Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners

Journal of Prosthodontic Research

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 450-459

  Fukazawa, Shota ^a   Odaira, Chikayuki ^a   Kondo, Hisatomo ^a  

^a IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Intraoral scanner; Optical impression; Precision; Trueness

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DEVICES; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 85012886081     PISSN: 18831958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beuer, F., Schweiger, J., Edelhoff, D., Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204 (2008), 505–511.
2. Mehl, A., Ender, A., Mörmann, W., Attin, T., Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12 (2009), 11–28.
3. Nayyar, N., Yilmaz, B., McGlumphy, E., Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant–supported, cement–retained restorations. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 210–215.
4. Zimmer, S., Göhlich, O., Rüttermann, S., Lang, H., Raab, W.H., C.R, Barthel, Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study. Oper Dent 33 (2008), 484–487.
5. Svanborg, P., Skjerven, H., Carlsson, P., Eliasson, A., Karlsson, S., Örtorp, A., Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int J Dent, 2014, 2014, 534382.
6. Almeida e Silva, J.S., Erdelt, K., Edelhoff, D., Araújo, É., Stimmelmayr, S., Vieira, L.C., et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit Zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18 (2014), 515–523.
7. Miyazaki, T., Hotta, Y., CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 9 (2011), 97–106.
8. Syrek, A., Reich, G., Ranftl, D., Klein, C., Cerny, B., Brodesser, J., Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38 (2010), 553–559.
9. Scotti, R., Cardelli, P., Baldissara, P., Monaco, C., Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent(October), 2011.
10. Brawek, P.K., Wolfart, S., Endres, L., Kirsten, A., Reich, S., The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 2119–2125.
11. Andriessen, F.S., Rijkens, D.R., van der Meer, W.J., Wismeijer, D.W., Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 111 (2014), 186–194.
12. Kurbad, A., Kurbad, S., CAD/CAM-based implant abutments made of lithium disilicate. Int J Comput Dent 16 (2013), 125–141.
13. Seelbach, P., Brueckel, C., Wöstmann, B., Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1759–1764.
14. Conrad, H.J., Seong, W.J., Pesun, I.J., Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98 (2007), 389–404.
15. Miyazaki, T., Nakamura, T., Matsumura, H., Ban, S., Kobayashi, T., Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res 57 (2013), 236–261.
16. Lin, W.S., Metz, M.J., Pollini, A., Ntounis, A., Morton, D., Digital data acquisition for a CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium framework and zirconium oxide restorations for an implant-supported fixed complete dental prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1324–1329.
17. Stober, T., Bermejo, J.L., Rammelsberg, P., Schmitter, M., Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil 41 (2014), 314–322.
18. Fluegge, T., Att, W., Metzger, M., Nelson, K., ANovel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies-an experimental approach. J Prosthodont(October), 2015.
19. Hamza, T.A., Ezzat, H.A., El-Hossary, M.M., Katamish, H.A., Shokry, T.E., Rosenstiel, S.F., Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 83–87.
20. Kim, B.C., Lee, C.E., Park, W., Kang, S.H., Zhengguo, P., Yi, C.K., et al. Integration accuracy of digital dental models and 3-dimensional computerized tomography images by sequential point- and surface-based markerless registration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110 (2010), 370–378.
21. van der Meer, W.J., Andriessen, F.S., Wismeijer, D., Ren, Y., Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e43312.
22. Boeddinghaus, M., Breloer, E.S., Rehmann, P., Wöstmann, B., Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 19 (2015), 2027–2034.
23. Patzelt, S.B., Vonau, S., Stampf, S., Att, W., Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc 144 (2013), 914–920.
24. Patzelt, S.B., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J.R., Att, W., Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 18 (2014), 1687–1694.
25. Güth, J.F., Keul, C., Stimmelmayr, M., Beuer, F., Edelhoff, D., Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1201–1208.
26. Nedelcu, R.G., Persson, A.S., Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1461–1471.
27. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 121–128.
28. DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: general principles and definitions(ISO 5725-1:1994). 1997, Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin.
29. de França, D.G., Morais, M.H., das Neves, F.D., Barbosa, G.A., Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 113 (2015), 22–28.
30. Tamac, E., Toksavul, S., Toman, M., Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 909–913.
31. Shim, J.S., Lee, J.S., Lee, J.Y., Choi, Y.J., Shin, S.W., Ryu, J.J., Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system. J Appl Oral Sci 23 (2015), 515–522.
32. Ajioka, H., Kihara, H., Odaira, C., Kobayashi, T., Kondo, H., Examination of the position accuracy of implant abutments reproduced by intra-oral optical impression. PLoS One, 10, 2016, e0164048, 10.1371/journal.pone.0164048.