Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: Advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1787-1797

  Sanderson, Penelope M ^a   Watson, Marcus O ^a   Russell, Walter John ^b,c   Jenkins, Simon ^c   Liu, David ^a   Green, Norris ^a,d   Llewelyn, Kristen ^b   Cole, Phil ^a   Shek, Vivian ^a   Krupenia, Stas S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^d PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIST; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BREATHING RATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; END TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE TENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETRY; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIDAL VOLUME; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEAD; HEARING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; METHODOLOGY; MONITOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; REACTION TIME; SOUND; TEACHING; VISION;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AWARENESS; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PATIENT SIMULATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS; SOUND; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 44649185628     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817325cb     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. APSF. Clinical Alarms. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.apsf.org/initiatives/clinical-alarms/on on Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation website, 30 January, 2007
2. Fitch WT. Sonification system using synthesized realistic bodily sounds modified by other medically important variables for physiologic monitoring US Patent 5730140. USA, 1998
3. Fitch WT, Kramer G. Sonifying the body electric: superiority of an auditory over a visual display in a complex, multivariate system. In: Kramer G, ed. Auditory display: sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces reading. MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994
4. Loeb RG, Fitch WT. A laboratory evaluation of an auditory display designed to enhance intraoperative monitoring. Anesth Analg 2002;94:362-8
5. Seagull FJ, Wickens C, Loeb RG. When is less more? Attention and workload in auditory, visual and redundant patientmonitoring conditions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting: Santa Monica, CA: HFES, 2001:1395-9
6. Watson M, Sanderson P. Sonification helps eyes-free respiratory monitoring and task timesharing. Hum Factors 2004;46:497-517
7. Watson M, Sanderson P. Designing for attention with sound: challenges and extensions to ecological interface design. Hum Factors 2007;49:331-46
8. Platt MJ. Correspondence: heads up display. Brit J Anaesth 2004;92:602-3
9. Ormerod DF, Ross B, Naluai-Cecchini A. Use of a see-through head-worn display of patient monitoring data to enhance anesthesiologists' response to abnormal clinical events. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'02). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2002:131-2
10. Ormerod DF, Ross B, Naluai-Cecchini A. Use of an augmented reality display of patient monitoring data to enhance anesthesiologists' response to abnormal clinical events. Stud Health Tech Informat 2003;94:248-50
11. Ross B, Ormerod DF, Hyde JP, Fine M. Use of a head-mounted display of patient monitoring data to enhance anesthesiologists' response to abnormal clinical events. 2003 International Meeting on Medical Simulation: Society for Technology in Anesthesia, 2002
12. Hudspith S. Controlling and monitoring induced unconsciousness: ergonomics and design in anaesthesia. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: HFES, 1990
13. Block FE, Yablock DO, McDonald JS. Clinical evaluation of the head-up display of anesthesia data. Preliminary communication. Int J Clin Monit Comp 1995;12:21-4
14. Sanderson P, Watson M, Russell WJ. Advanced patient monitoring displays: tools for continuous informing. Anesth Analg 2005;101:161-8
15. Woods DD. The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics 1995;38:2371-93
16. Sarter NB. The need for multisensory interfaces in support of effective attention allocation in highly dynamic event-driven domains: the case of cockpit automation. Int J Aviat Psychol 2000;10:231-45
17. Watson M, Sanderson P, Russell WJ. Tailoring reveals information requirements: the case of anaesthesia alarms. Interact Comput 2004;16:271-93
18. Watson M, Gill T. Earcon for intermittent information in monitoring environments. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia. Wollongong, NSW: IEEE Computer, 2004
19. Morris RW, Montano SR. Response times to visual and auditory alarms during anaesthesia. Anaesth Intens Care 1996;24:682-4
20. Via DK, Kyle RR, Kaye RD, Shields CH, Dymond MJ, Damiano LA, Mongan PD. A head mounted display of anesthesia monitoring data improves time to recognition of crisis events in simulated crisis scenarios. Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA2003), 2003
21. Via DK, Kyle RR, Geiger PG, Mongan PD. A head-mounted display of anesthesia monitoring data is of value and would be used by a majority of anesthesia providers. Anesth Analg 2002;95:S132
22. Crawford J, Neal A. A review of the perceptual and cognitive issues associated with the use of head-up displays in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psych 2006;16:113-33
23. Brodsky JB. What intraoperative monitoring makes sense? Chest 1999;115:S101-S105
24. Pedersen T, Moller AM, Pedersen BD. Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2003;96:426-31
25. Runciman WB. Qualitative versus quantitative research-balancing cost, yield and feasibility. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:146-7
26. Reason J. Human error: models and management. Brit Med J 2000;320:768-70
27. Liu D, Jenkins S, Watson M, Sanderson P, Russell WJ. Extending simulators to improve support for patient monitoring display research. Anesth Analg 2007;104:3S:S4
28. Watson M. Scalable earcons: bridging the gap between intermittent and continuous auditory displays. Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD). Queen Mary University of London, 2006
29. Sanderson P, Scott J, Johnston T, Mainzer J, Watanabe L, James J. MacSHAPA and the enterprise of Exploratory Sequential Data Analysis (ESDA). Int J Hum-Comput St 1994;41:633-81
30. Craven RM, McIndoe AK. Auditory monitoring-how much information do we register? Brit J Anaesth 1999;83:747-9
31. Lampotang S, Gravenstein JS, Euliano TY, van Meurs WL, Good ML, Kubilis P, Westhorpe R. Influence of pulse oximetry and capnography on time to diagnosis of critical incidents in anesthesia: a pilot study using a full-scale patient simulator. J Clin Monitor Comp 1998;14:313-21
32. Norman DA, Bobrow DG. On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cog Psych 1975;7:44-64
33. Cook R, Rasmussen J. "Going solid": a model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:130-4
34. Kjellberg A, Landstrom U, Tesarz M, Soderberg L, Akerlund E. The effects of nonphysical noise characteristics, ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work. J Env Psych 1996;16:123-36
35. Hodge B, Thompson JF. Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet 1990;335:891-4
36. Sanderson P, Tosh N, Philp S, Rudie J, Watson M, Russell WJ. Effects of ambient music on simulated anaesthesia monitoring with visual and auditory displays. Anaesth 2005;60:1073-80
37. Bregman AS. Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990