Emerging technology in surgical education: Combining real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices

Orthopedics

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 751-757

  Ponce, Brent A ^a   Menendez, Mariano E ^a   Oladeji, Lasun O ^a   Fryberger, Charles T ^a   Dantuluri, Phani K ^b  

^a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONFIDENTIALITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; RANGE OF MOTION; REAL TIME AUGMENTED REALITY; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SHOULDER PAIN; SURGICAL TRAINING; TELEMONITORING; VIRTUAL REALITY; WEARABLE COMPUTING DEVICE; AGED; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COOPERATION; MICROSURGERY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; TELEMEDICINE;

AGED; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSURGERY; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84910029056     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: 19382367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20141023-05     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gawande A. Two hundred years of surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(18): 1716-1723.
2. Cosman PH, Shearer CJ, Hugh TJ, Biankin AV, Merrett ND. A novel approach to high defini-tion, high-contrast video cap-ture in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2007; 245(4): 533-535.
3. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, et al. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: A systematic re-view and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010; 252(2): 254-262.
4. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Finley D, Stevens M, Paya M. Application of robotics in gen-eral surgery: Initial experience. Am Surg. 2004; 70(10): 914-917.
5. Joseph B, Hadeed G, Sadoun M, Rhee PM, Weinstein RS. Video consultation for trauma and emergency surgical pa-tients. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2012; 35(4): 341-345.
6. Lewis ER, Thomas CA, Wilson ML, Mbarika VW. Telemedi-cine in acute-phase injury man-agement: A review of practice and advancements. Telemed J E Health. 2012; 18(6): 434-445.
7. Shenai MB, Dillavou M, Shum C, et al. Virtual interactive pres-ence and augmented reality (VIPAR) for remote surgical assistance. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68(1 suppl): 200-207.
8. Chang J. Google Glass assists surgeons and medical students at Ohio State University. http: //abcnews.go.com/Technology/google-glass-assists-surgeons-medical-students-ohio-state/story?id=20109218. Accessed September 17, 2013.
9. Hay T. Google Glass could be-come a fixture in the operating room. http: //blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2013/08/12/google-glass-could-become-a-fixture-in-the-operating-room/?mod=wsj-stream-ing-latest-headlines. Accessed September 17, 2013.
10. Ekatha JA. In a first, Chen-nai doctor uses Google Glass to air operation live. http: //ar-ticles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-18/gadgets-special/42181937-1-google-glass-gadget-operaion-theatre. Accessed September 18, 2013.
11. De Benito E. El quirofano glob-al, de la mano de Google Glass. http: //www.sociedad.elpais.com. Accessed September 17, 2013.
12. Broderick TJ, Harnett BM, Do-arn CR, Rodas EB, Merrell RC. Real-time Internet connections: Implications for surgical deci-sion making in laparoscopy. Ann Surg. 2001; 234(2): 165-171.
13. Gandsas A, Altrudi R, Pleat-man M, Silva Y. Live interac-tive broadcast of laparoscopic surgery via the Internet. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(3): 252-255.
14. Rafiq A, Moore JA, Zhao X, Doarn CR, Merrell RC. Digital video capture and synchronous consultation in open surgery. Ann Surg. 2004; 239(4): 567-573.
15. Abe Y, Sato S, Kato K, et al. A novel 3D guidance system using augmented reality for percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(4): 492-501.
16. Marzano E, Piardi T, Soler L, et al. Augmented reality-guided artery-first pancreatico-duodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 17(11): 1980-1983.
17. Mitha AP, Almekhlafi MA, Janjua MJ, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG. Simulation and augmented reality in endo-vascular neurosurgery: Lessons from aviation. Neurosurgery. 2013; (72 suppl 1): 107-114.
18. Ponce BA, Jennings JK, Shep-pard ED, et al. Telementoring: Augmented reality in orthopae-dic education. Paper presented at: American Academy of Or-thopaedic Surgeons; March 19-23, 2013; Chicago, IL.
19. Phillips JD, Withrow K. Virtual interactive presence: An opera-tive feasibility study. Paper pre-sented at: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Annual Meeting; September 9-12, 2013; Wash-ington, DC.
20. Chapman WC. No silver bullet in liver transection: What has 35 years of new technology added to liver surgery? Ann Surg. 2009; 250(2): 204-205.
21. Koopmann MC, Kudsk KA, Szotkowski MJ, Rees SM. A team-based protocol and elec-tromagnetic technology elimi-nate feeding tube placement complications. Ann Surg. 2011; 253(2): 287-302.
22. Kumar RK. Technology and healthcare costs. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2011; 4(1): 84-86.
23. Hodgins JL, Veillette C. Ar-throscopic proficiency: Meth-ods in evaluating competency. BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13: 61.
24. Kassab E, Tun JK, Arora S, et al. "Blowing up the barriers" in surgical training: Exploring and validating the concept of dis-tributed simulation. Ann Surg. 2011; 254(6): 1059-1065.
25. Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, et al. General surgery resi-dency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: Re-sults of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg. 2013; 258(3): 440-449.
26. Karam MD, Pedowitz RA, Na-tividad H, Murray J, Marsh JL. Current and future use of surgi-cal skills training laboratories in orthopaedic resident educa-tion: A national survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(1): E4.
27. Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasun-daram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Proving the effective-ness of virtual reality simu-lation for training in laparo-scopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(5): 771-779.
28. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test lapa-roscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2003; 185(2): 146-149.
29. Henn RF III, Shah N, Warner JJ, Gomoll AH. Shoulder ar-throscopy simulator training improves shoulder arthros-copy performance in a cadav-eric model. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(6): 982-985.
30. Lange T, Indelicato DJ, Rosen JM. Virtual reality in surgical training. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2000; 9(1): 61-79.
31. Armstrong DG, Rankin TM, Giovinco NA, Mills JL, Mat-suoka Y. A heads-up display for diabetic limb salvage surgery: A view through the Google look-ing glass. J Diabetes Sci Tech-nol. 2014; 8(5): 951-956.