Mechanisms of combination in the processing of obscure poems

Journal of Literary Semantics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 151-166

  Yaron, Iris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248708347     PISSN: 03417638     EISSN: 16133838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/jlse.2003.009     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Cummings, E. E. (1991). Complete Poems 1904-1962. London: W.W. Norton & Company.
2. van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Cognitive Processing of Literary Discourse. Poetics Today 1(1-2) 142-159.
3. Gerhart, M. (1989). The dilemma of the text: How to belong to genre. Poetics 18: 355-73.
4. van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and Psychology: Investigation of Foregrounding. London/Sydney/ Wolfeboro/New Hampshire: Groom Helm.
5. Pierre, J. (1976). Le Symbolisme. Paris: Fernand Hazan.
6. Pratt, M. L. (1977). Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington: Indiana Uni-versity Press.
7. Press, J. (1963). The Chequered Shade: Reflections on Obscurity in Poetry. London: Oxford University Press.
8. Riffaterre, M. (1984). Semiotics of Poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9. Schmidt, S. J. (1980). Receptional problems with contemporary narrative texts and some of their rea-sons. Poetics 9:119-146.
10. Shimron, J. (1980). Psychological process behind the comprehension of a poetic text. Instruction Sciences 9: 44-63.
11. Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, L.T. Lemon and M. J. Reis (eds.), 3-24. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
12. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1989) La Pertinence: Communication et Cognition. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit.
13. Steiner, G. (1978). On Difficulty and Other Essays. Oxford/Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
14. Striedter, J. (1989). Literary Structure, Evolution and Value: Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. Viehoff, R. (1988). Preliminary remarks to coherence in understanding poems. In From Verbal Constitution to Symbolic Meaning, J. Petöfi, and T. Olivi (eds.), 397-414. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
17. Yaron, I. (1997). Poésie difficile: Rupture entre discours et Communication. Compar(a)ison: An International Review of Comparative Literature 2, 105-127.
18. - (2000). La Synesthésie vue de voyelles. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 27 (1-2): 197-211.
19. - (2002). Processing of obscure poetic texts: Mechanisms of selection. Journal of Literary Semantics 31 (2): 133-170.