Browsing the information highway while driving: Three in-vehicle touch screen scrolling methods and driver distraction

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 815-823

  Kujala, Tuomo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Driver distraction; Driving performance; In vehicle information system; Information search; Scrolling method; Touch screen; Visual load; Visual sampling

Indexed keywords

DRIVER DISTRACTIONS; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION SEARCH; SCROLLING METHOD; VISUAL LOAD;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; EXPERIMENTS; FASTENERS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; KINETICS; MOBILE DEVICES; TOUCH SCREENS;

VEHICLES;

EID: 84883464674     PISSN: 16174909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-012-0517-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Chisholm SL, Caird JF, Lockhart J, Fern L, Teteris E (2007) Driving performance while engaged in MP-3 player interaction: effects of practice and task difficulty on PRT and eye movements. In Proceedings of the fourth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design. University of Iowa Public Policy Center, Iowa City, pp 238-245
2. Collet C, Guillot A, Petit C (2010) Phoning while driving I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies. Ergonomics 53(2010):589-601
3. Dingus TA, Hulse MC, Mollenhauer MA, Fleischman RN, McGehee DV, Manakkal N (1997) Effects of age, system experience, and navigation technique on driving with an advanced traveler information system. Hum Factors 39:177-199
4. Fitts PM, Peterson JR (1964) Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67(2):103-112
5. GM Press Release (2011) Cadillac CUE: intuitive and connected driving in 2012 - integrates interior design with industry-first control, command technologies. Retrieved from: http://media.gm.com/content/media/us/en/gm/news. detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2011/Oct/1012cadillac
6. Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX: results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 139-183
7. Horrey WJ, Wickens CD (2007) In-vehicle glance duration: distributions, tails, and model of crash risk. Transp Res Rec 2018:22-28
8. Klauer SG, Dingus TA, Neale VL, Sudweeks JD, Ramsey DJ (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data (DOT HS Rep. 810 594). U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC
9. Kujala T, Saariluoma P (2011) Effects of menu structure and touch screen scrolling method on the variability of in-vehicle glance durations during in-vehicle visual search tasks. Ergonomics 54(8):716-732
10. Lee JD, Regan MA, Young KL (2008) What drives distraction? Distraction as a breakdown of multilevel control. In: Regan MA, Lee JD, Young KL (eds) Driver distraction: theory, effects, and mitigation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 41-56
11. Lee JD, Young KL, Regan MA (2008) Defining driver distraction. In: Regan MA, Lee JD, Young KL (eds) Driver distraction: theory, effects, and mitigation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 31-40
12. Pitts MJ, Burnett G, Skrypchuk L, Wellings T, Attridge A, Williams MA (2012) Visual-haptic feedback interaction in automotive touchscreens. Displays 33:7-16
13. Ratwani RJ, Andrews AE, McCurry M, Trafton JG, Peterson MS (2007). Using peripheral processing and spatial memory to facilitate task resumption. In: Human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting proceedings, vol 51, pp 244-248
14. Salvucci DD (2010). On reconstruction of task context after interruption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: CHI 2010. ACM Press, New York, pp 89-92
15. Society of Automotive Engineers (2000) SAE J2396 Surface vehicle recommended practice, definitions and experimental measures related to the specification of driver visual behavior using video based techniques. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale
16. Wang Y, Mehler B, Reimer B, Lammers V, D'Ambrosio LA, Coughlin JF (2010) The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: a comparison with field testing. Ergonomics 53:404-420
17. Wierwille WW (1993) An initial model of visual sampling of in-car displays and controls. In: Gale AG, Brown ID, Haslegrave CM, Kruysse HW, Taylor SP (eds) Vision in vehicles IV. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam, pp 271-279
18. Wierwille WW, Tijerina L (1998) Modeling the relationship between driver in-vehicle visual demands and accident occurrence. In: Gale AG (ed) Vision in vehicles VI. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 233-243
19. Wikman AS, Nieminen T, Summala H (1998) Driving experience and time-sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width. Ergonomics 41:358-372
20. Wikman AS, Summala H (2005) Aging and time-sharing in highway driving. Optom Vis Sci 82:716-723