Cellulose Nanocrystal Reinforced Chitosan Coatings for Improving the Storability of Postharvest Pears Under Both Ambient and Cold Storages

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 453-462

  Deng, Zilong ^a   Jung, Jooyeoun ^a   Simonsen, John ^a   Wang, Yan ^b   Zhao, Yanyun ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ambient storage; cellulose nanocrystal; chitosan; cold storage; edible coatings; postharvest quality of pears

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CELLULOSE; CHITOSAN; CHLOROPHYLL; ETHYLENE; ETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; EXCIPIENT; NANOPARTICLE; WATER;

CHEMISTRY; COLD; FOOD PRESERVATION; FOOD STORAGE; FRUIT; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PYRUS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CELLULOSE; CHITOSAN; CHLOROPHYLL; COLD TEMPERATURE; ETHYLENES; EXCIPIENTS; FOOD PRESERVATION; FOOD STORAGE; FRUIT; NANOPARTICLES; PYRUS; WATER;

EID: 85011579977     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13601     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ASTM. 2000. Standard test methods for water vapor transmission of materials. E96/E96M - 16. Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
2. Afshar-Mohammadian M, Rahimi-Koldeh J. 2010. The comparison of carbohydrate and mineral changes in three cultivars of kiwifruit of Northern Iran during fruit development. Aust J Crop Sci 4:49–54.
3. Alexander L, Grierson D. 2002. Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: a model for climacteric fruit ripening. J Exp Bot 53:2039–55.
4. Arnon H, Zaitsev Y, Porat R, Poverenov E. 2014. Effects of carboxymethyl cellulose and chitosan bilayer edible coating on postharvest quality of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 87:21–6.
5. Arvanitoyannis I, Gorris LGM. 1999. Edible and biodegradable polymeric materials for food packaging or coating. In: Oliveira FA and Oliveira JC, eds. Processing foods: quality optimization and process assessment. Florida: CRC Press p 357–71.
6. Azeredo H, Mattoso LHC, Avena-Bustillos RJ. 2010. Nanocellulose reinforced chitosan composite films as affected by nanofiller loading and plasticizer content. J Food Sci 75:1–7.
7. Bashir HA, Abu-Goukh ABA. 2003. Compositional changes during guava fruit ripening. Food Chem 80(4):557–63.
8. Calvo G, Sozzi GO. 2009. Effectiveness of 1-MCP treatments on ‘Bartlett’ pears as influenced by the cooling method and the bin material. Postharvest Biol Technol 51:49–55.
9. Cavender G, Liu M, Hobbs D, Frei B, Strik B, Zhao Y. 2014. Effects of different organic weed management strategies on the physicochemical, sensory, and antioxidant properties of machine-harvested blackberry fruits. J Food Sci 79:2107–16.
10. Chaimanee P, Suntornwat O. 1994. Changes in carbohydrate content during fruit ripening—a new approach of teaching of carbohydrate chemistry in biochemistry course. Biochem Educ 22(2):101–2.
11. Chen JL, Zhao Y. 2012. Effect of molecular weight, acid, and plasticizer on the physicochemical and antibacterial properties of β-chitosan based films. J Food Sci 77:127–36.
12. Choi YJ, Simonsen J. 2006. Cellulose nanocrystal-filled carboxymethyl cellulose nanocomposites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 6:633–9.
13. De Wild HPJ, Otma EC, Peppelenbos HW. 2003. Carbon dioxide action on ethylene biosynthesis of preclimacteric and climacteric pear fruit. J Exp Bot 54:1537–44.
14. Dehnad D, Mirzaei H, Emam-Djomeh Z. 2014. Thermal and antimicrobial properties of chitosan–nanocellulose films for extending shelf life of ground meat. Carbohydr Polym 109:148–54.
15. Dhall RK. 2013. Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53:435–50.
16. Diab T, Biliaderis CG, Gerasopoulos D, Sfakiotakis E. 2001. Physicochemical properties and application of pullulan edible films and coatings in fruit preservation. J Food Sci 81:988–1000.
17. Elsabee MZ, Abdou ES. 2013. Chitosan based edible films and coatings: a review. Mat Sci Eng C 33:1819–41.
18. Favier V, Chanzy H, Cavaille JY. 1995. Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers. Macromolecules 28:6365–7.
19. Franck C, Lammertyn J, Ho QT, Verboven P, Verlinden B, Nicolaï BM. 2007. Browning disorders in pear fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 43:1–13.
20. Hiwasa K, Nakano R, Hashimoto A, Matsuzaki M, Murayama H, Inaba A, Kubo Y. 2004. European, Chinese and Japanese pear fruits exhibit differential softening characteristics during ripening. J Exp Bot 55(406):2281–90.
