Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential

Injury Prevention

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 281-286

  Louw, Tyron ^a   Madigan, Ruth ^a   Carsten, Oliver ^a   Merat, Natasha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; CAR DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRENDS; UNITED KINGDOM; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84988564492     PISSN: 13538047     EISSN: 14755785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042155     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems; Technical Report J3016_201401. Hong Kong, China: SAE, 2014.
2. Volvo Cars. EU agrees to bring self-driving cars to the roads. http://www.volvocars.com/intl/about/our-innovation-brands/intellisafe/intellisafe-autopilot/news/eu-agrees-to-bring-self-driving-cars-to-the-roads (accessed 26 April 2016).
3. Merat N, Jamson AH, Lai FCH, et al. Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Beh 2014;27:274-82.
4. Desmond PA, Hancock PA. Active and passive fatigue states. In: Desmond PA, Hancock PA, eds. Stress, workload, and fatigue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001:455-65.
5. Desmond PA, Matthews G. Implications of task-induced fatigue effects for in-vehicle countermeasures to driver fatigue. Accid Anal Prev 1997;29:515-23.
6. Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 1995;37:65-84.
7. Hollnagel E, Woods DD. Joint cognitive systems: patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Boca Rotan: CRC Press, 2005.
8. de Winter JCF, Happee R, Martens MH, et al. Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2014;27:196-217.
9. Carsten O, Lai FCH, Barnard Y, et al. Control task substitution in semi-automated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated? Hum Factors 2012;54:747-61.
10. Neubauer C, Matthews G, Langheim L, et al. Fatigue and voluntary utilization of automation in simulated driving. Hum Factors 2014;54:734-46.
11. Merat N, Jamson AH, Lai FCH, et al. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Hum Factors 2012;54:762-71.
12. Louw T, Kountouriotis G, Carsten O, et al. Driver Inattention During Vehicle Automation: How Does Driver Engagement Affect Resumption of Control? In: 4th International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention. ARRB Group Limited, 2015:15.
13. Chapman PR, Underwood G. Visual search of driving situations: danger and experience. Perception 1998;27:951-64.
14. Velichkovsky BM, Rothert A, Kopf M, et al. Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Beh 2002;5:145-56.
15. Crundall DE, Shenton C, Underwood G. Eye movements during intentional car following. Perception 2004;33:975-86.
16. Gold C, Damböck D, Lorenz L, et al. “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meeting 2013;57:1938-42.
17. Louw T, Merat N, Jamson AH. Engaging with Highly Automated Driving: To be or not to be in the loop? In Proceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Utah: Snowbird, 2015:190-6.
18. Mehler B, Reimer B, Dusek JA. MIT AgeLab delayed digit recall task (n-back). MIT AgeLab White Paper Number 2011-3B. http://agelab.mit.edu/ystem/files/Mehler_et_al_n-back-white-paper_2011_B.pdf (accessed 28 Apr 2016).
19. Kirchner WK. Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J Exp Psychol 1958;55:352-8.
20. Harbluk JL, Noy YI, Eizenman M. The impact of cognitive distraction on driver visual behaviour and vehicle control. Canada: Transport Canada, 2002.
21. Victor TW, Harbluk JL, Engström J. Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Beh 2005;8:167-90.
22. Hammond KR, Householder JE, Castellan NJ. Introduction to the statistical method. New York: A.A. Knopf, 1970.
23. Schafer WD. Assessment of dispersion in categorical data. Educ Psychol Measur 1980;40:879-83.
24. Engström J, Johansson E, Ostlund J. Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Beh 2005;8:97-120.
25. Lee JD, See KA. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors 2004;46:50-80.
26. Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, Wickens CD. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Humans 2000;30:286-97.
27. Bainbridge L. Ironies of automation. Automatica 1983;19:776-9.
28. Vlasic B, Boudette N. Self-Driving Tesla Was Involved in Fatal Crash, US Says. New York Times. 2016. http://nyti.ms/2992FVh (accessed 5 Jul 2016).