Evaluation of a web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire

Public Health Nutrition

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 651-659

  Beasley, Jeannette M ^a,b   Davis, Amanda ^a,c   Riley, William T ^a,d  

^a Personal Improvement Computer Systems Inc   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Diet; Epidemiological methods; Internet; Nutrition assessment; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIETARY INTAKE; DOCUMENTATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUTRIENT; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS; VALIDITY; WEB BASED PICTORIAL DIET HISTORY QUESTIONNAIRE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; DIET RECORDS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (U.S.); NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650382092     PISSN: 13689800     EISSN: 14752727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980008002668     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V et al. (2001) Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: the Eating at America's Table Study. Am J Epidemiol 154, 1089-1099. (Pubitemid 33140629)
2. Freedman LS, Potischman N, Kipnis V et al. (2006) A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat-breast cancer relationship. Int J Epidemiol 35, 1011-1021. (Pubitemid 44540756)
3. Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ et al. (2003) A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24 hr recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol 32, 1054-1062. (Pubitemid 38072695)
4. Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP et al. (2003) Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study. Am J Epidemiol 158, 1-13. (Pubitemid 36745325)
5. Kristal AR, Peters U & Potter JD (2005) Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14, 2826-2828.
6. Willett WC & Hu FB (2006) Not the time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire: point. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15, 1757-1758. (Pubitemid 44664244)
7. Kristal AR & Potter JD (2006) Not the time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire: counterpoint. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15, 1759-1760. (Pubitemid 44664245)
8. Willett WC & Hu FB (2007) The food frequency questionnaire. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16, 182-183.
9. NutritionQuest (2007) NutritionQuest: Questionnaires and Screeners. http://www.nutritionquest.com/products/questionnaires-screeners.htm (accessed November 2007).
10. National Cancer Institute, Risk Factor Monitoring and Methods, Cancer Control and Population Sciences (2007) Diet History Questionnaire: Web-based DHQ. http://riskfactor.cancer.gov/DHQ/webquest/(accessed November 2007).
11. Conway JM, Ingwersen LA & Moshfegh AJ (2004) Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA fivestep multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 595-603.
12. Conway JM, Ingwersen LA, Vinyard BT & Moshfegh AJ (2003) Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 1171-1178.
13. National Cancer Institute, Risk Factor Monitoring and Methods, Cancer Control and Population Sciences (2007) Diet History Questionnaire: Diet*Calc Software. http://riskfactor.cancer.gov/DHQ/dietcalc/index.html (accessed November 2007).
14. Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V & Warm D (2002) Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires - a review. Public Health Nutr 5, 567-587. (Pubitemid 34887186)
15. Neuhouser ML, Tinker L, Shaw PA et al. (2008) Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the women's health initiative. Am J Epidemiol 167, 1247-1259. (Pubitemid 351670635)
16. Thompson FE, Subar AF, Brown CC et al. (2002) Cognitive research enhances accuracy of food frequency questionnaire reports: results of an experimental validation study. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 212-225.