What is literariness? three components of literary reading

Discourse Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 121-138

  Miall, David S ^a   Kuiken, Don ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038228271     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638539909545076     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bowen, E. (1981). The demon lover. In C. Brown (Ed.), The collected stories of Elizabeth Bowen (pp. 661-666). New York: Knopf.
3. Coleridge, S. T. (1924). The poems of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (E. H. Coleridge, Ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1817)
4. Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and literature: The interplay of form and mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5. Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
6. Erlich, V. (1981). Russian formalism: History - Doctrine (3rd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9. Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
10. Hobbs, J. R. (1990). Literature and cognition. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
11. Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1986). Evaluations in literary reading. Text, 6, 53-71.
12. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
13. Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (1995). Procedures in think aloud studies: Contributions to the phenomenology of literary response. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature: Proceedings of the Fourth Biannual Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, IGEL (pp. 50-60). Siegen, Germany: LUMIS-Publications.
14. Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., Busink, R., & Cey, R. (1996, August). Aesthetic attitude and insight-oriented reading: The realization of personal meanings in literary texts. Paper presented at the conference of the International Association for Empirical Aesthetics, Prague, The Czech Republic.
15. Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Meunier, R. (1996, August). Loss, depression, and feeling realization during reading. Paper presented at the conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, IGEL, Banff, Canada.
16. Kuiken, D., Schopflocher, D., & Wild, T. C. (1989). Numerically aided phenomenology: A demonstration. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 10, 373-392.
17. Miall, D. S. (1989). Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 55-78.
18. Miall, D. S. (1995). Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23, 275-298.
19. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994a). Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes, 17, 337-352.
20. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994b). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389-407.
21. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37-58.
22. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1998). The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25, 327-341.
23. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (in press). Shifting perspectives: Readers' feelings and literary response. In W. van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds.), New perspectives on narrative perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.
24. Mukařovský, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague School reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17-30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. (Original work published 1932)
25. O'Faoláin, S. (1980). The trout. In The collected stories of Seán O'Faoláin (pp. 383-386). London: Constable.
26. Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (1998, August). Enactment versus interpretation: A phenomenological study of readers 'responses to Coleridge's "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner." Paper presented at the sixth biannual conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, IGEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands. (Available online at: http://www.lumis.uni-siegen.de/ igel/en/igelconf/c 1998/sikora.pdf)
27. Smith, B. H. (1988). Contingencies of value: Alternative perspectives for critical theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Steen, G. (1994). Understanding metaphor in literature. London: Longman.
29. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287.
30. van Dijk, T. (1979). Advice on theoretical poetics. Poetics, 8, 569-608.
31. van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.
32. Zholkovsky, A. (1984). Themes and taxis: Toward a poetics of expressiveness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33. Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
34. Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Toward a model of literary comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 241-255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
36. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21, 386-397.
37. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.