Conserving genetic diversity in ecological restoration: a case study with ponderosa pine in northern Arizona, USA

New Forests

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 337-361

  DeWald, Laura E ^a,b   Kolanoski, Kristin M ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological restoration; Forest management; Genetics; Ponderosa pine

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; GENES; REFORESTATION; RESTORATION;

ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; GENETIC DIFFERENCES; GENETICS; PONDEROSA PINES; REFERENCE CONDITION; RESTORATION TREATMENTS; SELECTION CRITERIA;

FORESTRY;

ALLOZYME; CONIFEROUS FOREST; CONSERVATION GENETICS; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; REGENERATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STAND STRUCTURE;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PINUS PONDEROSA;

ARIZONA; FORT VALLEY EXPERIMENTAL FOREST; UNITED STATES;

PINUS PONDEROSA VAR. SCOPULORUM;

EID: 85008219800     PISSN: 01694286     EISSN: 15735095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-016-9565-1     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Abella SR, Fulé PZ, Covington WW (2006) Diameter caps for thinning southwestern ponderosa pine forests: viewpoints, effects, and tradeoffs. J For 104(8):407–414
2. Abella SR, Covington WW, Fulé PZ, Lentile LB, Sanchez Meador AJ, Morgan P (2007) Past, present, and future old growth in frequent-fire confer forests of the western United States. Ecol Soc 12(2):16. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art16
3. Adams WT (1992) Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New For 6:217–240
4. Adams WT, Zuo J, Shimizu JY, Tappeiner JC (1998) Impact of alternative regeneration methods on genetic diversity in coastal Douglas-fir. For Sci 44(3):390–396
5. Alfaro RI, Frady B, Vendramin GG, Dawson IK, Fleming RA, Saenz-Romero C, Lindig-Cisneros RA, Murdock T, Vinceti B, Navarro CM, Skroppa T, Baldinelli G, El-Kassaby YA, Loo J (2014) The role of forest genetic resources in responding to biotic and abiotic factors in the context of anthropogenic climate change. For Ecol Manag 333:76–87
6. Ally D, Ritland K (2007) A case study: looking at the effects of fragmentation on genetic structure in different life history stages of old-growth mountain hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana). J Hered 98:73–78
7. Bacles CFE, Jump AS (2011) Taking a tree’s perspective on forest fragmentation genetics. Trends Plant Sci 16(1):13–18
8. Beckman JS, Mitton JB (1984) Peroxidase allozyme differentiation among successional stands of ponderosa pine. Am Midl Nat 112(1):43–49
9. Bergmann F, Gregorius HR, Larson JB (1990) Levels of genetic variation in European silver fir (Abies alba): are they related to the species decline? Genetica 82:1–10
10. Biondi F (1996) Decadal-scale dynamics at the Gus Pearson Natural Area: evidence for inverse (a)symmetric competition? Can J For Res 26:1397–1406
11. Bozzano M, Jalonen R, Thomas E, Boshier D, Galllo L, Carvers S, Bordacs S, Smith P, Loo J (eds) (2014) Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. State of the world’s forest genetic resources—thematic study. FAO and Biodiversity International, Rome. www.fao.org/publications
12. Buchert GP, Rajora OP, Hood JV, Dancik BP (1997) Effects of harvesting on genetic diversity in old-growth eastern white pine in Ontario, Canada. Conserv Biol 11(3):747–758
13. Cheliak WM, Dancik BP, Morgan K, Yeh FCH, Strobeck C (1985) Temporal variation of the mating system in a natural population of jack pine. Genetics 109:569–584
14. Conkle MT (1992) Genetic diversity—seeing the forest through the trees. New For 6:5–22
15. Conkle MT, Hodgskiss PD, Nunnally LB, Hunter SC (1982) Starch gel electrophoresis of conifer seeds: a laboratory manual. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-64
16. Covington WW, Fulé PZ, Moore MM, Hart SC, Kolb TE, Mast JN, Sackett SS, Wagner MR (1997) Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the southwest. J For 95(4):23–29
17. Covington WW, Fulé PZ, Hart SC, Weaver RP (2001) Modeling ecological restoration effects on ponderosa pine forest structure. Restor Ecol 9(4):421–431
18. Davis ML (1981) Habitat diversity and its effects on the genetic and ecological structure of two successional populations of Douglas-fir. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
19. Deacon NJ, Cavender-Bares J (2015) Limited pollen dispersal contributes to population genetic structure but not local adaptation in Quercus oleoides forests of Costa Rica. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138783. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138783
