Effects of inbreeding on population mean performance and observational variances in Eucalyptus globulus

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 605-605

  Costa e Silva, João ^a   Hardner, Craig ^b   Tilyard, Paul ^c   Pires, Ana M ^a   Potts, Brad M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Eucalyptus globulus; Inbreeding depression; Mixed mating; Outcrossing rate; REML variance components; Self fertilization

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; BASAL AREA; DICOTYLEDON; INBREEDING; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MULTIPLE MATING; OUTCROSSING; STEM; SURVIVAL; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 77954594505     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: 1297966X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2010018     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Broadhurst L.M., Lowe A.J., Coates D.J., Cunningham S.A., McDonald M.W., Vesk P.A. and Yates C.J., 2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol. Appl. 1: 587-597.
2. Byrne M., 2008. Phylogeny, diversity and evolution of eucalypts. In: Sharma A.K. and Sharma A. (Eds.), Plant Genome: Biodiversity and Evolution, Part E: Phanerogams-Angiosperm, Science Publishers Enfield, Volume 1, pp. 303-346.
3. Chambers P.G.S., Borralho N.M.G. and Potts B.M., 1996. Genetic analysis of survival in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genet. 45: 107-112.
4. Charlesworth D., 2006. Evolution of plant breeding systems. Curr. Biol. 16: 726-735.
5. Charlesworth D. and Charlesworth B., 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
6. Cockerham C.C. and Weir B.S., 1984. Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating. Biometrics 40: 157-164.
7. Costa e Silva J., Dutkowski G.W. and Borralho N.M.G., 2005. Across-site heterogeneity of genetic and environmental variances in the genetic evaluation of Eucalyptus globulus trials for height growth. Ann. For. Sci. 62: 183-191.
8. Costa e Silva J., Hardner C.M., and Potts B.M., 2010. Genetic variation and parental performance under inbreeding for growth in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann. For. Sci. 67: 606.
9. Ellstrand N.C. and Elam D.R., 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-42.
10. Gilmour A.R., Gogel B.J., Cullis B.R., and Thompson R., 2006. ASReml User Guide Release 2.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
11. Goodwillie C., Kalisz S. and Eckert C.G., 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 47-79.
12. Griffin A.R. and Cotterill P.P., 1988. Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet. 37: 124-131.
13. Hardner C.M. and Potts B.M., 1995. Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing Eucalyptus globulus subsp. globulus. Silvae Genet. 44: 46-54.
14. Hardner C.M. and Potts B.M., 1997. Postdispersal selection following mixed mating in Eucalyptus regnans. Evolution 51: 103-111.
15. Hardner C.M. and Tibbits W.N., 1998. Inbreeding depression for growth, wood and fecundity traits in Eucalyptus nitens. For. Genet. 5: 11-20.
16. Hardner C.M., Potts B.M. and Gore P.L., 1998. The relationship between cross success and spatial proximity of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus parents. Evolution 52: 614-618.
17. Hodge G.R., Volker P.W., Potts B.M. and Owen J.V., 1996. A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 53-63.
18. Husband B.C. and Schemske D.W., 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
19. Jones T.H., 2005. Population Genetics of Native and Domesticated Eucalyptus globulus. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
20. Kelly J.K., 1999. An experimental method for evaluating the contribution of deleterious mutations to quantitative trait variation. Genet. Res. 73: 263-273.
21. Kelly J.K., 2005. Family level inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant systems. New Phytol. 165: 55-62.
22. Kenward M.G. and Roger J.H., 1997. The precision of fixed effects estimates from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53: 983-997.
