Forest structure and fuels dynamics following ponderosa pine restoration treatments, White Mountains, Arizona, USA

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 337, Issue , 2015, Pages 174-185

  Roccaforte, John P ^a   Huffman, David W ^a   Fulé, Peter Z ^a   Covington, W Wallace ^a   Chancellor, W Walker ^a   Stoddard, Michael T ^a   Crouse, Joseph E ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Canopy fuels; Elevation; Historical reference conditions; Prescribed fire; Surface fuels; Thinning

Indexed keywords

DEFORESTATION; ECOSYSTEMS; FIRES; FUELS; REDUCTION; RESTORATION;

CANOPY FUELS; ELEVATION; PRESCRIBED FIRES; REFERENCE CONDITION; SURFACE FUELS; THINNING;

CONSERVATION;

CONIFEROUS FOREST; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FUEL; HUMAN SETTLEMENT; LIVESTOCK FARMING; LOGGING (TIMBER); PRESCRIBED BURNING; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; THINNING;

FIRES; FOREST CANOPY; FUELS;

ARIZONA; UNITED STATES; WHITE MOUNTAINS [ARIZONA];

EID: 84913580341     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Agee J.K., Bahro B., Finney M.A., Omi P.N., Sapsis D.B., Skinner C.N., van Wagtendonk J.W., Weatherspoon C.P. The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 127:55-66.
2. Agee J.K., Skinner C.N. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:83-96.
3. Allen C.D., Savage M., Falk D., Suckling K.F., Swetnam T.W., Schulke T., Stacey P.B., Morgan P., Hoffman M., Klingel J.T. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:1418-1433.
4. Applequist M.B. A simple pith locator for use with off-center increment cores. J. Forest. 1958, 56:141.
5. Bakker, J.D., Sánchez Meador, A.J., Fulé, P.Z., Huffman, D.W., Moore, M.M. 2008. Growing trees backwards: description of a stand reconstruction model. In: Olberding, S.D., Moore, M.M. (Eds.), Fort Valley Experimental Forest - A Century of Research 1908-2008. Conference Proceedings; August 7-9, 2008; Flagstaff, AZ. Proceedings RMRS-P-53. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 408 p (pp. 136-142).
6. Brown, J.K. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-16, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
7. Callaham R.Z. Pinus ponderosa: a Taxonomic Review with Five Subspecies in the United States. Res. Pap. PSW-RP-264 2013, 52. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.
8. Clary W.P., Teidemann A.R. Distribution of biomass within small tree and shrub form Quercus gambelii stands. For. Sci. 1986, 32:234-242.
9. Cocke A.E., Fulé P.Z., Crouse J.E. Forest change on a steep mountain gradient after extended fire exclusion: San Francisco Peaks, Arizona, USA. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42:814-823.
10. Cooper C.F. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecol. Monogr. 1960, 30:129-164.
11. Covington W.W., Fulé P.Z., Moore M.M., Hart S.C., Kolb T.E., Mast J.N., Sackett S.S., Wagner M.R. Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the Southwest. J. Forest. 1997, 95:23-29.
12. Covington W.W., Sackett S.S. Effect of periodic burning on soil nitrogen concentrations in ponderosa pine. Soil Soc. Am. J. 1986, 50:452-457.
13. Covington W.W., Sackett S.S. Fire effects of on ponderosa pine soils and their management implications. Effects of Fire Management of Southwestern Natural Resources 1990, 105-111. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-191.
14. DellaSalla D.A., Williams J.E., Williams C.D., Franklin J.F. Beyond smoke and mirrors: a synthesis of fire policy and science. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:976-986.
15. Dether D., Black A. Learning from escaped prescribed fires - lessons for high reliability. Fire Manage. Today 2006, 66(4):50-56.
16. Egan D., Howell E.A. The historical ecology handbook: a restorationist's guide to reference ecosystems 2001, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
17. Fajardo A., Graham J.M., Goodburn J.M., Fiedler C.E. Ten-year responses of ponderosa pine growth, vigor, and recruitment to restoration treatments in the Bitterroot Mountains, Montana, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 243:50-60.
18. Feeney S.R., Kolb T.E., Covington W.W., Wagner M.R. Influence of thinning and burning restoration treatments on presettlement ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson natural area. Can. J. For. Res. 1998, 28:1295-1306.
19. Ffolliott P.F. Overstory-understory relationships: southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Overstory-Understory Relationships in Western Forests 1983, 13-18. Western Region Research Publication 1. Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO. E.T. Bartlett, E.R. Betters (Eds.).
