Fire in the forest: Public perceptions of ecological restoration in north-central Arizona

Ecological Restoration

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 51-60

  Ostergren, David M ^a   Abrams, Jesse B ^a   Lowe, Kimberly A ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arizona; Fire; Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa); Public opinion; Restoration

Indexed keywords

PINUS PONDEROSA;

EID: 41849147875     PISSN: 15434060     EISSN: 15434079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3368/er.26.1.51     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Abrams, J., E. Kelly, B.A. Shindler and J. Wilton. 2005. Value orientation and forest management: The forest health debate. Environmental Management 36:495-505.
2. Agee, J.K. 2002. The fallacy of passive management of western forest reserves. Conservation Biology in Practice 3(1):18-25.
3. Allen, C.D., D.A. Falk, M. Hoffman, J. Klingel, P. Morgan, M. Savage, T. Schulke, P. Stacey, K. Suckling and T.W. Swetnam. 2002. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: A broad perspective. Ecological Applications 12:1418-1433.
4. Allison, S.K. 2004. What do we mean when we talk about ecological restoration? Ecological Restoration 22:281-286.
5. Arizona Daily Sun. 2001. The time is now to keep forests healthy. Editorial Page. August 10, 2001.
6. Bonnicksen, T.M. 1994. Social and political issues in ecological restoration. Pages 108-114 in W.W. Covington and L.F. DeBano (coords), Sustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-27.
7. Brick, P., D. Snow and S. van de Wetering. 2001. Across the Great Divide: Explorations in Collaborative Conservation and the American West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
8. Bright, A.D., S.C. Barro and R.T. Burtz. 2002. Public attitudes toward ecological restoration in the Chicago metropolitan region. Society and Natural Resources 15:763-785.
9. Brunner, R.D., T.A. Stellman, L. Coe-Juell, C.M. Cromley, C.M. Edwards and D.W. Tucker. 2005. Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science Policy and Decision Making. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Brunson, M.W. and J. Evans. 2005. Badly burned?: Effects of an escaped prescribed burn on social acceptability of wildland fuels treatments. Journal of Forestry 103:134-138.
11. Brunson, M.W. and B.A. Shindler. 2004. Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States. Society and Natural Resources 17:661-678.
12. Brunson, M.W., B. Shindler and B.S. Steel. 1997. Consensus and dissension among rural and urban publics concerning forest management in the Pacific Northwest. Pages 83-94 in B.S. Steel (ed.), Public Lands Management in the West: Citizens, Interest Groups, and Values. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
13. Burns, S. 2003. Catron County, New Mexico: Mirroring the west, healing the land, rebuilding community. Pages 89-115 in J. Kusel and E. Adler (eds), Forest Communities, Community Forests. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
14. Connelly, N.A., T.L. Brown and D.J. Decker. 2003. Factors affecting response rates to natural resource-focused mail surveys: Empirical evidence of declining rates over time. Society and Natural Resources 16:541-549.
15. Cooper, C.F. 1960. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecological Monographs 30:129-164.
16. Cortner, H.J., J.S. Vaughn and G.M.R. Teich. 2003. Designing a framework for evaluating the impacts and outcomes of Forest Service appeals. Summary of a workshop in Troutdale, OR, January 6-8, 2003. Flagstaff, AZ: Ecological Restoration Institute.
17. Covington, W.W. 2000. Prescribed fire is not the issue. Journal of Forestry 98(8):48.
18. _. 2003a. The evolutionary and historical context. Pages 26-47 in P. Friederici (ed), Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19. _. 2003b. Restoring ecosystem health in frequent-fire forests of the American West. Ecological Restoration 21:7-11.
20. Covington, W.W., R.L. Everett, R. Steele, L.L. Irwin, T.A. Daer and A.N.D. AuClair. 1994. Historical and anticipated changes in forest ecosystems of the inland west of the United States. Pages 13-63 in R.N. Sampson and D.L. Adams (eds.), Assessing Forest Ecosystem Health in the Inland West. New York: Food Products Press.
21. Dillman, D.A. 2000. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
22. Findley, A.J., M.S. Carroll and K.A. Blatner. 2001. Social complexity and the management of small-diameter stands. Journal of Forestry 99(12):18-27.
