Non-invasive hemodynamic optimization in major abdominal surgery: A feasibility study

Minerva Anestesiologica

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1158-1169

  Broch, Ole ^a   Carstens, Arne ^b   Gruenewald, Matthias ^a   Nischelsky, Edith ^c   Vellmer, Lukas ^c   Bein, Berthold ^d   Aselmann, Heiko ^e   Steinfath, Markus ^a   Renner, Jochen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b Imland Hospital   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^d DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Feasibility studies; Surgical procedures

Indexed keywords

CATECHOLAMINE; DOBUTAMINE; LACTIC ACID; ROCURONIUM;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ERYTHROCYTE CONCENTRATE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INDEX; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OXYGEN SATURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL MORTALITY; ABDOMEN; ALGORITHM; BODY SURFACE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; ELECTIVE SURGERY; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ABDOMEN; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BODY SURFACE AREA; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84999664672     PISSN: 03759393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011;112:1392-402.
2. Kern JW, Shoemaker WC. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1686-92.
3. Mythen MG, Webb AR. Intra-operative gut mucosal hy-poperfusion is associated with increased post-operative complications and cost. Intensive Care Med 1994;20:99-104.
4. Gurgel ST, do Nascimento P, Jr. Maintaining tissue perfusion in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg 2011;112:1384-91.
5. McGuinness S, Parke R. Using cardiac output monitoring to guide perioperative haemodynamic therapy. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015;21:364-8.
6. Bogert LW, van Lieshout JJ. Non-invasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger. Exp Physiol 2005;90:437-46.
7. Stover JF, Stocker R, Lenherr R, Neff TA, Cottini SR, Zoller B, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2009;9:6.
8. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Schottler J, Caliebe A, et al. A comparison of the Nexfin(R) and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anesthesia 2012;67:377-83.
9. Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Ukoumunne OC, Campbell JL. Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012;379:905-14.
10. Eeftinck Schattenkerk DW, van Lieshout JJ, van den Meiracker AH, van den Meiracker AH, Wesseling KR, Blanc S, et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff. Am J Hypertens 2009;22:378-83.
11. Penaz J, Voigt A, Teichmann W. Contribution to the continuous indirect blood pressure measurement. Z Gesamte Inn Med 1976;31:1030-3.
12. Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:2566-73.
13. Bogert LW, Wesseling KH, Schraa O, Van Lieshout EJ, de Mol BA, van Goudoever J, et al. Pulse contour cardiac output derived from non-invasive arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease. Anaesthesia 2010;65:1119-25.
14. Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Thangathurai D, Velmahos G, Belzberg H, Asensio JA, et al. Hemodynamic patterns of survivors and nonsurvivors during high risk elective surgical operations. World J Surg 1999;23:1264-70.
15. Lees N, Hamilton M, Rhodes A. Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care 2009;13:231.
16. Challand C, Struthers R, Sneyd JR, Erasmus PD, Mel-Lor N, Hosie KB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:53-62.
17. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1092-7.
18. Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted? Crit Care 2006;10:R102.
19. Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R, Hanss R, Meybohm P, Steinfath M, et al. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med 2009;37:650-8.
20. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, Zogheib E, Lobjoie E, Tinturier F, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: False-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2570-5.
21. Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 2011;15:R15.
22. Lansdorp B, Ouweneel D, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Lemson J, Pickkers P. Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:540-5.
23. Fischer MO, Coucoravas J, Truong J, Zhu L, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL, et al. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013;57:704-12.
24. Stens J, Oeben J, Van Dusseldorp AA, Boer C. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor. J Clin Monit Comput 2016;30:587-94.
25. Vos JJ, Poterman M, Salm PP, Van Amsterdam K, Struys MM, Scheeren TW, et al. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study. Can J Anesth 2015;62:1153-60.
26. Ameloot K, Palmers PJ, Malbrain ML. The accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output and pressure measurements with finger cuff: a concise review. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015;21:232-9.
27. Maj G, Monaco F, Landoni G, Barile L, Nicolotti D, Pieri M, et al. Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in unstable patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011;25:476-80.
28. Barile L, Landoni G, Pieri M, Ruggeri L, Maj G, Nigro Neto C, et al. Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in critically ill unstable patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013;27:1108-13.
29. Talts J, Raamat R, Jagomagi K. Influence of pulse pres-sure variation on the results of local arterial compliance measurement: A computer simulation study. Comput Biol Med 2009;39:707-12.
30. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology 2011;115:231-41.