Wearable technology in the operating room: A systematic review

BMJ Innovations

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 55-63

  Kolodzey, Lauren ^a   Grantcharov, Peter D ^a   Rivas, Homero ^b   Schijven, Marlies P ^c   Grantcharov, Teodor P ^d  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERA; DEVICE SAFETY; EDUCATION; GOOGLE GLASS; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL DEVICE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATING ROOM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION; WEARABLE DEVICE; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 85011665505     PISSN: 20558074     EISSN: 2055642X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2016-000133     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Slade Shantz JA, Veillette CJ. The application of wearable technology in surgery: ensuring the positive impact of the wearable revolution on surgical patients. Front Surg 2014;1:39.
2. Armstrong DG, Rankin TM, Giovinco NA,. A heads-up display for diabetic limb salvage surgery: a view through the Google looking glass. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:951–6.
3. Davis CR, Rosenfield LK. Looking at plastic surgery through Google Glass: part 1. Systematic review of Google Glass evidence and the first plastic surgical procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:918–28.
4. Lukowicz P, Kirstein T, Tröster G. Wearable systems for health care applications. Methods Inf Med 2004;43:232–8.
5. Muensterer OJ, Lacher M, Zoeller C, et al. Google Glass in pediatric surgery: an exploratory study. Int J Surg 2014;12:281–9.
6. Adetayo OA, Midura D. Implementation of Google Glass technology in patient care: evaluating its potential benefits and pitfalls. Paediatr Anaesth 2015;25:755–6.
7. Google Glass—seeing the benefits for clinicians and patients. OR Manager 2015;31:20–2.
8. Assad-Kottner C, Hakeem A, Fontenot E, et al. “Tele-mentoring”: an interventional procedure using a wearable computer: first-in-man. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1022.
9. Aungst TD, Lewis TL. Potential uses of wearable technology in medicine: lessons learnt from Google Glass. Int J Clin Pract 2015;69:1179–83.
10. Chimenti PC, Mitten DJ. Google Glass as an alternative to standard fluoroscopic visualization for percutaneous fixation of hand fractures: a pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:328–30.
11. Datta N, MacQueen IT, Schroeder AD,. Wearable technology for global surgical teleproctoring. J Surg Educ 2015;72:1290–5.
12. Frankel J. Google Glass liability risks. Bull Am Coll Surg 2015;100:39.
13. Funk S, Lee DH. Optical head-mounted computer display for education, research, and documentation in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2016;41:150–3.
14. Glauser W. Doctors among early adopters of Google Glass. CMAJ 2013;185:1385.
15. Hamann D, Mortensen WS, Hamann CR,. Experiences in adoption of teledermatology in Mohs micrographic surgery: using smartglasses for intraoperative consultation and defect triage. Surg Innov 2014;21:653–4.
16. Hashimoto DA, Phitayakorn R, Fernandez-del Castillo C,. A blinded assessment of video quality in wearable technology for telementoring in open surgery: the Google Glass experience. Surg Endosc 2016;30:372–8.
17. Kantor J. First look: Google Glass in dermatology, Mohs surgery, and surgical reconstruction. JAMA Dermatol 2014;150:1191.
18. Kantor J. Application of Google Glass to Mohs micrographic surgery: a pilot study in 120 patients. Dermatol Surg 2015;41:288–9.
19. Knight HM, Gajendragadkar PR, Bokhari A. Wearable technology: using Google Glass as a teaching tool. BMJ Case Rep 2015.
20. McLean TR. Google Glass implications. Bull Am Coll Surg 2014;99:66.
21. Moshtaghi O, Kelley KS, Armstrong WB,. Using Google Glass to solve communication and surgical education challenges in the operating room. Laryngoscope 2015;125:2295–7.
22. Mitrasinovic S, Camacho E, Trivedi N,. Clinical and surgical applications of smart glasses. Technol Health Care 2015;23:381–401.
23. Niamtu J, III. Google Glass: dermatologic and cosmetic surgery applications. Dermatol Surg 2014;40:1150–2.
24. Parslow GR. Commentary: Google glass: a head-up display to facilitate teaching and learning. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2014;42:91–2.
25. Peregrin T. Surgeons see future applications for Google Glass. Bull Am Coll Surg 2014;99:9–16.
26. Rahimy E, Garg SJ. Google Glass for recording scleral buckling surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133:710–11.
27. Schreinemacher MH, Graafland M, Schijven MP. Google glass in surgery. Surg Innov 2014;21:651–2.
28. Vallurupalli S, Paydak H, Agarwal S,. Wearable technology to improve education and patient outcomes in a cardiology fellowship program-a feasibility study. Health Technol 2013;3:267–70.
29. Waxman BP. Medicine in small doses. Google Glass: a new dimension in surgical education or just another gimmick? ANZ J Surg 2014;84:810.
