Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation invitro and invivo

Biomaterials

Volumn 44, Issue , 2015, Pages 122-133

  Martínez Ávila, Héctor ^a   Feldmann, Eva Maria ^b   Pleumeekers, Mieke M ^c   Nimeskern, Luc ^d   Kuo, Willy ^d   de Jong, Willem C ^e   Schwarz, Silke ^b   Müller, Ralph ^d   Hendriks, Jeanine ^e   Rotter, Nicole ^b   van Osch, Gerjo J V M ^c   Stok, Kathryn S ^d   Gatenholm, Paul ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e CellCoTec BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Ear cartilage; Mononuclear cells; Nasoseptal chondrocytes; Neo cartilage; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; CARTILAGE; CELL ENGINEERING; CELLS; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS; CYTOLOGY; MAMMALS; MECHANICAL STABILITY; NANOCELLULOSE; PORE SIZE; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; CARTILAGE TISSUE ENGINEERING; CHONDROCYTES; HUMAN MONONUCLEAR CELLS; HUMAN NASOSEPTAL CHONDROCYTES; MONONUCLEAR CELLS; MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ALGINIC ACID; CELLULOSE; ENDOTOXIN; NANOPARTICLE;

ADULT; AGED; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CARTILAGE CELL; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; EAR CARTILAGE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MONONUCLEAR CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; ADOLESCENT; ANIMAL; CARTILAGE; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; CHONDROGENESIS; CYTOLOGY; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; NUDE MOUSE; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; YOUNG ADULT;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MUS MUSCULUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CARTILAGE; CELL LINE; CELLULOSE; CHONDROCYTES; CHONDROGENESIS; ENDOTOXINS; FEMALE; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MICE, NUDE; MIDDLE AGED; NANOPARTICLES; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84921311235     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.025     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bichara D.A., O'Sullivan N.A., Pomerantseva I., Zhao X., Sundback C.A., Vacanti J.P., et al. The tissue-engineered auricle: past, present, and future. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2012, 18:51-61.
2. Tanzer R.C. Total reconstruction of the auricle. The evolution of a plan of treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971, 47:523-533.
3. Persichetti P., Piombino L., Toto V., Segreto F., Marangi G.F. Septal cartilage graft for posttraumatic ear reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 128:773e-775e.
4. Mello L.R., Feltrin L.T., Neto P.T.F., Ferraz F.A.P. Duraplasty with biosynthetic cellulose: an experimental study. JNeurosurg 1997, 86:143-150.
5. Helenius G., Bäckdahl H., Bodin A., Nannmark U., Gatenholm P., Risberg B. Invivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. JBiomed Mater Res A 2006, 76:431-438.
6. Andrade F.K., Alexandre N., Amorim I., Gartner F., Mauricio A.C., Luis A.L., et al. Studies on the biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. JBioact Compat Pol 2013, 28:97-112.
7. Pertile R.A., Moreira S., Costa R.M., Correia A., Guardao L., Gartner F., et al. Bacterial cellulose: long-term biocompatibility studies. JBiomater Sci Polym Ed 2011.
8. Martínez Ávila H., Schwarz S., Feldmann E.-M., Mantas A., von Bomhard A., Gatenholm P., et al. Biocompatibility evaluation of densified bacterial nanocellulose hydrogel as an implant material for auricular cartilage regeneration. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98:7423-7435.
9. Svensson A., Nicklasson E., Harrah T., Panilaitis B., Kaplan D.L., Brittberg M., et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 2005, 26:419-431.
10. Ahrem H., Pretzel D., Endres M., Conrad D., Courseau J., Muller H., et al. Laser-structured bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels support ingrowth and differentiation of chondrocytes and show potential as cartilage implants. Acta Biomater 2014, 10:1341-1353.
11. Bäckdahl H., Helenius G., Bodin A., Nannmark U., Johansson B.R., Risberg B., et al. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2141-2149.
12. Zaborowska M., Bodin A., Bäckdahl H., Popp J., Goldstein A., Gatenholm P. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 2010, 6:2540-2547.
13. Martínez Ávila H., Brackmann C., Enejder A., Gatenholm P. Mechanical stimulation of fibroblasts in micro-channeled bacterial cellulose scaffolds enhances production of oriented collagen fibers. JBiomed Mater Res A 2012, 100:948-957.
14. Feldmann E.M., Sundberg J., Bobbili B., Schwarz S., Gatenholm P., Rotter N. Description of a novel approach to engineer cartilage with porous bacterial nanocellulose for reconstruction of a human auricle. JBiomater Appl 2013, 28:626-640.
