Multipotentiality among the Intellectually Gifted: "It Was Never There and Already It's Vanishing"

Journal of Counseling Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 65-76

  Achter, John A ^a,b   Lubinski, David ^a,b   Benbow, Camilla Persson ^a,b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002707974     PISSN: 00220167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.65     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Individual differences and skill acquisition. In P. L. Ackerman, R. J. Sternberg, & G. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Advances in theory and research (pp. 164-217). New York: Freedman.
2. Allport, G. W., Vernon, P.E., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Manual: Study of Values. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Austin, J. T., & Hanisch, K. A. (1990). Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: A longitudinal analysis using Project TALENT data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 77-89.
4. Benbow, C. P. (1991). Meeting the needs of gifted students through acceleration: A neglected resource. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education (Vol. 4, pp. 23-36). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
5. Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 51-61.
6. Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1994). Individual differences among the mathematically gifted: Their educational and vocational implications. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.). Talent development (Vol. 2, pp. 83-100). Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
7. Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., & Suchy, B. (in press). Impact of the SMPY model and programs from the perspective of the participant. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Campbell, D. P. (1977). Manual for the SVIB-SCII (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Carroll, J, B. (1989). Intellectual abilities and aptitudes. In A. Lesgold & R. Glaser (Eds.), Foundations for a psychology of education (pp. 137-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cohn, S. J. (1991). Talent searches. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 166-177). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Colangelo, N., & Kerr, B. A. (1990). Extreme academic talent: Profiles of perfect scorers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 404-409.
13. Colangelo, N., & Zaffrann, R. T. (Eds.). (1979). New voices in counseling the gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
14. Crites, J.O. (1969). Vocational psychology: The study of vocational behavior and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards. New York: Macmillian.
16. Dawis, R. V. (1991). Vocational interests, values, and preferences. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 25-58). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17. Dawis, R. V. (1992). The individual differences tradition in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 7-19.
18. Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Emmett, J. D., & Minor, C. W. (1993). Career decision-making factors in gifted young adults. Career Development Quarterly, 41, 350-366.
20. Fox, L. H. (1978). Interest correlates to differential achievement of gifted students in mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1, 24-36.
21. Fredrickson, R. H. (1979). Career development and the gifted. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 264-276). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
22. Fredrickson, R. H. (1986). Preparing gifted and talented students for the world of work. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 556-557.
23. Hansen, J. C., & Campbell, D. P. (1985). Manual for the SCII (4th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Harmon, L. W., Hansen, J. C., Borgen, F. H., & Hammer, A. L. (1994). Applications and technical guide for the Strong Interest Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
25. Holland, J. L. (1975). Manual for the Vocational Preference Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Humphreys, L. G. (1979). The construct of general intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 105-120.
28. Humphreys, L. G. (1986). Commentary. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 421-437.
29. Humphreys, L. G., & Lubinski, D. (in press). Brief history and psychological significance of spatial-visualization abilities. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250-261.
31. Jepsen, D. A. (1979). Helping gifted adolescents with career exploration. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 277-283). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/ Hunt.
32. Keating, D. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1972). Extreme measures for the exceptionally gifted in mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 1, 3-7.
33. Kerr, B. A. (1981). Career education strategies for the gifted. Journal of Career Education, 7, 318-324.
34. Kerr, B. A., & Claiborn, C. D. (1991). Counseling talented adults. Advanced Development, 3, 75-83.
35. Kerr, B. A., & Colangelo, N. (1988). The college plans of academically talented students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 42-48.
36. Kerr, B. A., & Erb, C. (1991). Career counseling with academically talented students: Effects of a value-based intervention. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 309-314.
37. Kerr, B. A., & Ghrist-Priebe, S. L. (1988). Intervention for multipotentiality: Effects of a career counseling laboratory for gifted high school students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, 366-369.
38. Lofquist, L. H., & Dawis, R. V. (1991). Essentials of person-environment-correspondence counseling. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66.
40. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1994). The study of mathematically precocious youth: The first three decades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 255-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Optimal development of talent: Respond educationally to individual differences in personality. Educational Forum, 59, 381-392.
42. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Ryan, J. (1995). Stability of vocational interests among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 90-94.
43. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Sanders, C. E. (1993). Reconceptualizing gender differences in achievement among the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 693-707). London: Pergamon Press.
44. Lubinski. D., & Dawis. R. V. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1-59). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
45. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14, 327-355.
46. Lubinski, D., Schmidt, D. B., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Stability of evaluative ("personological") attitudes among the intellectually gifted from adolescence to adulthood: A 20-year longitudinal study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47. Lunneborg, C. E., & Lunneborg, P. W. (1975). College major similarity profiles based on selected Washington pre-college measures and vocational interest scores (Educational Assessment Center Report 76-10). Seattle: University of Washington.
48. Marshall, B. C. (1981). Career decision making patterns of gifted and talented adolescents: Implications for career education. Journal of Career Education, 7, 305-310.
49. Milgram, R. M. (Ed.). (1991). Counseling gifted and talented children: A guide for teachers, counselors, and parents. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
50. Miller, J. V. (1981). Overview of career education for the gifted and talented. Journal of Career Education, 7, 266-270.
51. Milne, B. G. (1979). Career education. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and Talented: Their education and development (pp. 246-254). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Perrone, P. (1986). Guidance needs of gifted children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 564 - 566.
53. Perrone, P. A., & Van Den Heuvel, D. H. (1981). Career development of the gifted: Horizons unlimited. Journal of Career Education, 7, 299-304.
54. Prediger, D. J. (1976). A world-of-work map for career exploration. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 24, 198-208.
55. Psychological Corporation. (1980). Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test, manual supplement (Forms S and T). New York: Psychological Corporation.
56. Rothney, J. W. M., & Sanborn, M. P. (1966). Wisconsin's research-through-service program for superior high school students. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 44, 694-699.
57. Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J. (1993). Prediger's dimensional representation of Holland's RIASEC circumplex. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 875-890.
58. Sackett, S. A. (1993). Predicting the vocational outcome of college freshmen with undifferentiated profiles on the Strong Interest Inventory. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 2243B.
59. Sackett, S. A., & Hansen, J. C. (1995). Vocational outcomes of college freshmen with flat profiles on the Strong Interest Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 28, 9-24.
60. Sanborn, M. P. (1979a). Career development: Problems of gifted and talented students. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 284-300). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
61. Sanborn, M. P. (1979b). Counseling and guidance needs of the gifted and talented. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development (pp. 424-428). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Schroer, A. C. P., & Dorn, F. J. (1986). Enhancing the career and personal development of gifted college students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 567-571.
63. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
64. Silverman, L. K. (Ed.). (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love.
65. Smith, I. M. (1964). Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
66. Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 263-331). New York: Collier Macmillan.
67. Stanley, J. C. (1974). Intellectual precocity. In J. C. Stanley, D. P. Keating, & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development (pp. 1-22). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
68. Stanley, J. C. (1990). Leta Hollingworth's contribution to above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 12, 166-171.
69. Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991a). A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of participants in a fast-paced mathematics course. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 22, 138-150.
70. Swiatek, M. A., Benbow. C. P. (1991b). A comparison of gifted accelerates with ability-matched nonaccelerates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 528-538.
71. Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. (1992). Evaluating the RIASEC circumplex using high-point codes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41, 295-311.
72. Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. (1993). Evaluating Holland's and Gati's vocational-interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 229-246.
73. Tyler, L. E. (1992). Counseling psychology - Why? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 342-344.
74. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotation: A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
75. Vemon, P. E. (1961). The structure of human abilities (2nd ed.). London: Methuen.
76. Willings, D. (1986). Enriched career search. Roeper Review, 9, 95-100.