Touchscreen interfaces in context: A systematic review of research into touchscreens across settings, populations, and implementations

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 61, Issue , 2017, Pages 116-143

  Orphanides, Andreas K ^a   Nam, Chang S ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Human factors and ergonomics; Touchscreen interface; User centered design

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; USER CENTERED DESIGN;

HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS; IN CONTEXTS; INPUT/OUTPUT DEVICES; SYSTEM INTERACTIONS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONS; TOUCHSCREEN INTERFACES; USER SATISFACTION;

TOUCH SCREENS;

DATA BASE; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN; SAFETY; SATISFACTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; AGE; BIOENGINEERING; CAR DRIVING; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER TERMINAL; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DISABLED PERSON; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH CARE COST; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; ROBOTICS; TOUCH;

AGE FACTORS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER TERMINALS; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; DISABLED PERSONS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEALTH CARE SECTOR; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; ROBOTICS; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 85011591023     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.013     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Anthony, L., Brown, Q., Tate, B., Nias, J., Brewer, R., Irwin, G., Designing smarter touch-based interfaces for educational contexts. Personal. Ubiquitous Comput. 18:6 (2014), 1471–1483.
2. Apple, Apple Reinvents the Phone with IPhone. [Press Release]. Retrieved from, 2007, January 9 http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2007/01/09Apple-Reinvents-the-Phone-with-iPhone.html on 15 November 2016.
3. Baldus, T., Patterson, P., Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off- road environment. Appl. Ergon. 39:6 (2008), 671–677.
4. Beck, F., Stumpe, B., Two Devices for Operator Interaction in the Central Control of the New CERN Accelerator. [Memorandum], 1973, May 24, CERN, Geneva.
5. Bjorneseth, F.B., Dunlop, M.D., Hornecker, E., Assessing the effectiveness of direct gesture interaction for a safety critical maritime application. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 70:10 (2012), 729–745.
6. Burnett, G., Lawson, G., Millen, L., Pickering, C., Designing touchpad user-interfaces for vehicles: which tasks are most suitable?. Behav. Inf. Technol. 30:3 (2011), 403–414.
7. Burnett, G.E., Large, D.R., Lawson, G., De-Kremer, S., Skrypchuk, L., A comparison of resistive and capacitive touchscreens for use within vehicles. Adv. Transp. Stud. 31 (2013), 5–16.
8. Camilleri, M.J., Malige, A., Fujimoto, J., Rempel, D.M., Touch displays: the effects of palm rejection technology on productivity, comfort, biomechanics and positioning. Ergonomics 56:12 (2013), 1850–1862.
9. Chang, H., Tsai, T., Chang, Y., Chang, Y., Touch panel usability of elderly and children. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37 (2014), 258–269.
10. Chourasia, A.O., Wiegmann, D.A., Chen, K.B., Irwin, C.B., Sesto, M.E., Effect of sitting or standing on touch screen performance and touch characteristics. Hum. Factors 55:4 (2013), 789–802.
11. Chung, K., Shin, D., Effect of elastic touchscreen and input devices with different softness on user task performance and subjective satisfaction. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 83 (2015), 12–26.
12. Chung, M.K., Kim, D., Na, S., Lee, D., Usability evaluation of numeric entry tasks on keypad type and age. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40:1 (2010), 97–105.
13. Cockburn, A., Ahlstrom, D., Gutwin, C., Understanding performance in touch selections: tap, drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse. Int. J. Human-Computer Stud. 70:3 (2012), 218–233.
14. De Waard, D., Lewis-Evans, B., Jelijs, B., Tucha, O., Brookhuis, K., The effects of operating a touch screen smartphone and other common activities performed while bicycling on cycling behaviour. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 22 (2014), 196–206.
15. Dünser, A., Lochner, M., Engelke, U., Rozado Fernández, D., Visual and manual control for human-robot teleoperation. IEEE Comput. Gr. Appl. 35:3 (2014), 22–32, 10.1109/MCG.2015.4.