23. Friederici, P. 2003. The "Flagstaff Model." Pages 7-25 in P. Friederici (ed), Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24. _. 2005. Restoration of ponderosa pine forests to presettlement conditions. Working Papers in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forest Restoration No. 9. Flagstaff: Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University.
25. Ghioto, G. 2000. Forest thinning foiled again. Arizona Daily Sun 10/27/2000 on file at https://library.eri.nau.edu:8443/bitstream/2019/91/1/ Ghioto.2000.ForestThinningFoiledAgain.pdf.
26. Gobster, P.H. and R. B. Hull (eds). 2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
27. Graber, D.M. 2003. Ecological restoration in wilderness: Natural versus wild in National Park Service wilderness. The George Wright Forum 20(3):34-41.
28. Gross, M. 2003. Inventing Nature: Ecological Restoration by Public Experiments. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
29. Healthy Forest Restoration Act (HFRA). 2003. U.S. Code 16 §§ 6501-6591.
30. Helford, R.M. 2000. Constructing nature as constructing science: Expertise, activist science, and public conflict in the Chicago wilderness. Pages 119-142 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull (eds), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
31. Higgs, E.S. 1997. What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 11:338-348.
32. Hobbs, R.J. and D.A. Norton. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93-110.
33. Jackson, L.L., N. Lopoukhine and D. Hillyard. 1995. Ecological restoration: A definition and comments. Restoration Ecology 3:71-75.
34. Jordan, W.R., III. 2000. Restoration, community, and wilderness. Pages 21-36 in P.H. Gobster and R. B. Hull (eds), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35. Joyce, L.A. 2003. Improving the flow of scientific information across the interface of forest science and policy. Forest Policy and Economics 5:339-347.
36. Katz, E. 2000. Another look at restoration: Technology and artificial nature. Pages 37-48 in P.H. Gobster and R. B. Hull (eds), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
37. Kaufmann, M.R., P.Z. Fulé, W.H. Romme and K.C. Ryan. 2004. Restoration of ponderosa pine forests in the interior western U.S. after logging, grazing, and fire suppression. Pages 481-500 in J.A. Stanturf and P. Madsen (eds), Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
38. Loomis, J.B., L.S. Bair and A. Gonzalez-Caban. 2001. Prescribed fire and public support: Knowledge gained, attitudes changed in Florida. Journal of Forestry 99(11):18-22.
39. Manfredo, M.J., M. Fishbein, G.E. Haas and A.E. Watson. 1990. Attitudes toward prescribed fire policies: The public is widely divided in its support. Journal of Forestry 88(7):19-23.
40. Mast, J.N., P.Z. Fulé, M.M. Moore, W.W. Covington and A.E.M. Waltz. 1999. Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Ecological Applications 9:228-239.
41. Meadow, R., R.P. Reading, M. Phillips, M. Mehringer, B.J. Miller. 2005. The influence of persuasive arguments on public attitudes toward a proposed wolf restoration in the southern Rockies. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:154-163.
42. Moore, M.M., W.W. Covington and P.Z. Fulé. 1999. Invited Feature - Reference conditions and ecological restoration: A southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecological Applications 9:1266-1277.
43. Moore, M.M., D.W. Huffman, P. Z. Fulé, W.W. Covington and J.E. Crouse. 2004. Comparison of historical and contemporary forest structure and composition on permanent plots in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Forest Science 50:162-176.
44. Moote, M.A. 2003. Community-based forest restoration. Pages 335-352 in P. Friederici (ed), Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.
45. National Fire Plan 2001. Review and Update of the 1995 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy. http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/NFP/index.shtml.
46. Noss, R.F., P. Beier, W.W. Covington, R.E. Grumbine, D.B. Lindenmayer, J.W. Prather, F. Schmiegelow, T.D. Sisk and D.J. Vosick. 2006. Recommendations for integrating restoration ecology and conservation biology in ponderosa pine forests of the southwestern United States. Restoration Ecology 14:4-10.
47. Ostergren, D.M., K.A. Lowe, J.B. Abrams and E.J. Ruther 2006. Public perceptions of forest management in north-central Arizona: The paradox of demanding more involvement but allowing limits to legal action. Journal of Forestry 104:375-382.
48. Pyne, S.J. 2004. Tending Fire: Coping with America's Wildland Fires. Washington, DC: Island Press.
