Wearable technology to improve education and patient outcomes in a cardiology fellowship program - A feasibility study

Health and Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 267-270

  Vallurupalli, S ^a   Paydak, H ^a   Agarwal, S K ^a   Agrawal, M ^a   Assad Kottner, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented reality in healthcare; Google glass; Medtech; Wearable technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGY; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLE TACHYCARDIA; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MICROCOMPUTER; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SAFETY;

EID: 84889264015     PISSN: 21907188     EISSN: 21907196     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12553-013-0065-4     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. De Oliveira GS, Jr RR, Fitzgerald PC, Chang R, McCarthy RJ. The association between frequency of self-reported medical errors and anesthesia trainee supervision: a survey of United States anesthesiology residents-in-training. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(4):892-7.
2. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Application of the "see one, do one, teach one" concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):1194-201.
3. Curry JI. 'See one, practise on a simulator, do one': the mantra of the modern surgeon. S Afr J Surg. 2011;49:4-6.
4. Pan E, Cusack C, Hook J, Vincent A, Kaelber DC, Bates DW, et al. The value of provider-to-provider telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(5):446-53.
5. Graber MA, Wyatt C, Kasparek L, Xu Y. Does simulator training for medical students change patient opinions and attitudes toward medical student procedures in the emergency department? Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:635-9.
6. Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e128.