Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior?

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 269, Issue , 2012, Pages 68-81

  Fulé, Peter Z ^a   Crouse, Joseph E ^a   Roccaforte, John Paul ^a   Kalies, Elizabeth L ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fuel; Meta analysis; Pinus jeffreyi; Pinus ponderosa; Wildfire

Indexed keywords

BASAL AREA; BURNING TREATMENT; CANOPY BASE; CANOPY BULK DENSITIES; COMBINED TREATMENT; DENSE STANDS; DISTURBANCE REGIME; FIRE BEHAVIOR; FIRE EXCLUSION; FOREST THINNINGS; FOREST TYPE; FUEL LOADING; IMPERFECT MODELING; JEFFREY PINE; LOW-SEVERITY FIRE; META-ANALYSIS; NATURAL FIRE; PINE FOREST; PINUS JEFFREYI; PINUS PONDEROSA; PONDEROSA PINES; QUANTITATIVE DATA; STAND DENSITIES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT EFFECTS; WILDFIRE;

FIRES; FUELS; RESTORATION;

FORESTRY;

ADAPTATION; BASAL AREA; BIOMASS BURNING; COEXISTENCE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DISTURBANCE; FIRE BEHAVIOR; HEIGHT DETERMINATION; META-ANALYSIS; THINNING; WILDFIRE;

BASAL AREA; COMBUSTION; CROWNS; FOREST FIRES; PINUS PONDEROSA; RESTORATION; THINNING; WESTERN USA;

PINUS JEFFREYI; PINUS PONDEROSA;

