for selecting wavelength intervals in spectral imaging applications. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2010, 100:12-21.
23. Xiaobo Z, Jiewen Z, Povey M, Holmes M, Hanpin M. Variables selection methods in near-infrared spectroscopy. Analytica chimica acta 2010, 667(1-2):14-32. 10.1016/j.aca.2010.03.048, 20441862.
24. Frank I. Intermediate least squares regression method. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1987, 1(3):233-242.
25. Kettaneh-Wold N, MacGregor J, Dayal B, Wold S. Multivariate design of process experiments (M-DOPE). Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1994, 23:39-50.
26. Lindgren F, Geladi P, Rännar S, Wold S. Interactive variable selection (IVS) for PLS. Part 1: Theory and algorithms. Journal of Chemometrics 1994, 8(5):349-363.
27. Liu F, He Y, Wang L. Determination of effective wavelengths for discrimination of fruit vinegars using near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. Analytica chimica acta 2008, 615:10-17. 10.1016/j.aca.2008.03.030, 18440358.
28. Frenich A, Jouan-Rimbaud D, Massart D, Kuttatharmmakul S, Galera M, Vidal J. Wavelength selection method for multicomponent spectrophotometric determinations using partial least squares. The Analyst 1995, 120(12):2787-2792.
29. Spiegelman C, McShane M, Goetz M, Motamedi M, Yue Q, Cot'e G. Theoretical justification of wavelength selection in PLS calibration: development of a new algorithm. Anal Chem 1998, 70:35-44. 10.1021/ac9705733, 21644597.
30. Martens H, Martens M. Multivariate Analysis of Quality-An Introduction 2001, Wiley.
31. Lazraq A, Cleroux R, Gauchi J. Selecting both latent and explanatory variables in the PLS1 regression model. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2003, 66(2):117-126.
32. Huang X, Pan W, Park S, Han X, Miller L, Hall J. Modeling the relationship between LVAD support time and gene expression changes in the human heart by penalized partial least squares. Bioinformatics 2004, 4991.
33. Ferreira A, Alves T, Menezes J. Monitoring complex media fermentations with near-infrared spectroscopy: Comparison of different variable selection methods. Biotechnology and bioengineering 2005, 91(4):474-481. 10.1002/bit.20526, 15937882.
34. Xu H, Liu Z, Cai W, Shao X. A wavelength selection method based on randomization test for near-infrared spectral analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2009, 97(2):189-193.
35. Olah M, Bologa C, Oprea T. An automated PLS search for biologically relevant QSAR descriptors. Journal of computer-aided molecular design 2004, 18(7):437-449. 10.1007/s10822-004-4060-8, 15729845.
36. Chong G, Jun CH. Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemo-metrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2005, 78:103-112.
37. ElMasry G, Wang N, Vigneault C, Qiao J, ElSayed A. Early detection of apple bruises on different background colors using hyperspectral imaging. LWT-Food Science and Technology 2008, 41(2):337-345.
38. Aha D, Bankert R. A comparative evaluation of sequential feature selection algorithms. 1996, Springer-Verlag, New York.
39. Ye S, Wang D, Min S. Successive projections algorithm combined with uninformative variable elimination for spectral variable selection. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2008, 91(2):194-199.
40. Ramadan Z, Song X, Hopke P, Johnson M, Scow K. Variable selection in classification of environmental soil samples for partial least square and neural network models. Analytica chimica acta 2001, 446(1-2):231-242.
41. Indahl U, Liland K, Næs T. Canonical partial least squares: A unified PLS approach to classification and regression problems. Journal of Chemometrics 2009, 23(9):495-504.
42. Ripley B. Pattern recognition and neural networks 2008, Cambridge Univ Pr.
43. Naes T, Helland I. Relevant components in regression. Scandinavian journal of statistics 1993, 20(3):239-250.
44. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis 2002, 359. John Wiley and Sons.
45. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1996, 267-288.
46. Haury A, Gestraud P, Vert J. The influence of feature selection methods on accuracy, stability and inter-pretability of molecular signatures. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1101.5008 2011,
47. Lai D, Yang X, Wu G, Liu Y, Nardini C. Inference of gene networks application to Bifidobacterium. Bioinformatics 2011, 27(2):232. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq629, 21075742.
48. Mehmood T, Martens H, Saebo S, Warringer J, Snipen L. Mining for Genotype-Phenotype Relations in Saccha-romyces using Partial Least Squares. BMC bioinformatics 2011, 12:318. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-318, 3175482, 21812956.
49. Hanes A, Raymer M, Doom T, Krane D. A Comparision of Codon Usage Trends in Prokaryotes. 2009 Ohio Collaborative Conference on Bioinformatics 2009, 83-86. IEEE.
50. Chen R, Yan H, Zhao K, Martinac B, Liu G. Comprehensive analysis of prokaryotic mechanosensation genes: Their characteristics in codon usage. Mitochondrial DNA 2007, 18(4):269-278.
51. Zavala A, Naya H, Romero H, Musto H. Trends in codon and amino acid usage in Thermotoga maritima. Journal of molecular evolution 2002, 54(5):563-568. 10.1007/s00239-001-0040-y, 11965430.
52. Nguyen M, Ma J, Fogel G, Rajapakse J. Di-codon usage for gene classification. Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics 2009, 211-221.
53. Sharp P, Li W. The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic acids research 1987, 15(3):1281. 10.1093/nar/15.3.1281, 340524, 3547335.
54. Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: A proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system* 1. Journal of molecular biology 1981, 151(3):389-409. 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90003-6, 6175758.
55. Wright F. The effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 1990, 87:23-29. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90491-9, 2110097.
56. Petrosino J, Highlander S, Luna R, Gibbs R, Versalovic J. Metagenomic pyrosequencing and microbial identification. Clinical chemistry 2009, 55(5):856. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.107565, 2892905, 19264858.
57. Riesenfeld C, Schloss P, Handelsman J. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annu Rev Genet 2004, 38:525-552. 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091216, 15568985.
58. Ellis J, Griffin H, Morrison D, Johnson A. Analysis of dinucleotide frequency and codon usage in the phylum Apicomplexa. Gene 1993, 126(2):163-170. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90363-8, 8482530.
59. Lightfield J, Fram N, Ely B, Otto M. Across Bacterial Phyla, Distantly-Related Genomes with Similar Genomic GC Content Have Similar Patterns of Amino Acid Usage. PloS one 2011, 6(3):e17677. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017677, 3053387, 21423704.
60. Kotamarti M, Raiford D, Dunham M. A Data Mining Approach to Predicting Phylum using Genome-Wide Sequence Data.
61. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:119. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119, 2848648, 20211023.
62. Anderssen E, Dyrstad K, Westad F, Martens H. Reducing over-optimism in variable selection by cross-model validation. Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems 2006, 84(1-2):69-74.
63. Wolfe D, Hollander M. Nonparametric statistical methods. Nonparametric statistical methods 1973,
64. Newman J, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow D, Noble M, DeRisi J, Weissman J. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 2006, 441(7095):840-846. 10.1038/nature04785, 16699522.