Literature, Metaphor and the Foreign Language Learner

Literature, Metaphor and the Foreign Language Learner

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-174

  Picken, Jonathan D ^a  

^a TSUDA COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014757003     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230591608     Document Type: Book

References (226)

1. Abel, B. (2003). English idioms in the first and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach [Electronic version]. Second Language Research, 19,329-58.
2. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Alderson, J. c., Short, M. (1989). Reading literature. In M. Short (Ed.), Reading, analysing and teaching literature (pp. 72-119). London: Longman.
4. Azuma, M. (2005). Metaphorical competence in an EFL context: The mental lexicon and metaphorical competence of Japanese EFL students. Tokyo: Toshindo.
5. Bal, M. (1997). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
6. Beach, R. (1993). A teacher's introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
7. Black, M. (1993). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 19-41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21, 553-7l.
9. Boers, F., Demecheleer, M. (2001). Measuring the impact of cross-cultural differences on learners' comprehension of imageable idioms. ELT Journal, 55, 255-62.
10. Boers, F., Littlemore, J. (Eds.). (2003). Cross-cultural differences in conceptual metaphor: Applied linguistics perspectives [Special issue]. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4),232-320.
11. Bortolussi, M., Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology: Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bowdle, B. F., Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor [Electronic version]. Psychological Review, 12, 193-216.
13. Brewer, W. F. (1996). Good and bad story endings and story completeness. In R. J. Kreuz M. S. Macnealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 261-74). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Brooke-Rose, C. (1958). A grammar of metaphor. London: Secker and Warburg. Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
15. Cameron, L., Low, G. (Eds.). (1999a). Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cameron, L., Low, G. (1999b) Metaphor. Language Teaching, 32, 77-96
17. Carter, R. (1997). Investigating English discourse: Language, literacy, and literature. London: Routledge.
18. Carter, R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
19. Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge.
20. Carter, R., Goddard, A., Reah, D., Sanger, K., Bowring, M. (1997). Working with texts: A core book for language analysis. London: Routledge.
21. Carter, R., Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. Harlow, UK: Longman.
22. Celce-Murcia, M., Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Chang, Z. (2002). A case study of metaphor in literary readings [Electronic version]. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 17, 75-88.
24. Charteris-Black, J. (2002). Second language figurative proficiency: A comparative study of Malay and English. Applied Linguistics, 23, 104-33.
25. CieSlicka, A. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners [Electronic version]. Second Language Research, 22, 115-44.
26. Claridge, G. (2005). Simplification in graded readers: Measuring the authenticity of graded texts [Electronic version]. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 144-58. Cobb, T. (n.d.). VP English (Version 2.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved January 21, 2007, from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/eng/
27. Cobb, T. (n.d.). VP English (Version 2.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved January 21, 2007, from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/eng/
28. Collie, J., Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and literature: The interplay ofform and mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Croft, W., Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Crystal, D. (1998). Language play. London: Penguin.
34. Csatar, P., Pethö, G., Toth, E. (2006). On possible factors of the aesthetic appreciation of metaphors [Electronic version]. Journal of Literary Semantics, 35, 59-7L.
35. Curco, C. (2005). On mosquitoes and camels: Some notes on the interpretation of metaphorically transparent sayings. In H. L. Colston A. N. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 283-307). Mahwah, N]: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Dancygier, B. (Ed.). (2006). Blending [Special issue]. Language and Literature, 15(1), 1-120.
37. Davies, A. (1984). Simple, simplified and simplification. In J. C. Alderson A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 181-95). London: Longman.
38. Day, R. R., Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Deignan, A. (1995). Collins COBUILD English guides 7: Metaphor. London: HarperCollins.
40. Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Deignan, A., Gabrys, D., Solska, A. (1997). Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. ELT Journal, 51, 352-60.
41. Dickens, C. (2002). Bleak house (Retold by M. Tamer). Oxford, UK: Macmillan.
42. Dijkstra, K., Zwaan, R. A., Graesser, A. c., Magliano, J. P. (1994). Character and reader emotions in literary texts. Poetics, 23, 139-57.
43. Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. c., Leung, A. (1993). Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations [Electronic version]. Poetics, 22,5-33.
44. Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Doughty, c., Williams, J. (Eds). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
47. Edmondson, W. (1997). The role of literature in foreign language learning and teaching: Some valid assumptions and invalid arguments. AILA Review, 12,42-55.
48. Elliott, R. (1990). Encouraging reader-response to literature. ELT Journal, 44, 191-98.
49. Erlich, V. (1969). Russian formalism: History-doctrine (3rd ed.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
50. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman. Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
51. Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
52. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Fowler, R. (1996). Linguistic criticism (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54. Frost, R. (1951a). The road not taken. In Complete poems of Robert Frost. London: Jonathan Cape.
55. Frost, R. (1951b). Stopping by woods on a snowy evening. In Complete poems of Robert Frost. London: Jonathan Cape.
56. Gairns, R., Redman, S. (1995). True to life: Pre-intermediate class book. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57. Gavins, L Steen, G. (Eds.). (2003). Cognitive poetics in practice. London: Routledge.
58. Gentner, D. (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In D. S. Miall (Ed.), Metaphors: Problems and perspectives (pp. 106-32). Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.
59. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 223-47.
60. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, B., Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy [Electronic version]. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Gibbs, R. L JI. (2002b). Identifying and appreciating poetic metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics, 31, 101-12.
62. Gibbs, R. L Jr., Boers, E. (2005). Metaphoric processing of allegorical poetry. In Z. Maalej (Ed.), Metaphor, cognition, and culture: Selected papers from the Fourth International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor (RAAM IV) (pp. 11-24). Manouba, Tunis: University of Manouba-Tunis.
63. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1999a). Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1999b). Researching metaphOr. In L. Cameron G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 29-47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16,317-33.
67. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2002a). Psycholinguistic comments on metaphor identification. Language and Literature, 11, 78-84.
68. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nascimento, S. B. (1996). How we talk when we talk about love: Metaphorical concepts and understanding love poetry. In R. J. Kreuz M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 291- 307). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
70. Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
71. Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
72. Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.
73. Goatly, A. (2000). Critical reading and writing: An introductory coursebook. London: Routledge.
74. Goodblatt, C. (2001). Applying an empirical dimension to the study of poetic metaphor. Joumal of Literary Semantics, 30, 167-80.
75. Goodblatt, c., Glicksohn, J. (2003). From Practical Criticism to the practice of literary criticism [Electronic version]. Poetics Today, 24, 208-36.
76. Grabe, W., Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
77. Grady, J. E. (1997). Theories Are Buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 267-90.
78. Graves, B., Frederiksen, C. H. (1991). Literary expertise in the description of a fictional narrative. Poetics, 20, 1-26.
79. Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Hall, G. (2001). The poetics of everyday language. CAUCE, 24, 69-86.
81. Hall, G. (2005). Literature in language education. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
82. Hanauer, D. (1996). Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics, 23, 363-80.
83. Hanauer, D. (1998). The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and encyclopedic items. Poetics, 26, 63-80.
84. Hanauer, D. (2001a). The task of poetry reading and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 22, 295-323.
85. Hanauer, D. (2001b). Focus-on-cultural understanding: Literary reading in the second language classroom [Electronic verSion]. CAUCE, 24,389-404.
