The multimodal world of medical monitoring displays

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 37, Issue 4 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 501-512

  Sanderson, Penelope ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Display modalities; Medical monitoring

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; ERGONOMICS; HEALTH CARE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

ANESTHESIA; DISPLAY MODALITIES;

PATIENT MONITORING;

ANESTHETIC AGENT; SEVOFLURANE;

ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AWARENESS; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; CONTROL SYSTEM; DISPLAY SYSTEM; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ECOLOGY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEAD; HEALTH STATUS; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT MONITORING; SENSOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

EID: 33744931914     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. AAMI Human Engineering Committee. The Human Factors Design Process for Medical Devices (ANSI/AAMI HE-74:2001) (2001), Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Arlington, VA
2. Agutter J., Drews F., Syroid N., Westenskow D., Albert R., and Strayer D. Evaluation of graphic cardiovascular display in a high-fidelity simulator. Anesthesia Analgesia 97 5 (2003) 1403-1413
3. Anderson A.K. Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 134 (2005) 258-281
4. Benda P.J., and Sanderson P.M. New technology and work practice: modelling change with cognitive work analysis. Proceedings of the 7th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT99) (1999), IOS Press, Amsterdam 566-573
5. Berger A., Henik A., and Rafal R. Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 134 (2005) 207-221
6. Blattner M.M., Sumikawa D.A., and Greenberg R.M. Earcons and icons: their structure and common design principles. Hum. Comput. Interact. 4 (1989) 11-44
7. Blike G.T. Human factors engineering: it's all about usability. ASA Newsletter 68 10 (2004)
8. Blike G.T., Surgenor S.D., Whalen K., and Jensen J. Specific elements of a new hemodynamics display improves the performance of anesthesiologists. J. Clin. Monitor. Comput. 16 (2000) 485-491
9. Bliss J.P., Gilson R.D., and Deaton J.E. Human probability matching behaviour in response to alarms of varying reliability. Ergonomics 38 (1995) 2300-2312
10. Block F.E., Yablock D.O., and McDonald J.S. Clinical evaluation of the head-up display of anesthesia data. Preliminary communication. Int. J. Clin. Monitor. Comput. 12 1 (1995) 21-24
11. Block F.E., Rouse J.D., Hakala M., and Thompson C.L. A proposed new set of alarm sounds which satisfy standards and rationale to encode source information. J. Clin. Monitor. Comput. 16 (2000) 541-546
12. Broadbent D.E. The hidden preattentive process. Am. Psychol. 32 (1977) 109-118
13. Burns C.M., and Hajdukiewicz J.R. Ecological Interface Design (2004), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
14. Coiera, E.W., Tombs, V.J., Clutton-Brock, T.H., 1996. Attentional overload as a fundamental cause of human error in monitoring. Technical Report, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK, August.
15. Craven R.M., and McIndoe A.K. Auditory monitoring-how much information do we register?. Br. J. Anaesth. 83 (1999) 747-749
16. Dolan R.J. Emotion, cognition, and behaviour. Science 298 (2003) 1191-1194
17. Edworthy J., and Hellier E. Fewer but better auditory alarms will improve patient safety. Quality Safety Health Care 14 (2005) 212-215
18. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., and Wright J.H. The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. J. Exp. Psychol. 20 (1994) 317-329
19. Folke M., Cernerud L., Ekstrome M., and Hok B. Critical review of non-invasive respiratory monitoring in medical care. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 41 (2003) 377-383
20. Gaba D.M. Human error in dynamic medical domains. In: Bogner M.S. (Ed). Human Error in Medicine (1994), LEA, Hillsdale, NJ
21. Guillaume A., Pellieux L., Chastres V., and Drake C. Judging the urgency of non-vocal auditory signals: perceptual and cognitive processes. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 9 (2003) 196-212
22. Hajdukiewicz J.R., Vicente K.J., Doyle D.J., Milgram P., and Burns C.M. Modeling a medical environment: an ontology for integrated medical informatics design. Int. J. Med. Inform. 62 1 (2001) 79-99
