Taking a tree's perspective on forest fragmentation genetics

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 13-18

  Bacles, Cecile F E ^a   Jump, Alistair S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENETICS; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; PLANT; SHORT SURVEY; TREE;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; PLANTS; TREES;

EID: 78650955937     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.002     Document Type: Short Survey

References (77)

1. Bonan G.B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 2008, 320:1444-1449.
2. Soja A.J., et al. Climate-induced boreal forest change: predictions versus current observations. Global Planet. Change 2007, 56:274-296.
3. Petit R.J., Hampe A. Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37:187-214.
4. FRA Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 2005, FAO.
5. SCBD (2002) Review of the Status and Trends of, and Major Threats to, the Forest Biological Diversity (CBD Technical Series no. 7), Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
6. Lamb D., et al. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 2005, 310:1628-1632.
7. FRA (2010) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Key Findings, FAO.
8. Kremer A. How well can existing forests withstand climate change?. Climate Change and Forest Genetic Diversity: Implications for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe 2007, 3-17. Bioversity International. J. Koskela (Ed.).
9. Smulders M., et al. Landscape genetics of fragmented forests: anticipating climate change by facilitating migration. iForest 2009, 2:128-132.
10. Young A., et al. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996, 11:413-418.
11. Saunders D.A., et al. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation - a review. Conserv. Biol. 1991, 5:18-32.
12. Nathan R., et al. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:19052-19059.
13. Revilla E., Wiegand T. Individual movement behavior, matrix heterogeneity, and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:19120-19125.
14. Geburek, T. (2005) Sexual reproduction in forest trees. In Conservation and Management of Forest Genetic Resources in Europe (Geburek, T. and Turok, J., eds), pp. 171-198, Arbora.
15. Nathan R. Long-distance dispersal of plants. Science 2006, 313:786-788.
16. Irwin A.J., et al. A multiyear estimate of the effective pollen donor pool for Albizia julibrissin. Heredity 2003, 90:187-194.
17. Wang B.C., Smith T.B. Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:379-386.
18. Godoy J.A., Jordano P. Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10:2275-2283.
19. Sork V.L., et al. Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:219-224.
20. Sork V.L., Smouse P.E. Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21:821-836.
21. Lowe A.J., et al. Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 2005, 95:255-273.
22. Kramer A.T., et al. The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:878-885.
23. Ellstrand N.C., Elam D.R. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1993, 24:217-242.
24. Jump A.S., Peñuelas J. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated tree. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:8096-8100.
25. Kettle C.J., et al. Identifying the early genetic consequences of habitat degradation in a highly threatened tropical conifer, Araucaria nemorosa (Laubenfels). Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:3581-3591.
26. Dick C.W. Genetic rescue of remnant tropical trees by an alien pollinator. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001, 268:2391-2396.
27. Dick C.W., et al. Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12:753-764.
28. White G.M., et al. Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: An example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99:2038-2042.
29. Bacles C.F.E., Ennos R.A. Paternity analysis of pollen-mediated gene flow for Fraxinus excelsior L. in a chronically fragmented landscape. Heredity 2008, 101:368-380.
30. Bacles C.F.E., et al. Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape. Science 2006, 311:628-1628.
31. Hamrick J.L. Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 197:323-335.
32. Porcher E., et al. Genetic differentiation of neutral markers and quantitative traits in predominantly selfing metapopulations: confronting theory and experiments with Arabidopsis thaliana. Genet. Res. 2006, 87:1-12.
33. Richards C.M. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am. Nat. 2000, 155:383-394.
34. Wagenius S., et al. Biparental inbreeding and interremnant mating in a perennial prairie plant: fitness consequences for progeny in their first eight years. Evolution 2010, 64:761-771.
35. Mimura M., et al. Comparison of contemporary mating patterns in continuous and fragmented Eucalyptus globulus native forests. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:4180-4192.
36. De-Lucas A.I., et al. Spatial genetic structure in continuous and fragmented populations of Pinus pinaster Aiton. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:4564-4576.
37. Trakhtenbrot A., et al. The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Divers. Distrib. 2005, 11:173-181.
38. Klein E.K., et al. Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. IV. Whole interindividual variance of male fecundity estimated jointly with the dispersal kernel. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:3323-3336.
39. Oddou-Muratorio S., Klein E.K. Comparing direct vs. indirect estimates of gene flow within a population of a scattered tree species. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:2743-2754.