86. Hanauer, D. I. (2001c). What we know about reading poetry: Theoretical positions and empirical research. In D. Schram G. Steen (Eds.), The psychology and sociology of literature: In honour of Elrud Ibsch (pp. 107-28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
87. Hatch, E., Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.
88. Hess, N. (2006). The short story: Integrating language skills through the parallel life approach. In A. Paran (Ed.), Literature in language teaching and learning (pp. 27-43). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
89. Hiraga, M. (2005). Metaphor and iconicity. A cognitive approach to analysing texts. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
90. Hirvela, A., Boyle, J. (1988). Literature courses and student attitudes. ELT Journal, 42, 179-84.
91. Hoffstaedter, P. (1987). Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics, 16, 7S-9l.
92. Hoffstaedter-Kohn, P. (1991). Linguistic competence and poetic text processing. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies ofliterature: Proceedings of the second !GEL-conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 87-96). Amsterdam: Rodopi
93. Holme, R. (2004). Mind, metaphor and language teaching. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
94. Hoorn, J. (1996). Psychophysiology and literary processing: ERPs to semantic and phonological deviations in reading small verses. In R. J. Kreuz M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 339-S8). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
95. Horiba, Y., van den Broek, P. W., Fletcher, C. R. (1993). Second language readers' memory for narrative texts: Evidence for structure-preserving top-down processing. Language Learning, 43, 34S-72.
96. Hunt, R. A. (1996). Literacy as dialogic involvement: Methodological implications for the empirical study of literary reading. In R. J. Kreuz M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 479-94). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
97. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
98. Jakobson, R. (1960/1988). Linguistics and poetics. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modem criticism and theory: A reader (pp. 32-S7). London: Longman
99. Katz, A. N. (2005). Discourse and sociocultural factors in understanding nonliteral language. In H. L. Colston A. N. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 183-207). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
100. Katz, A. N., Ferretti, T. R. (2001). Moment-by-moment reading of proverbs in literal and nonliteral contexts. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 193-22l.
101. Katz, A. N., Paivio, A., Marschark, M. (1985). Poetic comparisons: Psychological dimensions of metaphoric processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 36S-83.
102. Kecskes, I. (2006). On my mind: Thoughts about salience, context and figurative language from a second language perspective [Electronic version]. Second Language Research, 22, 219-37.
103. Kercheval, J. L. (1996). Carpathia. In J. Stern (Ed.), Micro fiction: An anthology of really short stories (pp. 92-3). New York: Norton.
104. Kneepkens, E. W. E. M., Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 23, 125-38.
105. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
106. Kövecses, Z. (2001). A cognitive linguistic view of learning idioms in an FLT context. In M. Piitz, S. Niemeier, R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 87-115). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
107. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
108. Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
109. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
110. Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
111. Kuiken, D., Miall, D., Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25, 171-203.
112. Kurtz, V., Schober, M. F. (2001). Readers' varying interpretations of theme in short fiction. Poetics, 29, 139-66.
113. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
114. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202-51). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
115. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
116. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
117. Lakoff, G., Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
118. Larsen, S. F., Laszlö, J., Seilman, U. (1991) Across time and place: Culturalhistorical knowledge and personal experience in appreciation of literature. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram, G. Steen (Eds.), Empirical studies of literature: Proceedings of the second IGEL-conference, Amsterdam 1989 (pp. 97-103). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
119. Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
120. Leech, G. N. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. London: Longman. Leech, G. N. (1981). Semantics: The study of meaning (2nd ed.). London: Penguin. Leech, G. N., Short, M. H. (1981). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London: Longman.
121. Levin, S. R. (1993). Language, concepts, and worlds: Three domains of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 112-123). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
122. Liontas, J. I. (2001). That's all Greek to me! The comprehension and interpretation of Modern Greek phrasal idioms. The Reading Matrix, 1, 1-32. RetrievedJanuary 3, 2007, from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/john_liontas/article.pdf Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly, 35, 459-89.
123. Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly, 35, 459-89
124. Littlemore J. (2003). The effect of cultural background on metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 273-88.
125. Littlemore, J., Low, G. (2006a). Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27, 268-94.
126. Littlemore J., Low, G. (2006b). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
127. Lott, B. (1992). Night. In]. Thomas, D. Thomas, T. Hazuka (Eds.), Flash fiction: Very short stories (pp. 61-2). New York: Norton.
