Visual-haptic feedback interaction in automotive touchscreens

Displays

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-16

  Pitts, Matthew J ^a   Burnett, Gary ^b   Skrypchuk, Lee ^c   Wellings, Tom ^a   Attridge, Alex ^a   Williams, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c JAGUAR LAND ROVER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automotive; Haptic feedback; Human machine interface; Touchscreen

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; DRIVING SIMULATOR; DRIVING TASKS; FEEDBACK INTERACTION; FEEDBACK TYPE; HAPTIC FEEDBACKS; HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE; IN-CAR TECHNOLOGY; TASK COMPLETION TIME; TASK DIFFICULTY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH SCREEN; USER EXPERIENCE; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL-HAPTIC;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

TOUCH SCREENS;

EID: 80155175620     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ComScore Inc., Touchscreen Mobile Phone Adoption Grows at Blistering Pace in US. During Past Year, 3rd November 2009. < http://www.comscore.com/Press- Events/Press-Releases/2009/11/Touchscreen-Mobile-Phone-Adoption-Grows-at- Blistering-Pace-in-U.S.-During-Past-Year/(language)/eng-US > (accessed 19.05.10).
2. Gartner Inc., Gartner Says Worldwide Mobile Phone Sales Grew 17 Per Cent in First Quarter 2010, 19th May 2010. < http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp? id=1372013 > (accessed 19.05.10).
3. D. Newcomb, The Touch Screen Is Dead (In Acuras), Long Live the Touch Screen (In Other Makes), 2008 < http://blogs.edmunds.com/strategies/2008/12/ thetouchscreen-is-dead-in-acuras-long-live-the-touch-screen-in-othermakes.html > (accessed 19.01.09).
4. A. Sears, C. Plaisant, and B. Shneiderman A new era for high precision touchscreens H.R. Hartson, D. Hix, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 1992 Ablex Publishing New Jersey 2 3
5. F.-G. Wu, H. Lin, and M. You Direct-touch vs. mouse input for navigation modes of the web map Displays 32 2011 261 267
6. G.E. Burnett, and J.M. Porter Ubiquitous comupting within cars: designing controls for non-visual use Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact. 55 2001 521 531
7. S.G. Klauer, T.A. Dingus, V.L. Neale, J.D. Sudweeks, D.J. Ramsey, The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS 810 594, 2006.
8. D.A. Norman The Design of Everyday Things 1998 MIT Press London
9. M. Deron, How Important is Visual Feedback When Using a Touch Screen?, Usability News, 2000, vol. 2, Issue 1, < http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/ 21/touchscreen.asp > (accessed 20.05.10).
10. J. Clawson, K. Lyons, T. Starner, E. Clarkson, The impacts of limited visual feedback on mobile text entry for the Twiddler and mini-QWERTY keyboards, in: Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2005, pp. 170-177. (Pubitemid 44867511)
11. M. Silfverberg Using mobile keypads with limited visual feedback: implications to handheld and wearable devices L. Chittaro, Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services 2003 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 76 90
12. G. Walsozek, Interaction Design Guide for Touchscreen Aplpications (Experimental), SAP Design Guild, Version 0.5 2000.
13. I.S. MacKenzie, C. Ware, Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems, in: Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993, pp. 488-493.
14. I. Vaghi, C. Greenhalgh, S. Benford, Coping with inconsistency due to network delays in collaborative virtual environments, in: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, ACM, London, United Kingdom, 1999, pp. 42-49.
15. J.L. Burke, M.S. Prewett, A.A. Gray, L. Yang, F.R.B. Stilson, M.D. Coovert, L.R. Elliot, E. Redden, Comparing the effects of visual-auditory and visual-tactile feedback on user performance: a meta-analysis, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ACM, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2006, pp. 108-117. (Pubitemid 47113436)
16. I. Poupyrev, S. Maruyama, J. Rekimoto, Ambient Touch: Designing Tactile Interfaces for Handheld Devices, 2002, pp. 51-60.
17. S. Brewster, F. Chohan, L. Brown, Tactile feedback for mobile interactions, in: Proceedings of CHI 2007, 2007.