16. Eichinger, A., Kellerer, J., Between laboratory and simulator: a cognitive approach to evaluating cockpit interfaces by manipulating informatory context. Cognition, Technol. Work 16:3 (2014), 417–427.
17. Eliav, A., Lavie, T., Parmet, Y., Stern, H., Edan, Y., Advanced methods for displays and remote control of robots. Appl. Ergon. 42:6 (2011), 820–829.
18. Elton, E., Nicolle, C., Designing inclusive products for everyday environments: the effects of everyday cold temperatures on older adults' dexterity. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 12:3 (2013), 247–261.
19. Fitts, P.M., The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychology:General 121:3 (1992), 262–269.
20. Gao, Q., Sun, Q., Examining the usability of touch screen gestures for older and younger adults. Hum. Factors 57:5 (2015), 835–863.
21. Garcia-Lopez, E., Garcia-Cabot, A., de-Marcos, L., An experiment with content distribution methods in touchscreen mobile devices. Appl. Ergon. 50 (2015), 79–86.
22. Goode, N., Lenne, M.G., Salmon, P., The impact of on-road motion on BMS touch screen device operation. Ergonomics 55:9 (2012), 986–996.
23. Hagiwara, T., Sakakima, R., Kamada, T., Suzuki, Y., Effect of different distractions on driving performance for drivers using a touch screen. Transp. Res. Rec. 2434 (2014), 18–25.
24. Hammon, M., Kunz, B., Dinzl, V., Kammerer, F.J., Schwab, S.A., Bogdan, C., Uder, M., Schlechtweg, P.M., Practicability of hygienic wrapping of touchscreen operated mobile devices in a clinical setting. Plos One, 9(9), 2014, e106445.
25. Han, B., Kim, K., Typing performance evaluation with multimodal soft keyboard completely integrated in commercial mobile devices. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 9:3 (2015), 173–181.
26. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E., Development of NASA-TLX: results of empirical and theoretical research. Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N., (eds.) Hum. Ment. workload, 1988, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 139–183.
27. Harvey, C., Stanton, N.A., Pickering, C.A., McDonald, M., Zheng, P., To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems. Ergonomics 54:7 (2011), 609–625.
28. Herrick, D.B., Nakhasi, A., Nelson, B., Rice, S., Abbott, P.A., Saber Tehrani, A.S., Rothman, R.E., Lehmann, H.P., Newman-Toker, D.E., Usability characteristics of self-administered computer-assisted interviewing in the emergency department. Appl. Clin. Inf. 4:2 (2013), 276–292.
29. Hewlett-Packard Development Company, HP-150 Touchscreen Personal Computer with HP 9121 Dual Drives, 1983. In HP History: Virtual Museum [Online exhibit]. Retrieved from, 2012 http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/abouthp/histnfacts/museum/personalsystems/0031/ on 15 November 2016.
30. Huang, H., Chen, L., Enhancing human-computer interaction and feedback in touchscreen icon. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 65 (2010), 428–433.
31. Hwangbo, H., Yoon, S.H., Jin, B.S., Han, Y.S., Ji, Y.G., A study of pointing performance of elderly users on smartphones. Int. J. Human-Computer Interact. 29:9 (2013), 604–618.
32. Im, Y., Kim, T., Jung, E.S., Investigation of icon design and touchable area for effective smart phone controls. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 25:2 (2015), 251–267.
33. Irune, A., Burnett, G.E., Locating in Car Controls: Predicting the Effects of Varying Design Layout. Advances in Transportation Studies. 2007, 25–32.
34. Irwin, C.B., Sesto, M.E., Performance and touch characteristics of disabled and non-disabled participants during a reciprocal tapping task using touch screen technology. Appl. Ergon. 43:6 (2012), 1038–1043.
35. Ito, T., Miki, Y., Japan's Safety Guidelines for In-vehicle Display Systems. Proceedings from the its Congress in Berlin: 1997 its Technology Review: 4th World Congress on its, Berlin, Germany. 1997, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.
36. Jin, L., Xian, H., Niu, Q., Bie, J., Research on safety evaluation model for in-vehicle secondary task driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 81 (2015), 243–250.
37. Jochems, N., Vetter, S., Schlick, C., A comparative study of information input devices for aging computer users. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32:9 (2013), 902–919.
38. Johnson, E.A., Touch display - a novel input/output device for computers. Electron. Lett. 1:8 (1965), 219–220.
