Genetic parameter estimates informed by a marker-based pedigree: A case study with Eucalyptus cladocalyx in southern Australia

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-16

  Bush, David ^a,b   Kain, Dominic ^b,c   Kanowski, Peter ^b   Matheson, Colin ^a,b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c HQPlantations ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

Eucalyptus; Inbreeding depression; Mixed mating

Indexed keywords

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS CLADOCALYX;

EID: 85000214694     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-014-0798-x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baltunis BS, Martin TA, Huber DA, Davis JM (2008) Inheritance of foliar stable carbon isotope discrimination and third-year height in Pinus taeda clones on contrasting sites in Florida and Georgia. Tree Genet Genomes 4:797–807
2. Borralho NMG (1994) Heterogeneous selfing rates and dominance effects in estimating heritabilities from open-pollinated progeny. Can J For Res 24:1079–1082
3. Bush D, Thumma B (2013) Characterising a Eucalyptus cladocalyx breeding population using SNP markers. Tree Genet Genomes 9:741–752
4. Bush DJ, Jackson TJ, Driscoll J, Harwood CE (2009) Australian Low Rainfall Tree Improvement Group: metadata from measures of hardwood tree improvement trials in southern Australia. RIRDC Report 09/078. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, p 143
5. Bush D, Kain D, Matheson C, Kanowski P (2011a) Marker-based adjustment of the additive relationship matrix for estimation of genetic parameters—an example using Eucalyptus cladocalyx. Tree Genet Genomes 7:23–35
6. Bush D, McCarthy K, Meder R (2011b) Genetic variation of natural durability traits in Eucalyptus cladocalyx (sugar gum). Ann For Sci 68:1057–1066
7. Butcher P, Harwood C, Quang TH (2004) Studies of mating systems in seed stands suggest possible causes of variable outcrossing rates in natural populations of Acacia mangium. For Genet 11:303–309
8. Callister A, Bush DJ, Collins S, Davis W (2008) Prospects for genetic improvement of Eucalyptus cladocalyx in Western Australia. N Z J For Sci 38:211–226
9. Cornelius J (1994) Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Can J For Res 24:372–379
10. Costa e Silva J, Potts BM, Dutkowski GW, Potts BM, Dutkowski GW (2006) Genotype by environment interaction for growth of Eucalyptus globulus in Australia. Tree Genet Genomes 2:61–75
11. Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Potts BM (2010a) Genetic variation and parental performance under inbreeding for growth in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci 67:606p601–606p608
12. Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Tilyard P, Pires AM, Potts BM (2010b) Effects of inbreeding on population mean performance and observational variances in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci 67:605
13. de Lange WJ, Veldtman R, Allsopp MH (2013) Valuation of pollinator forage services provided by Eucalyptus cladocalyx. J Environ Manag 125:12–18
14. Doerksen TK, Herbinger CM (2010) Impact of reconstructed pedigrees on progeny-test breeding values in red spruce. Tree Genet Genomes 6:591–600
15. Doerksen TK, Bousquet J, Beaulieu J (2014) Inbreeding depression in intra-provenance crosses driven by founder relatedness in white spruce. Tree Genet Genomes 10:203–212
16. Dutkowski GW, Gilmour AR (2001) Modification of the additive relationship matrix for open pollinated trials. Developing the Eucalypt of the future. Instituto Forestal, Chile, Valdivia, Chile, p 71
17. Eldridge K, Davidson J, Harwood CE, van Wyk G (1993) Eucalypt domestication and breeding. Clarendon, Oxford
18. Ellis MF, Sedgley M (1992) Floral morphology and breeding system of three species of Eucalyptus, section Bisectaria (Myrtaceae). Aust J Bot 40:249–262
19. Gapare W, Ivkovic M, Powell MB, McRae TA, Wu HX (2008) Genetics of shrinkage in juvenile trees of Pinus radiata D. Don from two test sites in Australia. Silvae Genet 57:145
20. Gaspar MJ, de-Lucas AI, Alía R, Paiva JAP, Hidalgo E, Louzada J, Almeida H, González-Martínez SC (2009) Use of molecular markers for estimating breeding parameters: A case study in a Pinus pinaster Ait. progeny trial. Tree Genet Genomes 5:609–616
21. Gauch HG (2006) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci 46:1488–1500
22. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide: release 3. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead
23. Griffin AR, Cotterill PP (1988) Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet 37:124–131
24. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1995) Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genet 44:46–54
