Phylogenetic relationships of aroids and duckweeds (Araceae) inferred from coding and noncoding plastid DNA

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 95, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1153-1165

  Cabrera, Lidia I ^a   Salazar, Gerardo A ^a   Chase, Mark W ^b   Mayo, Simon J ^b   Bogner, Josef ^c   Dávila, Patricia ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Araceae; Lemnaceae; Molecular phylogenetics; Plastid DNA; rbcL; Subfamilial and tribal classification; trnK matK; trnL trnF

Indexed keywords

DNA; FLOWER; HERB; PHYLOGENETICS; PLASTID;

ARACEAE; AROIDEAE; CALLOIDEAE; COLOCASIEAE; GONATOPUS; GYMNOSTACHYDOIDEAE; LASIOIDEAE; LEMNA; LEMNOIDEAE; MONSTEREAE; ORONTIOIDEAE; PISTIA; POTHOIDEAE; ZAMIOCULCAS;

EID: 51349102681     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800073     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
2. APG [ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP]. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
3. APG [ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP]. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
4. ASMUSSEN, C. B., AND M. W. CHASE. 2001. Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics. American Journal of Botany 88: 1103-1117.
5. BARABÉ, D., A. BRUNEAU, F. FOREST, AND C. LACROIX. 2002. The correlation between development of atypical bisexual flowers and phylogeny in the Aroideae (Araceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 232: 1-19.
6. BARABÉ, D., C. LACROIX, A. BRUNEAU, A. ARCHAMBAULT, AND M. GIBERNAU. 2004. Floral development and phylogenetic position of Schismatoglottis (Araceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 173-189.
7. BATEMAN, R. M. 1999. Integrating molecular and morphological evidence of evolutionary radiations. In P. M. Hollingsworth, R. M. Bateman, and R. J. Gornall [eds.], Molecular systematics and plant evolution, 432-471. Taylor & Francis, London, UK.
8. BEILLE, L. 1935. Précis de botanique pharmaceutique, éd. 2, II: 193-194.
9. BELLSTEDT, D. U., H. P. LINDER, AND E. HARLEY. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in Disa based on non-coding trnL-trnF chloroplast sequences: evidence of numerous repeat regions. American Journal of Botany 88: 2088-2100.
10. BOGNER, J. 1979. A critical list of the aroid genera. Aroideana 1: 63-73.
11. BOGNER, J., AND M. HESSE. 2005. Zamioculcadoideae, a new subfamily of Araceae. Aroideana 28: 3-20.
12. BOGNER, J., AND D. H. NICOLSON. 1991. A revised classification of Araceae with dichotomous keys. Willdenowia 21: 35-50.
13. BOGNER, J., AND G. PETERSEN. 2007. The chromosome numbers of the aroid genera. Aroideana 30: 82-90.
14. BOWN, D. 2000. Aroids: Plants of the Arum family, 2nd ed. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
15. BOYCE, P. C. 1995. Introduction to the family Araceae. Curtis's Botanical Magazine 12: 122-125.
16. BROOKS, D. R., AND D. A. MCLENNAN. 1991. Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
17. BUZGO, M. 2001. Flower structure and development of Araceae compared with alismatids and Acoraceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 393-425.
18. CHASE, M. W. 2004. Monocot relationships: An overview. American Journal of Botany 91: 1645-1655.
19. CHASE, M. W., M. R. DUVALL, H. G. HILLIS, J. G. CONRAN, A. V. COX, L. E. EGUIARTE, H. HARTWELL, ET AL. 1995a. Molecular phylogenetics of Lilianae. In P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries [eds.]. Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution, vol. 1, 109-137. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
20. CHASE, M. W., M. F. FAY, D. S. DEVEY, O. MAURIN, N. RøNSTED, J. DAVIES, Y. PILLON, ET AL. 2006. Multi-gene analyses of monocot relationships: A summary. Aliso 22: 63-75.
21. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. MORGAN, D. H. LES, B. D. MISHLER, M. R. DUVALL, ET AL. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
22. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, P. J. RUDALL, M. F. FAY, W. J. HAHN, S. SULLIVAN, ET AL. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In K. L. Wilson, and D. A. Morrison [eds.], Monocots: Systematics and evolution, 3-16, CSIRO, Collinwood, Australia.