49. Schumman, M. 2004. Fuel reduction projects in southwest ponderosa pine forests: A description of sites and treatments. National Community Forestry Center, Southwest Region Working Paper No. 9. Santa Fe, NM: Forest Guild.
50. Shelby, B. and R.W. Speaker. 1990. Public attitudes and perceptions about prescribed burning. Pages 253-260 in J.D. Walstad, S.R. Radosevich and D.V. Sandberg (eds), Natural and Prescribed Fire in Pacific Northwest Forests, Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
51. Shindler, B.A., P. List and B.S. Steel. 1993. Managing federal forests: Public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide. Journal of Forestry 91(7):36-42.
52. Shindler, B.A., J. Wilton and A. Wright. 2002. A Social Assessment of Ecosystem Health: Public Perspectives on Pacific Northwest Forests. Corvallis: Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University.
53. Simpson, T.B. 2005. Ecological restoration and re-understanding ecological time. Ecological Restoration 23:46-51.
54. Sisk, T.D., J.W. Prather, H.M. Hampton, E.N. Aumack, Y. Xu and B.G. Dickson 2006. Participatory landscape analysis to guide restoration of ponderosa pine ecosystems in the American Southwest. Landscape and Urban Planning. 78:300-310.
55. Solop, F.I., K.K. Hagenand D. M. Ostergren. 2004. Managing nonnative plants and animals: Analysis of public opinion. National Park Service Technical Report to the Department of Interior. http://www.nature.nps.gov/socialscience/ pdf/Managing_Nonnative_Plants_and_Animals_Report_07_2004.pdf.
56. Taylor, J.G. and T.C. Daniel. 1984. Prescribed fire: Public education and perception. Journal of Forestry 82:361-365.
57. Theodori, G.L. and A.E. Luloff. 2002. Position on environmental issues and engagement in proenvironmental behaviors. Society and Natural Resources 15:471-482.
58. Thomas, J.W. 2002. Dynamic vs. static management in a fire-influenced landscape: The Northwest Forest Plan. Paper presented at the Fire in Oregon's Forests conference, Bend, OR, October 23, 2002.
59. Toman, E. and B.A. Shindler. 2003. Hazardous fuel reduction in the Blue Mountains: Public attitudes and opinions. Pages 241-254 in P.N. Orni and L.A. Joyce (eds), Fire, Fuel Treatments, and Ecological Restoration, USDA Forest Service RMRS-P-29.
60. U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of the Interior (USDA/DOI). 2000. Managing the impact of wildfires on communities and the environment. A report to the President in response to the wildfires of 2000. http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/hfi/president.pdf.
61. U.S. Forest Service (USFS) 2000. Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)Fort Valley Ecosystem Restoration Project. http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coconino/nepa/fort_valley_dn.html.
62. Vaske, J.J., M.P. Donnelly, D.R. Williams and S. Jonker. 2001. Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society and Natural Resources 14:761-776.
63. Vining, J., E. Tyler and B. Kweon. 2000. Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. Pages 143-161 in P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull (eds), Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
64. Vogt, C. 2003. Seasonal and permanent home owners' past experiences and approval of fuels reduction. Pages 63-73 in Homeowners, communities, and wildfire: Science findings from the National Fire Plan. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-231.
65. Vogt, C., G. Winter and J.S. Fried. 2003. Antecedents to attitudes toward prescribed burning, mechanical thinning, and defensible space fuel reduction techniques. Pages 74-83 in Homeowners, communities, and wildfire: Science findings from the National Fire Plan. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-231.
66. Winter, G.J. and J.S. Fried. 2000. Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland-urban interface. Society and Natural Resources 13:33-49.
67. Winter, G.J., C.A. Vogt and J.S. Fried. 2002. Fuel treatments at the wildland-urban interface: Common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry 100(1):15-21.
68. Winter, G.J., C.A. Vogt and S. McCaffrey. 2004. Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. Journal of Forestry 102(6):8-15.
69. Winter, P.L. and Cvetkovich, G.T. 2003. A study of Southwesterners' opinions on the management of wildland and wilderness fires: Fire management version. Riverside, CA: Wildland Recreation and Urban Cultures, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
70. Woolley, J.T. and M.V. McGinnis. 2000. The conflicting discourses of restoration. Society and Natural Resources 13:339-357.