Comparisons between talent search students qualifying via scores on standardized tests and via parent nomination

Roeper Review

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 157-166

  Lee, Seon‐Young ^a   Olszewski‐Kubilius, Paula ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007799814     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190609554355     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ablard, K. R, Mills, C. J., & Hoffhines, V. L. (1996). The developmental study of talented youth (DSTY): The participants (Tech. Rep. No. 13). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Institute for the Academic Advancement of Youth.
2. Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: "It was never there and already it's vanishing." Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 65-76.
3. Ackerman, C. M. (1997). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowski's overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19, 229-236.
4. Asakawa, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). The quality of experience of Asian American adolescents in academic activities: An exploration of educational achievement. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 241-262.
5. Assouline, S., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (1997). Talent searches: A model for the discovery and development of academic talent. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 170-179). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Baldwin, A. Y. (1991). Ethnic and cultural issues. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted éducation (pp. 416-427). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Barnett, L. B., & Durden, W. G. (1993). Education patterns of academically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 161-168.
8. Bartkovich, K. G., & Mezynski, K. (1981). Fast-paced precalculus mathematics for talented junior-high students: Two recent SMPY programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 73-80.
9. Baska, L. (1986). Alternatives to traditional testing. Roeper Review, 8(3), 181-184.
10. Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 51-61.
11. Benbow, C. P. (1992). Mathematical talent: Its nature and consequences. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 95- 123). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
12. Benbow, C. P., & Arjmand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 430-441.
13. Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1994). Individual differences amongst the mathematically gifted: Their educational and vocational implications. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 83-100). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
14. Benbow, C. P., Perkins, S., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Mathematics taught at a fast pace: A longitudinal evaluation of SMPY's first class. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 51-78). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Intellectually talented students: Family profiles. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 119-122.
16. Bernai, E. M. (2002). Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper Review, 24, 82-88.
17. Bittker, C. M. (1991). Patterns of academic achievement in students who qualified for a gifted program on the basis of nonverbal tests. Roeper Review, 14, 65-67.
18. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
19. Boyd, L. N. (1992). The needs assessment: Who needs it? Roeper Review, 15, 64-66.
20. Brody, L. E. (1998). The talent searches: A catalyst for change in higher education. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 124-133.
21. Burton, N. W. (1988). Survey II: Test-taking history for 1980-81 young SAT-takers (88-1). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
22. Center for Talent Development (2003-2004). The 2004 student guide: Participating in the Midwest talent search. Evanston, IL: Center for Talent Development, Northwestern University.
23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
24. Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little Brown.
25. Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is notan illness. London: Gryf.
26. Enersen, D. L. (1993). Summer residential programs: Academics and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 169-176.
27. Esquivel, G. B., & Lopez, E. (1988). Correlations among measures of cognitive ability, creativity, and academic achievement for gifted minority children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 395-398.
28. Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted black students: Promising practices and programs. New York: Teacher College Press.
29. Ford, D. Y., & Harris III, J. J. (1999). Multicultural gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Ford, D. Y., Harris, J. J., Tyson, C. A., & Trotman, M. F. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24, 52-58.
31. Gallagher, J. J. (1994). Current and historical thinking on education for gifted and talented students. In P. O. Ross (Ed.), National excellence, a case for developing America's talent: An anthology of readings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
32. Gallagher, S. (1986). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth-grade students. Roeper Review, 8, 115-119.
33. Galloway, B., & Porath, M. (1997). Parent and teacher views of gifted children's social abilities. Roeper Review, 20, 118-121.
34. Goyette, K., & Xie, Y. (1999). Educational expectations of Asian American youths: Determinants and ethnic differences. Sociology of Education, 72, 22-36.
35. Grantham, T. C. (2003). Increasing Black student enrollment in gifted programs: An exploration of the Pulaski county special school district's advocacy efforts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 46-65.
36. Green, S. B., Salkind, N. J., & Akey, T. M. (2000). Using SPSS for windows: Analyzing and understanding data (2nd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37. Hadaway, N., & Marek-Schroer, M. F. (1992). Multidimensional assessment of the gifted minority student. Roeper Review, 15, 73-77.
38. Jarosewich, T., & Stocking, V. B. (2003). Talent search: Student and parent perceptions of out-of-level testing. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 137-150.
39. Kolitch, E. R., & Brody, L. E. (1992). Mathematics acceleration of highly talented students: An evaluation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 78-86.
40. Lee, S.-Y., Matthews, M. S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (in press). A national picture of talent search and talent search educational programs. Gifted Child Quarterly.
41. Lohman, D. F. (2004a, November). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Paper presented at the 2003 National Association of Gifted Children, Indianapolis, IN.
42. Lohman, D. F. (2004b, May). An aptitude perspective on talent development. Paper presented at the Seventh Biennial Henry B & Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, Iowa City, IA.
