A Novel Dental Implant Guided Surgery Based on Integration of Surgical Template and Augmented Reality

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 543-553

  Lin, Yen Kun ^a   Yau, Hong Tzong ^a   Wang, I Chung ^b   Zheng, Cheng ^b   Chung, Kwok Hung ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Augmented reality; Dental implants; Guided implant surgery; Surgical template

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MOUTH, EDENTULOUS; OSTEOTOMY; PROCEDURES; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MOUTH, EDENTULOUS; OSTEOTOMY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 85013008829     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12119     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Brajnovic I, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:663-670.
2. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005; 76:503-507.
3. van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blomback U, etal. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7:111-120.
4. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, etal. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34:816-821.
5. Naitoh M, Ariji E, Okumura S, Ohsaki C, Kurita K, Ishigami T. Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 11:409-414.
6. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:571-577.
7. Ozen O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-dervied stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:394-401.
8. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G, Naert I, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: a three dimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:806-810.
9. Watzinger F, Birkfellner W, Wanschitz F, etal. Positioning of dental implants using computer-aided navigation and an optical tracking system: case report and presentation of a new method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999; 27:77-81.
10. Wagner A, Ploder O, Enislidis G, Truppe M, Ewers E. Image-guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 25:147-151.
11. Wagner A, Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, etal. Computer-aided placement of endosseous oral implants in patients after ablative tumour surgery: assessment of accuracy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:340-348.
12. Edwards PJ, King AP, Hawkes DJ, etal. Stereo augmented reality in the surgical microscope. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999; 62:102-108.
13. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Figl M, etal. Computer enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head mounted display for oral implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:610-616.
14. Casap N, Madel S, Tarazi E, Weiss EI. Evaluation of a navigation system for dental implantation as a tool to train novice dental practitioners. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69:2548-2556.
15. Lin YK, Tsai KL, Yau HT. The development of optical see-through display based on augmented reality for oral implant surgery simulation. Computer-Aided Design Appl 2012; 9:111-120.
16. Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G. Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:495-501.
17. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Wagner A, Enislidis G. Computer-guided flapless placement and immediate loading of four conical screw-type implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:534-539.
18. Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spüntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:709-716.
19. Platzer S, Bertha G, Heschl A, Wegscheider W, Lorenzoni M. Three-dimentional accuracy of guided implant placement: indirect assessment of clinical outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00406.x.
20. Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Knierim K, Behneke N. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:137-143.
21. Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, Nasstrom K, Klinge B. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:527-537.
22. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer guided template-base implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:73-86.
23. D'haese J, van de Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:321-335.
24. Ng FC, Ho KH, Wexler A. Computer-assisted navigational surgery enhances safety in dental implantology. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005; 34:383-388.
25. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H. Navigational precision of drilling tool preventing damage to the mandibular canal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29:271-275.
26. Kato H, Billinghurst M, Asano K, Tachibana K. An augmented reality system and its calibration based on marker tracking. Trans Virtual Real Soc Japan 1999; 4:607-616.
27. Horn BKP. Closed form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Am 1987; 4:629-642.
28. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16:187-198.
29. Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy AE. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computer tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008; 79:1339-1345.
30. Komiyama A, Pettersson A, Hultin M, Nasstrom K, Klinge B. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:308-313.
31. Kalt G, Gehrke P. Transfer precision of three-dimensional implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation. Int J Comput Dent 2008; 11:213-225.
32. Cassette M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Calasso S, Barbato E. Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical template: a retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 15:448-459.
33. Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, etal. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadaver: part I. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103:334-342.
34. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, Gigovic N, Turhani D, Enislidis G. Computer-guided flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a new combination of two innovative techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101:718-723.
35. Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:1156-1162.
36. Cassette M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Calasso S. Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 40:1377-1387.
37. Di Giacomo GA, da Silva JV, de Silva AM, Paschoal GH, Cury PR, Szarf G. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. J Periodontol 2012; 83:410-419.
38. Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Calasso S. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithogrpahic surgical template. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2012; 27:655-663.
39. Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108:181-188.
40. Cassette M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli LV, Cavallini C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 40:1377-1387.
41. D'haese J, van de Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithogrpahic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:293-303.
42. Dreiseidler T, Tandon D, Kreppel M, etal. CBCT device dependency on the transfer accuracy from computer-aided implantology procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:1089-1097.