40. Garcia C., et al. Contemporary pollen and seed dispersal in a Prunus mahaleb population: patterns in distance and direction. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1947-1955.
41. Jones F.A., et al. A genetic evaluation of seed dispersal in the neotropical tree Jacaranda copaia (Bignoniaceae). Am. Nat. 2005, 166:543-555.
42. Austerlitz F., et al. Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:937-954.
43. Chybicki I.J., Burczyk J. Realized gene flow within mixed stands of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) L. revealed at the stage of naturally established seedling. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:2137-2151.
44. Garcia C., et al. Maternal genetic correlations in the seed rain: effects of frugivore activity in heterogeneous landscapes. J. Ecol. 2009, 97:1424-1435.
45. Lopez S., et al. Migration load in plants: role of pollen and seed dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:294-309.
46. Ronce O., et al. Plastic changes in seed dispersal along ecological succession: theoretical predictions from an evolutionary model. J. Ecol. 2005, 93:431-440.
47. Wang I.J., et al. Landscape genetics and least-cost path analysis reveal unexpected dispersal routes in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:1365-1374.
48. Schurr F.M., et al. Plant fecundity and seed dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environments: models, mechanisms and estimation. J. Ecol. 2008, 96:628-641.
49. McRae B.H., Beier P. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:19885-19890.
50. Bohrer G., et al. Effects of canopy heterogeneity, seed abscission and inertia on wind-driven dispersal kernels of tree seeds. J. Ecol. 2008, 96:569-580.
51. Montoya D., et al. Animal versus wind dispersal and the robustness of tree species to deforestation. Science 2008, 320:1502-1504.
52. Spiegel O., Nathan R. Incorporating density dependence into the directed-dispersal hypothesis. Ecology 2010, 91:1538-1548.
53. Sagnard F., et al. Effects of seed dispersal, adult tree and seedling density on the spatial genetic structure of regeneration at fine temporal and spatial scales. Tree Genet. Genom. 2010, 10.1007/s11295-010-0313-y.
54. Dubreuil M., et al. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation revisited: strong genetic structure in a temperate tree, Taxus baccata (Taxaceae), with great dispersal capability. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97:303-310.
55. Craft K.J., Ashley M.V. Landscape genetic structure of bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) savannas in Illinois. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2007, 239:13-20.
56. Kamm U., et al. Frequent long-distance gene flow in a rare temperate forest tree (Sorbus domestica) at the landscape scale. Heredity 2009, 103:476-482.
57. Oddou-Muratorio S., et al. Impacts of gene flow and logging history on the local genetic structure of a scattered tree species, Sorbus torminalis L. Crantz. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:3689-3702.
58. Bacles C.F.E., et al. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation on tree species: the case of Sorbus aucuparia in a deforested Scottish landscape. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:573-584.
59. Jones F.A., Hubbell S.P. Demographic spatial genetic structure of the Neotropical tree. Jacaranda copaia. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:3205-3217.
60. Cheptou P.O., et al. Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weed Crepis sancta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:3796-3799.
61. Lindenmayer D.B., Fischer J. Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:127-132.
62. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:487-515.
63. Parker M., Mac Nally R. Habitat loss and the habitat fragmentation threshold: an experimental evaluation of impacts on richness and total abundances using grassland invertebrates. Biol. Conserv. 2002, 105:217-229.
64. Solè R.V., et al. Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity collapse in neutral communities. Ecological Complexity 2004, 1:65-75.
65. Bennett K.D., Parducci L. DNA from pollen: principles and potential. Holocene 2006, 16:1031-1034.
66. Barrett S.C.H., Kohn J.R. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: Implications for conservation. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants 1991, 31-44. Oxford University Press. D.A. Falk, K.E. Holsinger (Eds.).
67. Lande R. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 1988, 241:1455-1460.
68. Huenneke L.F. Ecological implications of genetic variation in plant populations. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants 1991, 31-44. Oxford University Press. D.A. Falk, K.E. Holsinger (Eds.).
69. Keller L.F., Waller D.M. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:230-241.
70. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987, 18:237-268.
71. Husband B.C., Schemske D.W. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae): Implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 1997, 51:737-746.
72. Hedrick P.W. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction - full-sib mating. Heredity 1994, 73:363-372.
73. Kirkpatrick M., Jarne P. The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. Am. Nat. 2000, 155:154-167.
74. Hansson B., Westerberg L. On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:2467-2474.
75. Vendramin G.G., et al. Genetically depauperate but widespread: the case of an emblematic Mediterranean pine. Evolution 2008, 62:680-688.
76. White T.L., et al. Forest Genetics 2007, CABI Publishing.
77. Reinartz J.A., Les D.H. Bottleneck-induced dissolution of self-incompatibility and breeding system consequences in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 1994, 81:446-455.