Designing touchpad user-interfaces for vehicles: Which tasks are most suitable?

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 403-414

  Burnett, Gary ^a   Lawson, Glyn ^a   Millen, Laura ^a   Pickering, Carl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b JAGUAR LAND ROVER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

design; distraction; in car user interfaces; touchpads; touchscreens; workload

Indexed keywords

DISTRACTION; IN-CAR USER-INTERFACES; TOUCH SCREEN; TOUCHPADS; WORKLOAD;

KNOBS; RADIO STATIONS; USER INTERFACES;

VEHICLES;

EID: 79956062241     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.553743     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bullinger, H., Kern, P., and Muntzinger, W.F., 1987. Design of controls. In: G. Salvendy, ed. Handbook of human factors. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 577-600.
2. Burnett, G.E., 2009. On-the-move and in your car: an overview of HCI issues for in-car computing. International Journal of Mobile Human-Computer Interaction, 1 (1), 60-78.
3. Burnett, G.E., et al., 2005. Writing and driving: an assessment of handwriting recognition as a means of alphanumeric data entry in a driving context. Advances in Transportation Studies, Special issue, 59-72.
4. Burnett, G.E., et al., under review. Designing touchpad userinterfaces for vehicles: where should the touchpad be located? Paper submitted to Behaviour & Information Technology.
5. Burnett, G.E., Summerskill, S.J., and Porter, J.M., 2004. Onthe- move destination entry for vehicle navigation systems: unsafe by any means? Behaviour and Information Technology, 23 (4), 265-272.
6. Engstrom, J., Johansson, E., and Ostlund, J., 2005. Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8 (2), 97-120. (Pubitemid 40743933)
7. Foley, J.P., 2009. Now you see it, now you don't: visual occlusion as a surrogate distraction measurement technique. In: M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee, and K. Young, eds. Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 123-134.
8. Gärtner, U., Kö nig, W., and Wittig, T., 2001. Evaluation of manual vs. speech input when using a driver information system in real traffic. In: Proceedings of international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design (University of Iowa Public Policy Center, Iowa). Available from: http://ppc.uiowa. edu/driving-assessment//2001/ index.html [Accessed December 2009].
9. Kamp, J.F., et al., 2001. HMI aspects of the usability of internet services with an in-car terminal on a driving simulator. IATSS Research, 25 (2), 29-39.
10. Kern, D., et al., 2009. Writing to your car: handwritten text input while driving. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI computer-human interaction conference (CHI09), 4705-4710, 4-9 April, 2009, Boston, MA, USA.
11. Norman, D.A., 1998. The design of everyday things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Pettitt, M.A., Burnett, G.E., and Stevens, A., 2007. An extended keystroke level model (KLM) for predicting the visual demand of in-vehicle information systems. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on Computer-Human- Interaction (CHI), held in San Jose, California, May 2007. New York: ACM Press.
13. Regan, M.A., Lee, J.D., and Young, K., 2009. Driver distraction: theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
14. Shneiderman, B., 1998. Designing the user-interface. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison Wesley.
15. Sivak, M., 1996. The information that drivers use: is it indeed 90% visual? Perception, 25 (9), 1081-1089. (Pubitemid 126695551)
16. Summerskill, S.J., Porter, J.M., and Burnett, G.E., 2003. Feeling your way home: the use of haptic interfaces within cars to make safety pleasurable. In: Proceedings of 3rd International conference on 'Design and Emotion', held 1-3 July, 2002 in Loughborough, UK.
17. Tijerina, L., Palmer, E., and Goodman, M.J., 1998. Driver workload assessment of route guidance system destination entry while driving. Technical Report UMTRI-96-30. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
18. Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D., and Green, P., 2002. Destination entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touchscreen keyboard. Technical Report UMTRI-2001-24. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
19. Young, K., Regan, M., and Hammer, M., November 2003. Driver distraction: a review of the literature. Report No. 206. Victoria, Australia: Monash University Accident Research Centre.