18. J.-H. Lee, C. Spence, Assessing the benefits of multimodal feedback on dual-task performance under demanding conditions, in: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, vol. 1. British Computer Society, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2008, pp. 185-192.
19. J.-H. Lee, E. Poliakoff, and C. Spence The effect of multimodal feedback presented via a touch screen on the performance of older adults Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design 2009 Springer-Verlag Dresden, Germany 128 135
20. C. Serafin, R. Heers, M. Tschirhart, C. Ullrich, C. Ramstien, User experience in the US and Germany of in-vehicle touch-screens with integrated haptic and auditory feedback, in: SAE World Congress, 2007.
21. M.J. Pitts, M.A. Williams, T. Wellings, A. Attridge, Assessing subjective response to haptic feedback in automotive touchscreens, in: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, ACM, Essen, Germany, 2009, pp. 11-18.
22. C.D. Wickens, and J.G. Hollands Engineering Psychology and Human Performance three ed. 2000 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
23. F. Janabi-Sharifi, V. Hayward, and Q.Y. Wang Design and implementation of a graphic-haptic display system Displays 28 2007 118 128 (Pubitemid 47048825)
24. L.A. Jones, and S.J. Lederman Human Hand Function 2006 Oxford University Press Oxford
25. C. Ullrich, M. Cruz, Perceived strength of lateral acceleration display for touchscreen emulation of mechanical switch transients, in: Proceedings of the 6th international Conference on Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios, Springer-Verlag, Madrid, Spain, 2008, pp. 331-336.
26. L. Tijerina Executive Summary: Heavy vehicle driver workload assessment 1996 NHTSA
27. A. Irune, G.E. Burnett, Locating in car controls: predicting the effects of varying design layout, in: International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation RSS 2007, Rome, Italy, 2007.
28. European Commission, Safe and Efficient In-vehicle Information and Communication Systems, European Commission Expert Group Report, EC 200/53/EC, 2001.
29. T. Kaaresoja, E. Anttila, E. Hoggan, The effect of tactile feedback latency in touchscreen interaction, in: World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2011 IEEE, 2011, pp. 65-70.
30. T. Kaaresoja, E. Hoggan, E. Anttila, Playing with tactile feedback latency in touchscreen interaction: two approaches, in: P. Campos, et al. (Eds.), INTERACT 2011, Part II, LNCS 6974, 2011, pp. 554-571.
31. ISO 15007-1:2002, Road Vehicles - Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems - Part 1: Definitions and Parameters, 2002.
32. H. Stone, and J.L. Sidel Sensory Evaluation Practices 2004 Elsevier Academic Press California
33. J.W. Tukey Exploratory Data Analysis 1977 Addison-Wesley
34. D.V. Cicchetti Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in the analysis of variance: a rapid approximate solution Psychol. Bull. 77 1972 405 408
35. W.W. Wierwille, Development of an initial model relating deiver in-vehicle visual demands to accident rate, in: Proceedings of the Third Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, 1995, pp. 1-7.
36. J. Engström, E. Johansson, and J. Ostlund Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated motorway driving Transport. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 6 2005 97 120 (Pubitemid 40743933)
37. A. Rydstrom, C. Grane, P. Bengtsson, Driver behaviour during haptic and visual secondary tasks, in: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, ACM, Essen, Germany, 2009, pp. 121-127.
38. M. Pitts, M.A. Williams, Diagnosis and resolution of a customer-defined satisfaction issue in automotive user controls, in: P.M.A. Desmet, et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Design & Emotion, 2008, Hong Kong, 2008.
39. O. Tsimhoni, and P. Green Visual demand of driving and the execution of display-intensive in-vehicle tasks Human Factors Ergonom. Soc. Ann. Meet. Proc. 45 2001 1586 1590
40. Y. Wang, B. Mehler, B. Reimer, V. Lammers, L.A. D'Ambrosio, and J.F. Coughlin The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: a comparison with field testing Ergonomics 53 2010 404 420