Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion

Biomaterials

Volumn 31, Issue 34, 2010, Pages 8889-8901

  Bodin, Aase ^a,b   Bharadwaj, Shantaram ^b   Wu, Shaofeng ^b   Gatenholm, Paul ^a,b   Atala, Anthony ^b   Zhang, Yuanyuan ^b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell matrix infiltration; Cellulose; Mesenchcymal stem cells; Tissue engineered urinary conduit; Urinary tract

Indexed keywords

3-DIMENSIONAL; ATHYMIC MICE; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; CELL MATRIX; HUMAN URINE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING; IN-VIVO; MESENCHCYMAL STEM CELLS; MICRO-POROUS; MULTI-LAYERED; SCAFFOLD CONSTRUCTS; SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTINS; SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS; URINARY TRACT; UROTHELIAL CELLS; UROTHELIUM;

BACTERIOLOGY; BODY FLUIDS; CELLULOSE; CYTOLOGY; MUSCLE; SEEPAGE; SOIL MECHANICS; STEM CELLS;

SCAFFOLDS;

5' NUCLEOTIDASE; ALPHA SMOOTH MUSCLE ACTIN; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BIOPOLYMER; CD146 ANTIGEN; CD31 ANTIGEN; CELL NUCLEUS ANTIGEN; CYTOKERATIN AE1; CYTOKERATIN AE3; DESMIN; PLATELET DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR BETA RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UROPLAKIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; STEM CELL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING; URINARY DIVERSION; URINE DERIVED STEM CELL; UROTHELIUM; YOUNG MODULUS;

ACETOBACTER; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULOSE; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; ELASTIC MODULUS; ENDOTOXINS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICE; PERICYTES; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; URINARY DIVERSION; URINE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MUS;

EID: 77957575140     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.108     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cancer facts and figures 2009 May 2009, AmericanCancerSociety, Atlanta.
2. Yoo J.J., Meng J., Oberpenning F., Atala A. Bladder augmentation using allogenic bladder submucosa seeded with cells. Urology 1998, 51:221-225.
3. Drewa T. The artificial conduit for urinary diversion in rats: a preliminary study. Transplant Proc 2007, 39:1647-1651.
4. Becker C., Olde Damink L., Laeufer T., Brehmer B., Heschel I., Jakse G. 'UroMaix' scaffolds: novel collagen matrices for application in tissue engineering of the urinary tract. Int J Artif Organs 2006, 29:764-771.
5. Atala A., Bauer S.B., Soker S., Yoo J.J., Retik A.B. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet 2006, 367:1241-1246.
6. Oberpenning F., Meng J., Yoo J.J., Atala A. De novo reconstitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder by tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 1999, 17:149-155.
7. Kobashi L.I., Raible D.A. Biocarbon urinary conduit: laboratory experience and clinical applications. Urology 1980, 16:27-32.
8. Zhang Y., Frimberger D., Cheng E.Y., Lin H.K., Kropp B.P. Challenges in a larger bladder replacement with cell-seeded and unseeded small intestinal submucosa grafts in a subtotal cystectomy model. BJU Int 2006, 98:1100-1105.
9. Frey P., Lutz N., Leuba A.L. Augmentation cystoplasty using pedicled and de-epithelialized gastric patches in the mini-pig model. J Urol 1996, 156:608-613.
10. Lutz N., Frey P. Enterocystoplasty using modified pedicled, detubularized, de-epithelialized sigmoid patches in the mini-pig model. J Urol 1995, 154:893-898.
11. Backdahl H., Helenius G., Bodin A., Nannmark U., Johansson Bengt R., Risberg B., et al. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2141-2149.
12. Wojciech Czaja A.K., Stanislaw Bielecki, Malcolm Brown R. Microbial cellulose-the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 2006, 27:145-151.
13. Mello L.R., Feltrin L.T., Fontes Neto P.T., Ferraz F.A. Duraplasty with biosynthetic cellulose: an experimental study. J Neurosurg 1997, 86:143-150.
14. Klemm D., Schumann D., Udhardt U., Marsch S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose - artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci 2001, 26:1561-1603.
15. Svensson A., Nicklasson E., Harrah T., Panilaitis B., Kaplan D.L., Brittberg M., et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 2005, 26:419-431.
16. Serafica G., Damien C., Oster G.A., Lentz K., Hoon R. Microbial cellulose materials for transdermal drug delivery of drugs 2006, Application: WOWO: (Xylos Corporation, USA, p. 17.
17. Bäckdahl H., Esguerra M., Delbro D., Risberg B., Gatenholm P. Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen M 2008, 2:320-330.
18. Liu Y., Bharadwaj S., Lee S.J., Atala A., Zhang Y. Optimization of a natural collagen scaffold to aid cell-matrix penetration for urologic tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009, 30:3865-3873.
19. Zhang Y., McNeill E., Tian H., Soker S., Andersson K.E., Yoo J.J., et al. Urine derived cells are a potential source for urological tissue reconstruction. J Urol 2008, 180:2226-2233.
20. Zhang Y., Kropp B.P., Moore P., Cowan R., Furness P.D., Kolligian M.E., et al. Coculture of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells on small intestinal submucosa: potential applications for tissue engineering technology. J Urol 2000, 164:928-934. discussion 34-5.
21. Reddy P., Barrieras D., Wilson G., Bägli D., McLorie G., Khoury A., et al. Regeneration of functional bladder substitutes using large segment acellular matrix allografts in a porcine model. J Urol 2000, 164:936-941.
22. Zheng M.H., Chen J., Kirilak Y., Willers C., Xu J., Wood D. Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) is not an acellular collagenous matrix and contains porcine DNA: possible implications in human implantation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2005, 73B:61-67.
23. FDA Guidline on validation of the limbulus amebocyte lysate test as an end-product endotoxin test for human and animal parenteral drugs, biological products and medical devices medical devices 1987, 49.
24. Helenius G., Backdahl H., Bodin A., Nannmark U., Gatenholm P., Risberg B. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006, 76:431-438.
25. Grise P., Droupy S., Saussine C., Ballanger P., Monneins F., Hermieu J.F., et al. Transobturator tape sling for female stress incontinence with polypropylene tape and outside-in procedure: prospective study with 1 year of minimal follow-up and review of transobturator tape sling. Urology 2006, 68:759-763.
26. Jakus S.M., Shapiro A., Hall C.D. Biologic and synthetic graft use in pelvic surgery: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008, 63:253-266.
27. Smith I.O., Liu X.H., Smith L.A., Ma P.X. Nanostructured polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2009, 1:226-236.
28. Millan-Rodriguez F., Chechile-Toniolo G., Salvador-Bayarri J., Huguet-Perez J., Vicente-Rodriguez J. Upper urinary tract tumors after primary superficial bladder tumors: prognostic factors and risk groups. J Urol 2000, 164:1183-1187.
29. Slaton J.W., Swanson D.A., Grossman H.B., Dinney C.P. A stage specific approach to tumor surveillance after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 1999, 162:710-714.