20. de-Lucas AI, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Vendramin GG, Hidalgo E, Heuertz M (2009) Spatial genetic structure in continuous and fragmented populations of Pinus pinaster Aiton. Mol Ecol 18:4564–4576
21. Dickinson Y (2014) Landscape restoration of a forest with a historically mixed-severity fire regime: what was the historical landscape pattern of forest and opening? For Ecol Manag 331:264–271
22. Dubreuil M, Riba M, González-Martínez SC, Sebastiani F, Mayol M (2010) Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation revisited: strong genetic structure in a temperate tree, Taxus baccata (Taxaceae), with great dispersal capability. Am J Bot 97(2):303–310
23. Dumroese RK, Williams MI, Stanturf JA, St. Clair JB (2015) Considerations for restoring temperate forests of tomorrow: forest restoration, assisted migration, and bioengineering. New For 46:947–964
24. Dutech C, Sork VL, Irwin AJ, Smouse PE, Davis FW (2005) Gene flow and fine-scale genetic structure in a wind-pollinated tree species Quercus lobata (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 92:252–261
25. Dyer RJ, Sork VL (2001) Pollen pool heterogeneity in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. Mol Ecol 10:859–866
26. Eckert AJ, Eckert ML, Hall BD (2010) Effects of historical demography and ecological context on spatial patterns of genetic diversity within foxtail pine (Pinus balfouriana; Pinaceae) stands located in the Klamath Mountains, California. Am J Bot 97(4):650–659
27. El-Kassaby YA (2000) Impacts of industrial forestry on genetic diversity of temperate forest trees. In: Mátyás C (ed) Forest genetics and sustainability. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 155–170
28. El-Kassaby YA, Jaquish B (1996) Population density and mating pattern in western larch. J Hered 87:438–443
29. El-Kassaby YA, Ritland K (1996) Impact of selection and breeding on the genetic diversity in Douglas-fir. Biol Conserv 5:795–813
30. Ellstrand NC (1992) Gene flow among seed plant populations. New For 6:241–256
31. Epperson BK (2003) Geographical genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
32. Espeland EK, Emery NC, Mercer KL, Woolbright SA, Kettenring KM, Gepts P, Etterson JR (2016) Evolution of plant materials for ecological restoration: insights from the applied and basic literature. J Appl Ecol. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12739
33. Fageria MS, Rajora OP (2013) Effects of harvesting of increasing intensities on genetic diversity and population structure of white spruce. Evol Appl 6:778–794
34. Feldman R, Tomback DF, Koehler J (1999) Cost of mutualism: competition, tree morphology, and pollen production in limber pine clusters. Ecology 80(1):324–329
35. Fulé PZ, McHugh C, Heinlein TA, Covington WW (2001) Potential fire behavior reduced following forest restoration treatments. In: Vance RK, Edminster CB, Covington WW, Blake JA (comps) Ponderosa pine ecosystems restoration and conservation: steps toward stewardship; 2000 April 25–27; Flagstaff, AZ. Proceedings RMRS-P-22. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, pp 28–35
36. Fulé PZ, Crouse JE, Roccaforte JP, Kalies RL (2012) Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior? For Ecol Manag 269:68–81
37. Goncharenko GG, Zadeika IV, Birgelis JJ (1995) Genetic structure diversity and differentiation of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in natural populations of Latvia. For Ecol Manag 72:31–38
38. Greene DF, Johnson EA (1993) Seed mass and dispersal capacity in wind-dispersed diaspores. Oikos 67:69–74
39. Gregorius HR (1980) The probability of losing an allele when diploid genotypes are sampled. Biometrics 36:643–652
40. Gullberg U, Yazdani R, Rudin D (1982) Genetic differentiation between adjacent populations of Pinus sylvestris. Silva Fenn 16:205–214
41. Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy–Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 45:53–70
42. Hampe A, El Masri L, Petit RJ (2010) Origin of spatial genetic structure in an expanding oak population. Mol Ecol 19:459–471
43. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Broyles SL (1992) Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For 6:95–124
44. Hawley GJ, Schaberg PG, DeHayes DH, Brissette JC (2005) Silviculture alters the genetic structure of an eastern hemlock forest in Maine, USA. Can J For Res 35:143–150
45. Hedrick PW (2000) Genetics of populations, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, p 629
