3D bioprinting of human chondrocyte-laden nanocellulose hydrogels for patient-specific auricular cartilage regeneration

Bioprinting

Volumn 1-2, Issue , 2016, Pages 22-35

  Martínez Ávila, Héctor ^a,b   Schwarz, Silke ^c   Rotter, Nicole ^c   Gatenholm, Paul ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b CELLINK AB   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D bioprinting; Ear cartilage; Nanofibrillated cellulose; Nasal chondrocytes; Neo cartilage; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; AGGRECAN; ALGINIC ACID; CALCEIN; CARTILAGE OLIGOMERIC MATRIX PROTEIN; CELLULOSE; COLLAGEN; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; GELATIN; GELATINASE; GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN; MATRILIN 3; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX9; VERSICAN;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; BIOPRINTING; CELL CULTURE; CELL DENSITY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CHONDROCYTE; CHONDROGENESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; CYTOTOXICITY; DNA CONTENT; EAR CARTILAGE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYALINE CARTILAGE; HYDROGEL; IMAGING SOFTWARE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POROSITY; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ZYMOGRAPHY;

EID: 85010204711     PISSN: 24058866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bprint.2016.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. [1] Li, D., Chin, W., Wu, J., Zhang, Q., Xu, F., Xu, Z., et al. Psychosocial outcomes among microtia patients of different ages and genders before ear reconstruction. Aesthet. Plast. Surg. 34 (2010), 570–576.
2. [2] Bichara, D.A., O'Sullivan, N.A., Pomerantseva, I., Zhao, X., Sundback, C.A., Vacanti, J.P., et al. The tissue-engineered auricle: past, present, and future. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 18 (2012), 51–61.
3. [3] Rotter, N., Bücheler, M., Haisch, A., Wollenberg, B., Lang, S., Cartilage tissue engineering using resorbable scaffolds. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 1 (2007), 411–416.
4. [4] Ohara, K., Nakamura, K., Ohta, E., Chest wall deformities and thoracic scoliosis after costal cartilage graft harvesting. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 99 (1997), 1030–1036.
5. [5] Griffith, L.G., Naughton, G., Tissue engineering-current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science 295 (2002), 1009–1014.
6. [6] Langer, R., Vacanti, J.P., Tissue engineering. Science 260 (1993), 920–926.
7. [7] Shieh, S.J., Terada, S., Vacanti, J.P., Tissue engineering auricular reconstruction: in vitro and in vivo studies. Biomaterials 25 (2004), 1545–1557.
8. [8] Zhou, L., Pomerantseva, I., Bassett, E.K., Bowley, C.M., Zhao, X., Bichara, D.A., et al. Engineering ear constructs with a composite scaffold to maintain dimensions. Tissue Eng. Part A 17 (2011), 1573–1581.
9. [9] Boland, T., Mironov, V., Gutowska, A., Roth, E.A., Markwald, R.R., Cell and organ printing 2: fusion of cell aggregates in three-dimensional gels. Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell. Evol. Biol. 272 (2003), 497–502.
10. [10] Mironov, V., Boland, T., Trusk, T., Forgacs, G., Markwald, R.R., Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 21 (2003), 157–161.
11. [11] Ilkhanizadeh, S., Teixeira, A., Hermanson, O., Inkjet printing of macromolecules on hydrogels to steer neural stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials 28 (2007), 3936–3943.
12. [12] Lee, Y.B., Polio, S., Lee, W., Dai, G., Menon, L., Carroll, R.S., et al. Bio-printing of collagen and VEGF-releasing fibrin gel scaffolds for neural stem cell culture. Exp. Neurol. 223 (2010), 645–652.
13. [13] Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F.P., Jungst, T., Hennink, W.E., Dhert, W.J., et al. 25th Anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv. Mater. 25 (2013), 5011–5028.
14. [14] Murphy, S.V., Atala, A., 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 773–785.
15. [15] Giannitelli, S.M., Accoto, D., Trombetta, M., Rainer, A., Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 10 (2014), 580–594.
16. [16] Jia, J., Richards, D.J., Pollard, S., Tan, Y., Rodriguez, J., Visconti, R.P., et al. Engineering alginate as bioink for bioprinting. Acta Biomater. 10 (2014), 4323–4331.
17. [17] Murphy, S.V., Skardal, A., Atala, A., Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 101 (2013), 272–284.
18. [18] Duan, B., Kapetanovic, E., Hockaday, L.A., Butcher, J.T., Three-dimensional printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells. Acta Biomater. 10 (2014), 1836–1846.
19. [19] Kolesky, D.B., Truby, R.L., Gladman, A.S., Busbee, T.A., Homan, K.A., Lewis, J.A., 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 26 (2014), 3124–3130.
20. [20] Pati, F., Jang, J., Ha, D.H., Won Kim, S., Rhie, J.W., Shim, J.H., et al. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat. Commun., 5, 2014, 3935.
