Genetic variation and parental performance under inbreeding for growth in Eucalyptus globulus

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 606-606

  Costa e Silva, João ^a   Hardner, Craig ^b   Potts, Brad M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breeding value; Eucalyptus globulus; Genetic variance; Heritability; Inbreeding depression; Mixed mating; Self fertilization

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; DICOTYLEDON; GENETIC VARIATION; GROWTH RATE; HERITABILITY; INBREEDING; MORTALITY; MULTIPLE MATING; POLLINATION;

EID: 77954619970     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: 1297966X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2010019     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ågren J. and Schemske D.W., 1993. Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. semiovata. Evolution 47: 125-135.
2. Borralho N.M.G., 1994. Heterogeneous selfing rates and dominance effects in estimating heritabilities from open-pollinated progeny. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 1079-1082.
3. Borralho N.M.G. and Potts B.M., 1996. Accounting for native stand characteristics in genetic evaluations of open-pollinated progeny from Eucalyptus globulus base population. New For. 11: 53-64.
4. Burgess I.P., Williams E.R., Bell J.C., Harwood C.E. and Owen J.V., 1996. The effect of outcrossing rate on the growth of selected families of Eucalyptus grandis. Silvae Genet. 45: 97-101.
5. Cockerham C.C., 1983. Covariances of relatives from self-fertilization. Crop Sci. 23: 1177-1180.
6. Cockerham C.C. and Weir B.S., 1984. Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating. Biometrics 40: 157-164.
7. Costa e Silva J., Borralho N.M.G. and Potts B.M., 2004. Additive and non-additive genetic parameters from clonally replicated and seedling progenies of Eucalyptus globulus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1113-1119.
8. Costa e Silva J., Borralho N.M.G., Araújo J.A., Vaillancourt R.E. and Potts B.M., 2009. Genetic parameters for growth, wood density and pulp yield in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Genet. Genomes 5: 291-305.
9. Costa e Silva J., Hardner C.M., Tilyard P., Pires A.M., and Potts B.M., 2010. Effects of inbreeding on population mean performance and observational variances in Eucalyptus globulus, Ann. For. Sci. 67: 605.
10. Dudash M.R., Carr D.E. and Fenster C.B., 1997. Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus. Inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution 51: 54-65.
11. 1 hybrid. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 750-759.
12. Edwards J.W. and Lamkey K.R., 2002. Quantitative Genetics of Inbreeding in a synthetic maize population. Crop Sci. 42: 1094-1104.
13. Eldridge K., Davidson J., Harwood C., and van Wyk G., 1993. Eucalypt domestication and breeding. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
14. Gilmour A.R., Gogel B.J., Cullis B.R., and Thompson R., 2006. ASReml User Guide Release 2.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
15. Hardner C.M. and Potts B.M., 1995. Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing Eucalyptus globulus subsp. globulus. Silvae Genet. 44: 46-54.
16. Hardner C.M. and Potts B.M., 1997. Postdispersal selection following mixed mating in Eucalyptus regnans. Evolution 51: 103-111.
17. Hardner C.M., Borralho N.M.G., Tier B., Miller S., and Goddard M., 1996a. Accounting for dominance and inbreeding in genetic evaluations using individual tree mixed models. In: Dieters M.J., Matheson A.C., Nikles D.G., Harwood C.E., and Walker S.M. (Eds.), Tree Improvement for Sustainable Tropical Forestry, Proceedings QFRI-IUFRO Conference, 27 October-1 November 1996, Caloundra, Queensland, Australia. Queensland Forest Research Institute, Caloundra, Queensland, pp. 143-147.
18. Hardner C.M., Vaillancourt R.E. and Potts B.M., 1996. Stand density influences outcrossing rate and growth of open-pollinated families of Eucalyptus globulus. Silvae Genet. 45: 226-228.
19. Hardner C.M., Potts B.M. and Gore P.L., 1998. The relationship between cross success and spatial proximity of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus parents. Evolution 52: 614-618.
20. Harris D.L., 1964. Genotypic covariances between inbred relatives. Genetics 50: 1319-1348.
21. Hodge G.R., Volker P.W., Potts B.M. and Owen J.V., 1996. A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 53-63.
22. Jordan G., Potts B.M. and Wiltshire R., 1999. Strong, independent quantitative genetic control of vegetative phase change and first flowering in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Heredity 83: 179-187.
23. Kelly J.K., 1999. An experimental method for evaluating the contribution of deleterious mutations to quantitative trait variation. Genet. Res. 73: 263-273.
24. Kelly J.K., 2005. Family level inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant systems. New Phytol. 165: 55-62.
25. Kelly J.K. and Arathi H.S., 2003. Inbreeding and the genetic variance of floral traits in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 90: 77-83.
26. Li Y., Dutkowski G.W., Apiolaza L.A., Pilbeam D.J., Costa e Silva J. and Potts B.M., 2007. The genetic architecture of a Eucalyptus globulus full-sib breeding population in Australia. For. Genet. 12: 167-179.
27. Lopez G.A., Potts B.M., Dutkowski G.W., Apiolaza L.A. and Gelid P.E., 2002. Genetic variation and inter-trait correlations in Eucalyptus globulus base population trials in Argentina. For. Genet. 9: 217-231.
28. Lopez G.A., Potts B.M., Vaillancourt R.E. and Apiolaza L.A., 2003. Maternal and carryover effects on early growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 2108-2115.
29. Lynch M. and Walsh B., 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
30. Mimura M., Barbour R.C., Potts B.M., Vaillancourt R.E. and Watanabe K.N., 2009. Comparison of contemporary mating patterns in continuous and fragmented Eucalyptus globulus native forests. Mol. Ecol. 18: 4180-4192.
31. Moorad J.A. and Wade M.J., 2005. A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression. Genetics 170: 1373-1384.
32. Patterson B., Vaillancourt R.E. and Potts B.M., 2001. Eucalypt seed collectors: beware of sampling seed lots from low in the canopy! Aust. For. 64: 139-142. (Pubitemid 33113632)
33. Potts B.M., McGowen M.H., Williams D.R., Suitor S., Jones T.H., Gore P.L. and Vaillancourt R.E., 2008. Advances in reproductive biology and seed production systems of Eucalyptus: The case of Eucalyptus globulus. Southern Forests 70: 145-154.
34. Resende M.D.V. and Vencovsky R., 1992. Numerical evaluation of the relative efficiency of Eucalyptus selection methods based on half-sib and selfed families. I. Progeny testing. In: Lambeth C.C. and Dvorak W. (Eds.), Resolving Tropical Forest Resource Concerns Through Tree Improvement, Gene Conservation and Domestication of New Species, Proceedings IUFRO Conference, Group S2.02-08, Breeding Tropical Trees, Cartagena and Cali, Colombia, pp. 261-269.
35. Shaw R.G., Byers D.L. and Shaw F.H., 1998. Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: morphology and flowering time. Genetics 150: 1649-1661.
36. Squillace A.E., 1974. Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet. 23: 149-156.
37. Stram D.O. and Lee J.W., 1994. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50: 1171-1177.
38. 1 Hybrid. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
39. Volker P.W., Owen J.V. and Borralho N.M.G., 1994. Genetic variances and covariances for frost tolerance in Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens. Silvae Genet. 43: 366-372.
40. Williams C.G. and Savolainen O., 1996. Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for breeding strategy. For. Sci. 42: 102-117.