15. Bodin A., Bharadwaj S., Wu S.F., Gatenholm P., Atala A., Zhang Y.Y. Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials 2010, 31:8889-8901.
16. Deinema M., Zevenhuizen L.P.T.M. Formation of cellulose fibrils by gram-negative bacteria and their role in bacterial flocculation. Arch Mikrobiol 1971, 78:42-57.
17. Brown R.M., Willison J.H., Richardson C.L. Cellulose biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum: visualization of the site of synthesis and direct measurement of the invivo process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1976, 73:4565-4569.
18. Fink H.P., Purz H.J., Bohn A., Kunze J. Investigation of the supramolecular structure of never dried bacterial cellulose. Macromol Symp 1997, 120:207-217.
19. Czaja W.K., Young D.J., Kawecki M., Brown R.M. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:1-12.
20. Gatenholm P., Klemm D. Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. MRS Bull 2010, 35:208-213.
21. Petersen N., Gatenholm P. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biot 2011, 91:1277-1286.
22. Nimeskern L., Martínez Ávila H., Sundberg J., Gatenholm P., Müller R., Stok K.S. Mechanical evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose as an implant material for ear cartilage replacement. JMech Behav Biomed 2013, 22:12-21.
23. Lee S.J., Broda C., Atala A., Yoo J.J. Engineered cartilage covered ear implants for auricular cartilage reconstruction. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:306-313.
24. Yanaga H., Imai K., Fujimoto T., Yanaga K. Generating ears from cultured autologous auricular chondrocytes by using two-stage implantation in treatment of microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009, 124:817-825. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b17c0e.
25. Zhou L., Pomerantseva I., Bassett E.K., Bowley C.M., Zhao X., Bichara D.A., et al. Engineering ear constructs with a composite scaffold to maintain dimensions. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17:1573-1581.
26. Nimeskern L., van Osch G.J., Muller R., Stok K.S. Quantitative evaluation of mechanical properties in tissue-engineered auricular cartilage. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2014, 20:17-27.
27. Cao Y., Vacanti J.P., Paige K.T., Upton J., Vacanti C.A. Transplantation of chondrocytes utilizing a polymer-cell construct to produce tissue-engineered cartilage in the shape of a human ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997, 100:297-302. [discussion 3-4].
28. Haisch A., Klaring S., Groger A., Gebert C., Sittinger M. Atissue-engineering model for the manufacture of auricular-shaped cartilage implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2002, 259:316-321.
29. Isogai N., Asamura S., Higashi T., Ikada Y., Morita S., Hillyer J., et al. Tissue engineering of an auricular cartilage model utilizing cultured chondrocyte-poly(l-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2004, 10:673-687.
30. Kusuhara H., Isogai N., Enjo M., Otani H., Ikada Y., Jacquet R., et al. Tissue engineering a model for the human ear: assessment of size, shape, morphology, and gene expression following seeding of different chondrocytes. Wound Repair Regen 2009, 17:136-146.
31. Shieh S.J., Terada S., Vacanti J.P. Tissue engineering auricular reconstruction: invitro and invivo studies. Biomaterials 2004, 25:1545-1557.
32. Ruszymah B.H.I., Chua K.H., Mazlyzam A.L., Aminuddin B.S. Formation of tissue engineered composite construct of cartilage and skin using high density polyethylene as inner scaffold in the shape of human helix. Int J Pediatr otorhinolaryngology 2011, 75:805-810.
33. Béguin P., Aubert J.-P. The biological degradation of cellulose. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1994, 13:25-58.
34. Martínez Ávila H., Sundberg J., Prakash S., Seniger M., Gatenholm P. Bioprinting of 3D patient-specific auricular scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2012, 6:1-465. Abstracts of the 3rd TERMIS World Congress 2012. September 5-8, 2012. Vienna, Austria.
35. Bäckdahl H., Esguerra M., Delbro D., Risberg B., Gatenholm P. Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. JTissue Eng Regen Med 2008, 2:320-330.
36. Chiaoprakobkij N., Sanchavanakit N., Subbalekha K., Pavasant P., Phisalaphong M. Characterization and biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose/alginate composite sponges with human keratinocytes and gingival fibroblasts. Carbohydr Polym 2011, 85:548-553.
37. Sundberg J., Feldmann E., Martinez H., Schwarz S., Rotter N., Gatenholm P. Evaluation of macroporous bacterial nanocellulose scaffolds for ear cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2012, 6:1-465. Abstracts of the 3rd TERMIS World Congress 2012. September 5-8, 2012. Vienna, Austria.