39. Kang, H., Shin, G., Hand usage pattern and upper body discomfort of desktop touchscreen users. Ergonomics 57:9 (2014), 1397–1404.
40. Kim, J.H., Aulck, L., Thamsuwan, O., Bartha, M.C., Johnson, P.W., The effect of key size of touch screen virtual keyboards on productivity, usability, and typing biomechanics. Hum. Factors 56:7 (2014), 1235–1248.
41. Kim, H., Kwon, S., Heo, J., Lee, H., Chung, M.K., The effect of touch-key size on the usability of in-vehicle information systems and driving safety during simulated driving. Appl. Ergon. 45:3 (2014), 379–388, 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.006.
42. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., Ramsey, D.J., The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-crash/crash Risk: an Analysis Using the 100-car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. 2006 (NHTSA publication no. HS-810 594).
43. Krohne, H.W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.W., Tausch, A., Investigations with a German version of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica 42:2 (1996), 139–156.
44. Kujala, T., Browsing the information highway while driving: three in-vehicle touch screen scrolling methods and driver distraction. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 17:5 (2013), 815–823.
45. Kujala, T., Salvucci, D.D., Modeling visual sampling on in-car displays: the challenge of predicting safety-critical lapses of control. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 79 (2015), 66–78.
46. Kwon, S., Choi, E., Chung, M.K., Effect of control-to-display gain and movement direction of information spaces on the usability of navigation on small touch-screen interfaces using tap-n-drag. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 41:3 (2011), 322–330.
47. Leahy, M., Hix, D., Effect of touch screen target location on user accuracy. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 34:4 (1990), 370–374.
48. Lewis, J.R., IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Human-Computer Interact. 7:1 (1995), 57–78.
49. Lin, C.J., Liu, C.N., Chao, C.J., Chen, H.J., The performance of computer input devices in a vibration environment. Ergonomics 53:4 (2010), 478–490.
50. McCormik, E.J., Human Factors in Engineering and Design. 1976, McGraw Hill, New York.
51. McLaughlin, A.C., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., Using direct and indirect input devices: attention demands and age-related differences. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interact., 16(1), 2009.
52. Mihajlov, M., Law, E.L., Springett, M., Intuitive learnability of touch gestures for technology-naive older adults. Interact. Comput. 27:3 (2015), 344–356.
53. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., The PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med., 6(6), 2009.
54. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Visual-manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-vehicle Electronic Devices. (NHTSA publication No. NHTSA-2010-0053), 2013, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
55. Neurauter, M.L., Hankey, J.M., Schalk, T.B., Wallace, G., Outbound texting comparison of speech-based approach and handheld touch-screen equivalent. Transp. Res. Rec. 2321 (2012), 23–30.
56. Oldfield, R.C., The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:1 (1971), 97–113.
57. Pal, P., Roy, A., Moore, G., Muzslay, M., Lee, E., Alder, S., Wilson, P., Powles, T., Wilson, P., Kelly, J., Keypad mobile phones are associated with a significant increased risk of microbial contamination compared to touch screen phones. J. Infect. Prev. 14:2 (2013), 65–68.
58. Parikh, S.P., Esposito, J.M., Negative feedback for small capacitive touchscreen interfaces: a usability study for data entry tasks. IEEE Trans. 5:1 (2012), 39–47.
59. Park, Y.S., Han, S.H., One-handed thumb interaction of mobile devices from the input accuracy perspective. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40:6 (2010), 746–756, 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.08.001.
60. Park, Y.S., Han, S.H., Touch key design for one-handed thumb interaction with a mobile phone: effects of touch key size and touch key location. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40:1 (2010), 68–76, 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.08.002.
