A well-supported phylogenetic framework for the monocot order Alismatales reveals multiple losses of the plastid NADH dehydrogenase complex and a strong long-branch effect

Early Events in Monocot Evolution

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-28

  Iles, William J D ^a   Smith, Selena Y ^b   Graham, Sean W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011320157     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139002950.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (98)

1. APG I (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group I). (1998). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 85, 531-553.
2. APG II (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II). (2003). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 141, 399-436.
3. APG III (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III). (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161, 105-121.
4. Azuma, H. and Tobe, H. (2011). Molecular phylogenetic analyses of Tofieldiaceae (Alismatales): family circumscription and intergeneric relationships. Journal of Plant Research, 124, 349-357.
5. Backlund, A. and Bremer, K. (1998). To be or not to be - principles of classification and monotypic plant families. Taxon, 47, 391-400.
6. Blazier, J. C., Guisinger, M. M. and Jansen, R. K. (2011). Recent loss of plastidencoded ndh genes within Erodium (Geraniaceae). Plant Molecular Biology, 76, 263-272.
7. Braukmann, T. W. A., Kuzmina, M. and Stefanović, S. (2009). Loss of all plastid ndh genes in Gnetales and conifers: Extant and evolutionary significance for the seed plant phylogeny. Current Genetics, 55, 323-337.
8. Cabrera, L. I., Salazar, G. A., Chase, M. W. et al. (2008). Phylogenetic relationships of aroids and duckweeds (Araceae) inferred from coding and noncoding plastid DNA. American Journal of Botany, 95, 1153-1165.
9. Cantino, P. D., Doyle, D. A., Graham, S. W. et al. (2007). Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon, 56, 822-846.
10. Chang, C.-C., Lin, H.-C., Lin, I-P. et al. (2006). The chloroplast genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): comparative analysis of evolutionary rate with that of grasses and its phylogenetic implications. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 279-291.
11. Chase, M. W. (2004). Monocot relationships: an overview. American Journal of Botany, 91, 1645-1655.
12. Chase, M. W., Duvall, M. R., Hills, H. G. et al. (1995). Molecular phylogenetics of Lilianae. In Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, Volume I, ed. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 109-137.
13. Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. et al. (2000). Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, ed. K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison. Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 3-16.
14. Chase, M. W., Fay, M. F., Devey, D. S. et al. (2006). Multigene analyses of monocot relationships: a summary. In Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution (excluding Poales), ed. J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince and M. G. Simpson. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, pp. 63-75.
15. Chen, J.-M., Chen, D., Gituru, W. R., Wang, Q.-F. and Guo, Y.-H. (2004a). Evolution of apocarpy in Alismatidae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast rbcL gene sequence data. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 45, 33-40.
16. Chen, J.-M., Gituru, W. R. and Wang, Q.-F. (2004b). Evolution of aquatic life-forms in Alismatidae: phylogenetic estimation from chloroplast rbcL gene sequence data. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 52, 323-329.
17. Cronquist, A. 1988. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
18. Cuenca, A., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Davis, J. I and Stevenson, D. W. (2010). Are substitution rates and RNA editing correlated? BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 349.
19. Cusimano, N., Bogner, J., Mayo, S. J. et al. (2011). Relationships within the Araceae: comparison of morphological patterns with molecular phylogenies. American Journal of Botany, 98, 654-668.
20. Dahlgren, R. M. T. and Clifford, H. T. (1982). The Monocotyledons: A Comparative Study. London: Academic Press.
21. Davis, J. I, Stevenson, D. W., Petersen, G. et al. (2004). A phylogeny of the monocots, as inferred from rbcL and atpA sequence variation, and a comparison of methods for calculating jackknife and bootstrap values. Systematic Botany, 29, 467-510.
22. Davis, J. I, Petersen, G., Seberg, O. et al. (2006). Are mitochondrial genes useful for the analysis of monocot relationships? Taxon, 55, 857-870.
23. dePamphilis, C. W. and Palmer, J. D. (1990). Loss of photosynthetic and chlororespiratory genes from the plastid genome of a parasitic flowering plant. Nature, 384, 337-339.
24. Doyle, J. J. and Doyle, J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19, 11-15.
25. Duvall, M. R., Clegg, M. T., Chase, M. W. et al. (1993). Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens, 80, 607-619.