21. [21] Schuurman, W., Levett, P.A., Pot, M.W., van Weeren, P.R., Dhert, W.J., Hutmacher, D.W., et al. Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. Macromol. Biosci. 13 (2013), 551–561.
22. [22] Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindstrom, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., et al. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50 (2011), 5438–5466.
23. [23] Petersen, N., Gatenholm, P., Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91 (2011), 1277–1286.
24. [24] Jorfi, M., Foster, E.J., Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 132, 2015 n/a.
25. [25] Helenius, G., Bäckdahl, H., Bodin, A., Nannmark, U., Gatenholm, P., Risberg, B., In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 76 (2006), 431–438.
26. [26] Martínez Ávila, H., Schwarz, S., Feldmann, E.-M., Mantas, A., von Bomhard, A., Gatenholm, P., et al. Biocompatibility evaluation of densified bacterial nanocellulose hydrogel as an implant material for auricular cartilage regeneration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98 (2014), 7423–7435.
27. [27] Bodin, A., Bharadwaj, S., Wu, S.F., Gatenholm, P., Atala, A., Zhang, Y.Y., Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials 31 (2010), 8889–8901.
28. [28] Rosen, C.L., Steinberg, G.K., DeMonte, F., Delashaw, J.B. Jr., Lewis, S.B., Shaffrey, M.E., et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial evaluating a biosynthesized cellulose graft for repair of dural defects. Neurosurgery 69 (2011), 1093–1103.
29. [29] Bhattacharya, M., Malinen, M.M., Lauren, P., Lou, Y.-R., Kuisma, S.W., Kanninen, L., et al. Nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel promotes three-dimensional liver cell culture. J. Control. Release 164 (2012), 291–298.
30. [30] Malinen, M.M., Kanninen, L.K., Corlu, A., Isoniemi, H.M., Lou, Y.-R., Yliperttula, M.L., et al. Differentiation of liver progenitor cell line to functional organotypic cultures in 3D nanofibrillar cellulose and hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels. Biomaterials 35 (2014), 5110–5121.
31. [31] Ahrem, H., Pretzel, D., Endres, M., Conrad, D., Courseau, J., Muller, H., et al. Laser-structured bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels support ingrowth and differentiation of chondrocytes and show potential as cartilage implants. Acta Biomater. 10 (2014), 1341–1353.
32. [32] Feldmann, E.M., Sundberg, J., Bobbili, B., Schwarz, S., Gatenholm, P., Rotter, N., Description of a novel approach to engineer cartilage with porous bacterial nanocellulose for reconstruction of a human auricle. J. Biomater. Appl., 2013.
33. [33] Svensson, A., Nicklasson, E., Harrah, T., Panilaitis, B., Kaplan, D.L., Brittberg, M., et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26 (2005), 419–431.
34. [34] Martínez Ávila, H., Feldmann, E.-M., Pleumeekers, M.M., Nimeskern, L., Kuo, W., de Jong, W.C., et al. Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 44 (2015), 122–133.
35. [35] Markstedt, K., Mantas, A., Tournier, I., Martínez Ávila, H., Hägg, D., Gatenholm, P., 3D Bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 16 (2015), 1489–1496.
36. [36] Nimeskern, L., Martínez Ávila, H., Sundberg, J., Gatenholm, P., Müller, R., Stok, K.S., Mechanical evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose as an implant material for ear cartilage replacement. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 22 (2013), 12–21.
37. [37] Schwarz, S., Koerber, L., Elsaesser, A.F., Goldberg-Bockhorn, E., Seitz, A.M., Dürselen, L., et al. Decellularized cartilage matrix as a novel biomatrix for cartilage tissue-engineering applications. Tissue Eng. Part A 18 (2012), 2195–2209.
38. [38] Malda, J., Kreijveld, E., Temenoff, J.S., Blitterswijk, C.Av, Riesle, J., Expansion of human nasal chondrocytes on macroporous microcarriers enhances redifferentiation. Biomaterials 24 (2003), 5153–5161.
39. [39] Barbosa, I., Garcia, S., Barbier-Chassefiere, Ve, Caruelle, J.-P., Martelly, I., Papy-Garcia, D., Improved and simple micro assay for sulfated glycosaminoglycans quantification in biological extracts and its use in skin and muscle tissue studies. Glycobiology 13 (2003), 647–653.
40. [40] Enobakhare, B.O., Bader, D.L., Lee, D.A., Quantification of sulfated glycosaminoglycans in chondrocyte/alginate cultures, by use of 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue. Anal. Biochem. 243 (1996), 189–191.
41. [41] Schmittgen, T.D., Livak, K.J., Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 3 (2008), 1101–1108.
42. [42] Bermueller, C., Schwarz, S., Elsaesser, A.F., Sewing, J., Baur, N., von Bomhard, A., et al. Marine collagen scaffolds for nasal cartilage repair: prevention of nasal septal perforations in a new orthotopic rat model using tissue engineering techniques. Tissue Eng. Part A 19 (2013), 2201–2214.
