Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 99, Issue , 2017, Pages 218-227

  Petermeijer, S M ^a   Cieler, S ^b   de Winter, J C F ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Interior Electronics Solutions   (Germany)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Highly automated driving; Simulator; Tactile haptic displays; Take over request

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; EYE MOVEMENTS; SIMULATORS; SURVEYS;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; BASE-LINE CONDITIONS; DRIVING SIMULATOR; DYNAMIC PATTERNS; STATIC PATTERNS; STEERING WHEEL; TAKE-OVER REQUEST; WARNING SIGNALS;

AUTOMOBILE STEERING EQUIPMENT;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; CAR DRIVING; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SAFETY; TOUCH; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VIBRATION;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SAFETY; TOUCH; VIBRATION;

EID: 85004007212     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bainbridge, L., Ironies of automation. Automatica 19 (1983), 775–779, 10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8.
2. Baldwin, C.J., Spence, C., Bliss, J.P., Brill, J.C., Wogalter, M.S., Mayhorn, C.B., Ferris, T.K., Multimodal cueing: the relative benefits of the auditory, visual, and tactile channels in complex environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, 2012, 1431–1435, 10.1177/1071181312561404.
3. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Keep the driver in control: automating automobiles of the future. Appl. Ergon. 53:Part B (2015), 389–395, 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.020.
4. Beruscha, F., Wang, L., Augsburg, K., Wandke, H., Do drivers steer towards or away from lateral directional vibrations at the steering wheel?. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 2010, 227–236.
5. Brewster, S., Brown, L.M., Tactons: stuctured tactile messages for non-visual information display. Australasian Interface Conference 2004, 2004, 18–22.
6. ERTRAC Task Force, Automated Driving Roadmap. 2015 (Retrieved from) http://www.ertrac.org/uploads/documentsearch/id38/ERTRAC_Automated-Driving-2015.pdf.
7. Eskildsen, P., Morris, A., Collins, C.C., Bach-Y-Rita, P., Simultaneous and succesive cutaneous two-point thresholds for vibration. Psychonom. Sci. 14 (1969), 146–147, 10.3758/BF03332755.
8. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., Buchner, A., G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39 (2007), 175–191, 10.3758/BF03193146.
9. Gasser, T., Arzt, C., Ayoubi, M., Bartels, A., Bürkle, L., Eier, J., Flemisch, F., Häcker, D., Hesse, T., Huber, W., Lotz, C., Maurer, M., Ruth-Schumacher, S., Schwarz, J., Vogt, W., Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Heft, 2012, F83.
10. Geschneider, G.A., Bolanowski, S.J., Pope, J.V., Verrillo, R.T., A four-channel analysis of the tactile sensitivity of the fingertip: frequency selectivity, spatial summation, and temporal summation. Somatosens. Motor Res. 19 (2002), 114–124, 10.1080/08990220220131505.
11. Gold, C., Bengler, K., Taking over control from highly automated vehicles. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2014, 3662–3667, 10.1177/0018720816634226.
12. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K.J., Take over! How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57:1 (2013), 1938–1942, 10.1177/1541931213571433.
13. Gold, C., Körber, M., Lechner, D., Bengler, K., Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: the role of traffic density. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc. 58 (2016), 642–652, 10.1177/0018720816634226.
14. Gray, R., Ho, C., Spence, C., A comparison of different informative vibrotactile forward collision warnings: does the warning need to be linked to the collision event?. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e87070, 10.1371/journal.pone.0087070.
15. Hancock, P.A., Mercado, J.E., Merlo, J., Van Erp, J.B., Improving target detection in visual search through the augmenting multi-sensory cues. Ergonomics 56 (2013), 729–738, 10.1080/00140139.2013.771219.
16. Ho, C., Tan, H.Z., Spence, C., Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8 (2005), 397–412, 10.1016/j.trf.2005.05.002.
17. Hwang, S., Ryu, J.-H., The haptic steering wheel: vibro-tactile based navigation for the driving environment. 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2010, 660–665, 10.1109/PERCOMW.2010.5470517.
18. Jones, L.A., Sarter, N.B., Tactile displays: guidance for their design and application. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc. 50:1 (2008), 90–111, 10.1518/001872008x250638.
19. Kerschbaum, P., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K.J., A transforming steering wheel for highly automated cars. Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium (IV), 2015, 1287–1292, 10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6.
20. Lif, P., Oskarsson, P.-A., Hedström, J., Andersson, P., Lindahl, B., Palm, C., Evaluation of tactile drift displays in helicopter. Hum. Comput. Interact. Adv. Interact. Modal. Techn., 2014, 578–588, 10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2.
21. Llaneras, R.E., Salinger, J., Green, C.A., Human Factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving system: drivers’ allication of visual attention to the forwards roadway. Proceedings of the Seventh International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, 2013, 92–98 http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/sites/default/files/DA2013/Papers/014_Mueller_0.pdf.
22. Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., Schumann, J., Desiging take over scenarios for automated driving: how does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting, 2014, 1681–1685, 10.1177/1541931214581351.
23. Louw, T., Madigan, R., Carsten, O., Merat, N., Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential. Inj. Prev., 2016, 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042155.
24. Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Dusek, J.A., MIT AgeLab Delayed Digit Recall Task (n-back). 2011, Working paper 2011-3B Retrieved from http://agelab.mit.edu/system/files/Mehler_et_al_n-back-white-paper_2011_B.pdf.
25. Melcher, V., Rauh, S., Diederichs, F., Bauer, W., Take-over requests for automated driving. 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015), 2015, 4219–4225, 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.788.
26. Meng, F., Spence, C.1, Tactile warning signals for in-vehicle systems. Accid. Anal. Prev. 75 (2015), 333–346, 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.013.
27. Meng, F., Gray, R., Ho, C., Ahtamad, M., Spence, C., Dynamic vibrotactile signals for forward collision avoidance warning systems. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc. 57 (2014), 329–346, 10.1177/0018720814542651.
28. Meng, F., Ho, C., Gray, R., Spence, C., Dynamic vibrotactile warning signals for frontal collision avoidance: towards the torso versus towards the head. Ergonomics 58 (2015), 411–425, 10.1080/00140139.2014.976278.
29. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C.H., Carsten, O., Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Hum. Factors: J. Human Factors Ergonom. Soc. 54 (2012), 762–771, 10.1177/0018720812442087.
30. Morando, A., Victor, T., Dozza, M., Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and time responses. Accid. Anal. Prev. 97 (2016), 206–219, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.025.
31. Morrell, J., Wasilewski, K., Design and evaluation of a vibrotactile seat to improve spatial awareness while driving. 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium, 2010, 281–288, 10.1109/HAPTIC.2010.5444642.
32. Petermeijer, S.M., De Winter, J.C.F., Bengler, K.J., Vibrotactile displays: a survey with a view on highly automated driving. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 99 (2015), 1–11, 10.1109/TITS.2015.2494873.
33. Petermeijer, S.M., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K.J., De Winter, J.C.F., 2016. Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. Prewett, M.S., Elliott, L.R., Walvoord, A.G., Coovert, M.D., A meta-analysis of vibrotactile and visual information displays for improving task performance. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 42 (2012), 123–132, 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2103057.
35. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K., How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58 (2014), 2063–2067, 10.1177/1541931214581434.
36. Salzer, Y., Oron-Gilad, T., Ronen, A., Parmet, Y., Vibrotactile on-thigh alerting system in the cockpit. Hum. Factors: J. Human Factors Ergonom. Soc. 53:2 (2011), 118–131, 10.1177/0018720811403139.
37. Sayer, T.B., Sayer, J.R., Devonshire, J.M., Assessment of a driver interface for lateral drift and curve speed warning systems: mixed results for auditory and haptic warnings. Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, 2005, 218–224 http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/DA2005/PDF/32_TinaSayerformat.pdf.
38. Schwalk, M., Kalogerakis, N., Maier, T., Driver support by a vibrotactile seat matrix −Recognition, adequacy and workload of tactile patterns in take-over scenarios during automated driving. 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015), 2015, 1427–1434, 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.507.
39. Schwalk M., Cui H., Maier T., 2016. Informationskodierung mittels Taktiler Sitz-Matrix (TSM) −Wie gut erkennen wir vibrotaktile Muster? In: Arbeit in komplexen Systemen −Digital, vernetzt, human?!, 62. Frühjahrskongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft (GfA), 1–6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297155281_Informationskodierung_mittels_Taktiler_Sitz-Matrix_TSM_-_Wie_gut_erkennen_wir_vibrotaktile_Muster.
40. Smart Eye, Smart Eye Pro Product Sheet. 2016 Retrieved from http://smarteye.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Smart-Eye-Pro.pdf.
41. Tanikawa, C., Urabe, Y., Matsuo, K., Kubo, M., Takahashi, A., Ito, H., Tajima, K., Kamatani, N., Nakamura, Y., Matsuda, K., A genome-wide association study identifies two susceptibility loci for duodenal ulcer in the Japanese population. Nat. Genet. 44 (2012), 430–434, 10.1038/ng.1109.
42. Van Erp, J.B.F., Veltman, J.A., Van Veen, H.A.H.C., Oving, A.B., Tactile torso display as countermeasure to reduce night vision goggles induced drift. Symposium on Spatial Disorientation in Militarry Vehicles: Cuases, Consequences and Cures, La Coruna, Spain, 2002, 15–17 http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/p013888.pdf.
43. Van Erp, J.B.F., Van Veen, H.A.H.C., Jansen, C., Dobbins, T., Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2 (2005), 106–117, 10.1145/1060581.1060585.
44. Van der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., De Waard, D., A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 5 (1997), 1–10, 10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3.
45. Vertanen, Keith, Implementation of the NASA-TLX in HTML and JavaScript—NASA-TLX German version. 2016 link: www.keithv.com/software/nasatlx.
46. WIVW, Würzburger Institute für Verkehrswissenschaften—SILAB 5.0. 2016 link: https://wivw.de/de/silab.
47. Wann, J.P., Swapp, D.K., Why you should look where you are going. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000), 647–648, 10.1038/76602.
48. Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G., Banbury, S., Parasuraman, R., Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. fourth edition, 2012, Psychology Press ISBN-13: 978-0205021987.
49. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M., What determines the take-over time? An integrated model appraoach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 78 (2015), 212–223, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.023.
50. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M., Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after coniditionally automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92 (2016), 230–239, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.002.