38. Andersson J., Stenhamre H., Bäckdahl H., Gatenholm P. Behavior of human chondrocytes in engineered porous bacterial cellulose scaffolds. JBiomed Mater Res A 2010, 94:1124-1132.
39. Pleumeekers M.M., Nimeskern L., Koevoet W.L., Kops N., Poublon R.M., Stok K.S., et al. The invitro and invivo capacity of culture-expanded human cells from several sources encapsulated in alginate to form cartilage. Eur Cell Mater 2014, 27:264-280. [discussion 78-80].
40. de Windt T.S., Hendriks J.A., Zhao X., Vonk L.A., Creemers L.B., Dhert W.J., et al. Concise review: unraveling stem cell cocultures in regenerative medicine: which cell interactions steer cartilage regeneration and how?. Stem Cells Transl Med 2014, 3:723-733.
41. Hendriks J.A.A., Riesle J.U., Wilson C.E., Van Den Doel M.A. Cartilage cell processing system 2014, USPTOgov. US: Cellcotec B.V. Office USPaT (Ed.).
42. Häuselmann H.J., Fernandes R.J., Mok S.S., Schmid T.M., Block J.A., Aydelotte M.B., et al. Phenotypic stability of bovine articular chondrocytes after long-term culture in alginate beads. JCell Sci 1994, 107(Pt 1):17-27.
43. Matsuoka M.T.T., Matsushita K., Adachi O., Yoshinaga F. Asynthetic medium for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum subsp. sucrofermentation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1996, 60:575-579.
44. Nimeskern L., Feldmann E.-M., Kuo W., Schwarz S., Goldberg-Bockhorn E., Dürr S., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the ear for patient-specific reconstructive surgery. PLoS One 2014, 9. e104975.
45. Bouxsein M.L., Boyd S.K., Christiansen B.A., Guldberg R.E., Jepsen K.J., Muller R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. JBone Min Res 2010, 25:1468-1486.
46. FDA US Guidance for industry - pyrogen and endotoxins testing: questions and answers June 2012, 8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring. Services USDoHH (Ed.).
47. Hierck B.P., Iperen L.V., Gittenberger-De Groot A.C., Poelmann R.E. Modified indirect immunodetection allows study of murine tissue with mouse monoclonal antibodies. JHistochem Cytochem 1994, 42:1499-1502.
48. Enobakhare B.O., Bader D.L., Lee D.A. Quantification of sulfated glycosaminoglycans in chondrocyte/alginate cultures, by use of 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue. Anal Biochem 1996, 243:189-191.
49. Stok K.S., Lisignoli G., Cristino S., Facchini A., Muller R. Mechano-functional assessment of human mesenchymal stem cells grown in three-dimensional hyaluronan-based scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. JBiomed Mater Res A 2010, 93:37-45.
50. Dhumal N.R., Kim H.J., Kiefer J. Molecular interactions in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ion pair: a density functional study. JPhys Chem A 2009, 113:10397-10404.
51. Viell J., Marquardt W. Concentration measurements in ionic liquid-water mixtures by mid-infrared spectroscopy and indirect hard modeling. Appl Spectrosc 2012, 66:208-217.
52. Chen H.-L., Kao H.-F., Wang J.-Y., Wei G.-T. Cytotoxicity of imidazole ionic liquids inhuman lung carcinoma A549 cell line. JChin Chem Soc-Taip 2014, 61:763-769.
53. Marijnissen W.J., van Osch G.J., Aigner J., van der Veen S.W., Hollander A.P., Verwoerd-Verhoef H.L., et al. Alginate as a chondrocyte-delivery substance in combination with a non-woven scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2002, 23:1511-1517.
54. Marijnissen W.J., van Osch G.J., Aigner J., Verwoerd-Verhoef H.L., Verhaar J.A. Tissue-engineered cartilage using serially passaged articular chondrocytes. Chondrocytes in alginate, combined invivo with a synthetic (E210) or biologic biodegradable carrier (DBM). Biomaterials 2000, 21:571-580.
55. Puelacher W.C., Kim S.W., Vacanti J.P., Schloo B., Mooney D., Vacanti C.A. Tissue-engineered growth of cartilage: the effect of varying the concentration of chondrocytes seeded onto synthetic polymer matrices. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994, 23:49-53.
56. Malm C.J., Risberg B., Bodin A., Bäckdahl H., Johansson B.R., Gatenholm P., et al. Small calibre biosynthetic bacterial cellulose blood vessels: 13-months patency in a sheep model. Scand Cardiovasc J 2012, 46:57-62.