23. Klekowski E.J., 1988. Genetic load and its causes in long-lived plants. Trees 2: 195-203.
24. Lande R. and Schemske D.W., 1985. The evolution of self-fertilisation and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
25. Lerner I.M., 1954. Genetic Homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Scotland.
26. Lopez G.A., Potts B.M. and Tilyard P.A., 2000. F1 hybrid inviability in Eucalyptus: the case of E. ovata x E. globulus. Heredity 85: 242-250.
27. Lynch M. and Walsh B., 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
28. McGowen M., Potts B.M., Vaillancourt R., Gore P., Williams D., and Pilbeam D., 2004a. The genetic control of sexual reproduction in Eucalyptus globulus. In: Borralho N.M.G., Pereira J.S., Marques C., Coutinho J., Madeira M., and Tomé M. (Eds), Eucalyptus in a Changing World, Proceedings IUFRO Conference, Aveiro, Portugal. RAIZ, Instituto Investigação de Floresta e Papel, Portugal, pp. 104-108.
29. McGowen M.H., Williams D.R., Potts B.M. and Vaillancourt R.E., 2004. Stability of outcrossing rates in Eucalyptus globulus seedlots. Silvae Genet. 53: 42-44.
30. Mimura M., Barbour R.C., Potts B.M., Vaillancourt R.E. and Watanabe K.N., 2009. Comparison of contemporary mating patterns in continuous and fragmented Eucalyptus globulus native forests. Mol. Ecol. 18: 4180-4192.
31. Moorad J.A. and Wade M.J., 2005. A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression. Genetics 170: 1373-1384.
32. Patterson B., Vaillancourt R.E. and Potts B.M., 2001. Eucalypt seed collectors: beware of sampling seed lots from low in the canopy! Aust. For. 64: 139-142. (Pubitemid 33113632)
33. Patterson B., Vaillancourt R.E., Pilbeam D.J. and Potts B.M., 2004. Factors affecting outcrossing rates in Eucalyptus globulus. Aust. J. Bot. 52: 773-780.
34. Patterson H.D. and Thompson R., 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554.
35. Petit R.J., Bialozyt R., Garnier-Gere P. and Hampe A., 2004. Ecology and genetics of tree invasions: from recent introductions to Quaternary migrations. For. Ecol. Manage. 197: 117-137.
36. Potts B.M. and Wiltshire R.J.E., 1997. Eucalypt genetics and genecology. In: Williams J.E. and Woinarski J.C.Z. (Eds), Eucalypt Ecology: Individuals to Ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 56-91.
37. Potts B.M., Vaillancourt R.E., Jordan G., Dutkowski G.W., Costa e Silva J., McKinnon G., Steane D., Volker P., Lopez G., Apiolaza L., Li Y., Marques C., and Borralho N.M.G., 2004. Exploration of the Eucalyptus globulus gene pool. In: Borralho N.M.G., Pereira J.S., Marques C., Coutinho J., Madeira M., and Tomé M. (Eds), Eucalyptus in a Changing World, Proceedings IUFRO Conference, Aveiro, Portugal. RAIZ, Instituto Investigação de Floresta e Papel, Portugal, pp. 46-61.
38. Potts B.M., McGowen M.H., Williams D.R., Suitor S., Jones T.H., Gore P.L. and Vaillancourt R.E., 2008. Advances in reproductive biology and seed production systems of Eucalyptus: The case of Eucalyptus globulus. Southern Forests 70: 145-154.
39. Robertson A., 1952. The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics 37: 189-207.
40. SAS Institute Inc., 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA, Volumes 1-7.
41. Sedgley M. and Griffin A.R., 1989. Sexual Reproduction of Tree Crops. Academic Press, Sydney.
42. Shapiro S.S. and Wilk M.B., 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591-611.
43. Stram D.O. and Lee J.W., 1994. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50: 1171-1177.
44. Vogler D.W. and Kalisz S., 2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55: 202-204.
45. 1 Hybrid. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
46. Williams C.G. and Savolainen O., 1996. Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for breeding strategy. For. Sci. 42: 102-117.
47. Wu H.X., Matheson A.C. and Spencer D., 1998. Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. I. The effect of inbreeding on growth, survival and variance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 1256-1268. (Pubitemid 29009988)