Phylogenetic studies of the core Alismatales inferred from morphology and rbcL sequences

Progress in Natural Science

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 931-945

  Li, Xiaoxian ^a   Zhou, Zhekun ^a  

^a KUNMING INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Alismatales; Cymodoceaceae complex; Hydrocharitaceae; Morphological phylogeny; Najadaceae; RbcL sequences

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY;

ALISMATALE; CYMODOCEACEAE COMPLEX; DATA SET; DEEP UNCERTAINTIES; HYDROCHARITACEAE; MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS; MORPHOLOGICAL PHYLOGENY; NAJADACEAE; PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES; RBCL SEQUENCE;

PHYLOGENETIC;

EID: 69049097035     PISSN: 10020071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Les DH. Breeding systems, population structure, and evolution in hydrophilous angiosperms. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 1988;75:819-35.
2. Philbrick CT. Underwater cross-pollination in Callitriche hermaph-roditica (Callitrichaceae): evidence from randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Am J Bot 1993;80:391-4.
3. Les DH, Cleland MA, Waycott M. Phylogenetic studies in Alismatales, II: evolution of marine angiosperms (seagrasses) and hydrophily. Syst Bot 1997;22:443-63.
4. Kallersjo M, Farris JS, Chase MW, et al. Simultaneous parsimony jacknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants. Plant Syst Evol 1998;213:259-87.
5. Chase MW, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, et al. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In: Monocots: systematics and evolution. Colling-wood: CSIRO; 2000. p. 3-16.
6. Kato M, Takimura A, Kawakita A. An obligate pollination mutualism and reciprocal diversification in the tree genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae). Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2003;100:5264-7.
7. Chen JM, Chen D, Gituru WR, et al. Evolution of apocarpy in Alismatales using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast rbcL gene sequence data. Bot Bull Acad Sin 2004;45:33-40.
8. Janssen T, Bremer K. The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800 + rbcL sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 2004;146:385-98.
9. Tamura MN, Yamashita J, Fuse S, et al. Molecular phylogeny of monocotyledons inferred from combined analysis of plastid matK and rbcL gene sequences. J Plant Res 2004;117:109-20.
10. Chase MW, Fay MF, Devey D, et al. Multigene analyses of monocot relationships: a summary. In: Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Excluding Poales. Claremont: Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden; 2006.
11. Givnish TJ, Pires JC, Graham SW, et al. Phylogeny of the monocots based on the highly informative plastid gene ndhF: evidence for widespread concerted convergence. In: Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Excluding Poales. Claremont: Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden; 2006.
12. Graham SW, Zgurski JM, McPherson MA, et al. Robust inference of monocot deep phylogeny using an expanded multigene plastid data set. In: Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Excluding Poales. Claremont: Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden; 2006.
13. Petersen J, Teich R, Becker B, et al. The GapA/B gene duplication marks the origin of Streptophyta (Charophytes and land plants). Mol Biol Evol 2006;23:1109-18.
14. Miki S. The origin of Najas and Potamogeton. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 1937;51:472-80.
15. Hutchinson J. The families of flowering plants. Third ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1973.
16. Dahlgren RMT, Rassmussen F. Monocotyledon evolution. Characters and phylogenetic estimation. Evol Biol 1983;16:255-395.
17. Les DH, Haynes PR. Systematics of order Alismatales: a synthesis of approaches. In: Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 1995.
18. Les DH, Garvin DK, Wimpee CF. Phylogenetic studies in the monocot order Alismatales: evidence for a reappraisal of the aquatic order Najadales. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1993;2:304-14.
19. Donoghue MJ, Sanderson MJ. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstruction of plant phylogeny. In: Molecular systematics of plants. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1992. p. 40-68.
20. II APG. An update of the Angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 2003;141:399-436.
21. Cook CDK. Aquatic plant book. Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing; 1990.
22. Cronquist A. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press; 1981.
23. Tomlinson PB. Anatomy of the monocotyledons VII. Helobiae (Alismatales). In: The families and genera of vascular plants IV. Berlin: Springer; 1982. p. 21-5.
24. Grayum M. Comparative external pollen ultrastructure of the Araceae and putatively related taxa. St Louis: Monogr Syst Bot Missouri Botanical Garden; 1992, p. 43.
25. Guan ZH, Kong ZZ, Du NQ. A study of pollen morphology of some aquatic vascular plants in Honghu Lake, Hubei. Acta Bot Sin 1992;34:81-9.