20. Fiedler C.E. Restoration treatments promote growth and reduce mortality of old-growth ponderosa pine (Montana). Ecol. Restoration 2000, 18:117-119.
21. Finney M.A. Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior. For. Sci. 2001, 47(2):219-228.
22. Fulé P.Z. Does it make sense to restore wildland fire in changing climate?. Restor. Ecol. 2008, 16(4):526-531.
23. Fulé P.Z., Cocke A.E., Heinlein T.A., Covington W.W. Effects of an intense prescribed forest fire: is it ecological restoration?. Restor. Ecol. 2004, 12(2):220-230.
24. Fulé P.Z., Crouse J.E., Roccaforte J.P., Kalies E.L. Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior?. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 269:68-81.
25. Fulé P.Z., Korb J.E., Wu R. Changes in forest structure of a mixed conifer forest, southwestern Colorado, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258:1200-1210.
26. Fulé, P.Z., McHugh, C., Heinlein, T.A., Covington, W.W. 2001. Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments. In: Vance, R.K., Covington, W.W., Edminster, C.B., Blake, J.A. (Eds.), Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems Restoration and Conservation: Steps Toward Stewardship. Proceedings of the Symposium, 25-27 April 2000, Flagstaff, Arizona. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-22, Ogden, UT, pp. 28-35.
27. Fulé P.Z., Moore M.M., Covington W.W. Determining reference conditions for ecosystem management in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecol. Appl. 1997, 7:895-908.
28. Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W., Moore M.M., Heinlein T.A., Waltz A.E.M. Natural variability in forests of the Grand Canyon, USA. J. Biogeogr. 2002, 29:31-47.
29. Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W., Smith H.B., Springer J.D., Heinlein T.A., Huisinga K.D., Moore M.M. Comparing ecological restoration alternatives: Grand Canyon, Arizona. For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 170:19-41.
30. Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W., Stoddard M.T., Bertolette D. Minimal-impact restoration treatments have limited effects on forest structure and fuels at Grand Canyon, USA. Restoration Ecol. 2006, 14(3):357-368.
31. Fulé P.Z., Roccaforte J.P., Covington W.W. Posttreatment tree mortality after ecological restoration, Arizona, United States. Environ. Manage. 2007, 40(4):623-634.
32. Fried J.S., Torn M.S., Mills E. The impact of climate change on wildfire severity: a regional forecast for northern California. Climatic Change 2004, 64:169-191.
33. Grier C.C., Elliot K.J., McCullough D.G. Biomass distribution and productivity of Pinus edulis-Juniperus monosperma woodlands of north-central Arizona. For. Ecol. Manage. 1992, 50:331-350.
34. Gruell, G.E., Schmidt, W.C., Arno, S.F., Reich, W.J. 1982. Seventy years of vegetative change in a managed ponderosa pine forest in western Montana - implications for resource management. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR-INT-170.
35. Harrod R.J., McRae B.H., Hartl W.E. Historical stand reconstruction in ponderosa pine forests to guide silvicultural prescriptions. For. Ecol. Manage. 1999, 114:433-446.
36. Hessburg P.F., Agee J.K. An environmental narrative of Inland Northwest United States forests, 1800-2000. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 178(1-2):23-59.
37. Holden Z.A., Morgan P., Rollins M.G., Wright R.G. Ponderosa pine snag densities following multiple fires in the Gila Wilderness, New Mexico. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 221:140-146.
38. Huffman, D.W., Moore, M.M., Covington, W.W., Crouse, J.E., Fulé, P.Z. 2001. Ponderosa pine forest reconstruction: comparisons with historical data. In: Vance, R.K., Edminster, C.B., Covington, W.W., Blake, J.A. (Eds.), Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems Restoration and Conservation: Steps Toward Stewardship. 2000 April 25-27, Flagstaff, AZ. Proceedings RMRS-P-22. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp. 3-8.
39. Huffman D.W., Sánchez Meador A.J., Greco B. Canopy cover and forest conditions. Fact Sheet 2012, 4. Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University.
40. InciWeb (Incident Information System), 2014 (Accessed 17.03.14). http://inciweb.nwcg.gov.
41. Kalies E.L. What are the consequences of cutting old ponderosa pine trees? a systematic review 2014, 3. Ecological Restoration Institute Fact Sheet.