128. MacArthur Purdon, F. (2001, April). Making semantically opaque metaphors transparent in FL instruction: Descriptive versus explanatory adequacy of the concept of attribute saliency. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor, Tunis, Tunisia.
129. Maley, A. (2001). Literature in the language classroom. In R. Carter D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 180-85). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
130. Mandler, J. M., Goodman, M. S. (1982). On the psychological validity of story structure. Journal of Verbal Leaming and Verbal Behavior, 21, 507-23.
131. Martindale, c., Dailey, A. (1995). L. A. Richards revisited: Do people agree in their interpretations of literature? Poetics, 23, 299-314.
132. McCabe, A. (1983). Conceptual similarity and the quality of metaphor in isolated sentences versus extended contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12,41-68.
133. McCagg, P. (1997). Speaking metaphorically. Tokyo: Kenkyusha. McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
134. McCarthy, M., Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman.
135. McCarthy, M., O'Dell, F. (1994). English vocabulary in use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
136. McGlone, M. (1996). Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought? Joumal of Memory and Language, 35, 544-65.
137. McKay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 529-36.
138. Miall, D. S. (2006). Literary reading: Empirical and theoretical studies. New York: Peter Lang.
139. Miall, D. S., Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect response to literary stories [Electronic version]. Poetics, 22, 389-407.
140. Miall, D. S., Kuiken, D. (1999). What is literariness? Three components of literary reading [Electronic version]. Discourse Processes, 28, 121-38.
141. Miall, D. S., Kuiken, D. (2002). A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30, 221-4l.
142. Miller, G. A. (1993). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 357-400). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
143. Minkoff, P. (2006). Talking it over in class. In A. Paran (Ed.), Literature in language teaching and learning (pp. 45-57). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
144. Montgomery, M., Durant, A., Fabb, N., Furniss, T., Mills, S. (2000). Ways of reading: Advanced reading skills for students of English literature (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
145. Mukai'ovsky, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Ed. and Trans.), A Prague School reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17-30). Washington: Georgetown University Press. (Original work was published 1932.)
146. Nation, L. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
147. Nattinger, J. (1988). Some current trends in vocabulary teaching. In R. Carter M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 62-82). London: Longman.
148. Nesi, H. (1995). A modern bestiary: A contrastive study of the figurative meanings of animal terms. ELT Journal, 49, 272-78.
149. Oh, S.-Y. (2001). Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 69-96.
150. Paran, A. (Ed.). (2006a). Literature in language teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: TES0L.
151. Paran, A. (2006b). The stories of literature and language teaching. In A. Paran (Ed.), Literature in language teaching and learning (pp. 1-10). Alexandria, VA: TES0L.
152. Parkinson, B., Thomas, H. R. (2000). Teaching literature in a second language. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
153. Partington, A. (1996). Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
154. Picken, J. D. (2001). Metaphor in narrative and the foreign language learner. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 16, 63-7l.
155. Picken, J. D. (2003a). Literature in language learning: Do students appreciate it? Gengobunkakenkyushoho [Tsuda Journal of Language and Culture], 18, 112-24.
156. Picken, J. D. (2003b). Metaphor in literature and the foreign language learner. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, UK.
157. Picken, J. D. (2005). Helping foreign language learners to make sense of literature with metaphor awareness-raising. Language Awareness, 14, 142-52.
158. Picken, J. D. (2006). The value of story interpretation for EFL students. In K. Bradford Watts, C. Ikeguchi, M. Swanson (Eds.), JALT 2005 Conference Proceedings (pp. 1094-1102). Tokyo: JALT.
159. Picken, J. D., Althaus, M., Wright, M. (2006). Representativeness in corpus stylistics: The metaphor in simplified readers project. Gengobunkakenkyushoho [Tsuda Journal of Language and Culture], 21, 114-23.
