Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 587-594

  Stens, Jurre ^a   Oeben, Jeroen ^a   Van Dusseldorp, Ab A ^a   Boer, Christa ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Blood pressure; Cardiac output; Fluid challenge; Hemodynamic; Non invasive monitoring

Indexed keywords

HEMODYNAMICS; VENTILATION;

ANESTHESIA; ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; NON- INVASIVE MEASUREMENTS; NON-INVASIVE MONITORING; PULSE-PRESSURE VARIATIONS; STROKE VOLUME VARIATIONS;

BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HEART INDEX; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NON INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEADY STATE; ANESTHESIOLOGY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; FLUID THERAPY; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIOLOGY; AREA UNDER CURVE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE VOLUME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941354325     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9759-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cecconi M, Monti G, Hamilton MA, et al. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:527–33.
2. Monnet X, Dres M, Ferré A, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:330–8.
3. Perel A, Habicher M, Sander M. Bench-to-bedside review: functional hemodynamics during surgery—should it be used for all high-risk cases? Crit Care. 2013;17:203.
4. Montenij LJ, de Waal EE, Buhre WF. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:651–6.
5. Truijen J, van Lieshout JJ, Wesselink WA, Westerhof BE. Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26:267–78.
6. Eeftinck Schattenkerk DW, van Lieshout JJ, et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22:378–83.
7. ®. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1092–103.
8. Sipkens LM, Treskes K, Ariese-Beldman K, Veerman DP, Boer C. Application of Nexfin noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure monitoring in autonomic function testing. Blood Press Monit. 2011;16:246–51.
9. Chen G, Chung E, Meng L, et al. Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26:133–40.
10. Van der Spoel AG, Voogel AJ, Folkers A, Boer C, Bouwman RA. Comparison of noninvasive continuous arterial waveform analysis (Nexfin) with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for monitoring of cardiac output. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:304–9.
11. Bogert LW, Wesseling KH, Schraa O, et al. Pulse contour cardiac output derived from non-invasive arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:1119–25.
12. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Schöttler J, Caliebe A, Steinfath M, Malbrain M, Bein B. A comparison of the Nexfin and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution tot estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:377–83.
13. Lansdorp B, Ouweneel D, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Lemson J, Pickkers P. Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:540–54.
14. Truijen J, van Lieshout JJ, Wesselink WA, Westerhof BE. Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26:267–78.
15. Fischer MO, Coucoravas J, Truong J, Zhu L, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:704–12.
16. Chen G, Meng L, Alexander B, et al. Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfin monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:275–83.
17. Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MM, et al. Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamic preload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:940–6.
18. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care. 2011;15:R15.
19. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45.
20. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:782–8.
21. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:513–7.
22. Qiao H, Zhang J, Liang WM. Validity of pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure variation data obtained from a DatexOhmeda S/5 monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness during surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010;22:316–22.
23. Hofer CK, Cannesson M. Monitoring fluid responsiveness. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2011;49:59–65.
24. Monnet X, Picard F, Lidzborski E, et al. The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin-device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challenge. Crit Care. 2012;16:R212.
25. Hohn A, Defosse JM, Becker S, Steffen C, Wappler F, Sakka SG. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:178–84.
26. ®) compared with echocardiography. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:917–23.
27. Trinkmann F, Sampels M, Doesch C, Papavassiliu T, Brade J, Schmid-Bindert G, Hoffmann U, Borggrefe M, Kaden JJ, Saur J. Is arterial pulse contour analysis using Nexfin a new option in the noninvasive measurement of cardiac output? A pilot study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27:283–7.
28. Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craniun M, Miclea I, Perel A. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:366–72.
29. Michard F, Biais M. Rational fluid management: dissecting facts from fiction. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:369–71.
30. Geerts BF, van den Bergh L, Stijnen T, Aarts LP, Jansen JR. Comprehensive review: is it better to use the Trendelenburg position or passive leg raising for the initial treatment of hypovolemia? J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:668–74.