42. Kaye J.P., Hart S.P., Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W., Moore M.M., Kaye M.W. Initial carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus fluxes following ponderosa pine restoration treatments. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15:1581-1593.
43. Kuehl R.O. Statistical principles of research design and analysis 1994, Duxbury Press, Belmont, California, USA.
44. Laughlin D.L., Roccaforte J.P., Fulé P.Z. Effects of a second-entry prescribed fire in a mixed conifer forest. Western North Am. Nat. 2011, 71(4):557-562.
45. Looney S.W., Stanley W.B. Exploratory repeated measures analysis for two or more groups. Am. Stat. 1989, 43(4):220-225.
46. Lynch D.L., Romme W.H., Floyd M.L. Forest restoration in southwestern ponderosa pine. J. Forest. 2000, 98:17-24.
47. Mast J.N., Fulé P.Z., Moore M.M., Covington W.W., Waltz A.E.M. Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:228-239.
48. McIver J., Erickson K., Youngblood A. Principal short-term findings of the national fire and fire surrogate study 2012, 210. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-860.
49. Miller C., Urban D.L. Modeling the effects of fire management alternatives on Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10(1):85-94.
50. Miller J.D., Safford H.D., Crimmins M., Thode A.E. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 2009, 12:16-32.
51. Moore M.M., Covington W.W., Fulé P.Z. Reference conditions and ecological restoration: a southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:1266-1277.
52. Moore M.M., Huffman D.W., Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W., Crouse J.E. Comparison of historical and contemporary forest structure and composition on permanent plots in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. For. Sci. 2004, 50:162-176.
53. Negrón J.F., McMillin J.D., Anhold J.A., Coulson D. Bark-beetle-caused mortality in a drought-affected ponderosa pine landscape in Arizona, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257(4):1353-1362.
54. Parker T.J., Clancy K.M., Mathiasen R.L. Interactions among fire, insects and pathogens in coniferous forest of the interior western United States and Canada. Agric. For. Entomol. 2006, 8:167-189.
55. Pausas J.G. Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean Basin). Climatic Change 2004, 63:337-350.
56. Peterson, D.L., 2012. Southwest. In: Vose, J.M., Peterson, D.L., Patel-Weynand, T. (Eds.), Effects of Climatic Variability and Change on Forest Ecosystems: a Comprehensive Science Synthesis for the U.S. Forest Sector. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-870. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest research Station, Portland, OR, p. 265 (pp. 219-222).
57. Reynolds, R.T., Sánchez Meador, A.J., Youtz, J.A., Nicolet, T., Matonis, M., Jackson, P.L., DeLorenzo, D.G., Graves, A.D. 2013. Restoring composition and structure in southwestern frequent-fire forests: a science-based framework for improving ecosystem resiliency. Gen Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-310. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 76.
58. Roccaforte J.P., Fulé P.Z., Chancellor W.W., Laughlin D.C. Woody debris and tree regeneration dynamics following severe wildfires in Arizona ponderosa pine forests. Can. J. For. Res. 2012, 42:593-604.
59. Roccaforte J.P., Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W. Landscape-scale changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behavior following ponderosa pine restoration treatments. Int J Wildland Fire 2008, 17:293-303.
60. Roccaforte J.P., Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W. Monitoring landscape-scale ponderosa pine restoration treatment implementation and effectiveness. Restor. Ecol. 2010, 18(6):820-833.
61. Rogers, J.J., Prosser, J.M., Garrett, L.D., Ryan, M.G. 1984. ECOSIM: a system for projecting multiresource outputs under alternative forest management regimes. USDA Forest Service, Administrative Report, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
62. Sackett, S.S., Haase, S.M., Harrington, M.G. 1996. Lessons learned from fire use for restoring southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems. In: Covington, W.W., Wagner, P.K. (Eds.), Conference on Adaptive Ecosystem Restoration and Management: Restoration of Cordilleran Conifer Landscapes of North America. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-278. U.S. Department of Agriculture, forest service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins CO, pp. 53-60.
63. Saeger R., Vecchi G.A. Greenhouse warming and the 21st century hydroclimate of southwestern North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107(50):21277-21282.