160. Pope, R. (1995). Textual intervention: Critical and creative strategies for literary studies. London: Routledge.
161. Pope, R. (2005). Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London: Routledge. Piitz, M., Niemeier, S., Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2001). Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
162. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
163. Reinhart, T. (1976). On understanding poetic metaphor. Poetics, 5, 383-402. Richards, I. A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
164. Richards, I. A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
165. Rodale J. I. (1978). The synonym finder. New York: Warner.
166. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UniverSity Press.
167. Rosenkjar, P. (2006). Learning and teaching how a poem means: Literary stylistics for EFL undergraduates and language teachers in Japan. In A. Paran (Ed.), Literature in language teaching and learning (pp. 117-31). Alexandria, VA: TES0L. Rundell, M., Fox, G. (Eds). (2002). Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan.
168. Schank, R. C., Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An enquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
169. Schmidt, S. J. (1983). Interpretation: Sacred cow or necessity? Poetics, 12,239-58.
170. Schumacher, R. (1997). 'Metapher': Erfassen und verstehen frischer metaphern. Tiibingen: Francke Verlag.
171. Scruton, R. (2006). Aesthetics. In Encyclopcedia Britannica. Retrieved January 22, 2007, from Encyclopcedia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD.
172. Searle J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
173. Sell, R. D. (2002a). Introduction: Children's literature as communication. In R. D. Sell (Ed.), Children's literature as communication: The ChiLPA project (pp. 1- 26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
174. Sell, R. D. (2002b). Reader-learners: Children's novels and participatory pedagogy. In R. D. Sell (Ed.), Children's literature as communication: The ChiLPA project (pp. 263-90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
175. Semino, E. (1997). Language and world creation in poems and other texts. London: Longman.
176. Semino, E. (2002). A cognitive stylistic approach to mind style in narrative fiction. In E. Semino & J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 95-122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
177. Semino, E., Culpeper, J. (Eds.). (2002). Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysiS. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
178. Shen, Y. (2002). Cognitive constraints on verbal creativity: The use of figurative language in poetic discourse. In E. Semino J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive stylis tics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 211-30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
179. Shklovsky, V. (1965/1988). Art as technique. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory: A reader (pp. 16-30). London: Longman. (Reprinted from Russian formalist criticism, pp. 5-24, by L. T. Lemon M. J. Reis, Eds. and Trans., 1965, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press).
180. Short, M., Freeman, D. c., van Peer, W., Simpson, P. (1998). Stylistics, criticism and mythrepresentation again: Squaring the circle with Ray Mackay's subjective solution for all problems. Language and Literature, 7, 39-50.
181. Short, M., van Peer, W. (1989). Accident! Stylisticians evaluate: Aims and methods of stylistic analysis. In M. Short (Ed.), Reading, analysing and teaching literature (pp. 22-71). London: Longman.
182. Sopory, P. (2005). Metaphor and affect. Poetics Today, 26, 433-58.
183. Spack, R. (1985). Literature, reading, writing, and ESL: Bridging the gaps. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 703-25.
184. Steen, G. (1994) Understanding metaphor in literature: An empirical approach. London: Longman.
185. Steen, G. (1999). From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps. In G. Steen R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997 (pp. 57-77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
186. Steen, G. (Ed.). (2002). Metaphor identification [Special issue]. Language and Literature, 11(1), 1-96.
187. Steen, G. (2003). A historical view of empirical poetics: Trends and possibilities [Electronic version]. Empirical Studies in the Arts, 21, 51-67.
188. Steen, G., Gibbs, R. (2004). Questions about metaphor in literature [Electronic version]. European Journal of English Studies, 8, 337-54.
189. Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, c. (1984). Cultural knowledge and reading. In J. C. Alderson A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 48-61). London: Longman.
