The relationship between general ability using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) and Stanford Achievement Test (SAT) reading achievement

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 230-239

  Naglieri, Jack A ^a   Ronning, Margaret E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034365863     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073428290001800303     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Carver, R. P. (1990). Intelligence and reading ability in grades 2-12. Intelligence, 1, 449-455.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Elliott, C. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
5. Howell, K. W., Zucker, S. H., & Morehead, M. K. (1985). Multilevel Academic Survey Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
6. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1985). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7. Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix Analogies Test - Short Form. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
8. Naglieri, J. A. (1996). An examination of the relationship between intelligence and reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 65-69.
9. Naglieri, J. A. (1997a). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
10. Naglieri, J. A. (1997b). NNAT multilevel technical manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
11. Naglieri, J. A. (1999). Essentials of CAS assessment. New York: Wiley.
12. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
13. Naglieri, J. A., & Prewett, P. N. (1990). Nonverbal intelligence: A selected review of instruments and their use. In R. W. Kamphaus & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment: Volume I, Intelligence and achievement (pp. 348-370). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-479.
15. Stanford Achievement Test (9th ed.). (1995). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
16. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
17. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Freeman, D. J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 278-303.
18. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
19. Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
20. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989/1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.