46. Iwaizumi MG, Takahashi M, Isoda K, Austerlitz F (2013) Consecutive five-year analysis of paternal and maternal gene flow and contributions of gametic heterogeneities to overall genetic composition of dispersed seeds of Pinus densiflora. Am J Bot 100(9):1896–1904
47. Jacobs DF, Oliet JA, Aronson J, Bolte A, Bullock JM, Donoso PJ, Landhausser SM, Madsen P, Peng S, Rey-Benayas JM, Weber JC (2015) Restoring forests: what constitutes success in the twenty-first century? New For 46:601–614
48. Johnson JM, Vander Wall SB, Borchert MM (2003) A comparative analysis of seed and cone characteristics and seed-dispersal strategies of three pines in the subsection Sabinianae. Plant Ecol 168:69–84
49. Jones FA, Hamrick JL, Peterson CJ, Squiers ER (2006) Inferring colonization history from analyses of spatial genetic structure within populations of Pinus strobus and Quercus rubra. Mol Ecol 15:851–861
50. Larson AJ, Stover KC, Keyes CR (2012) Effects of restoration thinning on spatial heterogeneity in mixed-conifer forest. Can J For Res 42:1505–1517
51. Latta RG (2006) Integrating patterns across multiple genetic markers to infer spatial processes. Landsc Ecol 21:809–820
52. Latta RG, Linhart YB, Fleck D, Elliott M (1998) Direct and indirect estimates of seed versus pollen movement within a population of ponderosa pine. Evolution 52(1):61–67
53. Ledig FT (1986) Conservation strategies for forest gene resources. For Ecol Manag 14:77–90
54. Ledig FT, Kitzmiller JH (1992) Genetic strategies for reforestation in the face of global climate change. For Ecol Manag 50:153–169
55. Lee SW, Choi WY, Kim WW, Kim ZS (2000) Genetic variation of Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. In Korea. Silvae Genet 49(3):124–130
56. Linhart YB (1988) Ecology and evolutionary studies of ponderosa pine in the Rocky Mountains. In: Baumgartner DM, Lotan JE (eds) Ponderosa pine: the species and its management. Symposium proceedings, Sept. 29–Oct 1, 1987, Spokane WA, USA, pp 77–89
57. Linhart YB, Mitton JB (1985) Relationship among reproduction, growth rates, and protein heterozygosity in ponderosa pine. Am J Bot 72(2):181–184
58. Linhart YB, Mitton JB, Sturgeon KB, Davis ML (1981a) Genetic variation in space and time in a population of ponderosa pine. Heredity 46:407–426
59. Linhart YB, Mitton JB, Sturgeon KB, Davis ML (1981b) Analysis of genetic architecture in populations of ponderosa pine. In: Conkle MT, technical coordinator. Proceedings of the symposium on isozymes of North American forest trees and forest insects, July 27, 1979, Berkeley, California. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-48. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp. Station, Berkeley, CA, pp 53–59
60. Marquardt PE, Echt CS, Epperson BK, Pubanz DM (2007) Genetic structure, diversity and inbreeding of eastern white pine under different management conditions. Can J For Res 37(12):2652–2662
61. Marshall DR, Brown AHD (1975) Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation. In: Frankel HO, Hawkes JG (eds) Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–80
62. Mast JN, Fulé PZ, Moore MM, Covington WW, Waltz AEM (1999) Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Ecol Appl 9(1):228–239
63. Mijangos JL, Pacioni F, Spencer PBS, Craig MD (2015) Contribution of genetics to ecological restoration. Mol Ecol 24:22–37
64. Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analyses [TFPGA v: 1.3]. Version 1.3. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff
65. Mitton JB (1992) The dynamic mating systems of conifers. New For 6:197–216
66. Mitton JB, Linhart YB, Hamrick JL, Beckman JS (1977) Observations on the genetic structure and mating system of ponderosa pine in the Colorado Front Range. Theor Appl Genet 51:5–13
67. Mitton JB, Linhart YB, Sturgeon KB, Hamrick JL (1979) Allozyme polymorphisms detected in mature needle tissue of ponderosa pine. J Hered 70:86–89
68. Namkoong G (1984) A control concept of gene conservation. Silvae Genet 33(4–5):160–463
69. Namkoong G (1992) Biodiversity—issues in genetics, forestry and ethics. For Chron 68(4):438–443
70. Neale DB (1985) Genetic implications of shelterwood regeneration of Douglas-fir in southwest Oregon. For Sci 31(4):995–1005
71. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106(949):283–292
72. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590
73. Newton AC, Cantarello E (2015) Restoration of forest resilience: an achievable goal? New For 46:645–668
74. NFGEL (2000) National Forest Genetic Electrophoresis Laboratory standard operating procedures. NFGEL, USDA Forest Service, Camino