EID: 84856448904     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.025     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Adams D.C., Gurevitch J., Rosenberg M.S. Resampling tests for meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology 1997, 78:1277-1283.
2. Agee J.K., Skinner C.N. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:83-96.
3. Agee J.K., Bahro B., Finney M.A., Omi P., Sapsis D.B., Skinner C.N., van Wagtendonk J.W., Weatherspoon C.P. The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2000, 127:55-66.
4. Allen C.D., Falk D.A., Hoffman M., Klingel J., Morgan P., Savage M., Schulke T., Stacey P., Suckling K., Swetnam T.W. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: A broad framework. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:1418-1433.
5. Arnqvist G., Wooster D. Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10:236-240.
6. Belsky A.J., Blumenthal D.M. Effects of livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in upland forests of the interior West. Cons. Biol. 1997, 11:315-327.
7. Brown A.A. Comments [Reply to Weaver, 1943]. J. Forest 1943, 41:14-15.
8. Brown P.M., Cook B. Early settlement forest structure in the Black Hills ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2006, 223:284-290.
9. Brown P.M., Wienk C.L., Symstad A.J. Fire and forest history at Mount Rushmore. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18:1984-1999.
10. Brown R.T., Agee J.K., Franklin J.F. Forest restoration and fire: Principles in the context of place. Cons. Biol. 2004, 18:903-912.
11. Carlton, D., 2005. Fuels Management Analyst Plus software, version 3. (Fire Program Solutions LLC: Estacada, OR). Available at: http://www.fireps.com/fmanalyst3/index.htm.
12. Cocke A.E., Fulé P.Z., Crouse J.E. Forest change on a steep mountain gradient after extended fire exclusion: San Francisco Peaks, Arizona, USA. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42:814-823.
13. Cooper C.F. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecology 1960, 42:493-499.
14. Côté I.M., Mosquera I., Reynolds J.D. Effects of marine reserve characteristics on the protection of fish populations: a meta-analysis. J. Fish Biol. 2001, 59(Suppl. A):178-189.
15. Covington W.W., Fulé P.Z., Moore M.M., Hart S.C., Kolb T.E., Mast J.N., Sackett S.S., Wagner M.R. Restoration of ecosystem health in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. J. Forest 1997, 95:23-29.
16. Cram, D., Baker, T., Boren, J., 2006. Wildland Fire Effects in Silviculturally Treated vs. Untreated Stands of New Mexico and Arizona, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-55.
17. Cruz M.G., Alexander M.E., Wakimoto R.H. Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western North America. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2003, 12:39-50.
18. Cruz M.G., Alexander M.E. Assessing crown fire potential in coniferous forests of western North America: a critique of current approaches and recent simulation studies. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2010, 19:377-398.
19. Fazey I., Salisbury J., Lindenmayer D.B., Douglas R., Maindonald J. Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research?. Environ. Conserv. 2005, 31:190-198.
20. Fernandes P.M., Botelho H.S. A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2003, 12:117-128.
21. Fiedler, C.E., Keegan III, C.E., Robertson, S.H., Morgan, T.A., Woodall, C.W., Chmelik, J.T., 2002. A Strategic Assessment of Fire Hazard in New Mexico. Final Report to the Joint Fire Science Program, Boise, Idaho.
22. Finney, M.A., 2006. An overview of FlamMap fire modelling capabilities. In: Andrews, P.L., Butler, B.W. (Eds.), 'Fuels Management - How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings', 28-30 March 2006, Portland, OR, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P 41, pp. 213-220 (Fort Collins, CO).
23. Finney M.A., McHugh C.W., Grenfell I.C. Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires. Can. J. Forest Res. 2005, 35:1714-1722.
24. Fulé P.Z., Crouse J.E., Heinlein T.A., Moore M.M., Covington W.W., Verkamp G. Mixed-severity fire regime in a high-elevation forest of Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecol. 2003, 18:465-486.
25. Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W., Stoddard M.T., Bertolette D. "Minimal-impact" restoration treatments have limited effects on forest structure and fuels at Grand Canyon, USA. Rest. Ecol. 2006, 14:357-368.
26. Graham, R.T., McCaffrey, S., Jain, T.B., 2004. Science Basis for Changing Forest Structure to Modify Wildfire Behavior And severity. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-120.
27. Gurevitch J., Morrow L.L., Wallace A., Walsh J.S. A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am. Nat. 1992, 140:539-572.
28. Hedges L.V., Gurevitch J., Curtis P.S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 1999, 80:1150-1156.
29. Hedges L.V., Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis 1985, Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, Florida.
30. Hessburg P.F., Agee J.K., Franklin J.F. Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:117-139.
31. Hunter, M.E., Shepperd, W.D., Lentile, J.E., Lundquist, J.E., Andreu, M.G., Butler, J.L., Smith, F.W., 2007. A Comprehensive Guide to Fuels Treatment Practices for Ponderosa Pine in the Black Hills, Colorado Front Range, and Southwest. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-198.
32. Jenkins S.E., Sieg C.H., Anderson D.E., Kaufman D.S, Pearthree P.A. Late holocene geomorphic record of fire in ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests, Kendrick Mountain, northern Arizona, USA. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2011, 20:125-141.
33. Johnson E.A., Gill A.M., Bradstock R.A., Granstrom A., Trabaud L., Miyanishi K. Towards a sounder fire ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2003, 1:271-276.
34. Keeley J.E. Fire management impacts on invasive plants in the western United States. Cons. Biol. 2006, 20:375-384.
35. Keeley J.E., Zedler P.H. Evolution of life histories in Pinus. Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus 1998, 219-250. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. D.M. Richardson (Ed.).
36. Leiberg J.B. Forest Conditions in the Northern Sierra Nevada, California 1902, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
37. Leone V., Lovreglio R. Conservation of Mediterranean pine woodlands: scenarios and legislative tools. Plant Ecol. 2004, 171:221-235.
38. Leopold A. Grass, brush, timber, and fire in southern Arizona. J. Forest 1924, 22:1-10.
39. Leopold A. Conservationist in Mexico. Am. Forest 1937, 37. 118-120, 146.
40. Lindenmuth, A.W., 1960. A Survey of the Effects of Intentional Burning on Fuels and Timber Stands of Ponderosa Pine in Arizona. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Sta. Pap. No. 54. Fort Collins, CO, p. 22.
