How will this help me? evaluating an accredited programme to enhance the early professional development of newly qualified teachers

Journal of In-Service Education

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 337-352

  Rhodes, Christopher ^a   Nevill, Alan ^a   Allan, Jo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007066604     PISSN: 13674587     EISSN: 17475082     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13674580500200282     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams, A., and Tulasiewicz, W., 1995. The Crisis in Teacher Education:a European concern?, London:Falmer Press.
2. Anderson, G., 1997. Fundamentals of Education Research, London:Falmer Press.
3. Bleach, K., 1997. The Importance of Critical Self-reflection in Mentoring Newly Qualified. Teachers, Mentoring and Tutoring, 4 (3):19–24.
4. Cockburn, A. D., 2000. Elementary Teachers' Needs:issues of retention and recruitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16:223–238.
5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K., 2003. Research Methods in Education, 5th edn, London:RoutledgeFalmer.
6. Dean, P., 2001. Blood on the Tracks:an accusation and proposal. Journal of Inservice Education, 27:491–499.
7. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). 1999. The Induction Period for Newly Qualified Teachers Circular 5/99
8. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). 2000. The Induction Period for Newly Qualified Teachers Circular 90/2000
9. Department for Education and Skills (DfEE). 2001a. Schools Achieving Success, London:Stationery Office.
10. Department for Education and Skills (DfEE). 2001b. Learning and Teaching:a strategy for professional development, London:Stationery Office.
11. Eraut, M., 1994. Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence, London:Falmer Press.
12. General Teaching Council for England (GTCE). 2000. Draft Professional Learning Framework:The general Teaching Council's professional learning framework –a draft for discussion and development, London:GTCE.
13. General Teaching Council for England (GTCE). 2002. Teachers on Teaching:a survey of the teaching profession Available at:http://www.educationguardian.co.uk
14. Harrison, J. K., 2001. The Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27:277–279.
15. Harrison, J. K., 2002. The Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers in Secondary Schools. Journal of In-service Education, 28:255–275.
16. Hoyle, E., 1974. Professionality, Professionalism and Control in Teaching. London Education Review, 3:13–19.
17. Jones, M., 2002. Qualified to Become Good Teachers:a case study of ten newly qualified teachers during their year of induction. Journal of In-service Education, 28:509–526.
18. Jones, C., Bubb, S., Totterdell, M., and Heilbronn, R., 2002. Reassessing Variability of Induction for Newly Qualified Teachers:statutory policy and schools' provision. Journal of In-service Education, 28:495–508.
19. Kearns, H., 2003. University Accreditation of Professional Development in Schools:can professional development serve two masters?. Journal of Inservice Education, 29:11–29.
20. Keltchermans, G., 1993. Getting the Story and Understanding the Lives:from career stories to professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9:443–456.
21. Kyriacou, C., and O'Connor, A., 2003. Primary Newly Qualified Teachers' Experience of the Induction Year in its First Year of Implementation in England. Journal of In-service Education, 29:185–200.
22. McNally, J., 2002. Developments in Teacher Induction in Scotland and Implications for the Role of Higher Education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 28:149–164.
23. Moon, J. A., 2002. Reflection in Learning and Professional Development, London:Kogan Page.
24. Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). 2003. Teachers' Early Professional Development Available at:http://www.ofsted.gov.uk
25. Office of the Controller General Canada. 1981. Principles for the Evaluation of Programs by Federal Departments and Agencies, Ottawa:Minister of Supply and Services.
26. Reed, Y., Davis, H., and Nyabanyaba, T., 2002. Investigating Teachers' Take-Up of Reflective Practice from an In-Service Professional Development Teacher Education Programme in South Africa. Educational Action Research, 10:253–274.
27. Rhodes, C. P., Nevill, A., and Allan, J., 2004. Valuing and Supporting Teachers:a survey of teacher satisfaction, dissatisfaction, morale and retention within an English Local Education Authority. Research in Education, 71:67–80.
28. Schon, D., 1983. The Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
29. Schon, D., 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
30. Teacher Training Agency (TTA). 2003a. Into Induction 2003:an introduction for trainee teachers to the induction period for newly qualified teachers, London:TTA.
31. Teacher Training Agency (TTA). 2003b. Results of Newly Qualified Teachers Survey 2003 Available at:http://www.tta.gov.uk/itt/qualityfunding/nqtsurvey/
32. Teacher Training Agency (TTA). 2003c. The New Induction Standards Available at:http://www.tta.gov.uk/inductionstandards/
33. Thornton, M., Bricheno, P., and Reid, I., 2002. Students Reasons for Wanting to Teach in Primary School. Research in Education, 67:33–43.
34. Tickle, L., 2001. Professional Qualities and Teacher Induction. Journal of In-service Education, 27:51–64.
35. Totterdell, M., Heilbronn, R., Bubb, S., and Jones, C., 2002. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Statutory Arrangements for the Induction of newly Qualified Teachers, London:Stationery Office. Research Report RR338, Department for Education and Skills
36. Williams, A., Prestage, S., and Bedward, J., 2001. Individualism to Collaboration:the significance of teacher culture to the induction of newly qualified teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27:253–267.