An oxygen sensitive self-decision making engineered CAR T-cell

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Juillerat, Alexandre ^a   Marechal, Alan ^a   Filhol, Jean Marie ^a   Valogne, Yannick ^a   Valton, Julien ^a   Duclert, Aymeric ^a   Duchateau, Philippe ^a   Poirot, Laurent ^a  

^a Arvid Wallgrens Backe 20   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUSION PROTEIN; HYPOXIA INDUCIBLE FACTOR 1ALPHA; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR; OXYGEN; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; TUMOR ANTIGEN;

ADOPTIVE IMMUNOTHERAPY; CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTE; CYTOTOXICITY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRANSPLANTATION; TUMOR CELL LINE; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

ANTIGENS, NEOPLASM; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CYTOTOXICITY, IMMUNOLOGIC; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HUMANS; HYPOXIA-INDUCIBLE FACTOR 1, ALPHA SUBUNIT; IMMUNOTHERAPY, ADOPTIVE; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; NEOPLASMS; OXYGEN; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; T-CELL ANTIGEN RECEPTOR SPECIFICITY; T-LYMPHOCYTES, CYTOTOXIC; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

EID: 85010042188     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep39833     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brentjens, R. J. et al. CD19-targeted T cells rapidly induce molecular remissions in adults with chemotherapy-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med 5, 177ra138 (2013).
2. Grupp, S. A. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 368, 1509-1518 (2013).
3. Kalos, M. et al. T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Sci Transl Med 3, 95ra73 (2011).
4. Morgan, R. A. et al. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther 18, 843-851 (2010).
5. Chakravarti, D. & Wong, W. W. Synthetic biology in cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Trends Biotechnol 33, 449-461 (2015).
6. Juillerat, A. et al. Design of chimeric antigen receptors with integrated controllable transient functions. Sci Rep 6, 18950 (2016).
7. Wu, C. Y., Roybal, K. T., Puchner, E. M., Onuffer, J. & Lim, W. A. Remote control of therapeutic T cells through a small moleculegated chimeric receptor. Science 350, aab4077 (2015).
8. Ma, J. S. et al. Versatile strategy for controlling the specificity and activity of engineered T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, E450-458 (2016).
9. Rodgers, D. T. et al. Switch-mediated activation and retargeting of CAR-T cells for B-cell malignancies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, E459-468 (2016).
10. Tamada, K. et al. Redirecting gene-modified T cells toward various cancer types using tagged antibodies. Clin Cancer Res 18, 6436-6445 (2012).
11. Urbanska, K. et al. A universal strategy for adoptive immunotherapy of cancer through use of a novel T-cell antigen receptor. Cancer Res 72, 1844-1852 (2012).
12. Marin, V. et al. Comparison of different suicide-gene strategies for the safety improvement of genetically manipulated T cells. Hum Gene Ther Methods 23, 376-386 (2012).
13. Poirot, L. et al. Multiplex Genome-Edited T-cell Manufacturing Platform for "Off-the-Shelf " Adoptive T-cell Immunotherapies. Cancer Res 75, 3853-3864 (2015).
14. Straathof, K. C. et al. An inducible caspase 9 safety switch for T-cell therapy. Blood 105, 4247-4254 (2005).
15. Duong, C. P., Westwood, J. A., Berry, L. J., Darcy, P. K. & Kershaw, M. H. Enhancing the specificity of T-cell cultures for adoptive immunotherapy of cancer. Immunotherapy 3, 33-48 (2011).
16. Wilkie, S. et al. Dual targeting of ErbB2 and MUC1 in breast cancer using chimeric antigen receptors engineered to provide complementary signaling. J Clin Immunol 32, 1059-1070 (2012).
17. Krause, A. et al. Antigen-dependent CD28 signaling selectively enhances survival and proliferation in genetically modified activated human primary T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 188, 619-626 (1998).
18. Fedorov, V. D., Themeli, M. & Sadelain, M. PD-1-And CTLA-4-based inhibitory chimeric antigen receptors (iCARs) divert off-target immunotherapy responses. Sci Transl Med 5, 215ra172 (2013).
19. Grada, Z. et al. TanCAR: A Novel Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptor for Cancer Immunotherapy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2, e105 (2013).
20. Morsut, L. et al. Engineering Customized Cell Sensing and Response Behaviors Using Synthetic Notch Receptors. Cell 164, 780-791 (2016).
21. Roybal, K. T. et al. Precision Tumor Recognition by T Cells With Combinatorial Antigen-Sensing Circuits. Cell 164, 770-779 (2016).
22. Brown, J. M. & Wilson, W. R. Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer 4, 437-447 (2004).
23. Vaupel, P. & Mayer, A. Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome. Cancer Metastasis Rev 26, 225-239 (2007).
24. Kinet, J. P. The high-Affinity IgE receptor (Fc epsilon RI): from physiology to pathology. Annu Rev Immunol 17, 931-972 (1999).
25. Semenza, G. L. Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 33, 207-214 (2012).
26. Jiang, B. H., Semenza, G. L., Bauer, C. & Marti, H. H. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 levels vary exponentially over a physiologically relevant range of O2 tension. Am J Physiol 271, C1172-1180 (1996).
27. Epstein, A. C. et al. C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell 107, 43-54 (2001).
28. Masson, N., Willam, C., Maxwell, P. H., Pugh, C. W. & Ratcliffe, P. J. Independent function of two destruction domains in hypoxiainducible factor-Alpha chains activated by prolyl hydroxylation. EMBO J 20, 5197-5206 (2001).
29. Paltoglou, S. & Roberts, B. J. HIF-1alpha and EPAS ubiquitination mediated by the VHL tumour suppressor involves flexibility in the ubiquitination mechanism, similar to other RING E3 ligases. Oncogene 26, 604-609 (2007).
30. Kugler, M. et al. Stabilization and humanization of a single-chain Fv antibody fragment specific for human lymphocyte antigen CD19 by designed point mutations and CDR-grafting onto a human framework. Protein Eng Des Sel 22, 135-147 (2009).
31. Abate-Daga, D. & Davila, M. L. CAR models: next-generation CAR modifications for enhanced T-cell function. Mol Ther Oncolytics 3, 16014 (2016).
32. Sadelain, M., Brentjens, R. & Riviere, I. The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov 3, 388-398 (2013).
33. van der Stegen, S. J., Hamieh, M. & Sadelain, M. The pharmacology of second-generation chimeric antigen receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14, 499-509 (2015).
34. Anurathapan, U. et al. Kinetics of tumor destruction by chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Mol Ther 22, 623-633 (2014).
35. Leen, A. M. et al. Reversal of tumor immune inhibition using a chimeric cytokine receptor. Mol Ther 22, 1211-1220 (2014).
36. Caruso, H. G. et al. Tuning Sensitivity of CAR to EGFR Density Limits Recognition of Normal Tissue While Maintaining Potent Antitumor Activity. Cancer Res 75, 3505-3518 (2015).
37. Liu, X. et al. Affinity-Tuned ErbB2 or EGFR Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Exhibit an Increased Therapeutic Index against Tumors in Mice. Cancer Res 75, 3596-3607 (2015).