75. Nijensohn SE, Schaberg PG, Hawley GJ, DeHayes DH (2005) Genetic subpopulation structuring in and its implications in a mature eastern white pine stand. Can J For Res 35:1041–1052
76. Noss RF, Beier P, Covington WW, Grumbine RE, Lindenmayer DB, Prather JW, Schmiegelow F, Sisk TD, Vosick DJ (2006) Recommendations for integrating restoration ecology and conservation biology in ponderosa pine forests of the southwestern United States. Restor Ecol 14(1):4–10
77. O’Malley DM, Allendorf FW, Blake GM (1979) Inheritance of isozyme variation and heterozygosity in Pinus ponderosa. Biochem Genet 17(3–4):233–250
78. Ostergren DM, Abrams JB, Lowe KA (2008) Fire in the forest: public perceptions of ecological restoration in north-central Arizona. Ecol Restor 26(1):51–60
79. Pandey M, Rajora OP (2012) Genetic diversity and differentiation of core vs. peripheral populations of eastern white cedar, Thuja occidentalis (Cupressaceae). Am J Bot 99(4):690–699
80. Parchman TL, Benkman CW, Jenkins B, Buerkle CA (2011) Low levels of population genetic structure in Pinus contorta (Pinaceae) across a geographic mosaic of co-evolution. Am J Bot 98:669–679
81. Pazouki L, Shanjani PS, Fields PD, Martins K, Suhhorutsenko M, Viinalass H, Niinemets U (2016) Large within-population genetic diversity of the widespread conifer Pinus sylvestris at its soil fertility limit characterized by nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers. Eur J For Res 135:161–177
82. Piotti A, Leonardi S, Heuertz M, Buiteveld J, Geburek T, Gerber S, Kramer K, Vettori C, Vendramin GG (2013) Within-population genetic structure in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands characterized by different disturbance histories: does forest management simplify population substructure? PLoS ONE 8(9):e73391. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073391
83. Potter KM, Hipkins VD, Mahalovich MF, Means RE (2015) Nuclear genetic variation across the range of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa): phylogeography, taxonomic and conservation implications. Tree Genet Genomes 11:38. doi:10.1007/s11295-015-0865-y
84. Rajora OP, Mosseler A (2001) Challenges and opportunities for conservation of forest genetic resources. Euphytica 118:197–212
85. Rajora OP, Rahman MH, Buchert GP, Dancik BP (2000) Microsatellite DNA analyses of genetic effects of harvesting in old-growth eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in Ontario. Mol Ecol 9:339–348
86. Rajora OP, Mosseler A, Major JE (2002) Mating system and reproductive fitness traits of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in large, central versus small, isolated, marginal populations. Can J Bot 80:1173–1184
87. Ratnam W, Rajora OP, Finkeldey R, Aravanopoulos F, Bouvet J-M, Vaillencourt RE, Kanashiro M, Fady B, Tomita M, Vinson C (2014) Genetic effects of forest management practices: global synthesis and perspectives. For Ecol Manag 333:52–65
88. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49(6):1280–1283
89. Reynolds RT, Sanchez Meador AJ, Youtz JA, Nicolet T, Matonis MS, Jackson PL, DeLorenzo DG, Graves AD (2013) Restoring composition and structure in southwestern frequent-fire forests: a science based framework for improving ecosystem resiliency. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-310. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins
90. Richardson BA, Brunsfeld SJ, Klopfenstein NB (2002) DNA from bird-dispersed seed and wind-disseminated pollen provides insights into postglacial colonization and population genetic structure of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis). Mol Ecol 11:215–227
91. Riggs LA (1990) Conserving genetic resources on-site in forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 35:45–68
92. Roberds JH, Conkle MT (1984) Genetic structure in loblolly pine stands: allozyme variation in parents and progeny. For Sci 30(2):319–329
93. Roccaforte JP, Fulé PZ, Covington WW (2010) Monitoring landscape-scale ponderosa pine restoration treatment implementation and effectiveness. Restor Ecol 18(6):820–833
94. Roccaforte JP, Huffman DW, Fulé PZ, Covington WW, Chancellor WW, Stoddard MT, Crouse JE (2015) Forest structure and fuels dynamics following ponderosa pine restoration treatments, White Mountains, Arizona, USA. For Ecol Manag 337:174–185
95. Rogers DL, Millar CI, Westfall RD (1999) Fine-scale genetic structure of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis): associations with watershed and growth form. Evolution 53:74–90