61. Pitrella, F.D., Käppler, W.D., Identification and Evaluation of Scale Design Principles in the Development of the Sequential Judgment, Extended Range Scale. 1988 Bericht Nr. 80, Institut für Anthropothechnik.
62. Pitts, M.J., Burnett, G., Skrypchuk, L., Wellings, T., Attridge, A., Williams, M.A., Visual-haptic feedback interaction in automotive touchscreens. Displays 33:1 (2012), 7–16.
63. Pitts, M.J., Skrypchuk, L., Wellings, T., Attridge, A., Williams, M.A., Evaluating user response to in-car haptic feedback touchscreens using the lane change test. Adv. Human-Computing Interact. 2012 (2012), 1–13.
64. Rydstrom, A., Brostrom, R., Bengtsson, P., A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces. Appl. Ergon. 43:3 (2012), 507–514, 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.004.
65. Sesto, M.E., Irwin, C.B., Chen, K.B., Chourasia, A.O., Wiegmann, D.A., Effect of touch screen button size and spacing on touch characteristics of users with and without disabilities. Hum. Factors 54:3 (2012), 425–436.
66. Shin, G., Zhu, X., User discomfort, work posture and muscle activity while using a touchscreen in a desktop PC setting. Ergonomics 54:8 (2011), 733–734.
67. Siegenthaler, E., Bochud, Y., Wurtz, P., Schmid, L., Bergamin, P., The effects of touch screen technology on the usability of e-reading devices. J. Usability Stud. 7:3 (2012), 94–104.
68. Siek, K.A., Rogers, Y., Connelly, K.H., Fat finger worries: how older and younger users physically interact with PDAs. Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT, vol. 2005, 2005, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 267–280.
69. Smith, A.L., Chaparro, B.S., Smartphone text input method performance, usability, and preference with younger and older adults. Hum. Factors 57:6 (2015), 1015–1028.
70. Sonderegger, A., Schmutz, S., Sauer, J., The influence of age in usability testing. Appl. Ergon. 52 (2016), 291–300.
71. Stanton, N.A., Harvey, C., Plant, K.L., Bolton, L., To twist, roll, stroke or poke? A study of input devices for menu navigation in the cockpit. Ergonomics 56:4 (2013), 590–611.
72. Vatavu, R., Cramariuc, G., Schipor, D.M., Touch interaction for children aged 3 to 6 years: experimental findings and relationship to motor skills. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 74 (2015), 54–76.
73. Wickens, C.D., Lee, J.D., Liu, Y., Gordon Becker, S.E., An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. 2004, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
74. Wierwille, W.W., Tijerina, L., Modeling the relationship between driver in-vehicle demands and accident occurrence. Gale, A.G., Brown, I.D., Haslegrave, C.M., Taylor, S.P., (eds.) Vision in Vehicles VI, 1998, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 233–243.
75. Williamson, A.R., Young, K.L., Navarro, J., Lenne, M.G., Music selection using a touch screen interface: effect of auditory and visual feedback on driving and usability. Int. J. Veh. Des. 57:4 (2011), 391–404.
76. Xian, H., Jin, L., The effects of using in-vehicle computer on driver eye movements and driving performance. Adv. Mech. Eng., 7(2), 2015, 10.1155/2014/981908.
77. Xiong, J., Muraki, S., Effects of age, thumb length and screen size on thumb movement coverage on smartphone touchscreens. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 53 (2016), 140–148, 10.1016/j.ergon.2015.11.004.
78. Yau, Y., Chao, C., Hwang, S., Effects of input device and motion type on a cursor-positioning task. Percept. Mot. Ski. 106:1 (2008), 76–90, 10.2466/PMS.106.1.76-90.
79. Young, J.K., Trudeau, M., Odell, D., Marinelli, K., Dennerlein, J.T., Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case-supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles. WORK A J. Prev. Assess. Rehabil. 41:1 (2012), 81–91.
80. Young, K.L., Rudin-Brown, C., Patten, C., Ceci, R., Lenne, M.G., Effects of phone type on driving and eye glance behaviour while text-messaging. Saf. Sci. 68 (2014), 47–54.
81. Zhai, S., Kristensson, P.O., The word-gesture keyboard: reimagining keyboard interaction. Commun. ACM 55:9 (2012), 91–101.
82. Zhai, S., Kong, J., Ren, X., Speed-accuracy tradeoff in Fitts' law tasks–on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision. Int. J. Human-Computer Stud. 61 (2004), 823–856.
83. Zwahlen, H.T., Adams, C.C., DeBald, D.P., Safety aspects of CRT touch panel controls in automobiles. Freeman, M.H., Haslegrave, C.M., Smith, P., Taylor, S.P., Gale, A.G., (eds.) Vision in Vehicles II, 1988, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 335–344.