30. Ponce BA, Jennings JK, Clay TB,. Telementoring: use of augmented reality in orthopaedic education: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:e84.
31. Vorraber W, Voessner S, Stark G,. Medical applications of near-eye display devices: an exploratory study. Int J Surg 2014;12:1266–72.
32. Shao P, Ding H, Wang J,. Designing a wearable navigation system for image-guided cancer resection surgery. Ann Biomed Eng 2014;42:2228–37.
33. Pugh CM, Golden RN. Medical training in the Fitbit, Google Glass and Personal Information Era. WMJ 2015;114:168–9.
34. Makhni EC, Jobin CM, Levine WN,. Using wearable technology to record surgical videos. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2015;44:163–6.
35. Paro JA, Nazareli R, Gurjala A,. Video-based self-review: comparing Google Glass and GoPro technologies. Ann Plast Surg 2015;74(Suppl 1):S71–4.
36. Ponce BA, Menendez ME, Oladeji LO,. Emerging technology in surgical education: combining real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices. Orthopedics 2014;37:751–7.
37. Garg S. Stereoscopic surgical recording using GoPro cameras—reply. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133:1484.
38. Lee B, Chen BR, Chen BB,. Recording stereoscopic 3D neurosurgery with a head-mounted 3D camera system. Br J Neurosurg 2015;29:371–3.
39. Nair AG, Kamal S, Dave TV,. Surgeon point-of-view recording: using a high-definition head-mounted video camera in the operating room. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63:771–4.
40. Birnbaum FA, Wang A, Brady CJ. Stereoscopic surgical recording using GoPro cameras: a low-cost means for capturing external eye surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133:1483–4.
41. Bizzotto N, Sandri A, Lavini F,. Video in operating room: GoPro HERO3 camera on surgeon's head to film operations—a test. Surg Innov 2014;21:338–40.
42. Warrian KJ, Ashenhurst M, Gooi A,. A novel combination point-of-view (POV) action camera recording to capture the surgical field and instrument ergonomics in oculoplastic surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;31:321–2.
43. Graves SN, Shenaq DS, Langerman AJ,. Video capture of plastic surgery procedures using the GoPro HERO 3+. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3:e312.
44. Aidlen JT, Glick S, Silverman K,. Head-motion-controlled video goggles: preliminary concept for an interactive laparoscopic image display (i-LID). J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:595–8.
45. Bichlmeier C, Heining SM, Rustaee M,. Virtually extended surgical drilling device: virtual mirror for navigated spine surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007;10:434–41.
46. Badiali G, Ferrari V, Cutolo F,. Augmented reality as an aid in maxillofacial surgery: validation of a wearable system allowing maxillary repositioning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:1970–6.
47. Block FE, Jr, Yablok DO, McDonald JS. Clinical evaluation of the ‘head-up’ display of anesthesia data. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1995;12:21–4.
48. Calvano CJ, Moran ME, Tackett LD,. New visualization techniques for in utero surgery: amnioscopy with a three-dimensional head-mounted display and a computer-controlled endoscope. J Endourol 1998;12:407–10.
49. Chen JC, Moffitt K, Levy ML. Head-mounted display system for microneurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1997;68:25–32.
50. Chen X, Xu L, Wang Y,. Development of a surgical navigation system based on augmented reality using an optical see-through head-mounted display. J Biomed Inform 2015;55:124–31.
51. Fujii Y, Kihara K, Yoshida S,. A three-dimensional head-mounted display system (RoboSurgeon system) for gasless laparoendoscopic single-port partial cystectomy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2014;9:638–43.
52. Geis WP. Head-mounted video monitor for global visual access in mini-invasive surgery. An initial report. Surg Endosc 1996;10:768–70.
53. Herron DM, Lantis JC, II, Maykel J,. The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display. A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies. Surg Endosc 1999;13:751–5.
54. Igarashi T. Editorial comment to new three-dimensional head-mounted display system, TMDU-S-3D system, for minimally invasive surgery application: procedures for gasless single-port radical nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2012;19:890.
55. Ishioka J, Kihara K, Higuchi S,. New head-mounted display system applied to endoscopic management of upper urinary tract carcinomas. Int Braz J Urol 2014;40:842–5.
56. Kihara K, Fujii Y, Masuda H,. New three-dimensional head-mounted display system, TMDU-S-3D system, for minimally invasive surgery application: procedures for gasless single-port radical nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2012;19:886–9.
57. Kihara K, Saito K, Komai Y,. Integrated image monitoring system using head-mounted display for gasless single-port clampless partial nephrectomy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2014;9:634–7.
58. Levy ML, Chen JC, Moffitt K,. Stereoscopic head-mounted display incorporated into microsurgical procedures: technical note. Neurosurgery 1998;43:392–5; discussion 95-6.
59. Lin YK, Yau HT, Wang IC,. A novel dental implant guided surgery based on integration of surgical template and augmented reality. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:543–53.