43. [43] Hua, K., Carlsson, D.O., Ålander, E., Lindström, T., Strømme, M., Mihranyan, A., et al. Translational study between structure and biological response of nanocellulose from wood and green algae. RSC Adv., 4, 2014, 2892.
44. [44] Pääkkö, M., Ankerfors, M., Kosonen, H., Nykänen, A., Ahola, S., Österberg, M., et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8 (2007), 1934–1941.
45. [45] Fedorovich, N.E., Swennen, I., Girones, J., Moroni, L., van Blitterswijk, C.A., Schacht, E., et al. Evaluation of photocrosslinked lutrol hydrogel for tissue printing applications. Biomacromolecules 10 (2009), 1689–1696.
46. [46] Schuh, E., Hofmann, S., Stok, K., Notbohm, H., Müller, R., Rotter, N., Chondrocyte redifferentiation in 3D: the effect of adhesion site density and substrate elasticity. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100A (2012), 38–47.
47. [47] Schwarz, S., Elsaesser, A.F., Koerber, L., Goldberg-Bockhorn, E., Seitz, A.M., Bermueller, C., et al. Processed xenogenic cartilage as innovative biomatrix for cartilage tissue engineering: effects on chondrocyte differentiation and function. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2012.
48. [48] Dreier, R., Wallace, S., Fuchs, S., Bruckner, P., Grassel, S., Paracrine interactions of chondrocytes and macrophages in cartilage degradation: articular chondrocytes provide factors that activate macrophage-derived pro-gelatinase B (pro-MMP-9). J. Cell Sci. 114 (2001), 3813–3822.
49. [49] Galasso, O., Familiari, F., De Gori, M., Gasparini, G., Recent findings on the role of gelatinases (matrix metalloproteinase-2 and −9) in osteoarthritis. Adv. Orthop. 2012 (2012), 1–7.
50. [50] Polacek, M., Bruun, J.-A., Elvenes, J., Figenschau, Y., Martinez, I., The secretory profiles of cultured human articular chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells: implications for autologous cell transplantation strategies. Cell Transplant. 20 (2011), 1381–1393.
51. [51] Nuernberger, S., Cyran, N., Albrecht, C., Redl, H., Vécsei, V., Marlovits, S., The influence of scaffold architecture on chondrocyte distribution and behavior in matrix-associated chondrocyte transplantation grafts. Biomaterials 32 (2011), 1032–1040.
52. [52] Goldring, M.B., Tsuchimochi, K., Ijiri, K., The control of chondrogenesis. J. Cell. Biochem. 97 (2006), 33–44.
53. [53] Lefebvre, V., de Crombrugghe, B., Toward understanding SOX9 function in chondrocyte differentiation. Matrix Biol. 16 (1998), 529–540.
54. [54] Caron, M.M.J., Emans, P.J., Coolsen, M.M.E., Voss, L., Surtel, D.A.M., Cremers, A., et al. Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human articular chondrocytes: comparison of 2D and 3D cultures. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 20 (2012), 1170–1178.
55. [55] Kafienah, W., Jakob, M., Demarteau, O., Frazer, A., Barker, M.D., Martin, I., et al. Three-dimensional tissue engineering of hyaline cartilage: comparison of adult nasal and articular chondrocytes. Tissue Eng. 8 (2002), 817–826.
56. [56] Pleumeekers, M.M., Nimeskern, L., Koevoet, W.L., Kops, N., Poublon, R.M., Stok, K.S., et al. The in vitro and in vivo capacity of culture-expanded human cells from several sources encapsulated in alginate to form cartilage. Eur. Cell Mater. 27 (2014), 264–280 discussion 78-80.
57. [57] Zaucke, F., Dinser, R., Maurer, P., Paulsson, M., Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and collagen IX are sensitive markers for the differentiation state of articular primary chondrocytes. Biochem. J. 358 (2001), 17–24.
58. [58] Kaps, C., Frauenschuh, S., Endres, M., Ringe, J., Haisch, A., Lauber, J., et al. Gene expression profiling of human articular cartilage grafts generated by tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2006.
59. [59] Yang, X., Trehan, S.K., Guan, Y., Sun, C., Moore, D.C., Jayasuriya, C.T., et al. Matrilin-3 Inhibits chondrocyte hypertrophy as a bone morphogenetic protein-2 antagonist. J. Biol. Chem. 289 (2014), 34768–34779.
60. [60] Kanbe, K., Yang, X., Wei, L., Sun, C., Chen, Q., Pericellular matrilins regulate activation of chondrocytes by cyclic load-induced matrix deformation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 22 (2006), 318–328.
61. [61] Nicolae, C., Ko, Y.P., Miosge, N., Niehoff, A., Studer, D., Enggist, L., et al. Abnormal collagen fibrils in cartilage of matrilin-1/matrilin-3-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007), 22163–22175.