23. CHASE, M. W., D. W. STEVENSON, P. WILKIN, AND P. J. RUDALL. 1995b. Monocot systematics: A combined analysis. In P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries [eds.]. Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution, vol. 2, 685-730. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
24. CIVEYREL, L., AND N. ROWE. 2001. Relationships of Secamonoideae based on the plastid gene matK, morphology and biomechanics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88: 583-602.
25. CROAT, T. B. 1988. Ecology and life-forms of Araceae. Aroideana 11: 4-56.
26. CROAT, T. B. 1990. A comparison of aroid classification systems. Aroideana 13: 44-63.
27. CROAT, T. B. 1998. History and current status on systematic research with Araceae. Aroideana 21: 26-145.
28. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
29. DAVIS, J. I. 1995. A phylogenetic structure for monocotyledons, as inferred from chloroplast restriction site variation, and a comparison of measures of clade support. Systematic Botany 20: 503-527.
30. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
31. DUVALL, M. R., M. T. CLEGG, M. W. CHASE, W. D. CLARK, W. J. KRESS, H. G. HILLS, L. E. EGUIARTE, ET AL. 1993a. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 607-619.
32. DUVALL, M. R., G. H. LEARN, L. E. EGUIARTE, AND M. T. CLEGG. 1993b. Phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences identifies Acorus calamus as the primal extant monocotyledon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 90: 4641-4644.
33. ENGLER, A. 1876. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die morphologischen Verhältnisse der Araceae. I. Natürliches System der Araceae. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopino-Carolinae Germanicae Naturae Curiosorum 39: 133-155.
34. ENGLER, A. 1905. Araceae-Pothoideae. In A. Engler [ed.], Das Pflanzenreich 21 (IV.23B), 1-330.
35. ENGLER, A. 1920. Araceae - Pars generalis et index familiae generalis. In A. Engler [ed.], Das Pflanzenreich 74 (IV.23A), 1-71.
36. FARRIS, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
37. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 39: 783-791.
38. FRENCH, J. C., M. G. CHUNG, AND Y. K. HUR. 1995. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Ariflorae. In P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries [eds.], Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution, vol. 1, 255-275. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
39. FRIIS, E. M., K. R. PEDERSEN, AND P. R. CRANE. 2004. Araceae from the early Cretaceous of Portugal: Evidence on the emergence of monocotyledons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 16565-16570.
40. FUTUYMA, D. J. 2004. The fruit of the tree of life. In J. Cracraft and M. J. Donoghue [eds.], Assembling the tree of life, 25-39. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
41. GIVNISH, T. J., AND K. J. SYSTMA. [EDS.]. 1997. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Goldman, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 36: 182-198.
42. GONÇALVES, E. G., S. J. MAYO, M.-A. VAN SLUYS, AND A. SALATINO. 2007. Combined genotypic-phenotypic phylogeny of the tribe Spathicarpeae (Araceae) with reference to independent events of invasion to Andean regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 1023-1039.
43. GOVAERTS, R., D. G. FRODIN, J. BOGNER, J. BOOS, P. BOYCE, B. COSGRIFF, T. B. CROAT, ET AL. 2002. World checklist and bibliography of Araceae and Acoraceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
44. GRACE, J. B. 1993. The adaptive significance of clonal reproduction in angiosperms: An aquatic perspective. Aquatic Botany 44: 159-180.
45. GRAYUM, M. H. 1987. A summary of evidence and arguments supporting the removal of Acorus from Araceae. Taxon 36: 723-729.
46. GRAYUM, M. H. 1990. Evolution and phylogeny of the Araceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77: 628-697.
47. HARVEY, P. H., A. J. LEIGH BROWN, J. MAYNARD SMITH, AND S. NEE. 1996. New uses for new phylogenies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
48. HARVEY, P. H., AND M. D. PAGEL. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
49. HESSE, M. 2006. Pollen wall ultrastructure of Araceae and Lemnaceae in relation to molecular classifications. Aliso 22: 204-208.