60. Liu D, Jenkins SA, Sanderson PM,. Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1135–46.
61. Liu D, Jenkins SA, Sanderson PM. Patient monitoring with head-mounted displays. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009;22:796–803.
62. Liu Y, Akers WJ, Bauer AQ,. Intraoperative detection of liver tumors aided by a fluorescence goggle system and multimodal imaging. Analyst 2013;138:2254–7.
63. Liu Y, Njuguna R, Matthews T,. Near-infrared fluorescence goggle system with complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor imaging sensor and see-through display. J Biomed Opt 2013;18:101303.
64. Maithel SK, Villegas L, Stylopoulos N,. Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue. Surg Endosc 2005;19:406–11.
65. Matsuoka Y, Kihara K, Kawashima K,. Integrated image navigation system using head-mounted display in “RoboSurgeon” endoscopic radical prostatectomy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2014;9:613–18.
66. Mondal SB, Gao S, Zhu N,. Binocular Goggle Augmented Imaging and Navigation System provides real-time fluorescence image guidance for tumor resection and sentinel lymph node mapping. Science 2015;5:12117.
67. Montgomery K, Thonier G, Stephanides M,. Virtual reality based surgical assistance and training system for long duration space missions. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001;81:315–21.
68. Mela CA, Patterson C, Thompson WK,. Stereoscopic integrated imaging goggles for multimodal intraoperative image guidance. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0141956.
69. Morisawa T, Kida H, Kusumi F,. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using head-mounted display. Gastroenterology 2015;149:290–1.e1.
70. Ormerod DF, Ross B, Naluai-Cecchini A. Use of an augmented reality display of patient monitoring data to enhance anesthesiologists’ response to abnormal clinical events. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003;94:248–50.
71. Ortega G, Wolff A, Baumgaertner M,. Usefulness of a head mounted monitor device for viewing intraoperative fluoroscopy during orthopaedic procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008;128:1123–6.
72. Prendergast CJ, Ryder BA, Abodeely A,. Surgical performance with head-mounted displays in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19(Suppl 1):S237–40.
73. Przkora R, McGrady W, Vasilopoulos T,. Evaluation of the head-mounted display for ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks in simulated regional anesthesia. Pain Med 2015;16:2192–4.
74. Sadda P, Azimi E, Jallo G,. Surgical navigation with a head-mounted tracking system and display. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013;184:363–9.
75. Sanderson PM, Watson MO, Russell WJ. Advanced patient monitoring displays: tools for continuous informing. Anesth Analg 2005;101:161–8, table of contents.
76. Sanderson P. The multimodal world of medical monitoring displays. Appl Ergon 2006;37:501–12.
77. Sanderson PM, Watson MO, Russell WJ,. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1787–97.
78. Tanaka H, Nakamura H, Tamaki E,. Brain surgery simulation system using VR technique and improvement of presence. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998;50:150–4.
79. Udani AD, Harrison TK, Howard SK,. Preliminary study of ergonomic behavior during simulated ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia using a head-mounted display. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:1277–80.
80. van Koesveld JJ, Tetteroo GW, de Graaf EJ. Use of head-mounted display in transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 2003;17:943–6.
81. van Lindert EJ, Grotenhuis JA, Beems T. The use of a head-mounted display for visualization in neuroendoscopy. Comput Aided Surg 2004;9:251–6.
82. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Figl M,. Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted display for oral implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:610–16.
83. Yoshida S, Kihara K, Takeshita H,. A head-mounted display-based personal integrated-image monitoring system for transurethral resection of the prostate. Wideochir 2014;9:644–9.
84. Yoshida S, Kihara K, Takeshita H,. Instructive head-mounted display system: pointing device using a vision-based finger tracking technique applied to surgical education. Wideochir 2014;9:449–52.
85. Yoshida S, Sasaki A, Sato C,. A Novel approach to surgical instructions for scrub nurses by using see-through-type head-mounted display. Comput Inform Nurs 2015;33:335–8.
86. Yoshida S, Kihara K, Takeshita H,. Head-mounted display for a personal integrated image monitoring system: ureteral stent placement. Urol Int 2015;94:117–20.
87. Yoshida S, Fukui N, Saito K,. Novel image monitoring system using a head-mounted display for assistants in da Vinci surgery. Int J Urol 2015;22:520–1.
88. Rolland JP, Fuchs H. Optical versus video see-through head-mounted displays in medical visualization. Presence 2000;9:287–309.
89. Liu Y, Bauer AQ, Akers WJ,. Hands-free, wireless goggles for near-infrared fluorescence and real-time image-guided surgery. Surgery 2011;149:689–98.
90. Chen TM, Vines LG, Wanitphakdeedecha R,. Electronically linked: wireless, discrete, hands-free communication to improve surgical workflow in Mohs and dermasurgery clinic. Dermatol Surg 2009;35:248–52.