Paper and pencil vs online self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) applied to university population: A pilot study;Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo de alimentos autoadministrado en formato papel vs online aplicado a la población universitaria: Un estudio piloto

Nutricion Hospitalaria

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1378-1384

  Gonzalez Carrascosa R ^a   Garcia Segovia P ^a   Martinez Monzo J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Diet; Food frequency questionnaire; Online; University population

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CALORIC INTAKE; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIET; FAT INTAKE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; INTERNET; LIFESTYLE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PILOT STUDY; PROTEIN INTAKE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SMOKING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; BODY WEIGHT; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIET SURVEYS; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; DIETARY FATS; DIETARY PROTEINS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD; FOOD HABITS; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SMOKING; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858225232     PISSN: 02121611     EISSN: 16995198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3305/nh.2011.26.6.5261     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Oliveras López MJ, Pnieto Guindo P, Agudo Aponte E, Martínez Martínez F, Lo ́pez Garci ́a de la Serrana H, López Martínez MC. Evaluación nutricional de una población universitaria. Nutr Hosp 2006; 21 (2): 179-83.
2. Jackson M, Walker S, Cade J, Forrester T, Cruickshank JK, Wilks R. Reproducibility and validity of a quantitative foodfrequency questionnaire among Jamaicans of African origin. Pub Health Nutr 2001; 4 (5): 971-80.
3. Abegunde DO, Stanciole AE. The economic impact of chronic disease: How do hoseholds respond to shocks? Evidence from Russia. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66: 2296-2307.
4. Block G, Thompson FE, Hartman AM, Larkin FA, Guire KE. Comparison of two dietary questionnaires validated against multiple dietary records collected during a 1 year period. J Am Diet Assoc 1992; 92: 686-93.
5. Block G. Human dietary assessment: methods and issues. Prev Med 1989; 18: 653-60.
6. Mares-Perlman JA, Klein BE, Klein R, Ritter LL, Fisher MR, Freudenheim JL. A diet history questionnaire ranks nutrient intakes in middle- aged and older men and women similarly to multiple food records. J Nutr 1993; 123: 489-501.
7. Munger RG, Folsom AR, Kushi LH, Kaye SA, Sellers TA. Dietary assessment of older Iowa women with a food frequency questionnaire: nutrient intake, reproducibility, and comparison with 24-hour dietary recall interviews. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 192-200.
8. Potosky AL, Block G, Hartman AM. The apparent validity of diet questionnaires is influenced by number of diet-record days used for comparison. J Am Diet Assoc 1990; 90: 810-13.
9. Zulkifli S, Yu S. The food frequency method for dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc 1992; 92: 681-85.
10. Block G, Hartman AM. Issues in reproducibility and validity of dietary studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 50: 1133-38.
11. Boeckner LS, Pullen CH, Walker SN, Abbott GW, Block T. Use and reliability of the World Wide Web Version of the Block Health Habits and History Questionnaire with Older Rural Women. J Nutr Educ Behav 2002; 34: S20-S24.
12. Thompson FE, Subar AF. Dietary assessment methodology. In: Coulston AM, Boushey CJ, eds. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2008.
13. Thompson FE, Subar AF, Loria CM, Reedy JL, Baranowski T. Need for technological innovation in dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110 (1): 48-51.
14. Grootenhuis PA, Westenbrink CS, D. De Neeling JN, Kok FJ, Bouter LM. A semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in epidemiologic research among the elderly: validation by comparison with dietary history. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48 (7): 859-68.
15. Friis S, Kjaer SK, Stripp C, Overvad K. Reproducibility and Relative Validity of a Self- Administered Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Applied to Younger Women. Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50 (3): 303-11.
16. Willett W. Invited commentary: a further look at dietary questionnaire validation. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 154: 1100-2.
17. Subar AF, Ziegler RG, Thompson FE, Johnson CC, Weissfeld JL, Reding D, Kavounis KH, Hayes RB. Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 404-9.
18. Georgea GC, Milania TJ, Hanss-Nussa H, Kimb M, Freeland- Gravesa JH. Development and validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for young adult women in the southwestern United States. Nutr Res 2004; 24: 29-43.
19. Finegan JE, Allen NJ. Computerized and Written Questionnaires: Are They Equivalent? Comput Hum Behav 1994; 10 (4): 483-96.
20. Health A-LM, Skeaff CM, Gibson RS. The relative validity of a computer food frequency questionnaire for estimating intake of dietary iron and its absorption modifiers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000; 54: 592-9.
21. Vandelanotte C, Matthys C, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Reliability and validity of a computerized questionnaire to measure fat intake in Belgium. Nutr Res 2004; 24: 621-31.
22. Matthys C, Pynaert I, De Keyzer W, et al. Validity and reproducibility of an Adolescent Web-Based Food Frequency Questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc 2007; 107: 605-10.
23. Wong SS, Boushey CJ, Novotny R, Gustafson DR. Evaluation of a Computerized Food Frequency Questionnaire to Estimate Calcium Intake of Asian, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic White Youth. J Am Diet Assoc 2008; 108: 539-43.
24. Knapp H, Kirk SA. Using pencil and paper, Internet and touchtone phones for self-administered surveys: does methodology matter? Comput Hum Behav 2003; 19: 117-34.
25. Lyu L-C, Hankin JH, Liu LQ, Wilkens LR, Lee JH, Goodman MT, Kolonel, LN. Telephone vs. face-to-face interviews for quantitative food frequency questionnaires. J Am Diet Assoc 1998; 98 (1): 44-48.
26. Willet WC, Sampson L, Browne ML, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. The use of a self-administered questionnaire to assess diet four years in the past. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 127: 188-199.
27. Caan B, Hiatt RA, Owen AM. Mailed dietary surveys: response rates, error rates, and the effect of omitted food items on nutrient values. Epidemiology 1991; 2: 430-36.
28. Fleming M. Evaluating adolescent responses to a computer health information system. J Adolesc Health 1997; 20: 166.
29. Boyes A, Newell S, Girgis A. Rapid assessment of psychosocial well-being: Are computers the way forward in a clinical setting? Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 27-35.
30. Bell DS, Mangione CM, Kahn CE. Randomized testing of alternative survey formats using anonymous volunteers on the World Wide Web. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 616-20.
31. Mangunkusumo RT, Moorman PW, Van Den Berg-de Ruiter AE, Van Der Lei J, De Koning HJ, Raat H. Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study. J Adolesc Health 2005; 36; 70e1-70e6
32. Klohe DM, Clarke KK, George GC, Milani TJ, Hanss-nuss H; Freeland-graves J. Relative validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire for a triethnic population of 1-year-old to 3-year-old children from low-income families. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; 105: 727-34.
33. Togo P, Heitmann BL, Sørensen TIA, osler M. Consistency of food intake factors by different dietary assessment methods and population groups. Br J Nutr 2003; 90: 667-78.