26. Engler, A. (1892). Syllabus der Vorlesungen über spezielle und medizinischpharmaceutische Botanik. Berlin: Bornträger.
27. Felsenstein, J. (1978). Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology, 27, 401-410.
28. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783-791.
29. Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R. and Crane, P. R. (2004). Araceae from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal: evidence on the emergence of monocotyledons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 16565-16570.
30. Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R. and Crane, P. R. (2010). Diversity in obscurity: fossil flowers and the early history of angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 369-382.
31. Givnish, T. J., Pires, J. C., Graham, S. W. et al. (2006). Phylogenetic relationships of monocots based on the highly informative plastid gene ndhF: evidence for widespread concerted convergence. In Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution (excluding Poales), ed. J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince and M. G. Simpson. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, pp. 27-50.
32. Givnish, T. J., Ames, M., McNeal, J. R. et al. (2010). Assembling the tree of monocotyledons: plastome sequence phylogeny and evolution of Poales. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 97, 584-616.
33. Graham, S. W. and Iles, W. J. D. (2009). Different gymnosperm outgroups have (mostly) congruent signal regarding the root of flowering plant phylogeny. American Journal of Botany, 96, 216-227.
34. Graham, S. W. and Olmstead, R. G. (2000). Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. American Journal of Botany, 87, 1712-1730.
35. Graham, S. W., Kohn, J. R., Morton, B. R., Eckenwalder, J. E. and Barrett, S. C. H. (1998). Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Systematic Biology, 47, 545-567.
36. Graham, S. W., Reeves, P. A., Burns, A. C. E. and Olmstead, R. G. (2000). Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 161 (Suppl. 6), S83-S96.
37. Graham, S. W., Zgurski, J. M., McPherson, M. A. et al. (2006). Robust inference of monocot deep phylogeny using an expanded multigene plastid data set. In Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution (excluding Poales), ed. J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince and M. G. Simpson. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, pp. 3-20.
38. Heath, T. A., Hedtke, S. M., and Hillis, D. M. (2008). Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 46, 239-257.
39. Hedtke, S. M., Townsend, T. M. and Hillis, D. M. (2006). Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling. Systematic Biology, 55, 522-529.
40. Hendy, M. D. and Penny, D. (1989). A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Systematic Zoology, 38, 297-309.
41. Hillis, D. M. (1998). Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Systematic Biology, 47, 3-8.
42. Hillis, D. M., Pollock, D. D., McGuire, J. A. and Zwickl, D. J. (2003). Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Systematic Biology, 52, 124-126.
43. Iida, S., Kosuge, K. and Kadono, Y. (2004). Molecular phylogeny of Japanese Potamogeton species in light of noncoding chloroplast sequences. Aquatic Botany, 80, 115-127.
44. Ito, Y., Ohi-Toma, T., Murata, J. and Tanaka, N. (2010). Hybridization and polyploidy of an aquatic plant, Ruppia (Ruppiaceae), inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA phylogenies. American Journal of Botany, 97, 1156-1167.
45. Jacobson, A. and Hedrén, M. (2007). Phylogenetic relationships in Alisma (Alismataceae) based on RAPDs, and sequence data from ITS and trnL. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 265, 27-44.
46. Janssen, T. and Bremer, K. (2004). The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800þ rbcL sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 146, 385-398.
47. Kato, Y., Aioi, K., Omori, Y., Takahata, N. and Satta, Y. (2003). Phylogenetic analysis of Zostera species based on rbcL and matK nucleotide sequences: implications for the origin and diversification of seagrasses in Japanese waters. Genes and Genetic Systems, 78, 329-342.
48. Keener, B. R. (2005). Molecular Systematics and Revision of the Aquatic Monocot Genus Sagittaria (Alismataceae). (Dissertation). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama.
49. Lehtonen, S. (2006). Phylogenetics of Echinodorus (Alismataceae) based on morphological data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 150, 291-305.
50. Lehtonen, S. (2009). Systematics of the Alismataceae - a morphological evaluation. Aquatic Botany, 91, 279-290.
51. Lehtonen, S. and Myllys, L. (2008). Cladistic analysis of Echinodorus (Alismataceae): simultaneous analysis of molecular and morphological data. Cladistics, 24, 218-239.