50. HESSE, M., J. BOGNER, H. HALBRITTER, AND M. WEBER. 2001. Palynology of the perigoniate Aroideae: Zamioculcas, Gonatopus and Stylochaeton (Araceae). Grana 40: 26-34.
51. HILLMAN, W. S. 1961. The Lemnaceae, or duckweeds: A review of the descriptive and experimental literature. Botanical Review 27: 221-287.
52. HOOKER, J. F. 1883. Aroideae. In G. Bentham and J. D. Hooker. Genera Plantarum, vol. 3, 995-1000. Reeve, London, UK.
53. HOTTA, M. 1970. A system of the family Araceae in Japan and adjacent areas. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science of Kyoto Imperial University. Series for Biology 4: 72-96.
54. HUTCHINSON, J. 1973. The families of flowering plants. Clarendon Press, Oxford. UK.
55. JUDD, W. S., C. S. CAMBELL, E. A. KELLOGG, P. F. STEVENS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2002. Plant systematics: A phylogenetic approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
56. KEATING, R. C. 2002. Acoraceae and Araceae. In M. Gregory and D. F. Cutler [eds.], Anatomy of the monocotyledons, vol. 9, 1-327. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
57. KELCHNER, S. A. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482-498.
58. KLUGE, A. G., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18: 1-32.
59. KREADER, C. A. 1996. Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62: 1102-1106.
60. KVAČEK, Z. 1995. Limnobiophyllum Krassilov - A fossil link between the Araceae and the Lemnaceae. Aquatic Botany 50: 49-61.
61. LANDOLT, E. 1986. Biosystematic investigations in the family of duckweeds (Lemnaceae), vol. 2, The family of Lemnaceae - A monographic study, vol. 1. Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung, Rübel, Zürich, Heft 71. Zürich, Switzerland.
62. LANDOLT, E. 1998. Lemnaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 4, 264-269. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
63. LAWALRÉE, A. 1945. La position systématique des Lemnaceae et leur classification. Bulletin de la Société Royale de Botanique de Belgique 77: 27-38.
64. LEMON, G. D., AND U. POSLUSZNY. 2000a. Shoot development in Pistia stratiotes (Araceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 721-732.
65. LEMON, G. D., AND U. POSLUSZNY. 2000b. Comparative shoot development and evolution in the Lemnaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 733-748.
66. LES, D. H., AND D. J. CRAWFORD. 1999. Landoltia (Lemnaceae), a new genus of duckweeds. Novon 9: 530-533.
67. LES, D. H., D. J. CRAWFORD, E. LANDOLT, J. D. GABEL, AND R. T. KIMBALL. 2002. Phylogeny and systematics of Lemnaceae, the duckweed family. Systematic Botany 27: 221-240.
68. LES, D. H., E. LANDOLT, AND D. J. CRAWFORD. 1997. Systematics of the Lemnaceae (duckweeds): Inferences from micromolecular and morphological data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 161-177.
69. MADDISON, R. D. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
70. MAYO, S. J., J. BOGNER, AND P. C. BOYCE. 1995a. The acolytes of the Araceae. Curtis's Botanical Magazine 12: 153-168.
71. MAYO, S. J., J. BOGNER, AND P. C. BOYCE. 1995b. The Arales. In P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries [eds.], Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution, vol. 1, 277-286. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, UK.
72. MAYO, S. J., J. BOGNER, AND P. C. BOYCE. 1997. The genera of Araceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
73. MAYO, S. J., J. BOGNER, AND P. C. BOYCE. 1998. Araceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 4, 26-74. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
74. MOLVRAY, M. P., P. J. KORES, AND M. W. CHASE. 2000. Polyphyly of mycoheterotrophic orchids and functional influences on floral and molecular characters. In K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison [eds.], Monocots: Systematics and evolution, 441-448. CSIRO, Collingwood, Australia.
75. MUASYA, A. M., D. A. SIMPSON, M. W. CHASE, AND A. CULHAM. 1998. An assessment of suprageneric phylogeny in Cyperaceae using rbcL DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 211: 257-271.
