Inbreeding depression in intra-provenance crosses driven by founder relatedness in white spruce

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 203-212

  Doerksen, T K ^a,b   Bousquet, J ^b   Beaulieu, J ^a,b  

^a LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dominance; Genomic relationship matrix; Inbreeding; Inbreeding depression; Relatedness

Indexed keywords

PICEA GLAUCA;

EID: 84892487963     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-013-0676-y     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abney M, McPeek MS, Ober C (2000) Estimation of variance components of quantitative traits in inbred populations. Am J Hum Genet 66(2): 629-650.
2. Beaulieu J (1996) Breeding program and strategy for white spruce in Québec. Information Report LAU-X-117E. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Québec.
3. Blouin MS (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 18(10): 503-511.
4. Boyle T (1987) A diallel cross in black spruce. Genome 29(1): 180-186.
5. Burdon RD, Namkoong G (1983) Multiple populations and sublines. Silvae Genet 5-6: 221-222.
6. Burdon RD, Russell JH (1998) Inbreeding depression in selfing experiments: statistical issues. For Genet 5(3): 179-189.
7. Bush D, Kain D, Matheson C, Kanowski P (2011) Marker-based adjustment of the additive relationship matrix for estimation of genetic parameters-an example using Eucalyptus cladocalyx. Tree Genet Genomes 7(1): 23-35.
8. Cheng R, Abney M, Palmer A, Skol A (2011) QTLRel: an R package for genome-wide association studies in which relatedness is a concern. BMC Genet 12(1): 66.
9. Coles JF, Fowler DP (1976) Inbreeding in neighboring trees in two white spruce populations. Silvae Genet 25(1): 29-34.
10. de los Campos G, Gianola D, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA, Crossa J (2010) Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods. Genet Res 92(04): 295-308.
11. Doerksen TK, Deslauriers M, Beaulieu J (2011) Ecological and biological information improves inferred paternity in a white spruce breeding orchard. Can J For Res 41: 1344-1351.
12. Durel CE, Bertin P, Kremer A (1996) Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Theor Appl Genet 92(3-4): 347-356.
13. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 3rd edn. Longman, Harlow, England.
14. Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33(2): 1-22.
15. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Broyles SL (1992) Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For 6(1-4): 95-124.
16. Hodge GR, Volker PW, Potts BM, Owen JV (1996) A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species. Theor Appl Genet 92(1): 53-63.
17. Jansson G, Li B (2004) Genetic gains of full-sib families from disconnected diallels in loblolly pine. Silvae Genet 53(2): 60-64.
18. Jaramillo-Correa JP, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J (2001) Contrasting evolutionary forces driving population structure at expressed sequence tag polymorphisms, allozymes and quantitative traits in white spruce. Mol Ecol 10(11): 2729-2740.
19. Jones AG, Small CM, Paczolt KA, Ratterman NL (2010) A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis. Mol Ecol Resour 10(1): 6-30.
20. Kumar S (2004) Effect of selfing on various economic traits in Pinus radiata and some implications for breeding strategy. For Sci 50(5): 571-578.
21. Kumar S, Richardson TE (2005) Inferring relatedness and heritability using molecular markers in radiata pine. Mol Breeding 15(1): 55-64.
22. Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM, van Der Werf JHJ (2010) Using the realized relationship matrix to disentangle confounding factors for the estimation of genetic variance components of complex traits. Genet Sel Evol 42: 22.
23. Legarra A, Aguilar I, Misztal I (2009) A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J Dairy Sci 92(9): 4656-4663.
24. Lindgren D (1975) Use of selfed material in forest tree improvement. Research Notes 15, The Royal College of Forestry. Department of Forest Genetics, Stockholm.
25. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
26. Mäki-Tanila A (2007) An overview on quantitative and genomic tools for utilising dominance genetic variation in improving animal production. Agr Food Sci 16(2): 188-198.
27. Misztal I (1997) Estimation of variance components with large-scale dominance models. J Dairy Sci 80(5): 965-974.
28. Mrode R (2006) Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. CABI, Wallingford.
29. Mullin TJ, Park YS (1994) Genetic parameters and age-age correlations in a clonally replicated test of black spruce after 10 years. Can J For Res 24(12): 2330-2341.
30. Namkoong G, Kang H (1990) Quantitative genetics of forest trees. Plant Breed Rev 8: 139-188.
31. Namroud MC, Beaulieu J, Juge N, Laroche J, Bousquet J (2008) Scanning the genome for gene single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in adaptive population differentiation in white spruce. Mol Ecol 17(16): 3599-3613.
32. Ovaskainen O, Cano JM, Merilä J (2008) A Bayesian framework for comparative quantitative genetics. P R Soc B 275: 669-678.
33. Patterson HD, Williams ER (1976) A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63(1): 83-92.
34. Pavy N, Gagnon F, Rigault P, Blais S, Deschênes A, Boyle B, Pelgas B, Deslauriers M, Clément S, Lavigne P, Lamothe M, Cooke JEK, Jaramillo-Correa JP, Beaulieu J, Isabel N, MacKay J, Bousquet J (2013) Development of high-density SNP genotyping arrays for white spruce (Picea glauca) and transferability to subtropical and nordic congeners. Mol Ecol Resour 13: 324-336.
35. Pemberton J (2004) Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: the old ways are the best. Trends Ecol Evol 19(12): 613-615.
36. Piepho HP (2009) Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Sci 49(4): 1165-1176.
37. Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6(1): 7-11.
38. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
39. Ritland K (1996) Inferring the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Genome 39(1): 1-8.
40. Santure AW, Stapley J, Ball AD, Birkhead TR, Burke T, Slate J (2010) On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs. Mol Ecol 19(7): 1439-1451.
41. Shaw RG, Byers DL, Shaw FH (1998) Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: morphology and flowering time. Genetics 150(4): 1649-1661.
42. Sillanpää MJ (2011) On statistical methods for estimating heritability in wild populations. Mol Ecol 20: 1324-1332.
43. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B 64(4): 583-639.
44. Su G, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Henryon M, Lund MS (2012) Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS ONE 7(9): e45293.
45. VanRaden P (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91(11): 4414-4423.
46. Waldmann P, Hallander J, Hoti F, Sillanpää MJ (2008) Efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation of Bayesian analysis of additive and dominance genetic variances in noninbred pedigrees. Genetics 179(2): 1101-1112.
47. Walsh B (2005) The struggle to exploit non-additive variation. Aust J Agr Res 56(9): 873-881.
48. Wang T, Hagqvist R, Tigerstedt PMA (1999) Inbreeding depression in three generations of selfed families of silver birch (Betula pendula). Can J For Res 29(6): 662-668.
49. White TL, Hodge GR (1989) Predicting breeding values with applications in forest tree improvement. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
50. Williams CG, Savolainen O (1996) Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for breeding strategy. For Sci 42(1): 102-117.
51. Wu HX, Matheson AC, Spencer D (1998) Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. I. The effect of inbreeding on growth, survival and variance. Theor Appl Genet 97(8): 1256-1268.
52. Wu HX, Matheson AC, Abarquez A (2002) Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. IV: the effect of inbreeding on wood density. Ann For Sci 59(5-6): 557-562.
53. Wu HX, Owen JV, Abarquez A, Matheson AC (2004) Inbreeding in Pinus radiata - V. The effects of inbreeding on fecundity. Silvae Genet 53(2): 80-87.
54. Yanchuk AD (1996) General and specific combining ability from disconnected partial diallels of coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet 45(1): 37-45.