25. Hardner C, Tibbits W (1998) Inbreeding depression for growth, wood and fecundity traits in Eucalyptus nitens. For Genet 5:11–20
26. Hardner C, Dieters M, DeLacy I, Neal J, Fletcher S, Dale G, Basford K (2011) Identifying deployment zones for Eucalyptus camaldulensis x E. globulus and x E. grandis hybrids using factor analytic modelling of genotype by environment interaction. Aust For 74:30–35
27. Harwood CE, Bush DJ, Butcher T, Bird R, Henson M, Lott R, Shaw S (2007) Achievements in forest tree genetic improvement in Australia and New Zealand. 4. Tree improvement for low-rainfall farm forestry. Aust For 70:23–27
28. Jacobs MR (1979) Eucalypts for planting. FAO, Rome
29. Jarvis S, Borralho N, Potts B (1995) Implementation of a multivariate BLUP model for genetic evaluation of Eucalyptus globulus in Australia. In: Potts B, Borralho N, Reid J, Cromer R, Tibbits W, Raymond C (eds) Eucalypt plantations: improving fibre yield and quality. Proc. CRCTHF-IUFRO Conference CRC for Temperate Hardwood Forestry, Hobart, Tasmania, pp 212–216
30. Kelly AM, Smith AB, Eccleston JA, Cullis BR (2007) The accuracy of varietal selection using factor analytic models for multi-environment plant breeding trials. Crop Sci 47:1063–1070
31. Klápště J, Lstibůrek M, El-Kassaby YA (2013) Estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values from western larch open-pollinated families using marker-based relationship. Tree Genet Genomes. doi:10.1007/s11295-013-0673-1
32. Kumar S, Richardson TE (2005) Inferring relatedness and heritability using molecular markers in radiata pine. Mol Breed 15:55–64
33. Lai BS, Funda T, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klápště J, Niejenhuis AV, Cook C, Stoehr MU, Woods J, El-Kassaby YA (2010) Pollination dynamics in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction. Ann For Sci 67:808
34. Matheson AC, Raymond CA (1986) A review of provenance x environment interaction: Its practical importance and use with particular reference to the tropics. Commonw For Rev 65:283–302
35. McDonald MW, Rawlings M, Butcher PA, Bell JC (2003) Regional divergence and inbreeding in Eucalyptus cladocalyx (Myrtaceae). Aust J Bot 51:393–403
36. Mora F, Gleadow R, Perret S, Scapim CA (2009) Genetic variation for early flowering, survival and growth in sugar gum (Eucalyptus cladocalyx F. Muell) in southern Atacama Desert. Euphytica 169:335–344
37. Moran G, Bell J, Griffin A (1989) Reduction in levels of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. compared with natural populations. Silvae Genet 38:32–36
38. Mrode RA (1996) Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. CAB International, Oxford, p 187
39. Potts B, Wiltshire J (1997) Eucalypt genetics and genecology. In: Williams J, Woinarski J (eds) Eucalypt ecology: individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 56–91
40. Smith AB (1999) Multiplicative mixed models for the analysis of multi-environment trial data. Department of Statistics, vol PhD. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide
41. Smith A, Cullis B, Thompson R (2001) Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57:1138–1147
42. Smith A, Cullis B, Thompson R (2005) The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: An overview of current mixed model approaches. J Agric Sci 143:449–462
43. Squillace AE (1974) Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet 23:149–156
44. Surles SE, Arnold J, Schnabel A, Hamrick JL, Bongarten BC (1990) Genetic relatedness in open-pollinated families of two leguminous tree species, Robinia pseudoacacia L. and Gleditsia tricanthos L. Theor Appl Genet 80:49.56
45. Van Raden PM (2007) Genomic measures of relatedness and inbreeding. Interbull Bull 37:33–36
46. Vargas-Reeve F, Mora F, Perret S, Scapim CA (2013) Heritability of stem straightness and genetic correlations in Eucalyptus cladocalyx in the semi-arid region of Chile. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 13:107–112
47. Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MAR, Morley KI, Zhu G, Cornes BK, Montgomery GW, Martin NG (2006) Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genet 2:e41
48. Wang J (2007) Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genet Res Camb 89:135–153
49. Westell RA, Quaas RL, Van Vleck LD (1988) Genetic groups in an animal model. J Dairy Sci 71: 1310–1318
50. White TL, Hodge GR (1989) Predicting breeding values with applications in forest tree improvement. Springer, Dordrecht
51. Wilks SS (1938) The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann Math Stat 9: 60–62
52. Zapata-Valenzuela J, Whetten RW, Neale D, McKeand S, Isik F (2013) Genomic estimated breeding values using genomic relationship matrices in a cloned population of loblolly pine. G3. (Bethesda) 3: 909–916