76. NICKRENT, D. L., R. J. DUFF, A. E. COLWELL, A. D. WOLFE, N. D. YOUNG, K. E. STEINER, AND C. W. DEPAMPHILIS. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic and evolutionary studies of parasitic plants. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing, 211-241. Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
77. NICOLSON, D. H. 1960. A brief review of classifications in the Araceae. Baileya 8: 62-67.
78. NICOLSON, D. H. 1987. History of aroid systematics. Aroideana 10: 23-30.
79. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 14: 817-818.
80. REEVES, J. H. 1992. Heterogeneity in the substitution process of amino acid sites of proteins coded for by mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 35: 17-31.
81. RENNER, S. S., AND L.-B. ZHANG. 2004. Biogeography of the Pistia clade (Araceae): Based on chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA sequences and Bayesian divergence time inference. Systematic Biology 53: 422-432.
82. RENNER, S. S., L.-B. ZHANG, AND J. MURATA. 2004. A chloroplast phylogeny of Arisaema (Araceae) illustrates Tertiary floristic links between Asia, North America, and East Africa. American Journal of Botany 91: 881-888.
83. RONQUIST, F., J. P. HUELSENBECK, AND P. VAN DER MARK. 2005. MrBayes 3.1 manual, draft 5/17/2005. Program documentation and manual. Website http://morphbank.ebc.uu.se/mrbayes/ [accessed 17 May 2005].
84. ROTHWELL, G. W., M. R. VAN ATTA, H. W. BALLARD JR., AND R. A. STOCKEY. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic relationships among Lemnaceae and Araceae using the chloroplast trnL-trnF spacer. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 378-385.
85. RUDALL, P. J., AND C. A. FURNESS. 1997. Systematics of Acorus: Ovule and anther. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: 640-651.
86. SCHOTT, H. W. 1860. Prodromus systematis aroidearum. Congretationis Mechitharisticae, Vienna, Austria.
87. SIMMONS, M. P. 2004. Independence of alignment and tree search. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 874-879.
88. SIMMONS, M. P., AND H. OCHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
89. SOLTIS, D. E., M. W. MORT, P. S. SOLTIS, C. HIBSCH-JETTER, E. A. ZIMMER, AND D. MORGAN. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic angiosperm family Podostemaceae inferred from 18S rDNA and rbcL sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 261-272.
90. SOLTIS, D. E., AND P. S. SOLTIS. 2004. The origin and diversification of angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 91: 1614-1626.
91. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, M. W. CHASE, M. W. MORT, D. C. ALBACH, M. ZANIS, V. SAVOLAINEN, ET AL. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381-461.
92. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, P. K. ENDRESS, AND M. W. CHASE. 2005. Phylogeny and evolution of angiosperms. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
93. STEELE, K. P., AND R. VILGALYS. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Systematic Botany 19: 126-142.
94. STOCKEY, R. A., G. L. HOFFMAN, AND G. W. ROTHWELL. 1997. The fossil monocot Limnobiophyllum scutatum: Resolving the phylogeny of Lemnaceae. American Journal of Botany 84: 355-368.
95. SUN, H., W. MCLEWIN, AND M. F. FAY. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of Helleborus (Ranunculaceae), with an emphasis on the east Asian-Mediterranean disjunction. Taxon 50: 1001-1018.
96. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
97. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, AND J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
98. TAKHTAJAN, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
99. TAM, S.-M., P. C. BOYCE, T. M. UPSON, D. BARABÉ, A. BRUNEAU, F. FOREST, AND J. S. PARKER. 2004. Intergeneric and infrafamilial phylogeny of subfamily Monsteroideae (Araceae) revealed by chloroplast trnL-F sequences. American Journal of Botany 91: 490-498.
100. THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS, AND R. J. GIBSON. 1994. Clustal W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.
101. WILDE, V., Z. KVAČEK, AND J. BOGNER. 2005. Fossil leaves of the Araceae from the European Eocene and notes on other aroid fossils. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 157-183.
102. YANG, Z. 1993. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny form DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 1396-1401.
103. YANG, Z., AND B. RANNALA. 1997. Bayesian pylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 717-724.