Phylogenetics of Echinodorus (Alismataceae) based on morphological data

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 150, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 291-305

  Lehtonen, Samuli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Aquatic plants; Continuous characters; Monocots; Morphological data

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC PLANT; HERB; MORPHOLOGY; ORNAMENTAL SPECIES; PHYLOGENY;

ARGENTINA; NORTH AMERICA; SOUTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ALISMATACEAE; ECHINODORUS; LILIOPSIDA;

EID: 33646485154     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00478.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Archie J. 1985. Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. Systematic Zoology 34 326 345.
2. Arechavaleta J. 1903. Contribución al conocimiento de la Flora Uruguaya. -Varias especies nuevas y otras poco conocidas. Anales del Museo Nacional de Montevideo 4 61 86.
3. Baum BR. 1988. A simple procedure for establishing discrete characters from measurement data, applicable to cladistics. Taxon 37 63 70.
4. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 795 803.
5. Buchenau F. 1903. Alismataceae. In Engler A ed. Das Pflanzenreich 15 23 35.
6. Cook C. 1978. Book reviews; two taxonomic monographs. Aquatic Botany 4 377 381.
7. Cook CDK. 1990. Aquatic plant book. The Hague SPB Academic Publishing.
8. Farris JS. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Systematic Zoology 19 83 92.
9. Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5 417 419.
10. Farris JS. 1990. Phenetics in camouflage. Cladistics 6 91 100.
11. Farris JS Albert VA Källersjö M Lipscomb D Kluge AG. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12 99 124.
12. Fasset NC. 1955. Echinodorus in the American tropics. Rhodora 57 133 156 174-188, 202-212.
13. Goloboff P Farris J Nixon K. 2003. T.N.T. tree analysis using new technology. Program and documentation, available from the authors, and http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny.
14. Haynes RR. 1984. Techniques for collecting aquatic and marsh plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71 229 231.
15. Haynes RR Burkhalter JR. 1998. A new species of Echinodorus (Alismataceae) from the United States of America. Castanea 63 180 182.
16. Haynes RR Holm-Nielsen LB. 1986. Notes on Echinodorus (Alismataceae). Brittonia 38 325 332.
17. Haynes RR Holm-Nielsen LB. 1989. Speciation of Alismatidae in the Neotropics. In Holm-Nielsen LB Nielsen IC Balslev H eds. Tropical forests. Botanical dynamics, speciation and diversity. Academic Press London 211 219.
18. Haynes RR Holm-Nielsen LB. 1994. The Alismataceae. Flora Neotropica 64. New York The New York Botanical Garden.
19. Hedges SB Maxson LR. 1996. Re: molecules and morphology in amniote phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6 312 314.
20. Hillis DM Wiens JJ. 2000. Molecules versus morphology in systematics. In Wiens JJ ed. Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. Washington, DC Smithsonian Institution Press 1 19.
21. Holmgren PK Holmgren NH Barnett LC eds. 1990. Index Herbariorum (Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 120) Part I: The Herbaria of the world 8th edn. New York New York Botanical Garden.
22. Jérémie J Lobreau-Callen D Couderc H Jossang A. 2001. Une nouvelle espèce d'Echinodorus (Alismataceae) de Guadeloupe (Petites Antilles). Observations palynologiques, cytogénétiques et chimiques. Adansonia 23 191 203.
23. Kasselmann C. 2000. Echinodórus decúmbens Kasselmann, spec. nov. (Alismatáceae), eine neue Art aus Ostbrasilien. Aqua-Planta 25 3 10.
24. Kasselmann C. 2001. Echinodorus, die beliebtesten Aquarienpflanzen. Ettlingen Dähne Verlag.
25. Kluge AG Farris JS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18 1 32.
26. Les DH Cleland MA. 1997. Phylogenetic studies in Alismatidae, II: Evolution of marine angiosperms (seagrasses) and hydrophily. Systematic Botany 22 443 463.
27. Lot AH Novelo AR. 1994. Alismataceae. In Davidse G Sousa MS Chater AO eds. Flora Mesoamericana 6 Alismataceae a Cyperaceae. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Missouri Botanical Garden and The Natural History Museum (London) 3 8.
28. Micheli M. 1881. Alismaceae. In De Candolle A De Candolle C eds. Monographiae Phanerogamarum Paris 29 83.
29. Nelson BW Ferreira CAC da Silva MF Kawasaki ML. 1990. Endemism centres, refugia and botanical collection density in Brasilian Amazonia. Nature 345 714 716.
30. Nixon KC Carpenter JM. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics 9 413 426.
31. Padgett DJ. 2003. Echinodorus tenellus (Martius) Buchenau (Dwarf burhead) conservation and research plan for New England. Framingham, MA New England Wild Flower Society.
32. Prance GT Beentje H Dransfield J Jons R. 2000. The tropical flora remains undercollected. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87 67 71.
33. Rae TC. 1998. The logical basis for the use of continuous characters in phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 14 221 228.
34. Rataj K. 1968. Echinodorus paniculatus Micheli and its ally E. lanceolatus Rataj sp. nov. (American Alismataceae). Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique 38 401 408.
35. Rataj K. 1969. Echinodorus longipetalus Mich. and other species with reticulate markings in the blades from Central and South America. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 4 331 336.
36. Rataj K. 1970. Las Alismataceae de la República Argentina. Darwiniana 16 9 39.
37. Rataj K. 1975. Revizion [sic!] of the genus Echinodorus Rich. Studie Csav 2 1 156.
38. Rataj K. 1978. Alismataceae of Brazil. Acta Amazonica 8 5 51.
39. Rataj K. 2004. A new revision of the swordplant genus Echinodorus Richard, 1848 (Alismataceae). Aqua, Journal of Ichtyology and Aquatic Biology Special Publication no. I.
40. Sculthorpe CD. 1967. The biology of aquatic vascular plants. London Edward Arnold Publishers.
41. Seiffert ER Kappelman J. 2001. Morphometric variation in the hominoid orbital aperture: a case study with implications for the use of variable characters in Miocene catarrhine systematics. Journal of Human Evolution 40 301 318.
42. Slowinski JB. 1993. 'Unordered' versus 'ordered' characters. Systematic Biology 42 155 165.
43. Soros C Les DH. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the Alismataceae. Botany 2002 Abstract S-107. Available at http://www.botany2002.org (accessed July 2003).
44. Stevens PF. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Systematic Botany 16 553 583.
45. Strong EE Lipscomb D. 1999. Character coding and inapplicable data. Cladistics 15 363 371.
46. Thiele K. 1993. The holy grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9 275 304.
47. Wanke D. 1999. Ansichten zum 'Formenkreis' um Echinodórus cylíndricus RATAJ (1975) und Echinodórus gláúcus RATAJ (1975). Aqua-Planta 24 105 111.
48. Wiens JJ. 1998. Testing phylogenetic methods with tree congruence: phylogenetic analysis of polymorphic morphological characters in phrynosomatid lizards. Systematic Biology 47 427 444.
49. Wiens JJ. 1999. Polymorphism in systematics and comparative biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30 327 362.
50. Wilkinson M. 1995. A comparison of two methods of character construction. Cladistics 11 297 308.