41. Martinson E.J., Omi, P.N., 2003. 'Performance of Fuel Treatments Subjected to Wildfires.' USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings RMRS-P-29.
42. Margolis E.Q., Balmat J. Fire history and fire-climate relationships along a fire regime gradient in the Santa Fe Municipal Watershed, NM, USA. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258:2416-2430.
43. Miller C., Urban D.L. Modeling the effects of fire management alternatives on Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10:85-94.
44. Minnich R.A., Barbour M.G., Burk J.H., Fernau R.F. Sixty years of change in Californian conifer forests of the San Bernadino Mountains. Cons. Biol. 1995, 9:902-914.
45. Moody J.A., Martin D.A. Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range. Earth Surface Process. Landforms 2001, 26:1049-1070.
46. Mosquera I., Côté I.M., Jennings S., Reynolds J.D. Conservation benefits of marine reserves for fish populations. Animal Cons. 2000, 4:321-332.
47. Naficy C., Sala A., Keeling E.G., Graham J., DeLuca T.H. Interactive effects of historical logging and fire exclusion on ponderosa pine forest structure in the northern Rockies. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:1851-1864.
48. Pausas J.G. Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean Basin). Clim. Change 2004, 63:337-350.
49. Pierce J., Meyer G. Long-term fire history from alluvial fan sediments: the role of drought and climate variability, and implications for management of Rocky Mountain forests. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2008, 17:84-95.
50. Pollet J., Omi P.N. Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2002, 11:1-10.
51. Pullin A.S., Stewart G.B. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:1647-1656.
52. Ritchie M.W., Skinner C.N., Hamilton T.A. Probability of tree survival after wildfire in an interior pine forest of northern California: Effects of thinning and prescribed fire. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 247:200-208.
53. Roccaforte J.P., Fulé P.Z., Covington W.W. Landscape-scale changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behavior following ponderosa pine restoration treatments. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2008, 17:293-303.
54. Rollins M.G., Swetnam T.W., Morgan P. Evaluating a century of fire patterns in two Rocky Mountain wilderness areas using digital fire atlases. Can. J. Forest Res. 2001, 31:2107-2123.
55. Rosenberg M.S., Adams D.C., Gurevitch J. MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis, Version 2.1 Software and Manual 2000, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
56. Rothermel, R.C., 1972. A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT).
57. Rothermel, R.C., 1991. Predicting Behavior and Size of Crown Fires In The Northern Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Research Paper INT-438. (Ogden, UT).
58. Sackett, S.S., Haase, S.M., Harrington, M.G., 1996. Lessons learned from fire use for restoring southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems. In: Covington, W.W., Wagner, P.K. (Eds.), Technical Coordinators, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-GTR-278, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 53-60.
59. Savage M., Mast J.N. How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires?. Can. J. Forest Res. 2005, 35:967-977.
60. Scott, J.H., 1998. Fuel Reduction in Residential and Scenic Forests: A Comparison of Three Treatments in A Western Montana Ponderosa Pine Stand. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-5.
61. Scott, J.H., Reinhardt, E.D., 2001. Assessing Crown Fire Potential by Linking Models of Surface and Crown Fire Behavior. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper RMRS-RP-29. Fort Collins, CO.
62. Scott, J.H., Reinhardt, E.D., 2005. Stereo photo guide for estimating canopy fuel characteristics in conifer stands. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-145. Fort Collins, CO.
63. Sherriff R.L., Veblen T.T. A spatially-explicit reconstruction of historical fire occurrence in the ponderosa pine zone of the Colorado Front Range. Ecosystems 2007, 10:311-323.
64. Sherriff R.L., Veblen T.T. A spatially-explicit reconstruction of historical fire occurrence in the ponderosa pine zone of the Colorado Front Range. Ecosystems 2007, 10:311-323.
65. Stephens S.L. Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatment on potential fire behavior in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecol. Manage. 1998, 105:21-35.
66. Stephens S.L., Fulé P.Z. Western pine forests with continuing frequent fire regimes: Possible reference sites for management. J. Forest 2005, 103:357-362.
67. Stephens S.L., Modhaddas J.J. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 215:21-36.
68. Stephens S.L., Moghaddas J.J., Edminster C., Fiedler C.E., Haase S., Harrington M., Keeley J.E., Knapp E.E., McIver J.D., Metlen K., Skinner C.N., Youngblood A. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in Western U.S. forests. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19:305-320.
69. Stephens S.L., Ruth L.W. Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15:532-542.
70. Stephens S.L., Skinner C.N., Gill S.J. Dendrochronology-based fire history of Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forests in the Sierra San Pedro Martir, Mexico. Can. J. Forest Res. 2003, 33:1090-1101.
71. Stephenson N.L. Reference conditions for giant sequoia forest restoration: structure, process, and precision. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:1253-1265.
72. Strom B.A., Fulé P.Z. Pre-wildfire fuel treatments affect long-term ponderosa pine forest dynamics. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2007, 16:128-138.
73. Sweeney J.R., Biswell H.H. Quantitative studies of the removal of litter and duff by fire under controlled conditions. Ecology 1961, 42:572-575.
74. Swetnam, T.W., Baisan, C., 1996. Historical fire regime patterns in the southwestern United States since AD 1700. In: Allen, C.D., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd la Mesa Fire Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMGTR-286, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 11-32.
75. Van Wagner C.E. Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Can. J. Forest Res. 1977, 7:23-34.
76. Weaver H. Fire as an ecological and silvicultural factor in the ponderosa pine region of the Pacific Slope. J. Forest 1943, 41:7-14.
77. Weaver H. Fire as an ecological factor in the southwestern ponderosa pine forests. J. Forest 1951, 49:93-98.
78. Westerling A.L., Hidalgo H.G., Cayan D.R., Swetnam T.W. Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. Forest wildfire activity. Science 2006, 313:940-943.
79. Youngblood A. Old-growth forest structure in eastern Oregon and Washington. Northwest Sci. 2001, 75:110-118.