A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 507-514

  Rydström, Annie ^a,b   Broström, Robert ^a,b   Bengtsson, Peter ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b VOLVO CAR CORPORATION   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Multifunctional interface; Rotary control; Secondary task; Touch screen

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; PHYSICAL THERAPY;

DISPLAY POSITION; DRIVING SIMULATOR STUDY; LATERAL CONTROL; MULTI-FUNCTIONAL INTERFACES; ROTARY CONTROLS; SECONDARY TASKS; TASK COMPLETION TIME; TOUCH SCREEN INTERFACE;

TOUCH SCREENS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRIVING ABILITY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84855890646     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blanco M., Biever W.J., Gallagher J.P., Dingus T.A. The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2006, 38:895-906.
2. Broström R., Bengtsson P., Axelsson J. Perceived styling and usability in integrated centre panel layouts as a function of interaction style and age. Human Factors Issues in Complex System Performance 2007, 193-204. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht. D. de Waard, G.R.J. Hockey, P. Nickel, K.A. Brookhuis (Eds.).
3. Broström R., Bengtsson P., Axelsson J. Correlation between safety assessments in the driver-car interaction design process. Applied Ergonomics 2011, 42:575-582.
4. Bruce V., Green P.R., Georgesson M.A. Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology, and Ecology 1996, Psychology Press, Hove. third ed.
5. Burnett G.E., Porter J.M. Ubiquitous computing within cars: designing controls for non-visual use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2001, 55:521-531.
6. Burnett G.E., Lomas S.M., Mason B., Porter J.M., Summerskill S.J. Writing and driving: an assessment of handwriting recognition as a means of alphanumeric data entry in a driving context. Advances in Transportation Studies, Special Issue 2005, 59-72.
7. Burnett G.E. Designing and evaluating in-car user-interfaces. User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology 2008, 218-236. Information Science Reference, Hersey. J. Lumsden (Ed.).
8. Dingus T.A., Hulse M.C., Barfield W. Human-system interface issues in the design and use of advanced traveller information systems. Human Factors in Intelligent Transportation Systems 1998, 359-395. Erlbaum, Mahwah. W. Barfield, T.A. Dingus (Eds.).
9. Engström J., Mårdh S. SafeTE Final Report (Rep. No. 2007:36) 2007, Swedish National Road Administration, Borlänge, Sweden.
10. Engström J., Johansson E., östlund J. Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F 2005, 8:97-120.
11. Forsman Å, Nilsson L. Effects of cognitive and visual load in real and simulated driving (Rep. No. 533A) 2006, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping, Sweden.
12. Green Driver interface safety and usability standards: an overview. Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation 2009, 445-464. CRC Press, Boca Raton. M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee, K.L. Young (Eds.).
13. Harvey C., Stanton N.A., Pickering C.A., McDonald M., Zheng P. Ausability evaluation toolkit for In-Vehicle Information Systems (IVISs). Applied Ergonomics 2011, 42:563-574.
14. Road vehicles - Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems - Part 1: Definitions and Parameters 2002, ISO 15007-1.
15. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Usability Methods Supporting Human-Centred Design 2002, ISO/TR 16982.
16. Jahn G., Oehme A., Krems J.F., Gelau C. Peripheral detection as a workload measure in driving: effects of traffic complexity and route guidance system use in a driving study. Transportation Research Part F 2005, 8:255-275.
17. Keppel G., Wickens T.D. Design and Analysis: A Researchers Handbook 2004, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. fourth ed.
18. Lamble D., Laakso M., Summala H. Detection thresholds in car following situations and peripheral vision: implications for positioning of visually demanding in-car displays. Ergonomics 1999, 42:807-815.
19. Land M.F. Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2006, 25:296-324.
20. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:476-490.
21. MacDonald W.A., Hoffmann E.R. Review of relationships between steering wheel reversal rate and driving task demand. Human Factors 1980, 22:733-739.
22. Patten C.J.D., Kircher A., Östlund J., Nilsson L., Svenson O. Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2006, 38:887-894.
23. Pettitt M.A., Burnett G.E., Bayer S., Stevens A. Assessment of the occlusion technique as a means for evaluating the distraction potential of driver support systems. Intelligent Transport Systems. IEE Proceedings 2006, 153:259-266.
24. Pitts, M.J., Williams, M.A., Wellings, T., & Attridge, A., 2009. Assessing subjective response to haptic feedback in automotive touchscreens. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Essen.
25. Rogers W.A., Fisk A.D., Collins McLaughlin A., Pak R. Touch a screen or turn a knob: choosing the best device for the job. Human Factors 2005, 47:271-288.
26. Rydström A., Bengtsson P., Grane C., Broström R., Agardh J., Nilsson J. Multifunctional systems in vehicles: a usability evaluation. Proceedings of the Fourth International Cyberspace Conference on Ergonomics 2005, International Ergonomics Association Press, Johannesburg. A. Thatcher, J. James, A. Todd (Eds.).
27. Rydström A., Broström R., Bengtsson P. Can haptics facilitate the interaction with an in-vehicle multifunctional interface?. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2009, 2:141-147.
28. Serafin, C., Heers, R., Tschirhart, M., Ullrich, C., & Ramstein, C., 2007. User experience in the U.S. and Germany of in-vehicle touch Screens with integrated haptic and Auditory Feedback. Proceedings of SAE World Congress, Detroit, MI.
29. Tijerina, L., Parmer, E., Goodman, M.J., 1998. Driver workload assessment of route guidance system destination entry while driving: a test track study. Proceedings of the 5th ITS World Congress, Seoul.
30. Tsimhoni O., Smith D., Green P. Address entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard. Human Factors 2004, 46:600-610.
31. Victor T.W., Harbluk J.L., Engström J. Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F 2005, 8:167-190.
32. Victor, T.W., Blomberg, O., Zelinsky, A., Automating driver visual behavior measurement. Vision in Vehicles 9, in press.
33. Wittman M., Kiss M., Gugg P., Steffen A., Fink M., Pöppel E., Kamiya H. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Applied Ergonomics 2006, 37:187-199.
34. Zwahlen H.T., Adams C.C., DeBald D.P. Safety aspects of CRT touch panel controls in automobiles. Vision in Vehicles II 1988, 335-344. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A.G. Gale, M.H. Freeman, C.M. Haslegrave, P. A Smith, S.P. Taylor (Eds.).