The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and encyclopedic items

Poetics

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 63-80

  Hanauer, David ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007256907     PISSN: 0304422X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-422X(98)00011-4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baynham, M., 1995. Literacy practices: Investigating literacy in social contexts. London: Longman.
2. Bazerman, C., 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Berkenkotter, C. and T.N. Huckin, 1993. Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication 10, 475-509.
4. Berman, R.A., 1987. Productivity in the lexicon: New word formation in modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica 21, 225-254.
5. Bhatia, J., 1993. Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
6. Burnshaw, S., T. Carmi and E. Spicehandler, 1989. The modern Hebrew poem itself. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Chapham, M.L., 1994. The emergence of genres: Some findings from an examination of first-grade writing. Written Communication 11, 348-380.
8. Culler, J. 1975. Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge.
9. Dias, P., 1987. Making sense of poetry. Ottawa: The Canadian Council of Teachers.
10. Fairley, I.R., 1989. The reader's need for conventions: When is a mushroom not a mushroom. In: W. van Peer (ed.), The taming of the text, 292-316. London: Routledge.
11. Finer-Mintz, R., 1968. Modern Hebrew poetry. London: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fish, S. 1980. Is there a text in this class: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Freedman, A. and P. Medway, 1994a. Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
14. Freedman, A. and P. Medway, 1994b. Learning and teaching genre. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Hanauer, D., 1995. The effects of educational background on literary and poetic text categorization judgements. In: G. Rusch (ed.), Empirical approaches to literature, 338-347. Siegen: LUMIS.
16. Hanauer, D., 1996a. Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics 23, 363-380.
17. Hanauer, D., 1996b. Academic literary competence testing. Journal of Literary Semantics 25(2), 142-153.
18. Hanauer, D. 1997. Student teacher's knowledge of literacy practices in school. Teaching and Teacher Education 13(8), 847-862.
19. Harker, J.W., 1994. 'Plain sense' and 'poetic significance': Tenth-grade readers reading two poems. Poetics 22, 199-218.
20. Hoffstaedter, P. 1987. Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation. Poetics 16, 75-91.
21. Hoorn, J., 1996. Psychophysiology and literary processing: ERPs to semantic and phonological deviations in reading small verses. In: R.J. Kruez and M.S. MacNealy (eds.), Empirical approaches to liaterature and aesthetics, 117-132. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
22. Jakobson, R., 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In: T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350-377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Kress, G., 1989. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Marshall, S., 1991. A genre-based approach to the teaching of report writing. English for Special Purposes 10, 3-13.
25. McCarthy, J., 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373-418.
26. Meutsch, D., 1989. How to do thoughts with words II: Degrees of explicitness in think-aloud during the comprehension of literary and expository texts with different types of readers. Poetics 18, 45-71.
27. Ravid, D., 1990. Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica 24, 289-346.
28. Schmidt, S.J., 1982. Foundations for the empirical study of literature. (Trans. R. de Beaugrande.) Hamburg: Buske.
29. Schmidt, S.J., 1989. On the construction of fiction and the invention of facts. Poetics 18, 319-335.
30. Shimron, J., 1980. Psychological processes behind the comprehension of poetic texts. Instructional Science 9, 43-66.
31. Swales, J., 1990. Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Thorne, J., 1989. What is a poem? In: W. van Peer (ed.), The taming of the text. London: Routledge.
33. Todorov, T. 1991. Genres in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Tzedka, R., 1986. Young modern poetry. Tel-Aviv: Rechess Press.
35. van Dijk, T.A. and W. Kintsch, 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
36. van Peer, W., 1986. Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. Wolfboro, NH: Croom Helm.
37. van Peer, W., 1990. The measurement of metre: Its cognitive and affective functions. Poetics 19, 259-275.
38. Veihoff, R., 1986. How to construct a literary poem? Poetics 15, 287-306.
39. Yaoz, H., 1980. Young poetry: An anthology. Tel-Aviv: Aked.
40. Zwaan, R., 1991. Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics 20, 139-156.
41. Zwaan, R., 1993. Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins