The comparative reliability and feasibility of the past-year Canadian diet history questionnaire II: Comparison of the paper and web versions

Nutrients

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Lo Siou, Geraldine ^a   Csizmadi, Ilona ^b   Boucher, Beatrice A ^c,d   Akawung, Alianu K ^a   Whelan, Heather K ^e   Sharma, Michelle ^a   Al Rajabi, Ala ^a   Vena, Jennifer E ^a   Kirkpatrick, Sharon I ^f   Koushik, Anita ^g   Massarelli, Isabelle ^h   Rondeau, Isabelle ^h   Robson, Paula J ^a  

^a ALBERTA HEALTH SERVICES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c CANCER CARE ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^g CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^h HEALTH CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dietary assessment; Feasibility; Food frequency questionnaire; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUTRIENT; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; AGED; BODY MASS; CANADA; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIETARY FIBER; FAT INTAKE; FEMALE; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION; PROTEIN INTAKE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE;

CARBOHYDRATE DIET; FAT INTAKE; PROTEIN INTAKE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY MASS INDEX; CANADA; DIET; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; DIETARY FATS; DIETARY FIBER; DIETARY PROTEINS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; NUTRITION SURVEYS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE;

EID: 85012935675     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20726643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/nu9020133     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fraser, G.E.; Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Henning, S.M.; Fan, J.; Knutsen, S.F.; Haddad, E.H.; Sabaté, J.; Beeson, W.L.; Bennett, H. Biomarkers of dietary intake are correlated with corresponding measures from repeated dietary recalls and food-frequency questionnaires in the Adventist Health Study-2. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 586-594. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Subar, A.F.; Thompson, F.E.; Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; Hurwitz, P.; McNutt, S.; McIntosh, A.; Rosenfeld, S. Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: The Eating at America’s Table Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 154, 1089-1099. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Tucker, K.L. Assessment of usual dietary intake in population studies of gene-diet interaction. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2007, 17, 74-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Shim, J.-S.; Oh, K.; Kim, H.C. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol. Health 2014, 36, e2014009. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Freedman, L.S.; Midthune, D.; Carroll, R.J.; Commins, J.M.; Arab, L.; Baer, D.J.; Moler, J.E.; Moshfegh, A.J.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Prentice, R.L., et al. Application of a new statistical model for measurement error to the evaluation of dietary self-report instruments. Epidemiology 2015, 26, 925-933. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. National Cancer Institute. Dietary Assessment Primer. Available online: https://dietassessmentprimer.cancer.gov/ (accessed on 8 November 2016).
7. Thompson, F.E.; Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Subar, A.F.; Reedy, J.; Schap, T.E.; Wilson, M.M.; Krebs-Smith, S.M. The National Cancer Institute’s Dietary Assessment Primer: A resource for diet research. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 115, 1986-1995. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Carroll, R.J.; Midthune, D.; Subar, A.F.; Shumakovich, M.; Freedman, L.S.; Thompson, F.E.; Kipnis, V. Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 175, 340-347. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Thompson, F.E.; Subar, A.F. Dietary assessment methodology. In Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease; Coulston, A.M., Boushey, C.J., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: London, UK, 2008; pp. 3-39.
10. Block, G.; Hartman, A.M.; Dresser, C.M.; Carroll, M.D.; Gannon, J.; Gardner, L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1986, 124, 453-469. [PubMed]
11. Willett, W.C.; Sampson, L.; Stampfer, M.J.; Rosner, B.; Bain, C.; Witschi, J.; Hennekens, C.H.; Speizer, F.E. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1985, 122, 51-65. [PubMed]
12. Thompson, F.E.; Subar, A.F.; Brown, C.C.; Smith, A.F.; Sharbaugh, C.O.; Jobe, J.B.; Mittl, B.; Gibson, J.T.; Ziegler, R.G. Cognitive research enhances accuracy of food frequency questionnaire reports: Results of an experimental validation study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2002, 102, 212-225. [CrossRef]
13. National Cancer Institute. Diet History Questionnaire II and Canadian Diet History Questionnaire II (C-DHQII). Available online: https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/dhq2/ (accessed on 8 November 2016).
14. Csizmadi, I.; Boucher, B.A.; Lo Siou, G.; Massarelli, I.; Rondeau, I.; Garriguet, D.; Koushik, A.; Elenko, J.; Subar, A.F. Using national dietary intake data to evaluate and adapt the US Diet History Questionnaire: The stepwise tailoring of an FFQ for Canadian use. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 3247-3255. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Csizmadi, I.; Kahle, L.; Ullman, R.; Dawe, U.; Zimmerman, T.P.; Friedenreich, C.M.; Bryant, H.; Subar, A.F. Adaptation and evaluation of the National Cancer Institute’s Diet History Questionnaire and nutrient database for Canadian populations. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10, 88-96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Kristal, A.R.; Kolar, A.S.; Fisher, J.L.; Plascak, J.J.; Stumbo, P.J.; Weiss, R.; Paskett, E.D. Evaluation of web-based, self-administered, graphical food frequency questionnaire. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 114, 613-621. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Storey, K.E. A changing landscape: Web-based methods for dietary assessment in adolescents. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2015, 18, 437-445. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Robson, P.J.; Solbak, N.M.; Haig, T.R.; Whelan, H.K.; Vena, J.E.; Akawung, A.K.; Rosner, W.K.; Brenner, D.R.; Cook, L.S.; Csizmadi, I., et al. Design, methods and demographics from phase I of Alberta’s Tomorrow Project cohort: A prospective cohort profile. CMAJ Open 2016, 4, E515-E527. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Awadalla, P.; Boileau, C.; Payette, Y.; Idaghdour, Y.; Goulet, J.-P.; Knoppers, B.; Hamet, P.; Laberge, C. CARTaGENE Project Cohort profile of the CARTaGENE study: Quebec’s population-based biobank for public health and personalized genomics. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2013, 42, 1285-1299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Schleyer, T.K.; Forrest, J.L. Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2000, 7, 416-425. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Boeckner, L.S.; Pullen, C.H.; Walker, S.N.; Abbott, G.W. A.; Block, T. Use and reliability of the World Wide Web version of the Block Health Habits and History Questionnaire with older rural women. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2002, 34, S20-S24. [CrossRef]
22. Beasley, J.M.; Davis, A.; Riley, W.T. Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire. Public Health Nutr. 2009, 12, 651-659. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. González Carrascosa, R.; García Segovia, P.; Martínez Monzó, J. Paper and pencil vs. online self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) applied to university population: A pilot study. Nutr. Hosp. 2011, 26, 1378-1384. [PubMed]
24. Bryant, H.; Robson, P.J.; Ullman, R.; Friedenreich, C.; Dawe, U. Population-based cohort development in Alberta, Canada: A feasibility study. Chronic Dis. Can. 2006, 27, 51-59. [PubMed]
25. Bonett, D.G. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1331-1335. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. National Cancer Institute. C-DHQ II forms and Diet Calc files. Available online: https://www.canadiandhqii.com/survey_resources.html (accessed on 10 February 2017).
27. Willett, W.C.; Howe, G.R.; Kushi, L.H. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 65, 1220S-1228S. [PubMed]
28. Altman, D.G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research, 1st ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC: London, UK, 1991.
29. Cicchetti, D.V. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol. Assess. 1994, 6, 284-290. [CrossRef]
30. Bland, J.; Altman, D. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1999, 8, 135-160. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Bland, J.; Altman, D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 327, 307-310. [CrossRef]
32. Cohen, J. A Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960, 20, 37-46. [CrossRef]
33. Health Canada. Canadian guidelines for body weight classification in adults. Available online: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/weights-poids/guide-ld-adult/index-eng.php (accessed on 28 November 2016).
34. Statistics Canada. Population, urban and rural, by province and territory (Alberta). Available online: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo62j-eng.htm (accessed on 28 November 2016).
35. Subar, A.F.; Kipnis, V.; Troiano, R.P.; Midthune, D.; Schoeller, D.A.; Bingham, S.; Sharbaugh, C.O.; Trabulsi, J.; Runswick, S.; Ballard-Barbash, R., et al. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: The OPEN study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 158, 1-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Kipnis, V.; Subar, A.F.; Midthune, D.; Freedman, L.S.; Ballard-Barbash, R.; Troiano, R.P.; Bingham, S.; Schoeller, D.A.; Schatzkin, A.; Carroll, R.J. Structure of dietary measurement error: Results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 158, 14-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Subar, A.F.; Midthune, D.; Kulldorff, M.; Brown, C.C.; Thompson, F.E.; Kipnis, V.; Schatzkin, A. Evaluation of alternative approaches to assign nutrient values to food groups in food frequency questionnaires. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 152, 279-286. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Archer, E.; Pavela, G.; Lavie, C.J. The inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES dietary data in nutrition and obesity research and the scientific formulation of national dietary guidelines. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015, 90, 911-926. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Subar, A.F.; Freedman, L.S.; Tooze, J.A.; Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Boushey, C.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Thompson, F.E.; Potischman, N.; Guenther, P.M.; Tarasuk, V., et al. Addressing current criticism regarding the value of self-report dietary data. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 2639-2645. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; Freedman, L.S.; Bingham, S.; Schatzkin, A.; Subar, A.; Carroll, R.J. Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 153, 394-403. [CrossRef] [PubMed]