23. Jarmasz J., Herdman C.M., and Johannsdottir K.R. Object-based attention and cognitive tunneling. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 11 (2005) 3-12
24. Jonides J. Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In: Long J.B., and Baddeley A.D. (Eds). Attention and Performance vol. IX (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 187-203
25. Jungk A., Thull B., Hoeft A., and Rau G. Ergonomic evaluation of an ecological interface and a profilogram display for hemodynamic monitoring. J. Clin. Monitor. Comput. 15 7-8 (1999) 469-479
26. Kennedy R.R., French R.A., and Gilles S. The effect of a model-based predictive display on the control of end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations during low-flow anesthesia. Anesthesia Analgesia 99 (2004) 1159-1163
27. Krupenia, S., Sanderson, P., Does a head-mounted display worsen inattentional blindness? In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 16-20 October, San Francisco, CA, in press.
28. Lampotang S., Gravenstein J., Euliano T., van Meurs W., Good M., Kublilis P., and Westhorpe R. Influence of pulse oximetry and capnography on time to diagnosis of critical incidents in anesthesia: a pliot study using a full-scale patient simulator. J. Clin. Monitor. Comput. 14 (1998) 313-321
29. Loeb R.G., and Fitch W.T. A laboratory evaluation of an auditory display designed to enhance intraoperative monitoring. Anesth. Analg. 94 (2002) 362-368
30. Locher S., Stadler K.S., Boehlen T., Bouillon T., Leibundgut D., Schumacher P.M., Wymann R., and Zbinden A.M. A new closed-loop control system for isoflurane using Bispectral Index outperforms manual control. Anesthesiology 101 (2004) 591-602
31. Miller A. Work domain analysis for intensive care unit patients. Cogn., Technol. Work 6 4 (2004) 207-222
32. Miller A., and Sanderson P. Evaluating an information display for clinical decision making in the ICU. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2003), HFES, Santa Monica, CA 576-580
33. Momtahan K., and Burns C. Applications of ecological interface design in supporting the nursing process. J. Healthcare Inform. Manage. 18 (2004) 74-82
34. Mondor T., and Finlay G. The perceived urgency of auditory warning alarms used in the hospital operating room is inappropriate. Canad. J. Anesthesia 50 (2003) 221-228
35. Morris R.W., and Mohacsi P.J. How well can anaesthetists discriminate pulse oximeter tones?. Anaesth. Intensive Care 33 (2005) 497-500
36. Myles P., Leslie K., McNeil J., Forbes A., Chan M., and for the B-Aware trial group. Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363 (2004) 1757-1763
37. Ng J.Y.C., Man J.C.F., Fels S., Dumont G., and Ansermino J.M. An evaluation of a vibro-tac tile display prototype for physiological monitoring. Anesthesia Analgesia 101 (2005) 1719-1724
38. Nyssen A.S., and Javaux D. Analysis of synchronisation constraints and associated errors in collaborative work environments. Ergonomics 39 (1996) 1249-1264
39. Olympio M. APSF workshop recommends new standards. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter 19 4 (2004)
40. Ormerod D.F., Ross B., and Naluai-Cecchini A. Use of a see-through head-worn display of patient monitoring data to enhance anesthesiologists' response to abnormal clinical events. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC.02) (2002), IEEE Computer, Los Alamos 131-132
41. Platt M.J. Heads up displays. Br. J. Anaesthesia 2 (2004) 602-603
42. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32 (1980) 3-25
43. Reising D.C., and Sanderson P. Work domain analysis and sensors I: principles and simple example. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 56 6 (2002) 569-596
44. Reising D.C., and Sanderson P. Minimally adequate instrumentation in an ecological interface may compromise failure diagnosis. Hum. Factors 46 2 (2004) 317-333
45. Remington R.W., Johnston J.C., and Yantis S. Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception Psychophys. 51 (1992) 279-290
46. Sanderson P.M., Anderson J., and Watson M. Extending ecological interface design to auditory displays. Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group (CHISIG) of the Ergonomics Society of Australia (OzCHI2000) (2000), CSIRO, Sydney 259-266
47. Sanderson P., Watson M., and Russell W.J. Advanced patient monitoring displays: tools for continuous informing. Anesthesia Analgesia 101 (2005) 161-168
48. Sanderson P., Wee A., and Lacherez P. Learnability and discriminability of melodic medical equipment alarms. Anaesthesia 61 (2006) 142-147