96. Sanchez Meador AJ, Parysow PF, Moore MM (2011) A new method for delineating tree patches and assessing spatial reference conditions of ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona. Restor Ecol 19(4):490–499
97. Sanchez Meador AJ, Waring KM, Kalies EL (2015) Implications of diameter caps on multiple forest resource responses in the context of the four forests restoration initiative: results from the forest vegetation simulator. J For 113(2):219–230
98. SAS Institute Inc. (2001) JMP IN. Version 4.0.3. Duxbury, Pacific Grove
99. Savage M, Brown PM, Feddema J (1996) The role of climate in a pine forest regeneration pulse in the southwestern United States. Ecoscience 3(3):310–318
100. Schuster WSF, Mitton JB (2000) Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity 84:348–361
101. SER (2004) The SER international primer on ecological restoration, version 2. Society for Ecological Restoration International. Washington, DC. http://www.ser.org
102. Shohami D, Nathan R (2014) Fire-induced population reduction and landscape opening increases gene flow via pollen dispersal in Pinus halepensis. Mol Ecol 23:70–81
103. Slatkin M, Barton NH (1989) A comparison of three methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43:1358–1368
104. Sorenson FC, Miles RS (1982) Inbreeding depression in height, height growth and survival of Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine and noble fir to 10 years of age. For Sci 28:283–292
105. Stanturf JA (2015) Future landscapes: opportunities and challenges. New For 46:615–644
106. 3 tolerance indicate shift in genetic structure of ponderosa and Jeffrey pine in Sequoia National Park, CA. Environ Pollut 149:366–375
107. Stephens SL, Fry DL (2005) Spatial distribution of regeneration patches in an old-growth Pinus jeffreyi-mixed conifer forest in northwestern Mexico. J Veg Sci 16:693–702
108. Thomas Z, Waring KM (2015) Enhancing resiliency and restoring ecological attributes in second-growth ponderosa pine stands in Northern New Mexico. For Sci 61(6):93–104
109. Thomas BR, Macdonald SE, Hicks M, Adams DL, Hodgetts RB (1999) Effects of reforestation methods on genetic diversity of lodgepole pine: an assessment using microsatellite and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theor Appl Genet 98:793–801
110. Thomas E, Jalonen R, Loo J, Boshier D, Gallo L, Cavers S, Bordacs S, Smith P, Bozzano M (2014) Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species. For Ecol Manag 333:66–75
111. Tomback DF, Linhart YB (1990) The evolution of bird-dispersed pines. Evol Ecol 4:185–219
112. Vander Wall SB (2008) On the relative contributions of wind vs. animals to seed dispersal of four Sierra Nevada pines. Ecology 89(7):1837–1849
113. Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004) New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol Ecol 13:921–935
114. Viard F, EL-Kassaby YA, Ritland K (2001) Diversity and genetic structure in populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Pinaceae) at chloroplast microsatellite loci. Genome 44:336–344
115. Weir BS (1996) Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, p 445
116. Wheeler NC, Guries RP (1982) Population structure, genic diversity and morphological variation in Pinus contorta Dougl. Can J For Res 12:595–606
117. Wheeler NC, Steiner KC, Schlarbaum SE, Neale DB (2015) The evolution of forest genetics and tree improvement research in the United States. J For 113(5):500–510
118. White AS (1985) Presettlement regeneration patterns in a southwestern ponderosa pine stand. Ecology 66(2):589–594
119. Williams MA, Baker WL (2012) Spatially extensive reconstructions show variable-severity fire and heterogeneous structure in historical western United States dry forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1042–1052
120. Woods JH, Blake GM, Allendorf FW (1983) Amount and distribution of isozyme variation in ponderosa pine from eastern Montana. Silvae Genet 32:151–156
121. Wymore AS, Bothwell HM, Compson ZG, Lamit LJ, Walker FM, Woolbright SA, Whitham TG (2014) Community genetics applications for forest biodiversity and policy: planning for the future. In: Fenning T (ed) Challenges and opportunities for the world’s forests in the 21st century, forestry sciences, vol 81. Springer, Berlin
122. Yazdani R, Lindgren D (1992) Gene dispersion after natural regeneration under a widely-spaced seed-tree stand of Pinus sylvestris (L.). Silvae Genet 41(1):1–5
123. Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle T (1997) Popgene. Version 1.31. University of Alberta, Alberta