190. Stockwell, P. (2000). The poetics of science fiction. Harlow, UK: Longman.
191. Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
192. Thackeray, W. M. (1996). Vanity fair [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http:// www.gutenberg.org/etext/599
193. Thackeray, W. M. (2007). Vanity fair (Retold by E. Walker). Oxford, UK: Macmillan.
194. Thomas, J. (1992). Introduction. In J. Thomas, D. Thomas, T. Hazuka (Eds.), Flash fiction: Very short stories (pp. 11-14). New York: Norton.
195. Tourangeau, R., Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition, 11,203-44.
196. Treese, G. (1952). The crown of violet. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
197. Treese, G. (2000). The crown of violet (Retold by John Escott). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
198. Tsur, R. (2002). Aspects of cognitive poetics. In E. Semino, J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 279-318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
199. Tutaş, N. (2006). Theory into practice: Teaching and responding to literature aesthetically. In A. Paran (Ed.), Literature in language teaching and learning (pp. 133-45). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
200. Ungerer, F. (2001). Basicness and conceptual hierarchies in foreign language learning: A corpus-based study. In M. Piitz, S. Niemeier, R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 201-22). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
201. Urquhart, A. H., Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a foreign language: Process, product and practice. London: Longman.
202. Valdes, J. M. (1986). Culture and literature. In]. M. Valdes (Ed.), Culture bound: Bridging the cultural gap in language teaching (pp. 137-47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
203. van der Meer, G. (1999). Metaphors and dictionaries: The morass of meaning, or how to get two ideas for one [Electronic version]. International Journal of Lexicography, 12, 195-208.
204. van Dijk, T. A. (1975). Formal semantics of metaphorical discourse. Poetics, 4, 173-98.
205. van Dijk, T. A., Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
206. van Ek J. A. (1976). The Threshold Level for modern language learning in schools. London: Longman.
207. van Luxemburg, J., Bal, M., Weststeijn, W. G. (1981). Inleiding in de literatuurwetenschap [Introduction to the theory of literature]. Muiderberg, The Netherlands: Dick Coutinho.
208. van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London: Croon Helm.
209. van Peer, W., Pander Maat, H. (2001). Narrative perspective and the interpretation of characters' motives. Language and Literature, 10, 229-4l.
210. Verdonk, P. (1995). Words, words, words: A pragmatic and sociocognitive view of lexical repetition. In P. Verdonk & J. Weber (Eds.), Twentieth-century fiction: From text to context (pp. 7-31). London: Routledge.
211. Verdonk, P. (2002). Stylistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Vipond, D., Hunt, R. A. (1984). Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary reading [Electronic version]. Poetics, 13, 261-77.
212. Wales, K. (2001). A dictionary of stylistics (2nd ed.) Harlow, UK: Longman. Weber J. J. (1992). Critical analysis of fiction: Essays in discourse stylistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
213. Werth, P. (1999). Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow, UK: Longman.
214. Widdowson, H. G. (1975). Stylistics and the teaching of literature. Harlow, UK: Longman.
215. Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Talking shop: H. G. Widdowson on literature and ELT. ELT Journal, 37, 30-35.
216. Widdowson, H. G. (1986). The untrodden ways. In C. Brumfit R. Carter (Eds.), Literature and language teaching (pp. 133-39). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
217. Widdowson, H. G. (1992). Practical stylistics: An approach to poetry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
218. Widdowson, H. G. (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature, 4, 157-72.
219. Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Context, community, and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 705-16.
220. Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children's understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
221. Yano, Y., Long, M. H., Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44, 189- 219.
222. Yaron, L. (2002). Processing of obscure poetic texts: Mechanisms of selection. Journal of Literary Semantics, 31, 133-70.
223. Yaron, L. (2003). Mechanisms of combination in the processing of obscure poems. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32, 151-66.
224. Zapata, G. C. (2005). Literature in L2 Spanish classes: An examination of focuson- cultural understanding. Language Awareness, 14, 261-73.
225. Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
226. Zwaan, R. A. (1996) Toward a model of literary comprehension. In B. K. Britton A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 241-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.