43. Lohman, D. F. (2005). Review of Naglieri and Ford (2003): Does the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test identify equal proportions of high-scoring White, Black, and Hispanic students? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 19-28.
44. Lynch, S. J. (1992). Fast-paced high school science for the academically talented: A six-year perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 147-154.
45. MacRae, L., & Lupart, J. L. (1991). Issues in identifying gifted students: How Renzulli's model stacks up. RoeperReview, 14, 53-58.
46. Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes, and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41-50.
47. Mathews, F. N. (1984). Parental perceptions of a preschool gifted program in a public school system. Roeper Review, 6, 210-213.
48. Matthews, D. J. (1988). Raven's Matrices in the identification of giftedness. Roeper Review, 10, 159-162.
49. Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E, & Lynch, S. J. (1992). Academically talented students' preparation for advanced-level coursework after individually-paced precalculus class. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 3-17.
50. Miller, N. B., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 20-38.
51. Morris, J. E. (2002). African American students and gifted education: The politics of race and culture. Roeper Review, 24,59-62.
52. Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix analogies test-expanded form. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
53. Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Addressing under-representation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 155-160.
54. Naglieri, J. A., & Ronning, M. E. (2000). Comparison of White, African American, Hispanic, and Asian children on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. Psychological Assessment, 12, 328-334.
55. Naglieri, J. A., & Ronning, M. E. (2000). The relationships between general ability using the NNAT and SAT reading achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 230-239.
56. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Talent search: Purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 106-113.
57. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Research evidence regarding the validity and effects of talent search educational programs. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 134-138.
58. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Grant, B. (1996). Academically talented women and mathematics: The role of special programs and support from others on acceleration, achievement, and aspirations. In K. Arnold, K. D. Noble, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women (pp. 281-294). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Kulieke, M. J., Willis, G. B., &
59. Krasney, N. (1989). An analysis of the validity of SAT entrance scores for accelerated classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 37-54.
60. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S-Y. (2005). How schools use talent search scores for gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 27, 233-240.
61. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Turner, D. (2002). Gender differences among elementary school-aged gifted students in achievement, perceptions of ability, and subject preference. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 233-268.
62. Passow, A. H., & Frasier, M. M. (1996). Toward improving identification of talent potential among minority and disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 18, 198-202.
63. Piechowski, M. M., & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80-88.
64. Piechowski, M. M., & Cunningham, K. (1985). Patterns of overexcitability in a group of artists. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 153-174.
65. Piechowski, M. M., & Miller, N. B. (1994). Assessing developmental potential in gifted children: A comparison of methods. Roeper Review, 17, 176-180.
66. Piechowski, M. M., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1985). Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensions of mental functioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539-549.
67. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.
68. Reyes, E. I., Fletcher, R., & Paez, D. (1996). Developing local multidimensional screening procedures for identifying giftedness among Mexican American border population. Roeper Review, 18, 208-211.
69. Sankar-DeLeeuw, N. (1999). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification, early admission, and programming. Roeper Review, 21, 174-179.
70. Sorensen, C. W. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38, 10-35.
71. Slocumb, P. D., & Payne, R. K. (2000). Removing the mask: Giftedness in poverty. Highlands, TX: RFT Publishing.
72. Stanley, J. C, Benbow, C. P., Brody, L. E., Dauber, S., & Lupkowski, A. E. (1992). Gender differences on eighty-six nationally standardized aptitude and achievement tests. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 42-65). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
73. Stanley, J. C, Stumpf, H., & Cohn, S. J. (1999). Ipsative evaluative attitudes versus vocational interests and cognitive abilities of bright male and female seventhgraders. In N. Colangelo & S. G. Assouline (Eds.), Talent development III: Proceedings from the 1995 Henry B and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 41-58). Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
74. Stinespring, J. A. (1991). The quest to find an alternative way to identify artistic talent in black students. Roeper Review, 14, 59-62.
75. Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of participants in a fast-paced mathematics class. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 138-159.
76. Swiatek, M. A., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (in press). An evaluation of the elementary student talent search by families and schools. Gifted Child Quarterly.
77. Tyler-Wood, T. & Cam, L. (1991). Identification of gifted children: The effectiveness of various measures of cognitive ability. Roeper Review, 14, 63-64.
78. VanTassel-Baska, J. L. (1989). Profiles of precocity: A three-year study of talented adolescents. In J. L. Van- Tassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners (pp. 29-39). New York: Teacher College Press.
79. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). A critique of the talent searches: Issues, problems, and possibilities. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 139-144.
80. VanTassel-Baska, I., Landau, M., & Olszewski, P. (1984). The benefits of summer programming for gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 73-82.
81. Wilder, G., & Casserly, P. L. (1988). Survey 1: Young SATtakers and their parents (88-1). News York: College Board Report.
82. Woods, S. B., & Achey, V. H. (1990). Successful identification of gifted racial/ethnic group students without changing classification requirements. Roeper Review, 13, 10-15.