49. Seagull F.J., and Sanderson P.M. Anesthesia alarms in surgical context: an observational study. Hum. Factors 43 1 (2001) 66-77
50. Seagull F.J., Xiao Y., Mackenzie C., and Wickens C. Auditory alarms: from alerting to informing. Proceedings of the Joint Congress of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and the International Ergonomics Association (IEA2000/HFES2000) (2000), HFES, Santa Monica, CA 223-226
51. Seagull, F.J., Wickens, C., Loeb, R.G., 2001. When is less more? Attention and workload in auditory, visual and redundant patient-monitoring conditions. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA, HFES, pp. 1395-1399
52. Sites B.D., Gallagher J.D., Cravero J., Lundberg J., and Blike G. The learning curve associated with a simulated ultrasound-guided interventional task by inexperienced anesthesia residents. Reg. Anesthesia Pain Med. 29 (2004) 544-548
53. St Cyr O., and Vicente K.J. Sensor noise and ecological interface design: effect of increasing noise magnitude on operators' performance. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2005), HFES, Santa Monica, CA 417-421
54. Strayer D.L., and Drews F.A. Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Hum. Factors 46 (2004) 640-649
55. Struys M., De Smet T., Greenwald S., Absalom A., Binge S., and Morier E. Performance evaluation of two published closed-loop control systems using bispectral index monitoring-a simulation study. Anesthesiology 100 (2004) 640-647
56. Syroid N.D., Agutter J., Drews F.A., Westenskow D.R., Albert R.W., Bermudez J.C., et al. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology 96 3 (2002) 565-575
57. Via D.K., Kyle R.R., Geiger P.G., and Mongan P.D. A head-mounted display of anesthesia monitoring data is of value and would be used by a majority of anesthesia providers (Abstract). Anesthesia Analgesia 95 2S (2002) S132
58. Via, D.K., Kyle, R.R., Kaye, R.D., Shields, C.H., Dymond, M.J., Damiano, L.A., et al., 2003. A head mounted display of anesthesia monitoring data improves time to recognition of crisis events in simulated crisis scenarios (Abstract). In: Proceedings of the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA2003).
59. Vicente K.J. Ecological interface design: progress and challenges. Hum. Factors 44 1 (2002) 62-78
60. Wachter S.B., Agutter J., Syroid N., Drews F., Weinger M.B., and Westenskow D. The employment of an iterative design process to develop a pulmonary graphical display. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 4 (2003) 363-372
61. Watson, M., Gill, T., 2004. Earcon for intermittent information in monitoring environments. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia (OzCHI2004), Wollongong, NSW, 22-24 November.
62. Watson M., and Sanderson P. Sonification helps eyes-free respiratory monitoring and task timesharing. Hum. Factors 46 3 (2004) 497-517
63. Watson, M., Sanderson, P. (in press). Designing for attention with sound: challenges and extensions to ecological interface design. Hum. Factors.
64. Webb R.K., Van de Walt J., Runciman W.B., Williamson J.A., Cockings J., Russell W.J., and Helps S. Which monitor? An analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth. Intensive Care 21 (1993) 529-542
65. Weinger M. A vision of the future of perioperative information management. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter 15 4 (2000)
66. Weinger M.B., and Englund C.E. Ergonomic and human-factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating-room environment. Anesthesiology 73 5 (1990) 995-1021
67. Wickens C.D. Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman R., and Davies R. (Eds). Varieties of Attention (1984), Academic Press, New York 63-101
68. Wickens C.D. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor. Issues Ergonom. Sci. 3 (2002) 159-177
69. Wickens, C.D., 2005. Attentional tunnelling and task management. 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH, 2005.
70. Wickens C.D., and Carswell C.M. The proximity compatibility principle: its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Hum. Factors 37 (1995) 473-494
71. Williams S., and Beatty P.C.W. Measuring the performance of audible alarms for anaesthesia. Physiol. Meas. 26 (2005) 571-581
72. Woods D.D. The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics 38 11 (1995) 2371-2393
73. Zhang Y., Drews F., Westenskow D., Forest S., Agutter J., Bermudez J., et al. Effects of integrated graphical displays on situational awareness in anesthesiology. Cogn., Technol. Work 4 2 (2002) 82-90