52. Les, D. H. and Haynes, R. R. (1995). Systematics of subclass Alismatidae: a synthetic approach. In Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, Volume II, ed. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 353-377.
53. Les, D. H., Garvin, D. K. and Wimpee, C. F. (1993). Phylogenetic studies in the monocot subclass Alismatidae: evidence for a reappraisal of the aquatic order Najadales. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2, 304-314.
54. Les, D. H., Cleland, M. A. and Waycott, M. (1997). Phylogenetic studies in Alismatidae, II: evolution of marine angiosperms (seagrasses) and hydrophily. Systematic Botany, 22, 443-463.
55. Les, D. H., Crawford, D. J., Landolt, E., Gabel, J. D. and Kimball, R. T. (2002a). Phylogeny and systematics of Lemnaceae, the duckweed family. Systematic Botany, 27, 221-240.
56. Les, D. H., Moody, M. L., Jacobs, S. W. L. and Bayer, R. J. (2002b). Systematics of seagrasses (Zosteraceae) in Australia and New Zealand. Systematic Botany, 27, 468-484.
57. Les, D. H., Moody, M. L. and Jacobs, S. W. L. (2005). Phylogeny and systematics of Aponogeton (Aponogetonaceae): the Australian species. Systematic Botany, 30, 503-519.
58. Les, D. H., Moody, M. L. and Soros, C. L. (2006). A reappraisal of phylogenetic relationships in the monocotyledon family Hydrocharitaceae (Alismatidae). In Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution (excluding Poales), ed. J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince and M. G. Simpson. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, pp. 211-230.
59. Les, D. H., Jacobs, S. W. L., Tippery, N. P. et al. (2008). Systematics of Vallisneria (Hydrocharitaceae). Systematic Botany, 33, 49-65.
60. Les, D. H., Sheldon, S. P. and Tippery, N. P. (2010). Hybridization in hydrophiles: natural interspecific hybrids in Najas (Hydrocharitaceae). Systematic Botany, 35, 736-744.
61. Li, X. and Zhou, Z. (2009). Phylogenetic studies of the core Alismatales inferred from morphology and rbcL sequences. Progress in Natural Science, 19, 931-945.
62. Lindqvist, C., De Laet, J., Haynes, R. R et al. (2006). Molecular phylogenetics of an aquatic plant lineage, Potamogetonaceae. Cladistics, 22, 568-588.
63. Martín, M. and Sabater, B. (2010). Plastid ndh genes in plant evolution. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48, 636-645.
64. Matsen, F. A. and Steel, M. (2007). Phylogenetic mixtures on a single tree can mimic a tree of another topology. Systematic Biology, 56, 767-775.
65. Mower, J. P., Touzet, P., Gummow, J. S., Delph, L. F. and Palmer, J. D. (2007). Extensive variation in synonymous substitution rates in mitochondrial genes of seed plants. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 135.
66. Neyland, R. and Urbatsch, L. E. (1996). Phylogeny of subfamily Epidendroideae (Orchidaceae) inferred from ndhF chloroplast gene sequences. American Journal of Botany, 83, 1195-1206.
67. Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Davis, J. I. et al. (2006a). Mitochondrial data in monocot phylogenetics. In Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution (excluding Poales), ed. J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince and M. G. Simpson. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, pp. 52-62.
68. Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Davis, J. I and Stevenson, D.W. (2006b). RNA editing and phylogenetic reconstruction in two monocot mitochondrial genes. Taxon, 55, 871-886.
69. Posada, D. (2008). jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 1253-1256.
70. Posluszny, U. and Charlton, W. A. (1993). Evolution of the helobial flower. Aquatic Botany, 44, 303-324.
71. Rambaut, A. (1998). Se-Al (sequence alignment editor version 10 alpha 1). Oxford: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford.
72. Rothwell, G. W., Van Atta, M. R., Ballard, Jr. H. E. and Stockey R. A. (2004). Molecular phylogenetic relationships among Lemnaceae and Araceae using the chloroplast trnL-trnF intergenic spacer. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30, 378-385.
73. Saarela, J. M. and Graham, S. W. (2010). Inference of phylogenetic relationships among the subfamilies of grasses (Poaceae: Poales) using meso-scale exemplar-based sampling of the plastid genome. Botany, 88, 65-84.