26. Chase MW, Stevenson DW, Wilkinet P, et al. Monocotyledon systematics: a combined analysis. In: Monocots: systematics and evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 1995. p. 685-730.
27. Stevenson DW, Loconte H. Cladistic analysis of monocot families. In: Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 1995. p. 543-78.
28. Wang QF, Zhang ZY, Chen JK. Pollen morphology of the Alismataceae. Acta Phyto Sin 1997;35:225-35.
29. Buzgo M. Flower structure and development of Araceae compared with alismatids and Acoraceae. Bot J Linn Soc 2001;136:393-425.
30. Igersheim A, Buzgo M, Endress PK. Gynoecium diversity and systematics in basal monocots. Bot J Linn Soc 2001;136:1-65.
31. Sun K, Chen JK, Zhang ZY. Pollen morphology of 15 species in nine genera of the Hydrocaritaceae. Acta Phyto Sin 2002;40:490-500.
32. Craene LP, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Evolution of floral structures in basal angiosperms. Int J Plant Sci 2003;164:S329-63.
33. Chen JM, Robert GW, Wang QF. Evolution of aquatic life forms in Alismatidae: phylogenetic estimation from chloroplast rbcL sequence data. Isr J Plant Sci 2004;52:323-9.
34. Riley MG, Stockey RA. Cardstonia tolmanii gen. et sp. nov. (Limnocharitaceae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada. Int J Plant Sci 2004;165:897-916.
35. Swofford DL. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Ver.4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates; 2000.
36. Mickevich MF, Farris JS. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst Zool 1981;30:351-70.
37. Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AC, et al. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst Biol 1995;44:570-2.
38. Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AC, et al. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 1995;10:315-9.
39. Cunningham CW. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol Biol Evol 1997;14:733-40.
40. Nixon KC. WinClada. ver.1.0. Ithaca, NY, USA (Published by the author); 2002.
41. GoloboffPA. Nona, ver.2.0. program and documentation. Tucuman, Argentina: Fundación e Instituto Miguel Lillo; 1999.
42. Kim KJ, Jansen PK. Comparisons of phylogenetic hypotheses among different data sets in dwarf dandelions (Krigia, Asteraceae): Additional information from internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Plant Syst Evol 1994;190:157-85.
43. Johnson LA, Soltis DE. Assessing congruence: empirical examples from molecular data. In: Molecular systematics of plants. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publications; 1998. p. 1-42.
44. de Pinna MCC. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 1991;7:367-94.
45. Sytsma KJ. DNA and morphology: inference of plant phylogeny. Trends Ecol Evol 1990;5:104-10.
46. Bull JJ, Huelsenbeck JP, Cunningham CW, et al. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 1993;42:384-97.
47. Miyamoto MM, Fitch WM. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst Biol 1995;44:64-76.
48. Huelsenbeck JP, Bull JJ, Cunningham CW. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 1996;11:152-8.
49. Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ. Homoplasy in molecular vs. morphological data: the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. In: Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1967. p. 55-101.
50. Soltis DE, Mort ME, Chase MW, et al. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony-an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst Biol 1998;47:32-42.
51. Sullivan J. Combining data with different distributions of among-site variations. Syst Biol 1996;45:375-80.
52. Davis JI, Simmons MP, Stevenson DW, et al. Data decisiveness, data quality, and incongruence in phylogenetic analyses: an example from the monocotyledons using the mitochondrial atpA sequences. Syst Biol 1998;47:282-310.
53. Flynn JJ, Nedbal MA. Phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): congruence vs. incompatibility among multiple data sets. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1998;9:414-26.
54. Wendel JF, Doyle JJ. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Molecular systematics of plants II. DNA sequencing. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. p. 265-96.
55. Yoder AD, Irwin JA, Payseur BA. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst Biol 2001;50:408-24.
56. Patterson C. Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol Biol Evol 1988;5:603-25.
57. Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT, Yeo PF. The families of the monocotyledons. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1985, p. 520.
58. Cox PA, Humphries CJ. Hydrophilous pollination and breeding system evolution in seagrasses: a phylogenetic approach to the evolutionary ecology of the Cymodoceaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 1993;113:217-26.
59. Haynes RR. Introduction to the symposium and overview of aquatic angiosperm diversity. Am J Bot 1991;78:190.
60. Sattler R. Organogenesis of Flowers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1973, p. 208.
61. Sculthorpe CD. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. London: Edward Arnold; 1967, p. 610.
62. Poluszny U, Sattler R. Floral development of Najas flexilis. Can J Bot 1976;54:1140-51.