21. Jung J, Cavender G, Zhao Y. 2014. The contribution of acidulant to the antibacterial activity of acid soluble α-and β-chitosan solutions and their films. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:425–35.
22. Jung J, Zhao Y. 2013. Impact of the structural differences between α-and β-chitosan on their depolymerizing reaction and antibacterial activity. J Agric Food Chem 61:8783–9.
23. Karlsen AM, Aaby K, Sivertsen H, Baardseth P, Ellekjær MR. 1999. Instrumental and sensory analysis of fresh Norwegian and imported apples. Food Qual Prefer 10:305–14.
24. Khan A, Khan RA, Salmieri S, Le Tien C, Riedl B, Bouchard J, Lacroix M. 2012. Mechanical and barrier properties of nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced chitosan based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 90:1601–8.
25. Li F, Zhang X, Song B, Li J, Shang Z, Guan J. 2013. Combined effects of 1-MCP and MAP on the fruit quality of pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Reld cv. Laiyang) during cold storage. Sci Hortic 164:544–51.
26. Lin D, Zhao Y. 2007. Innovations in the development and application of edible coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Trend Food Sci Technol 6:60–75.
27. Lin N, Dufresne A. 2014. Surface chemistry, morphological analysis and properties of cellulose nanocrystals with gradiented sulfation degrees. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:5384–93.
28. Liu A, Walther A, Ikkala O, Belova L, Berglund LA. 2011. Clay nanopaper with tough cellulose nanofiber matrix for fire retardancy and gas barrier functions. Biomacromolecules 12:633–41.
29. Liu T, Zhang H, Jiang G, Wu F, Qian Z, Qu H, Jiang Y. 2010. Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene released from 3-chloro-2-methylpropene and lithium diisopropylamide on quality of harvested mango fruit. J Food Technol 8:106–11.
30. Makkumrai W, Anthon GE, Sivertsen H, Ebeler SE, Negre-Zakharov F, Barrett DM, Mitcham EJ. 2014. Effect of ethylene and temperature conditioning on sensory attributes and chemical composition of ‘Bartlett’ pears. Postharvest Biol Technol 97:44–61.
31. Mattheis J, Felicetti D, Rudell DR. 2013. Pithy brown core in D'Anjou pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruit developing during controlled atmosphere storage at pO2 determined by monitoring chlorophyll fluorescence. Postharvest Biol Technol 86:259–64.
32. Park SI, Daeschel MA, Zhao Y. 2004. Functional properties of antimicrobial lysozyme-chitosan composite films. J Food Sci 69(8):M215–21.
33. Pereda M, Dufresne A, Aranguren MI. 2014. Polyelectrolyte films based on chitosan/olive oil and reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 101:1018–26.
34. Quamme HA, Gray JI. 1985. Pear fruit quality and factors that condition it. In: Pattee HE, editor. Evaluation of quality of fruits and vegetables. New York: Springer p 47–61.
35. Rhim JW, Ng PK. 2007. Natural biopolymer-based nanocomposite films for packaging applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 47:411–33.
36. Tariq MA, Tahir FM, Asi AA, Pervez MA. 2001. Effect of controlled atmosphere storage on damaged citrus fruit quality. Intl J Agric Biol 3:9–12.
37. USDA. 2014. The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. HB-66. Available from: http://www.ba.ars.usda.gov/hb66/contents.html. Accessed 2016 August 01.
38. Vazquez-Salinas C, Lakshminarayana S. 1985. Compositional changes in mango fruit during ripening at different storage temperatures. J Food Sci 50(6):1646–8.
39. Visakh PM, Iturriaga LB, Ribotta PD. 2013. Advances in food science and nutrition. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2:133–42.
40. Wang H, Roman M. 2011. Formation and properties of chitosan-cellulose nanocrystal polyelectrolyte-macroion complexes for drug delivery applications. Biomacromolecules 12:1585–93.
41. Wang Y, Sugar D. 2015. 1-MCP efficacy in extending storage life of ‘Bartlett’ pears is affected by harvest maturity, production elevation, and holding temperature during treatment delay. Postharvest Biol Technol 103:1–8.
42. Xu X, Wang H, Jiang L, Wang X, Payne SA, Zhu JY, Li R. 2014. Comparison between cellulose nanocrystal and cellulose nanofibril reinforced poly (ethylene oxide) nanofibers and their novel shish-kebab-like crystalline structures. Macromolecules 47:3409–16.
43. Zhao Y, Simonsen J, Cavender G, Jung J, Fuchigami LH. 2014. Nano-cellulose coatings to prevent damage in foodstuffs. U.S. Patent US20140272013 A1.
44. Zhou C, Wu Q. 2012. Recent development in applications of cellulose nanocrystals for advanced polymer-based nanocomposites by novel fabrication strategies. Croatia: Intech Open Access Publisher.