74. Saarela, J. M., Rai, H. S., Doyle, J. A. et al. (2007). Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree. Nature, 446, 312-315.
75. Saarela, J. M., Prentis, P. J., Rai, H. S. and Graham, S. W. (2008). Phylogenetic relationships in the monocot order Commelinales, with a focus on Philydraceae. Botany, 86, 719-731.
76. Sculthorpe, C. D. (1967). The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. London: Edward Arnold.
77. Shinozaki, K., Ohme, M., Tanaka, M. et al. (1986). The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO Journal, 5, 2043-2049.
78. Stamatakis, A. (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22, 2688-2690.
79. Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P. and Rougemont, J. (2008). A rapid bootstrap algorithm for RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology, 57, 758-771.
80. Stefanović, S. and Olmstead, R. G. (2005). Down the slippery slope: plastid genome evolution in Convolvulaceae. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 61, 292-305.
81. Stevens, P. F. (2001þ). Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 9, June 2008 [and more or less continuously updated since]. http://www.mobot.org/mobot/ research/apweb/.
82. Swofford, D. L. (2002). PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0d100. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
83. Takhtajan, A. (1997). Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
84. Tamura, M. N., Yamashita, J., Fuse S. and Haraguchi, M. (2004a). Molecular phylogeny of monocotyledons inferred from combined analysis of plastid matK and rbcL gene sequences. Journal of Plant Research, 117, 109-120.
85. Tamura, M. N., Fuse, S., Azuma, H. and Hasebe, M. (2004b). Biosystematic studies on the family Tofieldiaceae I. Phylogeny and circumscription of the family inferred from DNA sequences of matK and rbcL. Plant Biology, 6, 562-567.
86. Tamura, M. N., Azuma, H., Yamashita, J., Fuse, S. and Ishii, T. (2010). Biosystematic studies on the family Tofieldiaceae II. Phylogeny of species of Tofieldia and Triantha inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica, 60, 131-140.
87. Tanaka, N., Setoguchi, H. and Murata, J. (1997). Phylogeny of the family Hydrocharitaceae inferred from rbcL and matK gene sequence data. Journal of Plant Research, 110, 329-337.
88. Tanaka, N., Kuo, J., Omori, Y., Nakaoka, M. and Aioi, K. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships in the genera Zostera and Heterozostera (Zosteraceae) based on matK sequence data. Journal of Plant Research, 116, 273-279.
89. Thiers, B. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: A Global Directory of Public Herbaria and Associated Staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg. org/ih/
90. Tomlinson, P. B. (1982). Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. VII Helobiae (Alismatidae). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
91. von Mering, S. and Kadereit, J. W. (2010). Phylogeny, systematics, and recircumscription of Juncaginaceae - a cosmopolitan wetland family. In Diversity, Phylogeny, and Evolution in the Monocotyledons, ed. O. Seberg, G. Petersen, A. S. Barfod and J. I Davis. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press, pp. 55-79.
92. Wang, B. and Qiu, Y.-L. (2006). Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza, 16, 299-363.
93. Wang, Q. D., Zhang, T. and Wang, J. B. (2007). Phylogenetic relationships and hybrid origin of Potamogeton species (Potamogetonaceae) distributed in China: insights from the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequence (ITS). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 267, 65-78.
94. Waycott, M., Freshwater, D. W., York, R. A., Calladine, A. and Kenworthy, W. J. (2002). Evolutionary trends in the seagrass genus Halophila (Thouars): insights from molecular phylogeny. Bulletin of Marine Science, 71, 1299-1308.
95. Waycott, M., Procaccini, G., Les, D. H. and Reusch, T. B. H. (2006). Seagrass evolution, ecology and conservation: a genetic perspective. In Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation, ed. A. W. D. Larkum, R. J. Orth and C. M. Duarte. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 25-50.
96. Yang, Z. (2006). Computational Molecular Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97. Zhang, T., Wang, Q., Li, W., Cheng, Y. and Wang, J. (2008). Analysis of phylogenetic relationships of Potamogeton species in China based on chloroplast trnT-trnF sequences. Aquatic Botany, 89, 34-42.
98. Zwickl, D. J. and Hillis, D. M. (2002). Increased taxon sampling greatly decreases phylogenetic error. Systematic Biology, 51, 588-598.