64. Savage M., Mast J.N. How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires?. Can. J. For. Res. 2005, 35:967-977.
65. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group). 2004. SER international primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Washington DC . http://www.ser.org.
66. Schmidt, W.C., Wakimoto, R.H. 1988. Cultural practices that can reduce fire hazards to homes in the interior west. In: Fischer, W.C., Arno, S.F. (Eds.), Protecting People and Homes from Wildfire in the Interior West: Proceedings of the Symposium and Workshop. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-251. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, pp. 131-137.
67. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J.J., Edminster C., Fiedler C.E., Haase S., Harrington M., Keeley J.E., Knapp E.E., McIver J.D., Metlen K., Skinner C.N., Youngblood A. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19:305-320.
68. Stephenson N.L. Reference conditions for giant sequoia forest restoration: structure, process, and precision. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9(4):1253-1265.
69. Stoddard M.T. Compilation of Historical Forest Structural Characteristics Across the Southern Colorado Plateau 2011, 7. Ecological Restoration Institute Fact Sheet.
70. Stoddard M.T., McGlone C.M., Fulé P.Z., Laughlin D.C., Daniels M.L. Native plants dominate understory vegetation following ponderosa pine forest restoration treatments. Western North Am. Nat. 2011, 71(2):206-214.
71. Stokes M.A., Smiley T.L. An Introduction to Tree-Ring Dating 1968, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
72. Stone J.E., Kolb T.E., Covington W.W. Effects on presettlement Pinus ponderosa in Northern Arizona. Restor. Ecol. 1999, 7(2):172-182.
73. Strahan, R.T., Stoddard, M.T., Springer, J.D. Selecting targets for the restoration of understory vegetation in southwestern ponderosa pine forests (In Prep).
74. Swetnam T., Baisan C. Historical fire regime patterns in the southwestern United States since AD 1700. Fire Effects in Southwestern Forest: Proceedings of the 2nd La Mesa Fire Symposium 1996, 11-32. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RM-GTR-286. C.D. Allen (Ed.).
75. Ter-Mikaelian M.T., Korzuhkin M.D. Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For. Ecol. Manage. 1997, 97:1-24.
76. Thomas J.W., Anderson R.G., Maser C., Bull E.L. Snags. Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests-The Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington 1979, 60-77. USDA Agricultural Handbook 553, Washington, D.C.
77. U.S.Department of Agriculture Terrestrial Ecosystem Survey of the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests 1987, 453. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region.
78. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2014. Plants database (Accessed 12.02.14). http://plants.usda.gov/java/.
79. Wallin K.F., Kolb T.E., Skov K.R., Wagner M.R. Seven-year results of thinning and burning restoration treatments on old ponderosa pines at the Gus Pearson Natural Area. Restor. Ecol. 2004, 12:239-247.
80. Waltz A.E.M., Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W., Moore M.M. Diversity in ponderosa pine forest structure following ecological restoration treatments. For. Sci. 2003, 49:885-900.
81. Weaver H. A preliminary report on prescribed burning in virgin ponderosa pine. J. Forest. 1952, 50(9):662-667.
82. Weaver H. Effects of prescribed burning in ponderosa pine. J. Forest. 1957, 55(2):133-138.
83. Western Forestry Leadership Coalition. 2010. The true cost of wildfire in the western U.S. Report (Accessed 28.02.13). http://www.wflccenter.org.
84. White A.S. Presettlement regeneration patterns in a southwestern ponderosa pine stand. Ecology 1985, 66:589-594.
85. Youngblood A., Max T., Coe K. Stand structure in eastside old-growth ponderosa pine forests of Oregon and northern California. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 199:191-217.
86. Youngblood A., Metlen K.L., Coe K. Changes in stand structure and composition after restoration treatments in low elevation dry forests of northeastern Oregon. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 234:143-163.
87. Youngblood A., Grace J.B., McIver J.D. Delayed conifer mortality after fuel reduction treatments: interactive effects of fuel, fire intensity, and bark beetles. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19(2):321-337.
88. Zimmerman T.G. Fuels and fire behavior. Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests 2003, 126-143. Island Press, Washington, D.C. P. Friederici (Ed.).